HP Elite Mini 800 G9 review: Quiet NUC mini-PC with Intel Core i5-14500, DDR5 RAM and modular design

In addition to the many mini-PCs that are flooding the market, well-known manufacturers also offer compact systems for various purposes. The HP Elite Mini 800 G9 is a mini-PC that forms the basis for many different configurations. As a special feature, it is equipped with a conventional desktop processor. Our test device has an Intel Core i5-14500 with 16 GB RAM and a 512 GB SSD on board. If you order the device directly from HP, you will have to put 1,060 euros on the table. In the top configuration, the HP Elite Mini 800 G9 is available with an Intel Core i9-14900T as well as 64 GB DDR5 RAM and a 1 TB SSD including an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 with 4 GB VRAM. The device then costs 2,300 euros.
As a solid mid-range model, the HP Elite Mini 800 G9 has to hold its own against powerful mini-PCs, which we also recently tested. For the direct duel in this review, we added the HP Elite Mini 800 G9 based on an Intel Core i5-13500 to the list. We have summarized the overview of the comparison devices in the following table.
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
71.1 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA i5-14500, UHD Graphics 770 | 1.3 kg | 34 mm | |
72.1 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 440 g | 37 mm | |
71.5 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA i5-13500, UHD Graphics 770 | 1.3 kg | 34 mm | |
87.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | 863 g | 48.6 mm | |
81.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Minisforum MS-01 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 48 mm | |
83.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 768 g | 57 mm |
Note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7 available here.
Case - Sturdy metal
HP uses a sturdy metal casing as the basis for the hardware, which can be opened without tools. However, the HP model is not one of the smallest devices. Most devices from the Far East have a more compact design and also weigh a little less. Only the Minisforum MS-01 is slightly larger and also slightly heavier than the HP Elite Mini 800 G9. Our test device has an impeccable finish, and there are no visual highlights at all. The HP Elite Mini 800 G9 doesn't need that either. The mini-PC offers a major advantage with its modular design, which makes maintenance work considerably easier.
Equipment - Positioned well in terms of numbers
In terms of connectivity, our HP Elite Mini 800 G9 outperforms the competition with a large number of external interfaces. However, this only refers to the number of USB ports. We counted six USB ports on the rear, although there are three more ports on the front. Two of the USB ports are available as Type-C sockets but do not offer USB4 connectivity, which is a clear disadvantage compared to the competitors. Screens can be connected via HDMI or DisplayPort. The latter is available in two versions on our test device. Of course, we don't want to forget to mention the LAN socket on the back.
Communication
The Intel Wi-Fi 6E-AX211 wireless module, which works in our test system, is also used by HP in other mini-PCs. The performance is therefore similar. We determined the results with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 test router. Here it quickly becomes clear that the 6 GHz frequency band should primarily be used if it is available. The transfer rates are significantly slower in the slower 5 GHz frequency band.
Accessories
The scope of delivery of the HP Elite Mini 800 G9 includes more than conventional devices from the Far East. In addition to the device and the corresponding power supply unit, a keyboard, and a mouse are also included. These are simple, wired input devices.
Maintenance
The HP Elite Mini 800 G9 mini-PCs are always delivered pre-configured, which in turn means that the RAM and SSD are always already installed. Nevertheless, the device can be opened easily and without tools. The housing cover is only fixed at the back with a knurled screw. You then have more or less access to the already installed components under the cover. However, our test device can also be upgraded. A free RAM slot and two additional mass storage devices can still be accommodated.
The modular design is implemented excellently here. This means that entire assemblies can be removed and replaced. This means you can also carry out minor repairs yourself. Even the CPU can be replaced and is not permanently soldered, as is the case with most other mini-PCs.
Sustainability
The device is supplied together with the enclosed accessories in a simple cardboard box. The individual components are also provided with a plastic cover, which can certainly be saved in the course of sustainability. Nevertheless, HP scores points with the Elite Mini 800 G9 thanks to its modular design, which makes minor repairs possible. The manufacturer itself offers some spare parts via the HP spare parts store. When we asked the manufacturer directly, they also confirmed that ocean-bound plastic
is used in the production of the devices, which would otherwise have ended up in the oceans. Recycled metals and innovative recycled raw materials such as used cooking oil, fishing nets, and coffee grounds are also used. This is reflected in the certifications from external partners such as "Blue Angel", "EPEAT" or "TCO".
