Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

AMD Vega 8

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 is an integrated GPU for notebooks. It is used for the Ryzen 5 APUs, which were launched in the end of 2017. The GPU is based on the Vega architecture (5th generation GCN) and has 8 CUs (= 512 of the 704 shaders) clocked at up to 1100 MHz (Ryzen 5 2500U). The performance depends on the configured TDP (12-25 W at launch), the clocks, the cooling, and the memory configuration). The GPU should benefit from fast dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM (contrary to DDR4-2133 single-channel, which is also possible).

The Vega architecture offers some improvements over the Polaris generation and now supports DirectX 12 Feature Level 12_1. More information is available in our dedicated article about the Raven Ridge architecture.

AMD's reference design GPU is sitting between the GeForce 940MX / Radeon Pro 450 and GeForce MX150 / Radeon Pro 555. It can handle smooth gameplay in simple titles like League of Legends (med), Dota 2 (low), Overwatch (low), CS:GO (med), and Quake Champions (high) in 720p up to 1080p according to AMD.

Thanks to the 14nm process and clever power-saving features, the power consumption is comparatively low (according to AMD), so the graphics card can also be used for slim and light notebooks.

RX Vega 2000/3000 Series

Vega 10 compare 640 @ 1.3 GHz
Vega 9 compare 576 @ 1.3 GHz
Vega 8 512 @ 1.2 GHz
Vega 6 compare 384 @ 1.1 GHz
Vega 3 compare 192 @ 0.6 - 1.2 GHz
Vega 2 compare 128 @ 1.1 GHz
CodenameVega Raven Ridge
ArchitectureVega
Pipelines512 - unified
Core Speed1200 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1
Power Consumption15 Watt
Transistor Count4.5 Billion
technology14 nm
FeaturesTiled Rasterization, Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400)
Date of Announcement26.10.2017
CPU in Vega 8GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H4 x 2100 MHz, 35 W? MHz1200 MHz
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G4 x 3500 MHz, 65 W? MHz1100 MHz
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U4 x 2100 MHz, 15 W? MHz1200 MHz
min. - max.? MHz1100 - 1200 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.1 pt (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 587     avg: 756     median: 779 (2%)     max: 882 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 523     avg: 673     median: 693 (2%)     max: 790 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 82476     avg: 117107     median: 113247 (13%)     max: 164146 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 59083     avg: 67389     median: 67470 (9%)     max: 74203 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5527     avg: 10819     median: 11149 (12%)     max: 13817 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 7309     avg: 15327     median: 15770 (4%)     max: 19399 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 985     avg: 2009     median: 2142 (4%)     max: 2645 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1095     avg: 2224     median: 2381 (3%)     max: 2901 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 82476     avg: 92028     median: 92275 (11%)     max: 99523 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 5382     avg: 7643     median: 7670 (7%)     max: 9150 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 5951     avg: 8960     median: 8859 (3%)     max: 10846 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1768     avg: 3539     median: 3676 (5%)     max: 4528 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1668     avg: 3447     median: 3557 (3%)     max: 4317 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 9555     avg: 10294     median: 10294 (3%)     max: 11033 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 8461     avg: 8994     median: 8993.5 (5%)     max: 9526 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 10336     avg: 13392     median: 12213.5 (16%)     max: 20501 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6929     avg: 7970     median: 7779.5 (6%)     max: 10517 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 29.98     avg: 41     median: 39.1 (14%)     max: 65 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 24.5     avg: 46.3     median: 47.8 (3%)     max: 74 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.9     avg: 98     median: 98 (98%)     max: 98 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 19     avg: 22     median: 22.2 (4%)     max: 24.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 45.5     avg: 54.2     median: 53 (4%)     max: 64.2 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 31.1     avg: 38.7     median: 38.6 (4%)     max: 46.4 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 36.3     avg: 43.5     median: 41.7 (1%)     max: 54.3 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 32.1     avg: 43     median: 34.9 (2%)     max: 70.2 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 127.9     avg: 150.5     median: 146.5 (1%)     max: 177.3 fps
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.7     avg: 41.8     median: 38 (5%)     max: 74.7 Watt
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.3     avg: 38.1     median: 35.9 (5%)     max: 67.8 Watt
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 30.3     avg: 40.3     median: 39.6 (9%)     max: 50.3 Watt
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.1789     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (22%)     max: 0.2693 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.2274     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (22%)     max: 0.289 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
29.4
Dead Island 2

