HP Pro Mini 400 G9 Mini-PC review: Compact workstation impresses with good efficiency thanks to Intel Core i5-14500T

With the same advantages as HP's Elite Mini 800 G9 series in terms of modular design, HP offers its Pro Mini 400 G9 models at a more attractive price. In this test, we will focus on the HP Pro Mini 400 G9, which is powered by an Intel Core i5-14500T. The manufacturer charges 870 euros for the test configuration, which is equipped with 16 GB DDR4 RAM and a 512 GB SSD. In terms of price, nothing changes compared to the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 with 13500T CPU.
As a compact office device for everyday use, the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 has to compete against other mini-PCs that we recently put through our test course. We take a detailed look at the duel with the HP Elite Mini 800 G9 with Intel Core i5-14500. We have compiled a list of all comparison devices in the following table.
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
70.8 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA i5-14500T, UHD Graphics 770 | 1.2 kg | 34 mm | |
70.2 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA i5-13500T, UHD Graphics 770 | 1.2 kg | 34 mm | |
71.1 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA i5-14500, UHD Graphics 770 | 1.3 kg | 34 mm | |
72.1 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 440 g | 37 mm | |
81.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Minisforum MS-01 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 48 mm | |
83.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 768 g | 57 mm |
Note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7 available here.
Case - Lots of metal and modular design
Visually, the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 is very similar to the HP Elite Mini 800 G9 models. Only the name on the front indicates the respective model and a different housing cover is installed. The perforated lid, which is used on the HP Elite Mini 800 G9, is now completely closed. As a result, less dust gets inside, although the ventilation is also slightly worse - more on the effects this has on the noise level in everyday use later. The modular design is great and scores points in terms of sustainability. After all, various components can be replaced and minor repairs are possible. The workmanship is impeccable, which means that the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 earns nothing but praise from us, at this point.
Equipment - Only numerically superior
There are many external ports on the HP Pro Mini 400 G9. On closer inspection, however, it quickly becomes clear that only the sheer mass of interfaces is convincing here. There are no modern USB4 ports or even an OCuLink connection. The image output can be ensured via DisplayPort or HDMI. In combination, up to three screens can be used simultaneously.
Communication
An Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 wireless module is installed in the HP Pro Mini 400 G9. In our test sample, the Wi-Fi module delivers a similar performance to the other two HP devices in the comparison overview. However, the Minisforum MS-01 delivers consistently better results. The Wi-Fi module can work in both the 5 and 6 GHz frequency bands. The Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 was used for this test. A wired network connection is also possible. However, HP only installs an RJ45 socket here, which only works at Gbit speed at best.
Accessories
Maintenance
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 is only available in combination with RAM and SSD. The device can be opened very easily and even without tools. The housing cover is only fixed at the back with a knurled screw. If this is loosened, the cover can be slid backwards and removed. The RAM can be found directly under the CPU fan, which can also be removed without tools. To access the SSD or the WLAN module, a screwdriver is required. However, thanks to the modular design, these components are easily accessible. Cleaning the device is also done quickly. As with the HP Elite Mini 800 G9, the CPU of the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 can also be removed and replaced if necessary.
Sustainability
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 PCs are delivered in a simple cardboard box. Due to the accessories, the outer packaging is slightly larger. The individual accessories are packed in separate plastic sleeves, which could be improved in terms of sustainability. The modular design, which allows for minor repairs, should also be emphasized. Various spare parts can be purchased directly from HP. As the manufacturer informed us on request, so-called ocean-bound plastic
is used for the production of the devices, which would otherwise have ended up in the oceans. The manufacturer also relies on innovative recycled raw materials such as used cooking oil, fishing nets, and coffee grounds. This is underpinned by various certifications from external partners such as "Blue Angel", "EPEAT" and "TCO".
Performance - Intel Core i5-14500T with 14 cores and 20 threads
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 is designed as a pure work PC and offers with the Intel Core i5-14500T an economical yet powerful processor. Compared to the Intel Core i5-13500T, however, only a small increase in performance can be expected. The biggest weakness of the mini-PC is its 3D performance, as the iGPU of the desktop processor is inferior to most iGPUs of the mobile processors installed in the majority of its competitors.
