
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 review - Affordable everyday laptop with Raptor Lake refresh and 32 GB RAM
Matte IPS panel with 120 Hz.
The RedmiBook 14 gets new Raptor Lake Refresh CPUs from Intel for the 2025 model year. In addition to the high-quality aluminum casing, there is also a high-resolution IPS screen that can be used to edit images with ease.Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Brian Burriston (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Verdict - RedmiBook 14 convinces with a good price-performance ratio
The new RedmiBook 14 2025 proves to be a good all-rounder without any major weak points in the test and there is little to complain about considering the price. The aluminum casing is of high quality, the keyboard is comfortable, the Raptor Lake Refresh processor from intel offers sufficient performance and the cooling does a very good job overall, which is why the 14-inch notebook remains very quiet even under high load.
The matte IPS display also impresses with its high resolution, 120 Hz frequency and accurate color reproduction. Together with the full sRGB coverage, the RedmiBook 14 can also be used for image editing without any problems. However, the battery life is only average, which is also due to the rather low battery capacity.
Other weak points include the lack of Thunderbolt or USB 4.0 and there is actually still an old USB 2.0 port installed. The RAM cannot be expanded, but there is an additional slot for an M.2 SSD. The biggest problem in this country, however, is the international keyboard layout, as the RedmiBook 14 is not officially sold in Europe and has to be imported, which also complicates warranty issues.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
The RedmiBook 14 2025 is currently only available as an import and can be purchased via TradingShenzen, for example, from 727 Euros (~$755/16 GB, 512 GB SSD).
Possible competitors in comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Intel Core 5 220H ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... 2. $1,399.00 HP 2025 Laptop | OmniBook X ... 3. $20.99 Vaxson 3-Pack Screen Protect... List Price: 880€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $769.00 List Price: 820 USD | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 AMD Ryzen 5 7540U ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $579.60 List Price: 800 EUR | 1.4 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... 2. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... 3. $15.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... List Price: 870€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base Intel Core i5-1235U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 500 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $12.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Protector Film... 2. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... 3. $15.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... List Price: 720€ | 1.3 kg | 20.2 mm | 14.00" 1920x1080 157 PPI IPS |
With the RedmiBook 14 2025, Xiaomi has an affordable 14-inch notebook on offer that is equipped with Intel's Raptor Lake Refresh CPUs. Our test device is the variant with the Core 5 220H 2.8K IPS display, 32 GB RAM and a 1 TB SSD for around 870 Euros (~$903).
Specifications
Case & Connectivity
The RedmiBook 14 uses a stable and high-quality aluminum unibody case. The base unit is very stable and cannot be twisted or dented. The lid is a little more flexible and we can also provoke slight creaking noises here, but this is not a problem in everyday use. The hinges are well-adjusted with hardly any rocking and the maximum opening angle is 180 degrees. The lower casing cover can be easily removed and both the M.2-2242 SSD, the WLAN module and the battery can be replaced if necessary. There is also another full M.2-2280 slot available for SSDs.
While the case exceeds expectations in terms of price, you have to accept some compromises when it comes to features. You won't find Thunderbolt 4 or USB 4.0, and there is even an old USB 2.0 port. The Intel Wi-Fi module (AX203, 2x2) supports Bluetooth 5.2 and the Wi-Fi 6 standard, but only at 80 MHz, which is why the transfer rates are limited to around 900 Mbps. The 1080p webcam does not take particularly good pictures and Windows Studio effects are not supported. It is not a Copilot+ laptop, but at least the live subtitle function is available.
Networking | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |

Sustainability
We were unable to find any information on the sustainability of the Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025. However, the packaging is largely made of cardboard and can therefore be recycled.
Input devices - Illuminated keyboard
The RedmiBook 14 is currently only available with an international keyboard layout, but the keyboard itself is very comfortable. The key travel is quite long at 1.5 mm and there is precise feedback, which makes it easy to write long texts. A two-stage white illumination helps in dark environments. The ClickPad (12.5 x 8.2 cm/~4.9 x 3.2 in) with its plastic surface offers good gliding properties and we had no problems with pointer control or gestures. The pad can also be physically clicked in the lower area, but this is accompanied by loud noises.
Display - IPS with 120 Hz
The 14-inch IPS screen offers a high resolution of 2,880 x 1,800 pixels (16:10) and a frequency of 120 Hz, which is why movements are very fluid. The subjective image quality is good, but the colors and contrasts are of course not comparable to an OLED panel. However, there are no problems with PWM flickering or reflection, but the matte surface does lead to minimal graininess on bright surfaces. But you have to look closely. The response times are good.