Dead Island 2

2023
low 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
26.9
The Last of Us

The Last of Us

2023
low 1920x1080
7.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
12
low 1920x1080
7.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1280x720
12.4
low 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1280x720
31.4
low 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1280x720
17.7
low 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
22.8
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
10
low 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
13.6
low 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
22.4
low 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
26.6
low 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280x720
19.4
low 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
17.1
low 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
15.6
low 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Basic Quality Preset T2X SMAA 1280x720
21
low 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
13.2
low 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
16.3
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
21.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
35.9
low 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
35.1
low 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings 1280x720
16.2
low 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
31.7
low 1920x1080
7.7 10.8 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
12.8
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
low 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low / Off 1280x720
20.6
low 1920x1080
32.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
42.5
low 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
21.4
low 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Quality 1280x720
12.2
low 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality) 1280x720
38
low 1280x720
56.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
41.5
low 1280x720
39  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
21
low 1280x720
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
16
low 1280x720
51.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
32.1
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
24  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
12
low 1280x720
32.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
19.2
FIFA 22

FIFA 22

2021
ultra 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Rendering Quality 1920x1080
67.9
New World

New World

2021
low 1280x720
17.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Video Quality 1920x1080
10
Deathloop

Deathloop

2021
low 1280x720
23.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
12.9
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
31.5 54.3 58.4 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.1 20.9 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.7 18.3 18.4 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1920x1080
32.8
low 1280x720
50.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
32.1
Days Gone

Days Gone

2021
low 1280x720
17  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
14.5
low 1280x720
28.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1920x1080
17.3
Outriders

Outriders

2021
low 1280x720
28.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
23.3
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
44.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
24.6
low 1280x720
16.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
9.3
low 1280x720
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
26.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
23  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
30.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
21  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
low 1280x720
94.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
64.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
61.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
19.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
35.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
23  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
24 26.8 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.7 15.6 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.5 14.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.1 14 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
57  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
57.9 62.1 65.1 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.8 21.5 23.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13 13.9 13.9 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.3 9.5 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
39.6 43 45 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.9 22 25 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.6 20 21 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14 16 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
27.9 29.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.2 11.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
33.7 41.7 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.6 16 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
24.4 25 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.8 12.6 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
28.8 39.1 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.7 18.5 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.4 13.6 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17 20 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9 11 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9 10 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
99.5 103.7 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
57.6 58.5 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.8 49.8 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.1 41.1 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
32 34.9 49.1 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.7 14.2 18.7 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9 9.1 11.8 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.5 7.1 7.5 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
25.6 26 35.3 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.3 9.1 10.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.9 6 6.4 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
38 46 46.2 47.1 54 82 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17 19 19.8 23 27.6 41 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15 17 18.4 20 24.2 26 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10 11 12 16 22.5 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
26.8 29.9 41.7 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.2 10.2 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.2 6.5 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
20.5 29.3 33.1 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.5 13 28.5 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.9 10.1 28.4 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
29.6 32.7 55.4 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.8 11.9 19.4 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.7 7.7 11.6 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
29 43 51 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10 18 29 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13 15 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
85.6 89.5 115.8 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.9 30.4 41.2 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.7 30.6 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
0 (!) 10.8 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
19 27 27 33 37 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9 10 13 16 20 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9 12 15 18 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 14 16 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.2 26.4 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.1 13 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.3 9.1 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
41.4 47.9 59.8 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.6 21.8 28.2 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.8 19.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
30.5 31.2 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.2 18.4 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.9 14.4 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.5 11.5 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
54.8 62.8 79 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.6 18.4 22.4 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.3 18 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
38.3 51.7 62.1 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.8 24.1 27.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.2 23.7 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
5.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
87.1 120.2 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44.6 53.2 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.4 30.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
41.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
19 32.1 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
59.8 59.8 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.3 18.3 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
23 34 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11 18 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9 13 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6 9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
35 54 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18 33 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 19