Test conditions
We use the "HP Optimized" energy profile for all performance tests with the HP Pro Mini 400 G9. HP itself does not offer any further options for customizing the system's performance. The processor's power limits can be adjusted via the XTU (Intel Extreme Tuning Utility) tool. However, we do not recommend increasing the values since the power consumption rises too high and the power supply unit is not designed for this.
Processor
As we have already mentioned several times, the installed Intel Core i5-14500T is a conventional desktop processor from the Raptor Lake series. With 6 P and 8 E cores, the processor offers just as many computing units as the Intel Core i5-13500T, which HP also installs in its mini-PCs. We have already tested this model in detail and can now compare exactly what performance increase the Intel Core i5-14500T offers. In short, both models deliver an almost identical performance, which only leads to a small performance advantage of four percentage points in favor of the newer processor in the performance rating.
The name suffix "T" reveals that the processors are particularly economical models. Intel defines 35 watts as the performance limit for the processor installed here, although up to 92 watts are possible in Turbo if the conditions are right. However, HP limits the maximum power consumption of the processor to 74 watts due to the small cooling unit. However, even this value is not reached in the test. We can already reveal that at this point. With the exception of the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 based on the Intel Core i5-13500T, all other competitors deliver more performance than our test sample. The gap to the Minisforum MS-01 is only eight percentage points.
For further comparisons and benchmarks, please refer to our CPU comparison table.
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A |
WinRAR - Result | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (769 - 82725, n=112, last 2 years) | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (4140 - 227429, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Average of class Mini PC (290 - 9413, n=112, last 2 years) | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Average of class Mini PC (8186 - 184747, n=112, last 2 years) | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 31563, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (2088 - 121827, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=112, last 2 years) | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Average of class Mini PC (77.4 - 2431, n=112, last 2 years) | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (432 - 42272, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (5333 - 94026, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
Cinebench R15 multi loop
The Cinebench R15 continuous loop shows that the Intel Core i5-14500T has to struggle with a loss of performance after the first run. From the fourth run onwards, the performance stabilizes, which is then at the same level as the Intel Core i5-13500T.
System performance
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 also performs slightly worse than its rivals from the Far East in the system performance benchmarks. Only the internal duel is won by our test sample. The use of DDR4 certainly contributes to the fact that the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 with the Intel Core i5-14500T does not deliver a better result. In addition, only one RAM module is installed, which also limits the bandwidth, as a second module would allow the use of dual channels.
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (8377 - 154332, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (8974 - 123483, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (8762 - 216693, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=112, last 2 years) | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
We do not see any worrying DPC latencies on the HP Pro Mini 400 G9. The latencies increase slightly when opening several tabs in the Edge browser, although no warning is displayed yet. This is only displayed during 4K playback. The stress test with Prime95 does not increase them any further.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
* ... smaller is better
Mass storage
An SSD with 512 GB of storage space is used in the HP Pro Mini 400 G9. The in-house model is connected via PCIe 4.0 x4, although this is not reflected in the test results. Our test sample is clearly inferior to its competitors. They are all equipped with faster SSDs. Despite this, the SSD is still up to everyday tasks. We had no problems with the mass storage during the test period.
The manufacturer does not use an active cooling unit in the HP Pro Mini 400 G9, which does not have a negative effect in the test. In the endurance test, the installed model delivered a perfect, continuous read rate with one small exception. Our test sample can be equipped with a total of two mass storage devices. In addition to the already occupied M.2 slot, there is also a free 2.5-inch slot.
For further comparisons and benchmarks, please refer to our Comparison table.
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 does not have a dedicated graphics card, which means that only the iGPU of the Intel Core i5-14500T is available for image output. The now outdated Intel UHD Graphics 770 only offers 32 EUs, which is why the graphics unit has no chance against most other Mini PCs based on mobile processors.
For further comparisons and benchmarks, please refer to our GPU comparison table.
