Acer Swift 3 SF314-59-52Q3

Specifications

Pricecompare

Reviews for the Acer Swift 3 SF314-59-52Q3

80% Acer Swift 3 review
Source: Laptop Mag
The Acer Swift 3 isn’t a game-changer. Its design is nice with some cool chrome accents that give a touch of flair. You will get decent performance out of the 11th Gen Intel Core i7 CPU and solid rendering from the Intel Iris Xe GPU, but it won’t blow you away. Starting at just $729.99, you can get a solid, budget-friendly ultra-thin laptop and travel partner that won’t slow you down. However, if you max it out, you will push close to $1,000, which is fair pricing for the specs and performance you get.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%

Acer Swift 3 (SF314-59) - disassembly and upgrade options
Source: Laptop Media
Support, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/27/2021

Acer Swift 3 (SF314-59) review – ordinary doesn’t mean boring
Source: Laptop Media
Without being too harsh on this laptop, we feel that its biggest perk is that it’s … ordinary. There are no bold design choices, nor extremities. This means you get plenty for a reasonable price. Take its performance for example. No matter if you are mainly using the CPU, or its integrated graphics, you will be satisfied. Sure, your expectations should be on merit with what this notebook has to offer.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/27/2021

Foreign Reviews

Acer Swift 3 SF314-59-52Q3. Ultrabook 14,0" con Intel Core i5-1135G7 y buen diseño (599 €)
Source: Ofertaman ES→EN
Positive: Beautiful design; compact size; light weight; great built quality; powerful processor; high mobility; good connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/20/2021

Review Acer Swift 3 Infinity 3: Hampir Sempurna dengan Intel EVO
Source: Pemmzchannel ID→EN
Positive: Slim size; light weight; nice display; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2021

Comment

Intel Iris Xe G7 80EUs: Integrated graphics card in Intel Tiger Lake G7 SoCs based on the new Gen. 12 architecture with 80 EUs (Execution Units / Shader Cluster). The clock rate depends on the processor model. The Tiger Lake chips are produced in the modern 10nm+ process at Intel.

Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

i5-1135G7: A quad-core processor of the Tiger Lake product family designed for leaner laptops. The i5 is manufactured on the second-gen 10 nm Intel SuperFin process and features an Iris Xe G7 (80 EUs) iGPU. Core i5-1135G7 has a base clock speed of 2.4 GHz at 28 watts.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

14.00":

Above all, this display size is used for subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles. For all three types, this size is quite large. The biggest variety of subnotebooks is represented with this size.

Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.

1.2 kg:

This weight is typical for big tablets, small subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles with a 10-11 inch display-diagonal.

Acer: The company was founded under the name of Multitech in Taiwan in 1976 and renamed to Acer or Acer Group in 1987. The product range includes, for example, laptops, tablets, smartphones, desktops, monitors and televisions. Gateway Inc. and Packard Bell also belong to the Group and sell their own laptops.

While Acer still had the third largest global market share in the notebook segment in 2008, it ranked 6th in 2016 with a market share of 6% after they had continuously lost market shares.

There are dozens of Acer laptop reviews per month, the ratings are average (as of 2016). Gateway, which has an own laptop line-up, has also belonged to the Acer Group since 2007.

80%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer