Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia Titan X Pascal Review - The Fastest Consumer GPU Available

Fast, faster, fastest. Two months after the launch of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founder's Edition, the Nvidia Titan X was introduced to the public on 8th of August 2016. The new Titan X is based on the Pascal architecture, which has significantly improved the performance of the smaller variants. 1024 shader units more than the GeForce GTX 1080, 12 GB GDDR5X VRAM, and a wider memory interface raise hope for outstanding performance. In our review, you will find out how well the higher performance potential can be used and whether there are also points of criticism.
GPU-Z

For the original German review, see here.

The Nvidia Titan X can be bought only via the Nvidia web store. Thus, there will not be any custom designs or cards from other manufacturers. It looks significantly different compared to Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founder's Edition. The cooler, which appears to be top-quality, is entirely black. In addition to a 6-pin power-in, it features an 8-pin one in order to supply the graphics card with sufficient energy. The label of the cooler (TITAN X) hints at the top model again. On the side, there is a striking "GEFORCE GTX" logo, which glows green when it is on. We do not fully understand why Nvidia uses this logo in the Titan X, since the Titan X is not officially listed as GeForce GTX graphics card in the portfolio.

This feature is indeed an eye catcher and a gimmick. However, those who buy a graphics card of this price category might want you to see even from a distance that it is not just a conventional "GeForce GTX" graphics card.

The available interfaces are identical to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founder's Edition's. Hence, the Nvidia Titan X also features Dual-Link-DVI, an HDMI 2.0 port as well as three Display-Port-1.4 ports. An SLI interface allows combining two of the graphic cards for further increasing the performance.


 

CodenameGP102
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines3584 - unified
Core Speed1418 - 1531 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed10000 MHz
Memory Bus Width384 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5X
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5 / Vulkan
Power Consumption250 Watt
Transistor Count12 Billion
technology16 nm
FeaturesDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, HDCP 2.2, CUDA, PCIe 3.0, GPU Boost 3.0, G-SYNC
Date of Announcement25.07.2016
v1.26
log 27. 18:45:10

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 start showIntegratedCPUs +0.033s ... 0.034s

#4 return log +0.012s ... 0.046s

The Test System

Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 (not overclocked), 64 GB DDR4 2400 MHz, MSI Gaming 9 ACK (MS-7882), Acer Predator XB321HK 4K display, Samsung SM951 M.2 SSD (512 GB, system + benchmarks), Microsoft Windows 10 64-Bit

Admittedly, the used system is rather special. The performance of the processor is on par with the Intel Core i7-6950X in applications with multi-core support. However, the Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 gives in to the higher clocked Intel Core i7-6950X and other higher-clocked, modern processors in single thread performance.

During further testing, the Nvidia Titan X was embedded in an existing liquid cooling circuit. An Aquastream XT Ultra was used as a pump and heat is dissipated through a 480mm radiator from Phobya (Phobya G-Changer 480 V.2 - Full Copper).

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
160 Points +60%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
139 Points +39%
Eurocom Panther 5D
105 Points +5%
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal)
100 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal)
1657 Points
Eurocom Panther 5D
1550 Points -6%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
789 Points -52%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
669 Points -60%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
1.77 Points +57%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
1.59 Points +41%
Eurocom Panther 5D
1.25 Points +11%
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal)
1.13 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal)
17.65 Points
Eurocom Panther 5D
17.6 Points 0%
Core i7-3960x, Radeon HD 6450
10.54 Points -40%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
8.63 Points -51%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
7.4 Points -58%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
7881 Points +13%
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal)
6962 Points
Core i7-3960x, Radeon HD 6450
6305 Points -9%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal)
40835 Points
Core i7-3960x, Radeon HD 6450
32120 Points -21%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
30656 Points -25%

Legend

 
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal) Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4, NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, Samsung SM951 MZHPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
 
Core i7-3960x, Radeon HD 6450 Intel Core i7-3960X, AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5,
 
Eurocom Panther 5D Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2, NVIDIA Quadro K5100M, Crucial M500 120 GB CT120M500SSD3
 
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
 
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7

Clock Rates

By default, the Nvidia Titan X clocks at 1418 MHz and guarantees a Turbo clock of 1531 MHz. We have recorded a maximum GPU clock rate of 1835 MHz in the GPU-Z render test. The system could keep this frequency throughout the test without any drops. In gaming, the Nvidia Titan X frequently clocked at significantly above 1600 MHz (1600 MHz to 1800 MHz). The "Temperature Target" of the Nvidia Titan X is 84 °C (~183 °F) out-of-the-box. If this is exceeded, the GPU begins to throttle the performance. We will explain this in detail in the stress test section.