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA, Intel UHD Graphics 770 i5-14500T | HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA, Intel UHD Graphics 770 i5-13500T | HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA, Intel UHD Graphics 770 i5-14500 | Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H | Minisforum MS-01, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H | Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 2020 | -18% | 3% | 70% | 103% | 126% | 618% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 1.35 | 1.32 -2% | 1.34 -1% | 2.69 99% | 2.72 101% | 5.05 274% | 13.1 ? 870% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 1.51 | 0.76 -50% | 1.51 0% | 3.17 110% | 4.75 215% | 4.61 205% | 20.4 ? 1251% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 9.11 | 7.73 -15% | 9.17 1% | 16.3 79% | 19.2 111% | 17.9 96% | 38.6 ? 324% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 5.41 | 4.61 -15% | 5.6 4% | 8.53 58% | 9.99 85% | 10 85% | 24.3 ? 349% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 6.59 | 5.53 -16% | 6.69 2% | 10.3 56% | 11.6 76% | 12.9 96% | 34.1 ? 417% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 5.65 | 5.4 -4% | 6.24 10% | 6.62 17% | 6.9 22% | 5.7 1% | 43.6 ? 672% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 15.9 | 12.2 -23% | 16.3 3% | 27.3 72% | 34.1 114% | 35.4 123% | 86.4 ? 443% |
3DMark 05 Standard | 30039 points | |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 21770 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 14514 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 3920 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 85277 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16343 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2477 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1163 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 847 points | |
Help |
Gaming performance
The low performance of the Intel UHD Graphics 770 is by no means sufficient to achieve adequate frame rates in modern games. Only the simplest casual or browser games can be expected of the iGPU. You get significantly more performance with the latest iGPUs, such as the AMD Radeon 780M or an Intel Arc 8. As an example, we refer to the Geekom A8 and the Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti which are equipped with these.
GTA V | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA |
Dota 2 Reborn | |
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1280x720 Low Preset AA:SM | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA |
FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 95 | 84.7 | 12 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 102.4 | 74.4 | 38 | 35.4 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 24.2 | 12.9 | 9.17 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 28.5 | 21.7 | 18.8 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 8.87 | 6.97 | 6.12 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 8.82 | 6.75 | 5.86 | 5.03 |
F1 24 (2024) | 19.8 | 17 | 12.2 |
Emissions - Intel Core i5-14500T well and quietly cooled
Noise emissions
Despite the limited ventilation of the HP Pro Mini 400 G9, the cooling system is mostly quiet. The device is barely audible without load, although the fan does not stop at any time. We only measured 37.2 dB(A) in the stress test, which is the best result in comparison. The devices from Geekom, Minisforum, and Acemagic are significantly quieter under load.
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 has a compact metal casing with very few ventilation openings. Based on the economical processor, this decision is understandable, although the noise level is slightly higher compared to the HP Elite Mini 800 G9.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26.9 / 26.9 / 26.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.5 / 37.2 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA i5-14500T, UHD Graphics 770 | HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA i5-13500T, UHD Graphics 770 | HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA i5-14500, UHD Graphics 770 | Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Minisforum MS-01 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -3% | -14% | -26% | -11% | |
off / environment * | 24.8 | 24.7 -0% | 25.5 -3% | 24.3 2% | 24.4 2% | 24.9 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 26.9 | 27.6 -3% | 27.7 -3% | 27.9 -4% | 33.7 -25% | 25.4 6% |
Idle Average * | 26.9 | 27.7 -3% | 27.8 -3% | 27.9 -4% | 33.9 -26% | 25.7 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.9 | 27.7 -3% | 27.8 -3% | 28 -4% | 34.7 -29% | 25.7 4% |
Load Average * | 32.5 | 33.6 -3% | 30.2 7% | 43.8 -35% | 47.7 -47% | 47.8 -47% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 37.2 | 36.2 3% | 39.5 -6% | 45.4 -22% | ||
Load Maximum * | 37.2 | 38.2 -3% | 39.8 -7% | 48.5 -30% | 49.1 -32% | 49 -32% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.9 | 45.23 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The metal casing of the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 only heats up slightly. However, warmer areas are measurable and noticeable. The processor itself does not reach critical temperatures, which indicates that HP has reduced the power consumption of the Intel Core i5-14500T in relation to the size of the cooling unit. During the stress test, we can see that the power consumption of 35 watts can be easily maintained over the entire period.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.6 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.4 °C / 90 F.
