Dying Light 2 in test: Notebook and desktop benchmarks

The zombies are loose. In Dying Light 2, players fight their way through a post-apocalyptic open-world and collect all kinds of items. We looked at the technology and the graphics demands.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Brian Burriston (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/08/2022 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...

Technology

Rarely has a destroyed world been so appealing: This or something similar could sum up the visuals of Dying Light 2. The developer Techland, who was responsible for the western series Call of Juarez in the past, has managed to create a very coherent overall look.

Among the positive aspects are especially the enormous render distance and the dense vegetation, which provide a great atmosphere. Even indoors, there are usually an astonishing amount of details. Furthermore, the game scores with a chic lighting, which helps give environments natural coloring. Another highlight is the landscape simulation, with trees and grasses swaying in the wind. There is also rarely anything to complain about in terms of texture sharpness. Only the shadow quality and some animations could be better for our taste.

When it comes to the graphics options, PC fans get their money's worth. The video menu, which has more than 20 settings, consists of a simple and an advanced tab. Those who don't feel like eternal detail tuning can conveniently choose from several presets, which either fall back on DirectX 11 or DirectX 12.

Techland has even taken the trouble to include extra presets for ray tracing. The latter affects the options Ambient Occlusion, Sun Shadows, Flashlight, Global Illumination and Reflections, whereby you often have to look for the optical differences with a magnifying glass - the performance loss, however, is considerable, as we will see in a moment. However, upscaling via DLSS or FSR is possible to save performance.

Top: Except for ray tracing, all changes are applied directly without restarting. The technology also cut a stable figure in the test. We did not have to complain about any crashes or major graphics errors in the benchmarks. The loading times, the duration of the game start and the download size (approx. 43 GB) are completely acceptable.

Benchmark

Our benchmark sequence takes place outdoors. We use the tool CapFrameX to record a fixed sprint in the garden of the estate for about 20 seconds, which you browse with an acquaintance shortly after the game starts. Since this is a fast-paced action title from the first-person perspective, the average should be at least 40 FPS, or better yet, 60 FPS.

Results

For the benchmarks, we mainly use rental devices from our partners at XMG (Schenker Technologies) and MSI.

FHD (1,920 x 1,080)

The graphics requirements are still not particularly high in Full HD. GPUs from the lower mid-range, like the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti can at least handle minimum details. Representatives from the upper mid-range (e.g. the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti) are also suitable for the presets Medium to High.

Dying Light 2
1920x1080 Low Quality 1920x1080 Medium Quality 1920x1080 High Quality
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	152 (53.5^min, 71.2^P0.1, 122^P1) fps ∼16% 140 (53.9^min, 83.4^P0.1, 119^P1) fps ∼17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	139 (66.4^min, 74.9^P0.1, 118^P1) fps ∼15% 128 (60.1^min, 66^P0.1, 109^P1) fps ∼16%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	108 (51.2^min, 59.5^P0.1, 92^P1) fps ∼11% 97.8 (52.8^min, 57.1^P0.1, 86.1^P1) fps ∼12%
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX Asus ROG Strix G15	107 (53.4^min, 62.3^P0.1, 75.6^P1) fps ∼11% 91.5 (45.9^min, 60^P0.1, 67.7^P1) fps ∼11%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	99.6 (42.7^min, 72.3^P0.1, 88.7^P1) fps ∼11% 87.3 (39.7^min, 70.6^P0.1, 79.6^P1) fps ∼11%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	92.7 (40.9^min, 61.9^P0.1, 82.8^P1) fps ∼10% 81.8 (38.4^min, 64.7^P0.1, 75.6^P1) fps ∼10%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	73.4 (32.2^min, 37^P0.1, 67^P1) fps ∼8% 65.4 (34.8^min, 46.2^P0.1, 60.1^P1) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	49.6 (42.7^min, 42.9^P0.1, 45.5^P1) fps ∼5% 44 (37^min, 38.4^P0.1, 40.5^P1) fps ∼5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	59.4 (40^min, 47.5^P0.1, 54.4^P1) fps ∼6% 47 (29.5^min, 42.3^P0.1, 43.3^P1) fps ∼5% 40.1 (28.4^min, 34.3^P0.1, 37^P1) fps ∼5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	42.6 (35.1^min, 37^P0.1, 39^P1) fps ∼4% 33.4 (28.5^min, 29.8^P0.1, 30.8^P1) fps ∼4% 27.8 (23.8^min, 24.5^P0.1, 25.6^P1) fps ∼3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	37.6 (29.9^min, 30.5^P0.1, 32.3^P1) fps ∼4% 28.7 (21^min, 22.7^P0.1, 24.5^P1) fps ∼3% 23.8 (20.3^min, 20.3^P0.1, 20.7^P1) fps ∼3%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

With QHD displays, it is almost impossible to avoid a high-end system. A mix of 2,560 x 1,440 pixels and the High preset at least yearns for a GeForce RTX 3060.