The maximum brightness is 437 cd/m² (average 411 cd/m²) and together with the low black level (0.21 cd/m²) this results in a very high maximum contrast ratio. We used the professional CalMAN software to measure the factory profile, which is already very accurate. There is no visible color cast and all deviations (both grayscale and colors) are below the important mark of 3. This means that subsequent calibration is not necessary and we were only able to improve the display minimally (profile is available for free download on the right). Together with the full sRGB coverage, the RedmiBook 14 is therefore also suitable for editing images.
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 437 cd/m²
Contrast: 2081:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
72.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 TL140ADXP21-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 LEN140WUM, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 Lenovo LEN140WUXGA (LEN88AC), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | SCHENKER Work 14 Base B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -44% | 24% | -1% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 72 | 39.6 -45% | 99.9 39% | 70.3 -2% | 72.4 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 57.5 -42% | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 99.8 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.9 | 40.9 -44% | 97 33% | 72.1 -1% | 73.8 1% |
Response Times | 6% | 95% | 11% | -82% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33.7 ? | 27.1 ? 20% | 1.4 ? 96% | 32.7 ? 3% | 60 ? -78% |
Response Time Black / White * | 18.7 ? | 20.3 ? -9% | 1.2 ? 94% | 15.2 ? 19% | 34.7 ? -86% |
PWM Frequency | 480 ? | ||||
Screen | -211% | 83% | -13% | -21% | |
Brightness middle | 437 | 338 -23% | 391 -11% | 418 -4% | 402 -8% |
Brightness | 412 | 330 -20% | 386 -6% | 408 -1% | 404 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 95 9% | 95 9% | 90 3% | 89 2% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.37 -76% | 0.02 90% | 0.3 -43% | 0.16 24% |
Contrast | 2081 | 914 -56% | 19550 839% | 1393 -33% | 2513 21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 8.03 -474% | 1.89 -35% | 1.6 -14% | 2.2 -57% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.4 | 22.17 -824% | 4.43 -85% | 2.5 -4% | 4.2 -75% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 2.22 -122% | 1.79 -79% | 1.1 -10% | 1.3 -30% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 7.5 -317% | 1.3 28% | 2 -11% | 3 -67% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.1 105% | 2.204 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.18 101% |
CCT | 6392 102% | 5812 112% | 6411 101% | 6851 95% | 6801 96% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -83% /
-145% | 67% /
72% | -1% /
-7% | -34% /
-25% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
18.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise | |
↘ 10.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
33.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.5 ms rise | |
↘ 18.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8437 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Performance - Raptor Lake Refresh
The 2025 RedmiBook 14 is only available with the Core 5 220H with 16 or 32 GB LPDDR5x-6400 RAM. Dedicated GPUs are not available.
Test conditions
The RedmiBook 14 does not offer its own energy profiles. We performed the following benchmarks and measurements in Best Performance mode.
Processor - Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H does not belong to Intel's new Arrow Lake generation (that would be the Core Ultra 5 225H), instead it is a chip from the Raptor Lake refresh model range. Basically, it is a Core i5-13600H with a 100 MHz higher maximum clock rate. In the RedmiBook 14, the processor can briefly consume up to 43 watts and then 32 watts. The CPU performance is therefore sufficient for many everyday tasks. The performance remains relatively stable and there is no reduction in performance in battery mode. Further CPU benchmarks are available in our technology section available.
Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=74, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 826, n=69, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=70, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 17489, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3820, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 17218, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=66, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.403 - 1.456, n=68, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=68, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
System performance
In practice, the RedmiBook 14 is a responsive device and the results in the synthetic benchmarks are also decent. There were no problems with system stability during the test.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11406, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10623, n=57, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 12442, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2038, n=67, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1918, n=67, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2396, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=67, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 482, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 348, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (265 - 1104, n=75, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5393 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109035, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=67, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
Mass storage
A 1 TB SSD from YMTC (PC411) is installed in the test device, of which 909 GB is still available after the initial start-up. The performance of the compact PCIe 4.0 SSD (M.2-2242) is very good. We were unable to carry out our usual DiskSpeed test for performance under continuous load on the test device. Further SSD benchmarks can be found here.
* ... smaller is better
Graphics card
The iGPU of the Raptor Lake Refresh processor is the Iris Xe Graphics G7 with 80 EUs is used, which cannot keep up with the current iGPUs in terms of pure performance. This is also noticeable in the gaming performance, which is very limited. However, the iGPU is perfectly adequate for normal everyday tasks such as streaming videos (also in 4K). The performance also remains stable both on battery power and under prolonged load.