MSI Afterburner
MSI Afterburner
NVIDIA Inspector
NVIDIA Inspector

Synthetic Benchmarks

The synthetic benchmarks from Futuremark and Unigine clearly show that it tends to be the fastest consumer graphics card. With a significant difference of more than 30%, the Nvidia Titan X outperforms the former top model from the same manufacturer, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founder's Edition. Although graphics cards with GTX 1080 chip that are overclocked ex-factory can minimize the difference, they cannot catch up with the superior Titan X.

3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
Time Spy
Unigine Heaven 4.0
3DMark 11
 
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
33884 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
30045 Points -11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
29443 Points -13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
23990 Points -29%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
23057 Points -32%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
17543 Points -48%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
SCHENKER XMG U716, Intel Core i7-6700
17050 Points -50%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
12967 Points -62%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
27282 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
23351 Points -14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
20268 Points -26%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
16961 Points -38%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
16685 Points -39%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
14580 Points -47%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
SCHENKER XMG U716, Intel Core i7-6700
12691 Points -53%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
9963 Points -63%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
147015 Points +32%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
129042 Points +16%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
111721 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
104764 Points -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
98958 Points -11%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
80439 Points -28%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
SCHENKER XMG U716, Intel Core i7-6700
75213 Points -33%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
62938 Points -44%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
6751 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
5358 Points -21%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
4841 Points -28%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
4126 Points -39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
3918 Points -42%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
3552 Points -47%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
SCHENKER XMG U716, Intel Core i7-6700
2977 Points -56%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
2297 Points -66%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
13543 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
9994 Points -26%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
7817 Points -42%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
6951 Points -49%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
4673 Points -65%
Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
140.2 fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
137.7 fps -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
129.5 fps -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
117 fps -17%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
110 fps -22%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
SCHENKER XMG U716, Intel Core i7-6700
78.1 fps -44%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
77.1 fps -45%

Gaming Benchmarks

The Titan X can easily cope with VR requirements
very good for VR

Obviously, the actual performance in games has much more significance. After we ran all the games in our benchmark list from 2015 and 2016 on the Nvidia Titan X, we can say with certainty that all current games run smoothly in 4K with a "high preset". There are often still reserves, so that the Nvidia Titan X can even cope with "ultra preset" at a resolution of 3840x2160 pixels.

At lower resolutions, the combination with a higher clocked CPU is often the better choice. The lack of multi-core support ensures that the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 as well as the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 perform better in FHD resolution than the Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 with the Nvidia Titan X. This changes with increasing the resolution, so that the Titan X can often be outperformed only by multi GPU systems in UHD resolution. Even if you ignore the price performance ratio, this GPU only makes sense when you want to run games with resolutions above 1080p and a correspondingly high preset.