FIFA 19

2018
low 1280x720
74.7 110.5 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.6 81.7 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.9 73.1 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.8 70.6 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
20.1  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
17 24 34 46 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6 12 17 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6 10 15 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 12 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
34.2 56 61.6 65.5 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14 21.8 21.8 24.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.1 14.8 17.5 20 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3 13 14.6 16.7 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
29 34 64 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16 19 33 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 14 25 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 12 16 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
22.5 38.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.3 16.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
41.7 56.7 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.7 24.6 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.7 22.3 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.8 15.9 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
15 19 21 24 29 31 31 35 43 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7 8 10 11 12 14 16 17 20 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7 7 9 10 14 15 18 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6 7 9 9 13 14 17 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
13
low 1280x720
11.5 19.2 19.6 21 21.2 21.8 23.8 24 24.4 25.2 25.5 25.6 25.7 26.3 26.3 26.5 26.6 26.6 26.7 26.8 26.9 28.1 28.4 32.5 33.9 39.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.5 14.5 15.1 16.4 17.3 17.4 17.5 18.3 18.4 18.7 19.3 19.4 19.4 19.6 19.8 19.9 20.2 20.2 20.2 20.6 21 21.2 21.2 25.3 25.8 31 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.6 13.5 14.4 15.2 15.5 15.6 15.9 16.3 16.6 16.7 17.1 17.1 17.1 17.1 17.2 17.6 17.6 18.1 18.2 18.4 18.6 19.2 22.8 23.3 27.3 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
28.2 35.2 36.8 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.4 18.3 18.5 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13.4 13.5 18.1 20.1 21.2 23 26.4 26.6 27 27.2 27.8 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.2 6.6 10.3 10.7 11.4 13.6 13.6 13.7 13.8 14 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3.7 4.4 5.1 7.3 8.3 8.7 9.2 9.7 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
63.6 75 198 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.7 30.1 62 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.7 19.1 24.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.1 10.9 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
26.5 33.7 70 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.1 10.3 23.1 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.3 20.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
27.1 30.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.8 16.3 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.4 12.8 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
61.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
12 19 38 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11 20 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
35.4 41.2 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.5 30.5 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21 23.4 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.2 20.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
31.1 33.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.1 15.9 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 12.6 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5 9.9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
33 42 46 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13 14 21 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10 10 16 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
125.9 147.2 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
69.8 76.4 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.3 63.3 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.4 58.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
21.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
50 60 85 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23 27 36 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22 23 29 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
33 42.4 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14 19 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.3 16 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
66 67.3 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.3 63.4 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.3 50.5 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.5 39.8 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
77.1 90.4 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.5 35.6 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.2 20.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
52.9 93 93 94 99.7 107.3 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.7 43 44 44 45.8 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.9 28.2 29 30 32.1 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
60
60
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
56.8 63.2 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.1 21.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
42.7 43.3 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.7 18 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
30.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
49 52.5 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.6 17.6 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.8 17 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.6 13.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
67.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
29.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
65.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
med. 1366x768
80.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
45.8 47.2 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.8 29.8 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.9 14.4 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.7 13 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
43.6 56.3 65.1 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.1 12.4 15.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mafia 3