Performance - Raptor Lake refresh with 14 cores and 20 threads
The HP Elite Mini 800 G9 is a compact work PC equipped with a powerful Intel Core i5-14500 CPU. With its 14 cores, this chip is ideal for multi-threaded tasks. On the same basis, the HP Elite Mini 800 G9 is also available with older Alder Lake processors. However, it is worth taking a closer look at the specifications here, as not all 12th-generation models are equipped with P and E cores, which results in significantly lower multi-thread performance.
Test conditions
We use the "HP Optimized" energy profile for all performance tests with the HP Elite Mini 800 G9. HP itself does not offer any further options for customizing the system's performance. The processor's power limits can be adjusted via the XTU (Intel Extreme Tuning Utility) tool. However, we advise against increasing the values. This is because the power consumption is too high and the power supply unit is not designed for this.
Processor
The Intel Core i5-14500 is an economical yet powerful desktop processor. Basically, it is a slightly improved Intel Core i5-13500, which only provides a small performance advantage due to slightly higher clock rates. As you can see from the results, the Intel Core i5-14500 only has a performance advantage of two percentage points over the Intel Core i5-13500. The other comparison devices with mobile processors are almost as fast, if we only look at the performance rating here. In the individual tests, the various models can then occasionally deliver more performance than the Intel Core i5-14500 in our test device. This becomes very clear in the Cinebench 2024 multi-core test, where the Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti delivers around 30 percent more performance. In the single-core performance, however, the Intel Core i5-14500 can show its strength again and outperform its competitors in places.
It is important to know that the Intel Core i5-14500 only works with a reduced power limit due to the small cooling unit. Just like with the HP Elite Mini 800 G9 based on Intel Core i5-13500, the manufacturer defines 87 watts as the limit. According to the Intel specifications, however, the processor could be operated with up to 154 watts.
For further comparisons and benchmarks, please refer to our CPU comparison table.
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
WinRAR - Result | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (764 - 51004, n=112, last 2 years) | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Average of class Mini PC (4140 - 214250, n=112, last 2 years) | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Average of class Mini PC (290 - 9399, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=112, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (2088 - 113499, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=112, last 2 years) | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Average of class Mini PC (76.7 - 2039, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (432 - 26952, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (5296 - 51727, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA |
Cinebench R15 multi loop
Our test sample runs through the Cinebench R15 continuous loop with the Intel Core i5-14500 relatively well. At the beginning, our test device can deliver a better performance, which then levels off at an average of 2,127 points. With a maximum temperature of 84 °C, we see the Intel Core i5-14500 the same values as the Intel Core i5-13500.
System performance
Contrary to what the graphics suggest, the subjective system performance is excellent. Nevertheless, our test device can admit defeat to most of its rivals. We welcome the combination of the Intel Core i5-14500 with DDR5 RAM, even though the speed of 4,800 MT/s is already the maximum for technical reasons.
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (8377 - 89287, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (8974 - 100086, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (8762 - 100538, n=112, last 2 years) | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=112, last 2 years) | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
The HP Elite Mini 800 G9 already shows slightly increased latencies when surfing the Internet. When playing back the 4K test video, these only increase minimally. The iGPU is loaded by about 40 percent during 4K playback. We only see two dropped frames, which conversely means no impairment during playback.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
* ... smaller is better
Mass storage
The built-in SSD is no stranger to our test sample. The same mass storage device from Samsung was already used in the identical model based on the Intel Core i5-13500. The built-in model offers NVMe speed and delivers solid transfer rates in the test. Compared to most other competitors, however, the performance of the mass storage is worse. At least you can count on stable performance, as HP installs an active cooling unit in the Elite Mini 800 G9, which covers the two M.2 slots. A total of up to three data carriers can be accommodated in the device.
For further comparisons and benchmarks, please refer to our Comparison table.
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card
For image output, the HP Elite Mini 800 G9 only has a simple iGPU, which is integrated into the Intel Core i5-14500. Based on the Intel Iris Xe architecture, the Intel UHD Graphics 770 is no longer one of the latest models offered by Intel. In addition, the iGPU only has 32 EUs, which is clearly reflected in the performance. An Intel Core i9-13900H with its iGPU and 96 EUs can deliver noticeably more performance, even though this model has already been replaced by the Intel Arc 8. A dedicated graphics card cannot be retrofitted in the small HP Elite Mini 800 G9. There is also no option to use an external graphics card thanks to the connectivity.