Hitman 2016 - 3840x2160 High / On AA:FX AF:8x
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
62.4 (47min - 73max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
42 (34min - 53max) fps -33%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
38.9 (26min - 46max) fps -38%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
37.7 (26min - 46max) fps -40%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
35.6 (30min - 43max) fps -43%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
32.6 (24min - 42max) fps -48%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
26.2 (19min) fps -58%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
18.4 (15min) fps -71%
The Division - 3840x2160 High Preset AF:8x
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
52.4 fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
48.5 (19min - 65max) fps -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
39.8 (14min - 51max) fps -24%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
39.7 (17min - 52max) fps -24%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
34.5 (19min - 51max) fps -34%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
27.7 (10min) fps -47%
Far Cry Primal - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:SM
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
62 (55min - 68max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
49 (46min - 53max) fps -21%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
40 (37min - 44max) fps -35%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
38 (36min - 42max) fps -39%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
37 (33min - 42max) fps -40%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
29 (27min) fps -53%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
20 (18min) fps -68%
XCOM 2 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
42.8 (38min - 49max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
30.4 (27min - 34max) fps -29%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
25.6 (39min - 47max) fps -40%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
25 (24min - 28max) fps -42%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
22 (19min - 24max) fps -49%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
18.7 (17min) fps -56%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
68.4 (62min - 76max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
50 fps -27%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
47.8 (43min - 54max) fps -30%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
40.6 (36min - 46max) fps -41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
38.9 (35min - 44max) fps -43%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
32.4 (29min - 37max) fps -53%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
27.9 (25min) fps -59%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
20.8 (19min) fps -70%
Just Cause 3 - 3840x2160 High / On AA:FX AF:8x
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
81.6 (71min - 123max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
62 (56min - 67max) fps -24%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
49.6 (44min - 53max) fps -39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
48 (42min - 52max) fps -41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
36.6 (33min) fps -55%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
36.3 (33min - 41max) fps -56%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
23.6 (20min) fps -71%
Star Wars Battlefront - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
88.6 (79min - 103max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
67 (58min - 79max) fps -24%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
62.6 fps -29%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
53 (46min - 64max) fps -40%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
52.7 (45min - 63max) fps -41%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
50 (43min - 60max) fps -44%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
40.4 (35min) fps -54%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
27.9 (23min) fps -69%
Assassin's Creed Syndicate - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
65.1 (58min - 75max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
47.3 (44min - 51max) fps -27%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
38 (35min - 42max) fps -42%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
37.7 fps -42%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
37.4 (35min - 41max) fps -43%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
31.5 (29min - 37max) fps -52%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
27.6 (26min) fps -58%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
20.7 (18min) fps -68%
Fallout 4 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
74 (60min - 89max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
55.6 fps -25%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
54 (42min - 66max) fps -27%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
46 (37min - 56max) fps -38%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
45.2 (35min - 55max) fps -39%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
38.7 (30min - 49max) fps -48%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
24 (18min) fps -68%
Anno 2205 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:4x
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
88.1 (82min - 93max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
67 (64min - 70max) fps -24%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
54 fps -39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
52.2 (49min - 55max) fps -41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
35.4 fps -60%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
34.3 (32min - 36max) fps -61%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
23.8 (20min) fps -73%
World of Warships - 3840 x 2160 Very High Preset AA:High FX AF:16x
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
109 (81min - 150max) fps +5%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
104.1 (54min - 156max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
100 (53min - 133max) fps -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
87 (64min - 132max) fps -16%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
64 (50min - 82max) fps -39%
Dirt Rally - 3840x2160 High Preset
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
137 (110min - 143max) fps +41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
126 (99min - 154max) fps +30%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
109 (88min - 139max) fps +12%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
97 (66.8min - 160.3max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
85.6 fps -12%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
81 (53min - 104max) fps -16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
58.6 (45min) fps -40%
GTA V - 3840x2160 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:FX AF:8x
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
95.5 (37.9min - 174.5max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
79 fps -17%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
71.2 (11.6min - 170max) fps -25%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
59.1 fps -38%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
46.6 fps -51%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
41.4 (15min) fps -57%
Battlefield 4 - 3840x2160 High Preset
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
126.2 (107min - 152max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
91.6 fps -27%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
90 fps -29%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
70 (63min - 84max) fps -45%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
69.8 (61min - 83max) fps -45%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
56 (49min - 65max) fps -56%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
35.2 (30min) fps -72%
The Witcher 3 - 3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
68.1 (59min - 77max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
55 fps -19%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
51.2 fps -25%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
44 (39min - 49max) fps -35%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
43 fps -37%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
35.9 (32min - 39max) fps -47%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
22.8 (19min) fps -67%
Overwatch - 3840x2160 High (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:4x
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
165.8 (158min - 234max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
104 (88min - 121max) fps -37%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
87 (75min - 101max) fps -48%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
85.5 (74min - 98max) fps -48%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
77 (64min - 91max) fps -54%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
62.3 (53min) fps -62%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
47.3 (39min) fps -71%
Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 3840x2160 High Preset AF:4x
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
41.1 (35.6min - 47.6max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
30.8 (26min - 36max) fps -25%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
28.3 (24min - 34max) fps -31%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
25.1 (11min - 34max) fps -39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
24.8 (21.3min - 28.4max) fps -40%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
18 (15min) fps -56%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
13.3 (12min) fps -68%
No Man's Sky - 3840x2160 High AA:FX AF:8x
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
79.9 (65min - 96max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
58.5 (21min - 68max) fps -27%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
46.7 (38min - 53max) fps -42%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
35.7 (26min - 41max) fps -55%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
33.9 (27min) fps -58%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
23.7 (14min) fps -70%
FIFA 16 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:2x MS
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
270.9 (259min) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
208 (194min - 218max) fps -23%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
162 fps -40%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
157 (143min - 167max) fps -42%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
118.6 fps -56%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
88.2 (35min) fps -67%
Rainbow Six Siege - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:4x
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
106.9 (45.6min - 206.2max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
82 fps -23%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
67.4 (52min - 88max) fps -37%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
67 (50min - 95max) fps -37%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
62 (47min - 76max) fps -42%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
50.2 fps -53%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
50.1 (35min) fps -53%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
35.9 (28min) fps -66%
Doom - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
86.4 (71min - 112max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
56.5 fps -35%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
48.6 (42min - 60max) fps -44%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
46 (41min - 60max) fps -47%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
38.2 (33min - 51max) fps -56%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
34.4 (30min) fps -60%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
22.6 (19min) fps -74%
Mirror's Edge Catalyst - 3840x2160 High Preset AF:16x
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
61.1 (58min - 68max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
47 (44min - 50max) fps -23%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
38.3 (35min - 42max) fps -37%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
38.2 (35min - 41max) fps -37%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
31.5 (23min - 35max) fps -48%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
28.3 (26min) fps -54%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
20.6 (17min) fps -66%