Mafia 3

2016
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25.8 42.5 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.6 15.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
45.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
84.6 94.2 127 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40 67.1 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.9 46.7 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.2 22.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
47.2
49.9
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
high 1920x1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
12.9 16.3 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
40.8 43.9 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.7 26.5 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.5 19.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.2 8.5 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
31.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
27.7 29.9 30.4 34.2 35.1 37 38.7 42.6 47.2 49.3 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.6 21.7 26.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.9 10.6 10.8 10.9 11.1 12.3 13.5 13.6 14 14.8 15.4 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.2 10.5 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
82.5 88.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52 56.1 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.3 30.1 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.3 22.4 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
43.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
51.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1366x768
78.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
58.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.4 46 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.1 37.5 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
4K 3840 x 2160
13.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
59.8 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.6 31 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16 20 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
43.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
56.2 58.4 61 63 64 64.5 64.9 65 66.5 67.5 68.3 68.5 69 69 70 70.5 70.6 70.8 70.9 70.9 72 72 73 74.9 75 76.6 84.7 87.4 97.2 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.9 46.8 47.5 50.1 50.3 50.7 52.1 53.4 54.5 54.9 57.4 57.6 58.2 58.3 60 61.2 63.2 63.7 63.7 63.8 64 64.2 64.4 65.4 65.9 66 66.9 68.3 76.3 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.4 26.9 27.7 28.3 28.3 28.5 28.5 29 31.9 34 34.8 36.1 36.4 37.4 38 38.1 38.8 38.9 39 39 39.3 39.6 39.8 40.7 41.2 41.9 43.4 44.4 47.8 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.8 24.7 25.5 26.3 26.4 26.5 27.2 27.3 29 30.5 31.2 32.6 33 33.2 34.6 34.9 35.2 35.4 36.2 36.3 36.3 36.7 37.3 37.8 38.5 39.2 40.7 41.4 44.8 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
42  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
22 23 24 24.5 29 29.5 30.4 30.5 30.9 37 37.1 37.3 41 41.9 42.3 46 47.4 50.7 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
16.3 16.4 19.5 19.6 20 24 27.9 29 30 33.8 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.7 9.2 9.7 9.8 10.1 12.5 13 13 13.1 13.9 14 15.4 16.4 18.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
4.4 6.3 6.9 8 8.9 9 10.1 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
59.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
41 51.5 52.4 65.5 74.6 81.2 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.9 42.2 57.8 68 72.3 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.1 14.2 15.7 20.3 21.8 25.3 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5 7 10.3 12.3 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
21.6
32.3
51.2
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
21.7
32.8
51.6
low 1024x768
58  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
51.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
35.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
71.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
56.2 63 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
41.5 52 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20 21.1 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.1 16.6 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
150  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
36.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
25.2 33.7 45.9 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.9 9.7 14 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
40.2 63.5 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.8 41.1 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.3 19.3 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
68.9 74.4 76.5 81.4 81.9 82.7 82.9 83.4 87.1 88.2 91.2 99.5 100.7 101 103.1 105.7 106.2 107.1 109 113 114.4 115 115 115.4 116.2 117.3 118.8 120 122.8 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
0 (!) 50.2 52.4 54.5 55.9 59.6 67.2 68.3 70.1 70.8 71.4 72.1 73.5 76.2 83 83 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
0 (!) 17.2 39.4 41.2 42.8 43.4 49.3 53.4 56 58.5 59.3 59.3 59.4 60.2 61.2 66 68 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.6 12.1 12.7 13.3 13.9 14 14.2 14.3 14.6 15.1 15.4 16.5 16.7 17.6 18.4 18.4 18.4 19.3 19.5 19.7 19.8 20 21 21 21.1 21.2 21.3 21.4 22 28 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
95.7 122 134.6 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57 61.1 71.9 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