Dying Light 2
2560x1440 High Quality
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	106 (56.5^min, 60.7^P0.1, 92.7^P1) fps ∼15%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	94.6 (49.2^min, 59.1^P0.1, 83.9^P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	70.1 (46.9^min, 55.6^P0.1, 65.1^P1) fps ∼10%
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX Asus ROG Strix G15	64.5 (45.6^min, 46.2^P0.1, 48.8^P1) fps ∼9%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	61.8 (32.9^min, 44.9^P0.1, 56.3^P1) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	57.4 (30.6^min, 41.7^P0.1, 53.2^P1) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	46 (28.1^min, 36.4^P0.1, 42.9^P1) fps ∼6%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	30.3 (26^min, 26.1^P0.1, 27.9^P1) fps ∼4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	26.5 (20.3^min, 21.3^P0.1, 24.1^P1) fps ∼4%

UHD (3,840 x 2,160)

It gets really crisp in the 4K range. When using high details, even the strongest notebook chips have to nibble at the 40 FPS mark (GeForce RTX 3080 etc.).

Dying Light 2
3840x2160 High Quality
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	62.1 (41.7^min, 51.1^P0.1, 56.6^P1) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	53.8 (34.4^min, 42.8^P0.1, 49.9^P1) fps ∼7%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	38.2 (28^min, 28.7^P0.1, 34.4^P1) fps ∼5%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	34 (20.1^min, 22.2^P0.1, 31.1^P1) fps ∼4%
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX Asus ROG Strix G15	32.6 (20.7^min, 22.9^P0.1, 27^P1) fps ∼4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	31.2 (21.4^min, 24.8^P0.1, 28.4^P1) fps ∼4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	24.5 (16.5^min, 18.2^P0.1, 22.5^P1) fps ∼3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	15.3 (13.7^min, 13.7^P0.1, 13.8^P1) fps ∼2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	13 (11.3^min, 11.4^P0.1, 11.5^P1) fps ∼2%

Raytracing

The situation is similarly hard for ray tracing. Without DLSS, the frame rate drops by more than 50% at the maximum ray tracing preset, so that almost all laptop GPUs are already overtaxed in Full HD. As is often the case with ray tracing, the optical improvements are out of proportion to the performance loss. Techland should therefore add significant optimizations.

Dying Light 2
1920x1080 High Quality Raytracing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	67.9 (4.05^min, 7.44^P0.1, 36.6^P1) fps ∼25%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	59.7 (4.25^min, 6.59^P0.1, 31.8^P1) fps ∼22%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	42.2 (4.42^min, 6.15^P0.1, 22.3^P1) fps ∼15%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	36 (5.07^min, 5.26^P0.1, 21.1^P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	33.3 (5.53^min, 5.83^P0.1, 21^P1) fps ∼12%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	26.1 (3.8^min, 4.89^P0.1, 12.5^P1) fps ∼10%
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX Asus ROG Strix G15	17.8 (1.957^min, 2.67^P0.1, 9.2^P1) fps ∼7%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	6.75 (2.2^min, 2.56^P0.1, 4.56^P1) fps ∼2%

Note

Since gaming tests are very time-consuming and often hindered by installation or activation limits, we can only provide you with a part of the benchmarks for the publication of the articles. More graphics cards will be installed in the coming days and weeks.

Overview

Test systems

XMG Neo 15 (RTX 3080) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)

XMG Neo 17 (RTX 3070) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)

XMG Core 15 (RTX 3060) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)

XMG Focus 17 (RTX 3050 Ti) - Click on photo to open the configurator (bestware.com)

Device	Graphics card	Processor	Memory	Operating system
XMG Neo 15	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 @165 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Neo 17	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Core 15	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 @130 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Focus 17	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti @75 W TGP (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP65	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-9750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP75	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-10750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GL75	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-10750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Asus ROG Strix G15	AMD Radeon RX 6800M (12 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 11
MSI Prestige 14 Evo	Intel Iris Xe (96 CUs)	Intel Core i7-1185G7	1 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 11
MSI Prestige 14 Evo	Intel Iris Xe (96 CUs)	Intel Core i7-1195G7	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 11
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42	AMD Radeon Vega 7	AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	2 x 4 GB DDR4	Windows 11
Desktop PC I	MSI GeForce RTX 3090 (24 GB GDDR6X) MSI GeForce RTX 3080 (10 GB GDDR6X) MSI GeForce RTX 3070 (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-9900K	4 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 11
Desktop-PC II	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 FE (24 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 (12 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia Titan RTX (24 GB GDDR6) Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (8 GB GDDR6) GDDR6) Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super (6 GB GDDR6) PNY GeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super (4 GB GDDR6) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR5) AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (12 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6600 (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700 (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (6 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	2 x 32 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Desktop PC III	Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super FE	Intel Core i9-11900K	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 11

4K monitors	Nvidia drivers	AMD drivers
Asus PB287Q, Philips Brilliance 329P9H, Acer Predator XB321HK	ForceWare 511.65	Adrenalin 22.2.1

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Florian Glaser - Managing Editor Gaming Laptops - 568 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009

I discovered my interest in computers in my childhood, growing up with MS-DOS and Windows 3.1 in the early 1990s. I was especially fascinated with computer games, even from an early age. From Monkey Island through Lands of Lore to Doom, I tried every game I could get my hands on. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2009 with my focus mostly being on high-performance gaming laptops.