Boost Clock and Performance Under Load

Let us turn to the aspects of stress test and performance under prolonged load. We used the program FurMark, which demands everything from the GPU with the manual settings 4K and 8x MSAA. We have increased the "Temperature Target" to 90 °C (~194 °F) for this test. The Titan X reaches a very high 1835 MHz directly after the start. After a short time the frequency hovers at 1733 MHz. Consequently, the memory clock of the Titan X remains at 5005 MHz (effectively 10010 MHz). In the stress tests we have run (“Time Spy” and “Sky Diver”), which are included in Futuremark 3DMark, our test sample achieved 90.9% and 97.3%, respectively. So far, all tests were carried out with the standard cooler and keeping the default rotation speed setting of "auto". Hence, the performance loss falls slightly under prolonged GPU stress with the standard cooler. Due to Titan X's enormous performance, this small difference can be measured, but is not noticeable.

Sky Diver Stress test (97,7%)
Sky Diver Stress test (97,7%)
Time Spy Stress test (90,9%)
Time Spy Stress test (90,9%)

Professional Applications

If you only consider the technical specifications and the results of the Titan X in gaming benchmarks, you might suspect that it would also be more than sufficient for professional use. However, the significantly more expensive Quadro cards from Nvidia are out of reach for the consumer card. Unfortunately, the Titan X lacks the driver support of the Quadro GPUs.

NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
SCHENKER XMG U716, Intel Core i7-6700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
MSI GT72S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
MSI WT72-6QM, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
SCHENKER W706, Intel Core i7-6700
SPECviewperf 12
9%
-32%
-30%
-39%
115%
49%
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
48.75
67.7
39%
50.8
4%
49.23
1%
43.23
-11%
101
107%
92
89%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
8.58
8.67
1%
6.05
-29%
6.11
-29%
5.69
-34%
86.9
913%
52
506%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
126.4
112
-11%
61.2
-52%
59.3
-53%
52.1
-59%
44.14
-65%
37
-71%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
59.9
45.6
-24%
30.18
-50%
30.94
-48%
29.57
-51%
31.35
-48%
22
-63%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
114.5
163
42%
88.9
-22%
107
-7%
75.2
-34%
69.6
-39%
61
-47%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
13.16
10.4
-21%
6.8
-48%
7.17
-46%
5.61
-57%
6.86
-48%
4.8
-64%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
43.74
60.9
39%
35.42
-19%
34.82
-20%
32.6
-25%
81.3
86%
66
51%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
83.5
86.3
3%
52.2
-37%
53.6
-36%
49.52
-41%
94.4
13%
77
-8%

Compute Performance

The Titan X can clearly show its strengths in LuxMark and ComputeMark. In the LuxMark benchmark, only the SLI combination from two Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 can beat the currently fastest desktop graphics card into the second place. Currently, no other graphics card can keep up with the Titan in single GPU operation. It is as much as 40% faster than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founder's Edition.