Speaker
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Minisforum Mars Series MC560 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (62.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (20.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power consumption
The biggest advantage of small PCs is certainly their low power consumption. Our test sample performs excellently here. We see comparatively low values in all tests with regard to energy consumption. Compared to the identical device with Intel Core i5-13500T, we see slightly improved values for energy consumption with the Intel Core i5-14500T. In terms of efficiency, our test sample cannot keep up with all mini-PCs based on mobile processors. Only the Minisforum MS-01 can be beaten, although the gap to the winner is not extremely high at just 14 percent.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA i5-14500T, UHD Graphics 770 | HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA i5-13500T, UHD Graphics 770 | HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA i5-14500, UHD Graphics 770 | Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Minisforum MS-01 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Average Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -9% | -37% | -36% | -107% | -36% | -17% | -44% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.9 | 6.3 -29% | 6 -22% | 7.9 -61% | 14.4 -194% | 9.1 -86% | 4.88 ? -0% | 9.54 ? -95% |
Idle Average * | 8 | 8.6 -8% | 8.9 -11% | 10.3 -29% | 16.1 -101% | 10.3 -29% | 8.12 ? -2% | 11.8 ? -48% |
Idle Maximum * | 13.3 | 12.9 3% | 21.5 -62% | 22.3 -68% | 25.5 -92% | 14.4 -8% | 13.9 ? -5% | 15.2 ? -14% |
Load Average * | 44.6 | 45.3 -2% | 55.5 -24% | 57.44 -29% | 87.3 -96% | 54.9 -23% | 53.5 ? -20% | 60.2 ? -35% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 49 | 57.1 -17% | 73.4 -50% | 55.9 -14% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 81.3 | 84 -3% | 122.8 -51% | 93.4 -15% | 123.3 -52% | 110.4 -36% | 128.2 ? -58% | 104 ? -28% |
* ... smaller is better
Efficiency
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA |
Power Consumption | |
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA | |
Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor) | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA |
Power consumption with the external monitor
Power consumption with the external monitor
Pros
Cons
Verdict - Efficient Intel Core i5-14500T with good performance
Designed purely as a work device, the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 with the Intel Core i5-14500T delivers rock-solid performance. In the duel with other manufacturers' models, our test sample can hold its own against the Intel Core i5-13500T only slightly. However, there is no significant increase in performance. The biggest difference compared to the mini-PCs that are flooding the market in this country is the modular design. This approach is to be welcomed, as minor maintenance work or repairs can be carried out independently.
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 impresses with its good efficiency in conjunction with the Intel Core i5-14500T. Unfortunately, the interfaces are not on par with the most modern Mini-PCs.
Our test sample based on the Intel Core i5-14500T loses the performance comparison to its rivals from the Far East, although the gap should hardly be noticeable in everyday use. The combination with DDR4 RAM is certainly one of the reasons for this, just like the reduced power consumption of the processor. However, due to the compact design, more is not possible here. In addition, the efficiency would then be significantly worse again. With the performance that the Intel Core i5-14500T provides out of the box, HP has found a good middle ground to create an economical yet powerful mini-PC. The connectivity is worthy of criticism, as it is only impressive in terms of numbers. Unfortunately, there are no modern ports such as USB4 or OCuLink. This is a pity, as it would make many more application scenarios possible.
HP charges 853 euros in its own store, which is significantly cheaper than an HP Elite Mini 800 G9, which is not noticeably better in terms of performance. In relation to efficiency, the choice clearly falls on the HP Pro Mini 400 G9, even if it offers a slightly lower CPU performance.
Note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. Further information can be found here.
Price and availability
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 is available directly from the manufacturer. Amazon also lists the mini-PC with an Intel Core i3-13100T for around $600.
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA
- 07/27/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.