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 311130 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

My main responsibility as an editorial assistant is maintaining the Library section, which aggregates reviews from other publications and channels. In addition, my daily breakfast is Notebookcheck's long list of new content, which I comb through to select the most interesting topics for translation from English to French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch."

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

.170

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Dying Light 2 in test: Notebook and desktop benchmarks

Florian Glaser, 2022-02- 8 (Update: 2022-02- 8)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > Dying Light 2 (2022)
Pos	Model	low 1920x1080 Low Quality	med. 1920x1080 Medium Quality	high 1920x1080 High Quality	QHD 2560x1440 High Quality	4K 3840x2160 High Quality
1	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	363	315	276	204	105.2
3	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080	307	255	215	153.5	77.5
4	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²
6	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti			0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²
8	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	240	206	0ⁿ³	0ⁿ³	0ⁿ³
9	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	209	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²
10	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti	189	164	149	109	61.5
14	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	184.1	160.4	140.9	97.8	48.6
15	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB	157.8	132.9	116	86.5	50
16	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080		139	128	94.6	53.8
17	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070			135.2	92.7	45.8
20	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU			95	64	32
21	AMD Radeon RX 6800	227	133	113	80.8	43
22	NVIDIA Titan RTX	169	110	93.6	66.5	37.1
24	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	0ⁿ⁵	0ⁿ⁵	0ⁿ⁵	0ⁿ⁵	0ⁿ²
26	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070		108	97.8	70.1	38.2
29	AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT	208	110	89.1	62.6	32.5
30	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU		99.6	87.3	61.8	34
31	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	114.1	93.8	81	58.6	31.9
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Dying Light 2
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	QHD	4K
32	AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	136	107	86	60	30
33	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	0ⁿ³	0ⁿ⁶	0ⁿ⁷	0ⁿ⁷	28.3
36	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	80	64	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	23
37	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop)			79.3	56.2	28.9
39	AMD Radeon RX 6800M		107	91.5	64.5	32.6
41	AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT	116	86.1	68.9	46.9	23.7
44	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	111.6	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	57.4	31.2
46	AMD Radeon RX 6800S		89.7	73.8	48.7	23.6
48	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060	86	68.9	59.8	42.3	22.5
58	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	126	72	61	43.1	22.3
62	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	122	74.9	62.1	44.3	23.5
66	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)	196	81.7	68.5	47	24.7
70*	AMD Radeon RX 7600S		79.1	65.7	43.2	20.8
71	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		73.4	0ⁿ²	46	24.5
77	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	109	64.4	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²
78	AMD Radeon RX 6600	96.3	71.4	57.2	38.8	19.8
81	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)	143	73	60.6	42	21.9
83	AMD Radeon RX 6600M	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²
95*	Intel Arc A730M		60.9	51.2	35.6
96*	AMD Radeon RX 6700S		64.8	50.9	31.1
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Dying Light 2
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	QHD	4K
109	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050	64	54.3	48.3	32.6	16.5
111	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)	139	69.5	58.6	39.7	20.5
118	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)	61.2	48.2	40.3	27.4	13.3
119	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	87.5	44.6	36.3	24.7	12.6
120	AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT	58.3	44.1	35.5	24.4	11.2
121	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)	85.9	43.4	35.3	24.3	12.6
122	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	41	21
127	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	59.4	47	40.1	26.5	13
128	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		0ⁿ³	0ⁿ³	30.3	15.3
132	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)	51	39.1	32.1	21.8	10.7
135	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)	69.1	34.8	28.2	18.5	8.62
141	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU		0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²
145	AMD Radeon RX 6500M	58.4	46.6	37
160	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	42.6	33.4	27.8
170	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	34.9	28.5	23.5
174	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	37.6	28.7	23.8
190*	NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU	36.1	25.7	21.2
193*	Intel Arc A350M	26.7	21.9	17.8
194*	NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU	31.7	23	18.3
213	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	27.5	21.5	17.4
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Dying Light 2
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	QHD	4K
215*	AMD Radeon 780M	22.9	19.6	18
216	AMD Radeon 680M	29.4	23.9	20.4
222*	NVIDIA GeForce MX450	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	9.4
236	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)		16.4	13.2	9.56
237	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	31.4	18.3	14.2
247	AMD Radeon 660M	19.7	15.4	12.4
280	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	0ⁿ³	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²
290	AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)	13.5	10.3
296	NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)	21	8.16	6.96
298	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	12.6	9.6
301	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²
345*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	11.4	8.7
381*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	9.65
382*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	9.97
383	Intel UHD Graphics 770	11.3
391*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	0ⁿ³	0ⁿ⁴	0ⁿ⁴	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²
399	AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²
416	NVIDIA GeForce MX130	8.92
420	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	8.03
423	NVIDIA GeForce 930MX	6.27
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Dying Light 2
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	QHD	4K
464	Intel Iris Graphics 550	6.49
539*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 5	8.1
625*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 3	5.57

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.