Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Specifications
Primary Camera: 3.7 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 2 scores (from 3 reviews)
Reviews for the Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
The Swift Go 14 boasts a low weight (1.3 kg), an aluminum case and an OLED screen (2,880 x 1,800 pixels, 90 Hz) with a work-friendly 16:10 aspect ratio. Furthermore, the laptop features two USB 4 ports, a QHD webcam and an attractive price (US$800).
Source: Ricks Tech
Support, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/25/2025
Source: Ricks Tech
Support, online available, Medium, Date: 12/09/2024
Source: 91mobiles
The Acer Swift Go 14 OLED is a nifty value-for-money 14-inch notebook that offers an appealing OLED display, and enough grunt to take on everyday productivity. The design and chassis aren’t the most premium, but mostly look and feel pleasant, especially for something that’s priced at Rs 60,000. Battery life could be better, but in return you get a fairly powerful 12-core H-series Core i5 CPU. Besides, it doesn’t weigh a lot, which means carrying the charging brick with you shouldn’t be a hassle.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/12/2024
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 75% display: 80% mobility: 65% workmanship: 65%
Comment
Intel Iris Xe G7 80EUs: Integrated graphics card in Intel Tiger Lake G7 SoCs based on the new Gen. 12 architecture with 80 EUs (Execution Units / Shader Cluster). The clock rate depends on the processor model. The Tiger Lake chips are produced in the modern 10nm+ process at Intel.
Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
i5-1335U: Alder Lake based mobile CPU with 2 performance cores and 8 efficient cores. The performance cores offer hyper threading, leading to 12 threads that can be processed. The CPU clocks from 0.9 to 4.6 GHz. The TDP is specified at 15 Watt.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
