Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 review - Perhaps the best Meteor Lake laptop with a long battery life
With the new RedmiBook Pro 16, Xiaomi offers a powerful high-quality 16-inch laptop for multimedia users and the home office, if you won't need a dedicated graphics card. The aluminum case houses a powerful cooling system, Intel's new Core Ultra 7 155H Meteor Lake processor including Arc graphics, 32 GB of RAM, a large 1-TB SSD, and a matte, high-resolution IPS panel with 500 Nits of brightness and a 165 Hz refresh rate.
In Germany, the device can be imported via TradingShenzen, for example, costing 997 Euros (~$1,062) with the German Windows 11 Pro version (base price: 957 Euros, ~ $1,020). Alternatively, a model with the slower Core Ultra 5 125H but otherwise identical equipment is available for 907 Euros (~$967).
Note that by default, the RedmiBook Pro 16 comes with a Chinese version of Windows 11, where you cannot change the language. This was also the case with our test unit, which was the reason why we installed the German version of the operating system ourselves. You should therefore make sure that you get the right version of Windows before a purchase.
Possible Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.7 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 15.9 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
| 85 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.9 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.5 kg | 12.5 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 88.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.6 kg | 19.1 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
| 84.9 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 2880x1620 |
Case - RedmiBook Pro with robust aluminum case
Xiaomi uses a silver color aluminum case for the RedmiBook Pro 16. The base unit gets slightly thinner on the sides, making the device look very slim, although it is definitely not trying to be the thinnest laptop on the market. With its slim display bezels, the design looks modern, and fingerprints are also not a problem on the surface. Thanks to its subdued look, the RedmiBook Pro can also be used in professional environments without any problem.
The quality of our test unit also gives a good impression, without any faults in the workmanship. The stability of the case is also good overall. Only when trying to warp the case, can we force it to produce some minimal creaking noises, and the center of the keyboard can be pressed in minimally. The slim display lid is slightly more flexible, but we are unable to provoke any artifacts in the display. The hinges are well-adjusted, and the lid can be lifted easily using a single hand. However, when changing the display angle (maximum opening angle ~170 degrees), the hinges still cannot completely prevent it from wobbling slightly.
In terms of the footprint, the RedmiBook Pro 16 is one of the more compact models in our comparison group. Weighing around 1.87 kg (~4.1 lb), it is slightly heavier than its direct competitors. But at a thickness of about 1.6 cm (~0.63 in), the RedmiBook is also relatively slim. Together with its USB-C charging cable, the 140-Watt charger weighs 382 grams (~13.5 oz).
Equipment - Thunderbolt 4 and HDMI 2.1
The connections are distributed over the back area of both sides, and there is no need for accepting any compromises here. In addition to a USB-C port, there are also Thunderbolt 4 and an HDMI port. The right side offers two regular USB-A ports, so you won't need any adapters in everyday operation. However, the RedmiBook Pro doesn't include a card reader or Ethernet port.
Communication
Xiaomi uses the current Intel AX211 WLAN module that in addition to the Wi-Fi 6E standard also supports Bluetooth 5.3. But the manufacturer seems to have cut some corners with the antennas, since in the test with our reference router from Asus, the maximum transfer rates are barely around 850-900 MB/s, which only corresponds to about half the usual value. Depending on the Internet connection, you won't be able to use its full potential, although this limitation should be minimal for most users.
| Networking | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Webcam
The 1080p webcam is another weak area of the RedmiBook Pro 16, since the image quality is only average even in good light conditions. In combination with the Meteor Lake processor, studio effects (such as a blurring effect for the background, head tracking, etc.) are supported directly by the operating system and independent of the application.
Maintenance
The case cover at the bottom is secured with several Torx screws (T5) and can be removed without any problems. Inside, you will find two slots for compact M.2-2242 SSDs and a replaceable WLAN module. The battery is screwed in and can be replaced, if necessary, but the working memory is soldered in.
Input Devices - A very good keyboard with illumination
The RedmiBook Pro 16 includes a black chiclet keyboard with a three-step white illumination. The quality of the keyboard leaves a very good impression, offering a long key stroke and precise typing experience, and the keys don't clatter either. So this is a very good keyboard, and we also prefer it over the one in the Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16 (review to be published shortly). While our test unit doesn't include a dedicated number block, there are large arrow keys and dedicated keys for PgUp/PgDn. The power button is on the right top outside the keyboard area and also includes the fingerprint sensor.