43 50.3 51.3 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.2 24.4 26.8 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
72.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
med. 1366x768
95.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
67.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
med. 1366x768
87  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
77.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
110.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
76.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
49.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
35.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
med. 1360x768
68.2  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
47.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
158.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
102.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo 412.4
Dead Island 216.514.4
The Last of Us7.69
Resident Evil 4 Remake7.48
Company of Heroes 318.413.8
Sons of the Forest12.3
Atomic Heart13.910.3
Returnal7
Hogwarts Legacy10.5
The Witcher 3 v4.0014
High On Life17.49.8
The Callisto Protocol12.58.17.4
Need for Speed Unbound12.2
Spider-Man Miles Morales11.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022141211
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection8.37.31
A Plague Tale Requiem8.96
The Quarry10.7
F1 2221.720.816.611.3
Vampire Bloodhunt22.515.212.6
Ghostwire Tokyo10
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands16.3127.9
Cyberpunk 2077 1.698.66.35
Elex 213
GRID Legends32.319.516.4
Elden Ring1312
Dying Light 28.03
Rainbow Six Extraction1914
Farming Simulator 2256.927.6
Forza Horizon 53917
Riders Republic2712
Back 4 Blood51.217.914.913.6
Far Cry 624
Alan Wake Remastered32.513.7
FIFA 2240.2
New World17.6
Deathloop23.711.2
F1 2021482016
Monster Hunter Stories 250.628.323.8
Days Gone1711.9
Resident Evil Village28.114.8
Outriders28.617.811.910.5
Hitman 344.4
Cyberpunk 2077 1.016.8
Immortals Fenyx Rising271312
Yakuza Like a Dragon26.19.38
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla2310
Dirt 530.711.78.8
Watch Dogs Legion2111.6
FIFA 2194.964.955.435.7
Star Wars Squadrons61.630.721.819.6
Mafia Definitive Edition19.78.3
Crysis Remastered35.57.06
Flight Simulator 202016.86.1
Horizon Zero Dawn2312
Death Stranding25151414
F1 202057272115
Gears Tactics6222149
Doom Eternal43222015
Hunt Showdown2911
Escape from Tarkov3815
Red Dead Redemption 22512
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order16.211.49.9
Need for Speed Heat25.812.110.1
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 201925.215.511.4
GRID 2019341613
Ghost Recon Breakpoint1910107
FIFA 20102584841
Borderlands 33916107
Control2996
F1 201952252014
League of Legends10279.27069
Total War: Three Kingdoms331064.4
Rage 2281715
Anno 1800391483.1
The Division 24119149
Dirt Rally 2.097322815.3
Anthem57.56.43.7
Far Cry New Dawn29141413
Metro Exodus221073.1
Apex Legends50231816.5
Just Cause 431181411
Darksiders III66181714.8
Battlefield V51232222.55.6
Farming Simulator 19104492814
Fallout 7641.922.517.916.2
Hitman 2269.89.16.4
Call of Duty Black Ops 46018
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey29151184
Forza Horizon 4452630239
FIFA 199358525120.1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider301210103
Strange Brigade54201613
F1 2018422317129
Monster Hunter World311314.710.7
The Crew 2492018145
Far Cry 528131111
X-Plane 11.1126201712.8
Kingdom Come: Deliverance331610.17.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark22117
Fortnite112382010
Star Wars Battlefront 2431415
Need for Speed Payback29151211.1
Call of Duty WWII61.456.118
Assassin´s Creed Origins2316118
Destiny 238272219
ELEX3216129
The Evil Within 217.79.98.9
Middle-earth: Shadow of War4016127
FIFA 18137736056
Ark Survival Evolved21.86.8
F1 2017652925
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)38171413.9
Team Fortress 267625039
Dirt 484341910
Rocket League90442914.1
Prey602116.714.8
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III431714.813.1
Ghost Recon Wildlands30.211.510.35.9
For Honor51171613
Resident Evil 767.627.817.311.2
Watch Dogs 229.621.710.76.9
Dishonored 22520.611.79.9
Titanfall 265.146.917.515.7
Farming Simulator 17102.580.337.315.6
Battlefield 147281412
Civilization VI5530.61311.5
Mafia 313
Deus Ex Mankind Divided3413
Mirror's Edge Catalyst45.128.112.68.1
Overwatch102543920
Doom25.110.4
Ashes of the Singularity15
Hitman 201625.426.717.9
The Division4225158
Far Cry Primal321614
XCOM 231.110.67.2
Rise of the Tomb Raider3723129
Rainbow Six Siege85542922
Fallout 443.914.9
Anno 220551.328.113.26.2
World of Warships78.658.8423313.3
Metal Gear Solid V602618
Mad Max43.522.720.7
Dota 2 Reborn7059363314.7
Batman: Arkham Knight4216
The Witcher 33524138
Dirt Rally59.131.414.7
GTA V6154189
Battlefield Hardline5851.921.414
Dragon Age: Inquisition35.627.512.8
Alien: Isolation71.949.528.722.3
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor60472116
Sims 415057.931.527.7
Risen 3: Titan Lords36.340.714.69.5
Thief3510
X-Plane 10.2552321518.2
Metro: Last Light6014.2
BioShock Infinite100634918
Tomb Raider117634824
Guild Wars 272.312.9
Counter-Strike: GO120.795.867.341.9
Diablo III104.98777.747.2
Anno 2070110.976.549.124.8
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim6049.135.821
StarCraft 2183.668.247.530.3
World of Warcraft158.3102.220.5
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
67
56
35
5
102
24
12
96
16
4
80
11
1