Further comparisons and benchmarks can be found in our GPU comparison table.
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA |
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA, Intel UHD Graphics 770 i5-14500 | Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H | HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA, Intel UHD Graphics 770 i5-13500 | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H | Minisforum MS-01, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H | Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 2020 | 67% | -8% | 138% | 100% | 122% | 388% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 1.34 | 2.69 101% | 1.34 0% | 4.23 216% | 2.72 103% | 5.05 277% | 8.34 ? 522% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 1.51 | 3.17 110% | 0.76 -50% | 6.03 299% | 4.75 215% | 4.61 205% | 12 ? 695% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 9.17 | 16.3 78% | 9.08 -1% | 18.5 102% | 19.2 109% | 17.9 95% | 31.3 ? 241% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 5.6 | 8.53 52% | 5.56 -1% | 11.1 98% | 9.99 78% | 10 79% | 19 ? 239% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 6.69 | 10.3 54% | 6.66 0% | 14.9 123% | 11.6 73% | 12.9 93% | 23 ? 244% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 6.24 | 6.62 6% | 5.98 -4% | 6.24 0% | 6.9 11% | 5.7 -9% | 38.2 ? 512% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 16.3 | 27.3 67% | 16.1 -1% | 37.7 131% | 34.1 109% | 35.4 117% | 58.7 ? 260% |
3DMark 05 Standard | 34010 points | |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 20877 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 14951 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 3960 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 77543 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16716 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2498 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1196 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 855 points | |
Help |
Gaming performance
The low 3D performance of the iGPU is not sufficient to play current games. Even older games can only be played smoothly, if at all, in low resolutions with the lowest details.
GTA V | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA |
Dota 2 Reborn | |
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1280x720 Low Preset AA:SM | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA |
FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 102.4 | 90.8 | 12.3 | 5.34 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 105.8 | 78.4 | 43.9 | 40.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 26.2 | 14.3 | 9.38 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 10.2 | 7.86 | 6.88 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 9.13 | 7.06 | 6.09 | 5.24 |
F1 24 (2024) | 21.1 | 18 | 12.8 |
Emissions - Intel Core i5-14500 cooled without problems
Noise emissions
Our test device works quietly for the most part and is barely audible during normal everyday use. However, with a sound pressure level of just under 28 dB(A), the fans work consistently. We also only measured just over 30 dB(A) under low load, which is an excellent result compared to the competition. In the stress test, we achieved a maximum noise level of 39.8 dB(A) in our measurements, which is also excellent. The HP Elite Mini 800 G9 is audible in this case, to be honest. However, the volume of the Mini PC cannot be described as extremely annoying under full load.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 27.7 / 27.8 / 27.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 30.2 / 39.8 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA i5-14500, UHD Graphics 770 | Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA i5-13500, UHD Graphics 770 | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Minisforum MS-01 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -11% | 2% | -9% | -24% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 25.5 | 24.3 5% | 24.4 4% | 24.1 5% | 24.4 4% | 24.9 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 27.7 | 27.9 -1% | 28.1 -1% | 29.8 -8% | 33.7 -22% | 25.4 8% |
Idle Average * | 27.8 | 27.9 -0% | 28.1 -1% | 29.9 -8% | 33.9 -22% | 25.7 8% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.8 | 28 -1% | 28.2 -1% | 30 -8% | 34.7 -25% | 25.7 8% |
Load Average * | 30.2 | 43.8 -45% | 29.8 1% | 37.3 -24% | 47.7 -58% | 47.8 -58% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 39.5 | 45.4 -15% | 33.9 14% | |||
Load Maximum * | 39.8 | 48.5 -22% | 40.7 -2% | 43.5 -9% | 49.1 -23% | 49 -23% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.2 | 48.9 | 45.23 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The HP Elite Mini 800 G9 can distribute heat perfectly thanks to the metal casing. However, higher temperatures can still be seen in the area of the built-in processor. At just over 45 °C, the underside does not heat up very much. The temperature values recorded on the upper side are even better. The compact casing only offers limited space for an elaborate cooling unit. Nevertheless, the Intel Core i5-14500 can be cooled reliably. In the stress test, we see a maximum of 95 °C for a short time, although the temperature levels off at 84 °C later on. The processor can maintain Power Limit 1 (PL1), which is 65 watts, permanently.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.6 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.
Speaker
Somewhat unusual, but the HP Elite Mini 800 G9 has a mini speaker installed behind the front panel. The sound is sufficient for small rooms. Basically, the small speaker is ideal for playing quiet background music at work.
