Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 15 scores (from 40 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS
Following in the footsteps of the MateBook D 15, the smaller MateBook D 14 proves once again that there is absolutely no reason to throttle CPU performance under load. Find out in our review what other qualities Huawei's notebook has to offer.
Source: Laptop Media
Archive.org versionAnother budget alternative. The laptop has its issues like shallow key travel, lack of a backlight, pathetic I/O (with two USB Type-A 2.0 ports), and average battery life (roughly 7 hours of Web browsing/video playback). Expect even lower numbers, when you’re doing productivity work with it. Also, the memory is soldered to the motherboard, which is not ideal, so if you want to future proof your notebook, go for the 16GB version, which happens to be the largest available option.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/28/2020
Source: Unbox
Archive.org versionIf you’ve been looking for a notebook to use for our “new normal”, then you might want to take a look at Huawei’s new MateBook D14. There’s a lot to like here, from the aluminum chassis to the powerful internals, to the laptop’s exceptional battery endurance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2020
Source: Trusted Reviews
Archive.org versionThe Huawei MateBook D 14 should be considered by all students and productivity users, especially those for whom value for money is a priority. Student favourites such as the MacBook Air and Surface Laptop come in at prices of at least £300 more, and while you will get a better performance and display with more expensive options, the MateBook D is still comfortably quality enough to delight your average laptop user.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor
Archive.org versionThe MateBook D 14 offers serious value for money with impressive AMD-flavoured mid-range specs that can outperform similarly-priced laptops, and let's be honest, it's a well-designed, premium-looking laptop too.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Stadt-bremerhaven
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2020
Source: Android Pit
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Golem
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/24/2020
Source: Ofertaman
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; compact size; light weight; excellent autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/14/2020
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Slim size; light weight; compact size; nice display; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: No USB-C.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/29/2020
Source: Ofertaman
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Compact size; elegant design; excellent battery life; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/08/2020
Source: Ofertaman
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Compact size; light weight; nice design; excellent battery life; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/15/2020
Source: Ofertaman
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Big screen; premium design; metal case; good price; stylish design; nice connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/20/2020
Source: Tuexperto
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Long battery life; great built quality; high performance; powerful processor; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/25/2020
Source: PC Guia
PT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/12/2020
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 80%
Source: Android Geek
PT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Premium design; long battery life; fast charging; good price. Negative: Average performance; no card reader; noisy under loads.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2020
Source: Notebook Italia
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; great built quality; powerful hardware; high performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2020
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; great built quality; compact size; light weight; nice performance; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/04/2020
Source: HDblog.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice design; solid workmanship; high autonomy; good price; 500GB SSD. Negative: Only one USB-C; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/12/2020
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Journal du Geek
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: 01Net
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: Frandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Stylish design; solid workmanship; metal case; nice display; good connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2020
Source: Tabletowo
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Komputerswiat
PL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: High performance; powerful hardware; long battery life. Negative: Poor display.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 04/25/2020
Source: PurePC
PL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; comfortable keyboard; great speakers; good cooling system. Negative: Average touchpad; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2020
Source: PC Lab.pl
PL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Stylish design; solid workmanship; thin frames; high gaming performance; fast SSD; comfortable keyboard and touchpad; nice connectivity; good cooling and silent system; long battery life; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: Poor display; no memory card reader; high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2020
Source: Komputerswiat
PL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; nice display; decent processor; long battery life; compact size.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2020
Source: Chip Online TR
TR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Chip Online TR
TR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Teknolojioku
TR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: 512GB SSD; light weight; fast fingerprint sensor; comfortable keyboard. Negative: Only 2 USB-A ports; no card reader.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/28/2020
Source: Hitech Vesti
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Slim size; light weight; thin frames; backlit keys; convenient touchpad; nice webcam; fast fingerprint sensor; high autonomy; fast charging. Negative: Low gaming performance; limited port set; no card reader.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/31/2020
Source: Ixbt
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Metal case; beautiful design; excellent battery life; decent hardware; nice performance. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/14/2020
Source: 3DNews.ru
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Metal case; nice ergonomy; good autonomy. Negative: No card reader; poor set of ports; low keyboard backlight.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/12/2020
Source: Prohardver.hu
HU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; great built quality; good cooling system; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/12/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Compact size; nice display; high performance; premium design.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/25/2021
Source: Tek.no
NO→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Dinside
NO→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Fast fingerprint sensor; comfortable keyboard; good SSD. Negative: Poor cameras; average performance; noisy under loads.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/24/2020
Source: Alt om Data
DA→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: M3 PC för alla
SV→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Comment
AMD Vega 8: Integrated graphics card of the Ryzen APUs based on the Vega architecture with 8 CUs (= 512 shaders) and a clock of up to 1100 MHz.
Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
R5 3500U: Mobile Quad-Core APU using Zen+ cores clocked at 2.1 to 3.7 GHz and a Vega iGPU with 8 CUs running at up to 1200 MHz.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.