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 30078 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7215 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4991 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1791 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 1201 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 1197 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (463 - 3047, n=51) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 -1! | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base -2! |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.48 - 31.4, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (12.1 - 31.1, n=46, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS-Diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 121.9 | 105.7 | 25.9 | 11 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 107.8 | 65.8 | 70.2 | 65.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 44.8 | 25.4 | 17.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 0 game wont start | |||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 96 | 43 | 34 | 27 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 19 | 14.8 | 13.1 | 12.8 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 17.2 | 13.7 | 12 | 10.6 |
Emissions & Energy
Noise emissions
The RedmiBook 14 uses a cooling unit consisting of two heat pipes and two fans, which makes for a very quiet device overall. You often only hear a quiet hiss and even when gaming or in our stress test, we measured a maximum of 34 dB(A), making it by far the quietest device in the comparison group. There were no other electronic noises.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.6 / 23.6 / 25.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 31.9 / 34.4 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Core 5 220H, YMTC PC411-1TB | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 Radeon 740M, R5 7540U, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | SCHENKER Work 14 Base Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -19% | -10% | -10% | -5% | |
off / environment * | 23.6 | 25.9 -10% | 24 -2% | 23.8 -1% | 23.6 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.6 | 25.9 -10% | 25 -6% | 23.8 -1% | 23.6 -0% |
Idle Average * | 23.6 | 27.6 -17% | 27 -14% | 23.8 -1% | 23.6 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.7 | 27.6 -7% | 29 -13% | 27.1 -5% | 24.8 4% |
Load Average * | 31.9 | 43.4 -36% | 37 -16% | 34.9 -9% | 34.2 -7% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 34.4 | 43.7 -27% | 37 -8% | 43.7 -27% | |
Load Maximum * | 34.4 | 43.8 -27% | 38 -10% | 43.7 -27% | 42.9 -25% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.2 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The casing remains very cool in idle mode and during simple tasks. Under high load, there is a hotspot on the underside (upper middle area), where we measured up to 45 °C (113 °F). However, due to its position, the device can still be placed on the thighs even in this extreme scenario. The top of the base unit remains significantly cooler at a maximum of 38 °C (100.4 °F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.3 °C / 84.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-1.1 °C / -1.9 F).
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 AMD Ryzen 5 7540U, AMD Radeon 740M | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | SCHENKER Work 14 Base Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -12% | -9% | -13% | -0% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 38.6 | 41.2 -7% | 39 -1% | 43.7 -13% | 39.2 -2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45.1 | 41.4 8% | 46 -2% | 49.4 -10% | 40.4 10% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.4 | 29.2 -20% | 28 -15% | 27.7 -14% | 25.3 -4% |
Idle Bottom * | 24.6 | 31.2 -27% | 29 -18% | 28.6 -16% | 25.8 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
Speaker
The two stereo speakers do a good job overall, especially considering the price range. Voice reproduction benefits from clean highs, only the bass is relatively weak.
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER Work 14 Base audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Energy consumption
Our consumption measurements reveal no surprises and the values are not bad considering the high display resolution. The relatively low power limit is noticeable under load, as we only measured a maximum of 63 watts, which then quickly levels out at around 50 watts. The supplied 100 watt power supply unit (GaN, including EU adapter) is therefore actually oversized. The values for standby mode and when switched off are also unremarkable.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Core 5 220H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, YMTC PC411-1TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, , IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, YMTC PC300-1TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | SCHENKER Work 14 Base i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | 3% | -29% | 19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 3.8 -15% | 5 -52% | 4.4 -33% | 3.7 -12% |
Idle Average * | 8.4 | 8.6 -2% | 6 29% | 9.2 -10% | 6.8 19% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.6 | 8.8 8% | 10 -4% | 9.6 -0% | 7.2 25% |
Load Average * | 51.9 | 60 -16% | 41 21% | 62.6 -21% | 31.8 39% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 51 | 59.4 -16% | 42.5 17% | 71.5 -40% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 51 | 51.7 -1% | 71.9 -41% | ||
Load Maximum * | 63.2 | 65 -3% | 58 8% | 101.7 -61% | 47.2 25% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 31 |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Energy consumption with external Monitor
Battery life
With the 56 Wh battery, the test device only achieves average results in our battery tests. In WLAN mode with 150 cd/m² (corresponds to 34% of the maximum brightness in the test device), it is just under 10 hours and just under 6.5 hours at full brightness (both at 60 Hz). The old Pro version of the RedmiBook 14 2024 in particular has a clear advantage here with the larger 80 Wh battery.
A full charge takes 123 minutes when switched on and 80% of the capacity is available again after 55 minutes.
Notebookcheck overall rating
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025
- 02/27/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.