The only problem for German users is the international keyboard layout. Of course you can use the English input, but this will get complicated with umlauts, for example. Alternatively, you can also select the German layout, but you will then have to memorize the key assignments (and perhaps put some stickers on the special keys).
With its 15 x 9.5 cm (~5.9 x 3.7 in) size, the large ClickPad offers a lot of space for inputs, and its sliding characteristics are also very good. We had no problems with inputs at all during the test, and if we have to complain about something, it would be the slightly louder clicking noise, if you press down on the bottom area of the pad.
Display - 3K IPS with 165 Hz
The RedmiBook Pro is equipped with a large 16-inch IPS display that offers a 3072x1920 pixel resolution in the 16:10 format. The subjective image impression is very good, with the contents looking very sharp and colors looking vibrant, even if OLED panels of course have an advantage here. But that also means that the RedmiBook Pro doesn't show any IPS flickering. In bright image areas, you can detect some minimal graininess, but you have to take a very close look to notice this, and it isn't annoying in everyday operation. There are no major problems with light halos, and the response times are inconspicuous. Thanks to the brightness sensor, both the image brightness and color temperature can be adjusted automatically to the surrounding light conditions.
The maximum brightness is 526 cd/m² and it is 510 cd/m² on average. The black value is slightly elevated at 0.35 cd/m², but the maximum contrast ratio is still a very good ~1,500:1. HDR content is also supported, but in contrast to OLED or mini-LED panels, the maximum brightness remains unchanged here.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 520 cd/m²
Contrast: 1486:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.9 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}
calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
89.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
98.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 7422 K
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US AU Optronics B160QAN03.R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Samsung SDC4180, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -19% | 3% | -3% | 4% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 98.8 | 66.7 -32% | 99.5 1% | 96.7 -2% | 99.9 1% | 99.93 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 96.5 -3% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 89.9 | 68.8 -23% | 97.5 8% | 84.6 -6% | 100 11% | 95.52 6% |
| Response Times | -9% | 97% | -79% | 96% | 91% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39.2 ? | 31 ? 21% | 0.64 ? 98% | 49.4 ? -26% | 0.57 ? 99% | 2 ? 95% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 14.6 ? | 20.3 ? -39% | 0.68 ? 95% | 33.9 ? -132% | 1 ? 93% | 2 ? 86% |
| PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 238.8 | 240 | |||
| Screen | -5% | 26% | -13% | 0% | 126% | |
| Brightness middle | 520 | 349 -33% | 385 -26% | 473.6 -9% | 379.8 -27% | 370.4 -29% |
| Brightness | 510 | 340 -33% | 391 -23% | 456 -11% | 383 -25% | 376 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 80 -14% | 97 4% | 87 -6% | 98 5% | 96 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.24 31% | 0.19 46% | 0.02 94% | ||
| Contrast | 1486 | 1454 -2% | 2493 68% | 18520 1146% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 2.8 3% | 1.1 62% | 5.9 -103% | 4.7 -62% | 1.51 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.2 | 7.3 -18% | 1.8 71% | 9.37 -51% | 7.51 -21% | 2.89 53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 0.7 36% | 0.89 19% | 0.55 50% | 3.36 -205% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 4.9 -14% | 1.4 67% | 7.3 -70% | 0.8 81% | 2.1 51% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% | 1.9 116% | 2.22 99% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7422 88% | 7328 89% | 6444 101% | 7260 90% | 6381 102% | 6536 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-9% | 42% /
32% | -32% /
-20% | 33% /
17% | 73% /
95% |
* ... smaller is better
When analyzing the panel with the professional CalMAN software, we find that the calibration is not optimal in the state of delivery. There is a visible blue tint, the color temperature is also too cool, and there are several colors that deviate from the target values. However, these settings help in increasing the maximum brightness, since it drops from 520 to about 490 cd/m² after our calibration. On the other hand, the calibration is able to get some massive improvements in the display overall. You can download the corresponding free profile from the link above. But even after our calibration, the high deviation with 100% blue still remains. So the device is not ideal for image processing, since an sRGB profile is also not available.
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8320 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
The matte panel does a good job outdoors, and we only wish for a higher brightness on sunny days. The viewing angle stability of the IPS panel is also good.