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
3660 Samples/s +22%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
2991 Samples/s
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
2490 Samples/s -17%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
2474 Samples/s -17%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
2327 Samples/s -22%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
1938 Samples/s -35%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
1566 Samples/s -48%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
1407 Samples/s -53%
Sala GPUs-only
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
6920 Samples/s
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
5814 Samples/s -16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
5012 Samples/s -28%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
4708 Samples/s -32%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
3919 Samples/s -43%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
3125 Samples/s -55%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
3077 Samples/s -56%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
2319 Samples/s -66%
ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
7847 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
6191 Points -21%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
4761 Points -39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
4270 Points -46%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
3229 Points -59%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
3091 Points -61%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
3082 Points -61%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
2418 Points -69%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
5096 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
3646 Points -28%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
3233 Points -37%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
2861 Points -44%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
2710 Points -47%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
1960 Points -62%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
1854 Points -64%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
1461 Points -71%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
4284 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
3284 Points -23%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
2706 Points -37%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
2602 Points -39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
2479 Points -42%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
1926 Points -55%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
1856 Points -57%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
1564 Points -63%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
2032 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
1758 Points -13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
1390 Points -32%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
1382 Points -32%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
1114 Points -45%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
1031 Points -49%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
1020 Points -50%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
760 Points -63%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
2254 Points
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
1860 Points -17%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
1730 Points -23%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
1531 Points -32%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
1402 Points -38%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
1070 Points -53%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
1059 Points -53%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
783 Points -65%
1024x600 Normal, Score
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
21512 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
16610 Points -23%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
13121 Points -39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
12373 Points -42%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
11890 Points -45%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
9204 Points -57%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
8892 Points -59%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
6986 Points -68%

Emissions

The Nvidia Titan X is not fully convincing in terms of emissions. The radial fan, which sits at the rear part of the graphics card, should blow hot air out of the case under load. This works well enough to largely keep the Boost clock, but the noise is distracting. Nevertheless, the cooler ensures that the performance of the graphics card remains high. The almost 5 minutes long video is supposed to show how the fan behaves when idling, under maximum load and during the stress test (FurMark). All three test scenarios have been recorded with open case and at a distance of about 30 cm (~1 ft). When idling or even during Windows use, the fan rotates at approximately 1100 RPM (26%). Thereby, the card reaches a temperature of 38 °C (~100 °F) and the fan is not audible. When the rotation speed is manually set to 100%, which conforms to 4800 RPM, the Titan X is quite clearly audible and silent working is not possible even when the case is closed. During the stress test, the radial fan could keep the GPU temperature at a constant 86 °C (~187 °F) with a rotation speed of 68% and the card was still clearly audible.

It is a pity that Nvidia only sells the Titan X with this cooler. Partner cards or custom designs might bring other cooling units, which might not limit the performance of the GPU that quickly.

Hence, we recommend using water cooling with the Titan X. Known manufacturers offer compatible models for the Pascal based Titan X. We will explain the advantages and disadvantages here.

The emissions also include power consumption. The energy demand is about 12 watts in Windows use without load. With an unchanged power target of 100%, the Titan X requires a maximum of 254 watts. When manually changed to 120%, the energy demand is significantly higher and we record a maximum of 295 watts.

Power consumption when idling
Power consumption when idling
Power consumption under load (Power Target: 100%)
Power consumption under load (Power Target: 100%)
Power consumption under load (Power Target: 120%)
Power consumption under load (Power Target: 120%)

Cooling Modifications

EKWB cooler compatible for the Pascal based Titan X
EKWB cooler compatible for the Pascal based Titan X

We decided to use a compatible water cooler from EKWB with suitable backplate. You have to first remove the original backplate, which exposes all the screws connecting the cooler and PCB. Once you have removed these twenty screws, you can carefully take off the cooler. However, you have to be very careful: The cooling unit is also fixed to the PCB with two cables at the rear. Once you have disconnected these, you can finally remove the entire cooling unit (see pictures).

Before installing the new cooler, you have to remove all remnants of thermal grease and the thermal pads. This is easily done with a little alcohol, a dust-free cloth or a few cotton buds. The scope of delivery of the water cooler includes all suitable thermal pads in the right size. You have to put them on the right components and spread the included thermal grease on the GPU. Now, you can carefully lay the full cover water cooler on the card, which is fixed to the PCB with suitable screws. The same applies to the backplate.