11


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 23:36:06

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.06s ... 0.062s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.062s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.062s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8144 +0.034s ... 0.095s

#7 got single benchmarks 8144 +0.15s ... 0.245s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.245s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.889s ... 1.134s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.134s

#11 Got 1243 rows for game benchmarks. +0.127s ... 1.262s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.262s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.123s ... 1.385s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +5.066s ... 6.451s

#15 return log +0.054s ... 6.505s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) graphics card

Trigkey S3 mini PC review: Core i3-like performance for the price of a Celeron or Atom

Trigkey S3 mini PC review: Core i3-like performance for the price of a Celeron or Atom

The Trigkey is inexpensive at just under US$300, but it thankfully sidesteps the terribly slow Celeron or Atom solutions for an older but faster AMD Zen+ proces...
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | | 419 g
Dell Inspiron 15 3505 in review: Quiet, affordable office laptop

Dell Inspiron 15 3505 in review: Quiet, affordable office laptop

The Inspiron 15 3505 shines with low noise levels, two drive slots, and a moderate price. The installed Ryzen 5 APU does not reach its full performance potentia...
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | 15.60" | 2 kg
BMAX X14 Pro laptop review: Attractive with AMD Ryzen 5 for under $500 USD

BMAX X14 Pro laptop review: Attractive with AMD Ryzen 5 for under $500 USD

$500 USD isn't a lot for a laptop these days unless if you're willing to settle for cheap designs and slower Celeron-level performance. The BMax X14 Pro bucks t...
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
Impact Display Solutions IMP-3713-V2-16-500 Fanless PC Review

Impact Display Solutions IMP-3713-V2-16-500 Fanless PC Review

Why use a small heat sink when the entire chassis itself can be one instead? This bulky industrial PC may be fanless, but it sacrifices performance in the proce...
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | | 3.7 kg
HP 17 in Review: Ryzen notebook for the home desk

HP 17 in Review: Ryzen notebook for the home desk

HP's 17.3-inch model is a simple office notebook with a Ryzen 5-3500U APU, 16GB memory (dual-channel mode), NVMe SSD and a matte IPS screen. In addition, an opt...
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | 17.30" | 2.5 kg

Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T: AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, 0.8 kg
  Review » Beelink GT-R Mini Desktop Review

Honor MagicBook 15: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  Review » Honor MagicBook 15 in review: Ryzen 5 in a stylish suit

Huawei MateBook 13 2020 AMD: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 13.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » Huawei MateBook 13 (2020) review - A Ryzen laptop isn't always the better choice

HP EliteBook 735 G6 7KN29EA: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  Review » HP EliteBook 735 G6 laptop review: Despite AMD Picasso, not necessarily a bad choice

Honor Magicbook 14: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Honor Magicbook 14 Laptop Review: A better version of the MateBook D 14?

SCHENKER VIA 15: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.4 kg
  Review » Schenker VIA 15 Laptop Review: a lightweight AMD notebook

Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Huawei MateBook D 14 in Review: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U Unleashed

Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  Review » Huawei MateBook D 15 Laptop Review: Still a good notebook with AMD

Asus VivoBook 17 M712DA-AU017T: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 17.30", 2.3 kg
  Review » Asus VivoBook 17 M712DA Laptop Review: Cheap 17-incher

Lenovo IdeaPad S540-13API: AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  Review » Lenovo IdeaPad S540-13API Laptop in Review: Slim Ryzen Companion with Long Battery Life

Walmart Motile M142: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  Review » Walmart Motile M142 Laptop Review: Pretty Good for $500

Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R057 Laptop Review: A super price for an AMD laptop, but with a hefty shortcoming

Acer Swift 3 SF314-41-R8HZ: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Acer Swift 3 SF314-41 Laptop Review: A stylish and slim Ryzen subnotebook with plenty of power and battery life in the tank

Lenovo Ideapad C340-14API 81N6004UGE: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 14API Review: Ryzen 5 raises the bar

HP ProBook 455R G6: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 2 kg
  Review » HP ProBook 455R G6 Laptop Review: Better battery life thanks to Zen+

Lenovo V155-15API: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  Review » Lenovo V155 Review: Budget laptop turns out as a storage giant

Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad E495 Laptop Review: Inexpensive office device with a lot of power, but without keyboard illumination

Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T495 Review: business laptop with AMD processor, long battery life, and good display

Lenovo Ideapad L340-17API-81LY0004GE: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  Review » Lenovo Ideapad L340-17API laptop review: 17.3-incher pleases with good battery life

Lenovo Ideapad 330S-15ARR-81FB00C7GE: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 330s-15ARR Laptop Review: A powerful Ryzen 5 2500U laptop paired with disappointing battery life

Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D (Ryzen 5, RX Vega 8) Laptop Review

HP ProBook 445 G6: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » HP ProBook 445 G6 (Ryzen 5 2500U, RX Vega 8, SSD, FHD) Laptop Review

Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad E485 (Ryzen 5, Vega 8) Laptop Review

Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, 12.50", 1.1 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad A285 (Ryzen 5 Pro, Vega 8, FHD) Laptop Review

HP 17-ca0013ng: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  Review » HP 17 (Ryzen 5 2500U, FHD, IPS, Vega 8) Review

HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  Review » HP Pavilion 15 (AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, Vega 8) Laptop Review

Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad A485 (Ryzen 5 Pro) Laptop Review

Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 330 15 (Ryzen 5 2500U) Laptop Review

HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » HP ProBook 645 G4 (Ryzen 5 Pro 2500U, SSD, FHD) Laptop Review

HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  Review » HP Envy x360 15z (Ryzen 5 2500U, Vega 8, SSD, FHD) Convertible Review

Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  Review » Lenovo Ideapad 720S (Ryzen 2500U, Vega 8) Laptop Review