Performance - Meteor Lake and 32 GB of RAM
Processor - Core Ultra 7 155H
The RedmiBook Pro 16 is equipped with the new Core Ultra 7 155H Meteor Lake processor. It has 16 cores (22 threads), and the Performance cores can run at up to 4.8 GHz. The power limits in our test unit are at 90/45 watts, so the performance overall turns out very good. The MateBook D16 with its Core i9-13900H has a slight advantage overall, but that is mainly due to its better single-core performance. Basically, the new Meteor Lake processors are simply slightly weaker here than the old Raptor Lake models.
Under constant load, the multicore performance drops by about 15%. In battery operation, the processor is allowed to consume 85/35 watts, which is the reason for the multicore performance turning out about 13% lower. You can find additional CPU benchmarks in our technical section.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 30783, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=52) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1128 - 2290, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1815, n=52) | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=50) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 11924, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (420 - 853, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=50) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2880, n=56) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=52) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (175 - 381, n=47) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70254, n=50) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (29095 - 130368, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3666 - 7545, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (4594 - 5621, n=50) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 25760, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=55) | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=52) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4652 - 23059, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=52) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1462 - 1824, n=52) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=50) | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (37.5 - 79.2, n=49) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4457 - 0.53, n=49) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5121 - 50388, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=50) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=50) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1188 - 8623, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=50) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=50) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=50) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=50) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=50) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (26066 - 169946, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=50) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (440 - 2022, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2759 - 26875, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=50) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=50) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12860 - 65787, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
System Performance
Our test unit does an excellent job in the synthetic system benchmarks, and our subjective performance impression is also very high. We did not notice any problems at all during our tests.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4325 - 8670, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4809 - 7529, n=34) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7605 - 11289, n=34) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8025 - 12420, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6763 - 10615, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (6042 - 10591, n=34) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 15187, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=34) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2255, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=34) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2050, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=33) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (907 - 2795, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=33) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2094, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=33) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=34) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 353, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (166.4 - 309, n=29) | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=35) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (254 - 835, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6994 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=50) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21158 - 108302, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=50) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (24312 - 125604, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (24382 - 117933, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=50) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (116.2 - 233, n=50) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies
In our standardized latency test (surfing the Internet, playing 4K YouTube video, CPU load), our test unit with its current BIOS version doesn't show any limitations for using real-time audio applications. Even though one driver shows some slight elevations, the important "interrupt-to-process-latency" value is still very low.
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Solution
Xiaomi has equipped our test unit with a short M.2-2242 SSD from the Chinese manufacturer YMTC. The PC300 offers a storage capacity of 1 TB, with the SSD partitioned in the state of delivery. After the first startup, there are still 137 GB available to the user on the system drive (and 757 GB on the D drive). While this is a PCIe 4.0 drive, the transfer rates are more on PCIe 3.0 levels. But this won't really be a problem in everyday operation, and the performance also remains completely stable even under constant load. There is also an addition M.2-2242 slot available for storage expansion. You can find additional SSD benchmarks listed here.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics Card
The new Meteor Lake processor also includes the new Arc graphics. In combination with the Core Ultra 7 155H, the fastest version with 8 Xe cores is used, and the iGPU of course also profits from the fast working memory (LPDDR5x-7467). The performance of the RedmiBook Pro 16 is very good, and this is one of the fastest Arc iGPUs that we have tested so far. We were unable to detect any problems with frame drops at all in the benchmarks, which was still the case with some of the competitors (and particularly Meteor Lake CPUs with lower power limits).
In the synthetic tests, the AMD Radeon 780M can be surpassed, but in the actual gaming benchmarks, the fast versions of the 780M still have some advantages. But we assume that the situation will still improve with coming updates. Many of the older games can be played comfortably in 1080p at high details, and even some current games such as Cyberpunk 2077 can be played fairly smoothly at low details. If possible, you should use upscaling here to improve the performance further. At low details in 1080p, you can increase the performance with activated XeSS from 34.7 to 42 FPS, for example.