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Minisforum Mars Series MC560 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (62.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (20.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power consumption
Basically, all the mini-PCs listed here are economical. Nevertheless, there are clear differences, which are mainly noticeable in idle mode. Occasional spikes of up to 21.5 watts are nevertheless noted in idle mode. Under average load, the power supply has to provide 55.5 watts. However, we see peaks of up to 122.8 watts under load, which are slightly above the power supply's maximum output. However, these very short-term overruns are not a problem and there were no problems with the power supply during the test.
A look at the efficiency shows that the Intel Core i5-14500 and the Intel Core i5-13500 deliver identical values. All mini-PCs that are equipped with mobile processors in this comparison work significantly more efficiently under load.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA i5-14500, UHD Graphics 770 | Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA i5-13500, UHD Graphics 770 | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Minisforum MS-01 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Average Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -1% | 16% | -3% | -59% | -5% | 13% | -10% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6 | 7.9 -32% | 3.5 42% | 8.2 -37% | 14.4 -140% | 9.1 -52% | 4.88 ? 19% | 9.54 ? -59% |
Idle Average * | 8.9 | 10.3 -16% | 7.9 11% | 12.1 -36% | 16.1 -81% | 10.3 -16% | 8.12 ? 9% | 11.7 ? -31% |
Idle Maximum * | 21.5 | 22.3 -4% | 13.2 39% | 14 35% | 25.5 -19% | 14.4 33% | 13.9 ? 35% | 15.1 ? 30% |
Load Average * | 55.5 | 57.44 -3% | 52.7 5% | 53.1 4% | 87.3 -57% | 54.9 1% | 53.5 ? 4% | 59.1 ? -6% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 73.4 | 55.9 24% | 73.8 -1% | |||||
Load Maximum * | 122.8 | 93.4 24% | 122.2 -0% | 100.4 18% | 123.3 -0% | 110.4 10% | 128.2 ? -4% | 100.3 ? 18% |
* ... smaller is better
Efficiency overview
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA |
Power Consumption | |
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA |
Power consumption with external monitor
Power consumption with external monitor
Pros
Cons
Verdict - Solid mini-PC with an average selection of connections
The HP Elite Mini 800 G9 is a solid mini-PC for computing-intensive tasks. For normal everyday use, there is no need to switch to the Intel Core i5-14500 as HP's mini-PC series is available with many other processors. In the version we tested with 16 GB RAM and 512 GB storage space, the compact PC is excellent for work. In terms of design, HP doesn't attempt any great feats and packs everything into a sturdy metal casing. The internal structure is well thought out and the modular design makes maintenance work much easier. Even minor repairs can be carried out; HP itself offers various spare parts. This is something we are not familiar with from mini-PCs from the Far East. Visually and haptically, the HP Elite Mini 800 G9 offers a good balance between a classic industrial and consumer PC. The HP Elite Mini 800 G9 can also be shortlisted as an economical workstation for the home. However, some disadvantages cannot be glossed over: First of all, there is the connectivity. In terms of numbers, the HP Elite Mini 800 G9 is impressive. However, it would be much better to integrate USB4 or Thunderbolt in order to expand the range of applications for the small computing powerhouse. Here, the competitors often offer better solutions, and, in addition to USB4, we are also increasingly seeing the use of an OCuLink interface, which is primarily used to operate external graphics cards.
The HP Elite Mini 800 G9 is an excellent workstation. However, the price-performance ratio is the biggest weakness of the Elite Mini 800 G9 with Intel Core i5-14500.
The use of the Intel Core i5-14500 in the very compact case should be emphasized positively. Unfortunately, a reduction in power consumption is unavoidable here. However, with the reduced power limit, the Intel Core i5-14500 still achieves excellent everyday performance. Our tests have also shown that HP has explored the maximum possible here.
The official price of the HP Elite Mini 800 G9 is definitely not a bargain at 1,063 euros. Various online retailers now offer the device for 1,000 euros, but this only improves the price-performance ratio minimally. The HP Elite Mini 800 G9 with Intel Core i5-13500 is somewhat cheaper and on par in terms of performance, starting at 843 euros.
Note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. Further information can be found here.
Price and availability
The HP Elite Mini 800 G9 is available directly from the manufacturer. Alternatively, interested users can purchase the mini-PC on Amazon.
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA
- 07/18/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.