MSI B350I Pro AC - DDR4-2933: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G, 0.00"
  Review » Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G in Review

Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R4W1: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2 kg
  Review » Acer Swift 3 SF315 (Ryzen 5 2500U, Vega 8, 256 GB, FHD) Laptop Review

HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  Review » HP Envy x360 15 (Ryzen 5 2500U, Radeon Vega 8) Laptop Review

Medion Akoya E14301: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya E14301

HP Pavilion 15-cw1501nd: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-cw1501nd

Dell Vostro 14 3405, R5 3500U: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 14 3405, R5 3500U

BMAX X14 Pro: AMD Ryzen 5 3450U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » BMAX X14 Pro

HP Pavilion 15-cw1947nd: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-cw1947nd

Acer Spin 3 SP314-21-R572: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 3 SP314-21-R572

Asus VivoBook 14 D415DA-EB238: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 D415DA-EB238

Asus VivoBook 14 M415DA-EK274: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 M415DA-EK274

Medion Akoya E15301: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya E15301

Lenovo ThinkPad E585-20KV0008MH: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad E585-20KV0008MH

HP 15s-eq0022ns: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP 15s-eq0022ns

Asus VivoBook 14 M409DA-BV646: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 M409DA-BV646

Asus VivoBook D509DA-EJ028T: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook D509DA-EJ028T

Asus VivoBook 14 M409DA-EK146T: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 M409DA-EK146T

HP Pavilion 15-cw1948nd: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-cw1948nd

HP 14-dk0033ns: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP 14-dk0033ns

Acer Aspire 3 A315-23-R6U9: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-23-R6U9

Acer Aspire 3 A315-23-R875: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-23-R875

Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE

Lenovo IdeaPad S145-81V70008BR: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad S145-81V70008BR

Acer Aspire 3 A315-23-R33X: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-23-R33X

HP 14-dk0030ns: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP 14-dk0030ns

Acer Aspire 3 A315-23-R8W6: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-23-R8W6

HP 17-ca1008ng: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP 17-ca1008ng

Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ADA05: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ADA05

Asus VivoBook 17 D712DA-AU021T: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 17 D712DA-AU021T

Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM011T: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM011T

Asus D509DA-BR294: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus D509DA-BR294

Acer Swift 3 SF314-41-R69Y: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF314-41-R69Y

Asus M509DA-EJ068T: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus M509DA-EJ068T

Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI038: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI038

Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00

Honor MagicBook 15: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook 15

Asus VivoBook 14 D409DA-EK366: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 D409DA-EK366

Lenovo Ideapad S340-14API-81NB006AGE: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S340-14API-81NB006AGE

Huawei MateBook 13 2020 AMD: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 13.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 13 2020 AMD

Lenovo IdeaPad S540-13API: AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad S540-13API

HP 15s-eq0025ns: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP 15s-eq0025ns

Honor MagicBook Pro HLY-19R: AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, 16.10", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook Pro HLY-19R

Lenovo Ideapad S145-15API-81UT00DBGE: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S145-15API-81UT00DBGE

Asus VivoBook 17 M712DA-AU017T: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 17.30", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 17 M712DA-AU017T

Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R4HV: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R4HV

HP 14-dk0009ns: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP 14-dk0009ns

HP 15s-eq0017ns: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP 15s-eq0017ns

Asus M509DA-EJ025T: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus M509DA-EJ025T

HP Envy x360 13-ar0002ur: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 13-ar0002ur

Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MW000JMH: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 12.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MW000JMH

Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF001HMH: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF001HMH

Acer Swift 3 SF314-41-R9JT: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF314-41-R9JT

Honor Magicbook 14: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Honor Magicbook 14

Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY

HP 14-dk0933nd: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP 14-dk0933nd

Huawei Matebook D 15 Space Grey (2020): AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei Matebook D 15 Space Grey (2020)

Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS

HP Envy x360 13-ar0006nw: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 13-ar0006nw

HP Envy x360 13-ar0150nd: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 13-ar0150nd

HP Envy x360 13-ar0800no: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 13-ar0800no

Acer Swift 3 SF314-41-R8HZ: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF314-41-R8HZ

Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI012T: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI012T

Acer Swift 3 SF314-41-R1X6: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF314-41-R1X6

Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM003: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM003

HP 255 G7 6UM18EA: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP 255 G7 6UM18EA

HP 17-ca1105ng: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP 17-ca1105ng