Under constant load as well as in battery operation, the graphics performance remains completely stable. You can find additional GPU benchmarks here.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13729 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9001 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4042 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Average of class Multimedia (160 - 1042, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (294 - 692, n=41) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
* ... smaller is better
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11 - 121, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9.38 - 141.6, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 171.5 | 164.4 | 41.2 | 15.9 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 157 | 97 | 57 | 25.1 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 102.4 | 96.9 | 83 | 79.8 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 84.1 | 45 | 30.6 | 23 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 56.1 | 40.1 | 32.4 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 84 | 52 | 48 | 45 | 32 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 205 | 84 | 64 | 53 | 42 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 80.1 | 74.2 | 50.4 | 14 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 34.7 | 29.5 | 25 | 21.2 |
Emissions - Good cooling with quiet fans
Noise Levels
Xiaomi uses a powerful cooling system with two fans and two heat pipes. The fans often remain deactivated or run very quietly in everyday operation. In addition, the fan curves are adjusted well, and despite the high power limits for the processor, some short load peaks don't immediately lead to the fans revving up. Even under load, the device remains very quiet overall, particularly when gaming (~31-35 dB(A) depending on the CPU load) or under pure CPU load. Only in our stress test with a combined CPU/GPU load, the fans get briefly louder at a maximum of 39.7 dB(A), since the processor is able to consume up to 115 watts. But as soon as the consumption is reduced again, the fan noise also drops to around 38 dB(A). Basically, the fans also quickly deactivate after completing the load phases. There are no other electronic noises in our test unit.
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.4 / 24.4 / 24.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 32 / 39.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.4 dB(A) | ||
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | -10% | -16% | -11% | -13% | |
| off / environment * | 24.4 | 23.2 5% | 24.6 -1% | 24.5 -0% | 23.4 4% | 25.3 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.4 | 23.2 5% | 24.6 -1% | 24.5 -0% | 24.1 1% | 25.3 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 24.4 | 23.2 5% | 24.6 -1% | 26.3 -8% | 24.3 -0% | 25.3 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.4 | 24 2% | 26.4 -8% | 26.3 -8% | 28 -15% | 25.3 -4% |
| Load Average * | 32 | 28 12% | 40 -25% | 36.5 -14% | 41 -28% | 43.5 -36% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.6 | 31.9 -4% | 40 -31% | 46.3 -51% | 40.9 -34% | |
| Load Maximum * | 39.7 | 36.2 9% | 40 -1% | 52.9 -33% | 40.9 -3% | 50.75 -28% |
* ... smaller is better
Temperatures
During idle operation and under low load, the metal case remains very cool, and there are no problems even under load. Although there is one hotspot on the bottom that reaches up to 46 °C (115 °F), this is in the central area in the back, so even then you could still place the device on your thighs. The temperature in the keyboard area remains below 40 °C (104 °F) and particularly the palm rest practically doesn't get warm at all, even under high load.
As already mentioned, the Core Ultra 7 155H is allowed to consume up to 115 watts under combined CPU/GPU load, but it will level out at 45 watts after a few minutes.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.1 °C / 80.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+1.6 °C / 2.9 F).
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 1% | 6% | -1% | -8% | -39% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40.3 | 40.3 -0% | 40.9 -1% | 48.8 -21% | 41.6 -3% | 51.5 -28% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 45.9 | 45.1 2% | 42.6 7% | 47.6 -4% | 46.6 -2% | 62.4 -36% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26.3 | 26.6 -1% | 24.5 7% | 24.2 8% | 30.4 -16% | 41.7 -59% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.9 | 27.1 3% | 24.8 11% | 23.6 15% | 31 -11% | 37.2 -33% |
* ... smaller is better
Speakers
The stereo speakers of the RedmiBook Pro 16 leave a good impression. Even though there are also multimedia laptops with better sound systems, those will then also be much more expensive. Our test unit still doesn't have to hide, producing a sound that is at the same level as that of a Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro, for example (which costs twice as much).
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power Management - Extreme battery life
Power Consumption
There are no surprises in our measurements of the power consumption, and at a maximum of 12 watts during idle operation, our test unit is fairly efficient considering the good brightness values. The maximum power consumption is 140.6 watts at the beginning of the stress test, after which it initially levels out at around 102 watts, and then at 78 watts during the continuation of the test. We should also mention as a positive point that Xiaomi doesn't cut corners with the charger, using 140-Watt adapter, so the battery doesn't have to be used even during the stress test. In addition, this is a modern GaN charger that is also very compact. The charger itself has a US plug, but an EU adapter is also included.