Lenovo V155-15API-81V50008SP: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo V155-15API-81V50008SP

Acer Aspire 3 A315-42-R5P7: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-42-R5P7

Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM053: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM053

Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R7MS: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R7MS

Lenovo Ideapad C340-14API 81N6004UGE: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad C340-14API 81N6004UGE

Asus VivoBook 15 S512DA-BR097: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 15 S512DA-BR097

Acer Swift 3 SF314-41-R8VS: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF314-41-R8VS

Asus ZenBook 14 UM433DA-AM062T: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UM433DA-AM062T

Lenovo Ideapad C340-14API-81N6005LSP: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad C340-14API-81N6005LSP

HP 14-dk0002ns: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP 14-dk0002ns

HP Envy x360 13-ar0004ng: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 13-ar0004ng

Lenovo Ideapad S540-14API-81NH002YGE: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S540-14API-81NH002YGE

Lenovo V330-14ARR-81B1001EUK: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo V330-14ARR-81B1001EUK

HP 15-db1011ns: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP 15-db1011ns

Lenovo Ideapad S145-15API-81UT001: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S145-15API-81UT001

HP 15-db0069wm: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP 15-db0069wm

HP Envy x360 13-ar0000ns: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 13-ar0000ns

HP 15-db1014ns: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP 15-db1014ns

Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR-81D2007KSP: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR-81D2007KSP

Huawei MateBook D 14-53010GXL: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook D 14-53010GXL

Asus VivoBook 15 R505ZA-BR675: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 15 R505ZA-BR675

Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R98U: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R98U

Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9001PMH: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9001PMH

Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS

Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL

Lenovo Ideapad 330-15ARR-81D2007LSP: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 330-15ARR-81D2007LSP

Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R96P: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R96P

Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, 12.50", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE

Honor MagicBook KPL-WOOB: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook KPL-WOOB

Asus VivoBook 15 X505ZA-BQ012T: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 15 X505ZA-BQ012T

HP 15-db0045ns: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP 15-db0045ns

HP 14-cm0970nd: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP 14-cm0970nd

HP 17-ca0980nd: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP 17-ca0980nd

Dell Inspiron 13 7375 2-in-1: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 13.30", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 13 7375 2-in-1

Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9001ASP: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9001ASP

Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9003DGE: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9003DGE

HP Envy x360 13-ag0005ng: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 13-ag0005ng

HP 15-db0029ns: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP 15-db0029ns

HP 15-db0011ns: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP 15-db0011ns

HP 17-ca0992nd: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP 17-ca0992nd

HP Envy x360 13-ag0140nd: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 13-ag0140nd

Huawei MateBook D 14, AMD Edition: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook D, AMD Edition

HP Pavilion 15-cw0001ns: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-cw0001ns

HP Envy x360 13-AG0002NS: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 13-AG0002NS

Acer Aspire 3-A315-41S: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3-A315-41S

HP Envy x360 15-bq181no: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 15-bq181no

Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R8ZC: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R8ZC

Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R8PP: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R8PP

Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR

Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R7EQ: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R7EQ

HP Envy x360 15-bq100au: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 15-bq100au

Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R69U: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R69U

HP Envy x360 15z-1ZA07AV: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 15z-1ZA07AV

HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng

HP Envy x360 15-bq100nl: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 15-bq100nl

Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R1H4: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R1H4

HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx

Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R4W1: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R4W1

HP Envy 15-bq100nd x360: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-bq100nd x360

Dell Inspiron 15 3505-PXHPW: AMD Ryzen 5 3450U, 15.60", 2 kg
   » Dell Inspiron 15 3505: Ryzen office laptop with low stamina

Honor MagicBook 15: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.5 kg
   » The Honor MagicBook 15 has turned out pretty, but offers only mediocre endurance values

Huawei MateBook 13 2020 AMD: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 13.00", 1.3 kg
   » MateBook 13: This is the best chipset for the Huawei laptop

Honor Magicbook 14: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Apple MacBook Air vs. Honor MagicBook 14: Twice the price, half of the performance?

   » The Honor MagicBook 14 is the price-performance champion

   » Honor MagicBook 14 Hands-On: A solid and stylish budget laptop

Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Huawei MateBook D 14: Just as good as the D 15

Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, 15.60", 1.5 kg
   » Huawei MateBook D 15: Other manufacturers have something to learn from Huawei

Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad T495 with Ryzen 5 Pro is slower than Core i5 ThinkPad T490 in initial benchmarks

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2017-10-26)