| Off / Standby | 0.56 / 0.64 Watt |
| Idle | 4.2 / 11.6 / 12.3 Watt |
| Load |
61.9 / 140.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, YMTC PC300-1TB, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6" | Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 15% | 34% | 10% | 2% | -9% | 11% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 4.7 -12% | 3.6 14% | 3 29% | 7.1 -69% | 5.73 -36% | 5.33 ? -27% | 6.05 ? -44% |
| Idle Average * | 11.6 | 9.5 18% | 5.7 51% | 9.5 18% | 10.1 13% | 14.5 -25% | 8.54 ? 26% | 10.8 ? 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12.3 | 10.1 18% | 6.1 50% | 12 2% | 18.6 -51% | 15.6 -27% | 11.8 ? 4% | 12.7 ? -3% |
| Load Average * | 61.9 | 49.7 20% | 52.5 15% | 68.3 -10% | 45.3 27% | 40.5 35% | 53.8 ? 13% | 67.8 ? -10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 57 | 60 -5% | 46.6 18% | 59.8 -5% | 39.5 31% | 74.9 -31% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 140.6 | 66.3 53% | 64.7 54% | 104.8 25% | 52.9 62% | 94 33% | 84.5 ? 40% | 111.7 ? 21% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption With External Monitor
Battery Life
The RedmiBook Pro 16 offers a 99-Wh battery, achieving extremely long runtimes. It is only surpassed in the WLAN test by the MSI Prestige 16 (but that also has a lower display resolution). Using a brightness of 150 cd/m² (corresponding to 60% of the maximum brightness in our test unit) and 60 Hz, our test unit achieves a very good runtime of 16:23 hours (13:46 hours at 165 Hz) in our WLAN test. At full brightness, the power requirements of the panel increase, and the battery life is reduced to 9:39 hours at 60 Hz (or 9 hours at 165 Hz), which is still a very good result. The video test again shows the advantage of the new Meteor Lake processors, and videos can be played for almost 22 hours at 150 cd/m². In the worst case under load (max. brightness), the lights go out after slightly more than 2 hours. A complete recharging process with the device turned on takes 89 minutes, with 80% of the capacity already available after 43 minutes.
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 76 Wh | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99.9 Wh | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -33% | -22% | 23% | -66% | -13% | -25% | |
| H.264 | 1308 | 835 -36% | 1144 -13% | 537 -59% | 954 ? -27% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 983 | 674 -31% | 644 -34% | 1100 12% | 336 -66% | 510 -48% | 694 ? -29% |
| Load | 124 | 83 -33% | 100 -19% | 166 34% | 209 69% | 102.2 ? -18% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict - The RedmiBook Pro 16 is a great multimedia laptop
The new Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 left a very good impression in our test (not only in relation to its price), and the multimedia laptop doesn't need to hide at all even from significantly more expensive devices. There is a robust and high-quality aluminum case, there was no cutting corners with the connection equipment, and the keyboard is also very comfortable with its long key stroke and accurate pressure point. The matte IPS panel also impresses with a good subjective image quality, high brightness, and smooth display thanks to 165 Hz. But it should still be calibrated for an optimal performance and an sRGB profile is unfortunately not available. The battery life in combination with the 99-Wh battery is outstanding.
The positive news continue with the performance, since this is one of the best Meteor Lake implementations that we have tested so far. The power limits are very high at a brief 90 watts, but this of course brings a lot of performance. Despite that, the cooling won't immediately rev up during load peaks. The graphics performance of the new Arc iGPU is also very good and benefits from the fast working memory.
A high-quality case with a comfortable keyboard, a fast processor, 32 GB of RAM, a long battery life, and a very good IPS display: With the RedmiBook Pro 16, Xiaomi offers one of the best multimedia laptops if you don't need a dedicated graphics card. For less than 1,000 Euros (~$1,066), the whole package is practically impossible to beat.
In terms of weaknesses, there are a few aspects but nothing grave. The WLAN performance is surprisingly low, which might lead to some small limitations with very fast internet connections from 1 GB/s. In addition, the quality of the webcam could be slightly better, and the clicking noise of the ClickPad is a bit loud. But those are complaints at a very high level. The working memory is soldered in, but this shouldn't be much of a limitation with 32 GB of RAM. For German users, the US keyboard layout might of course also become a problem, but you can either get used to it or remedy it with some stickers for the special keys.
Compared to its competitors, the RedmiBook Pro 16 does better in most categories, and the overall package is practically impossible to beat considering the price of less than 1,000 Euros (~$1,066). Currently, we are also testing the Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 16, which is also equipped with a Core Ultra 7 155H. But its price is higher, and particularly in terms of the image quality, the IdeaPad is unable to reach the RedmiBook Pro 16.
Price and Availability
You can purchase the RedmiBook Pro 16 from TradingShenzen for around $1059, for example (including the English version of Windows Pro).
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
- 04/21/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
More articles related to this device
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 (RedmiBook Pro 16 Series)Related Articles
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