First Impressions after Modifications

This modification aims to reduce the noise of the Titan X significantly. In addition, the temperature of the GPU should remain acceptable. In short, both "problems" have improved significantly after the modification. The GPU temperature hovered at about 50 °C (~122 °F) during prolonged gaming sessions (“Forza Horizon 3”) for several hours. In addition, the better cooling ensures a more constant and better boost clock of 1835 MHz. The frequency can be maintained throughout the whole load period without problems now. The temperature target of 84 °C (~183 °F) is much higher. The better values are also reflected positively in the benchmark results. In “3DMark Fire Strike Ultra”, the graphics card achieved a 300 points higher result. Since the water cooler on the graphics card does not have an active fan, the Titan X works almost silently now. You can only hear the familiar coil whining, which is also audible in the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 in certain scenarios when the 200 fps level is exceeded. You can mitigate this problem with the useful "G-Sync" feature.

3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (air cooling)
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (air cooling)
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (water cooling)
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (water cooling)
Time Spy Stress test - prior to the modification ...
Time Spy Stress test - prior to the modification ...
... and after the modification
... and after the modification

Verdict

the Nvidia Titan X - the fastest consumer desktop GPU so far
the Nvidia Titan X - the fastest consumer desktop GPU so far

We have deliberately ignored the price performance ratio since a price of 1299 Euros (~$1446), which Nvidia charges for their consumer range flagship, cannot be called reasonable at all. Nevertheless, buyers who are looking for something special and are also willing to pay for it, might consider buying it. However, an extra charge of 500 Euros (~$557) compared with the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founder's Edition is not reasonable since it bears no relation to the performance gain. In the meanwhile, there are many partner cards with the GTX 1080 chip, which bring even more performance due to factory-set overclocking.

Those who really dare to buy an Nvidia Titan X (Pascal), should consider implementing a water cooling circuit. With it, the Titan X will live longer thanks to lower waste heat.

If we judge the performance without considering the price, Nvidia offers the fastest single GPU so far with the Titan X. Only multi GPU systems consisting of two Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 are able to beat the Titan X. However, the Titan X performs better if SLI support is missing. Those who follow rumors will notice that the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti might be released in the coming months. The Internet site www.fudzilla.com mentions CES 2017 as possible release date. The technical specifications are supposed to be similar to the Titan X, but the GTX 1080 Ti will only feature 3328 CUDA cores (96 ROPs/208 TMUs). The GPU core frequency will be slightly increased compared to the Titan X (1503 MHz, Boost 1623 MHz). The price of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti will be in between the non-Ti model and the test model.

Who would be interested in this graphics card? Certainly the gamers. But those who still want to run games in FHD or WQHD in the near future might also be satisfied with the performance of Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 or Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070. Currently, the Titan X only makes sense if demanding games are supposed to run in UHD and with suitable quality settings (high/ultra preset) without stuttering.

Pricecompare

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
12.4 pt (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 8942     avg: 9451     median: 9417 (27%)     max: 9877 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 9031     avg: 9203     median: 9076 (24%)     max: 9635 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 238961     avg: 526905     median: 496070 (56%)     max: 796701 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 215098     avg: 382871     median: 365538 (47%)     max: 546817 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 36851     avg: 57843     median: 58418 (62%)     max: 75037 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 102781     avg: 131615     median: 135092 (36%)     max: 153552 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 19107     avg: 23634     median: 23165 (41%)     max: 26925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 25642     avg: 26877     median: 27315.5 (31%)     max: 27864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 226697     avg: 431186     median: 405420 (49%)     max: 627765 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 52892     avg: 54141     median: 54141 (51%)     max: 55390 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 102111     avg: 104649     median: 104649 (40%)     max: 107187 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 23186     avg: 29573     median: 30628 (42%)     max: 35183 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 27632     avg: 34424     median: 35995 (31%)     max: 37012 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 97575     avg: 100949     median: 100948 (29%)     max: 104322 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 103537     avg: 103837     median: 103837 (59%)     max: 104137 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 24206     avg: 67108     median: 86558 (95%)     max: 90559 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 22088     avg: 53433     median: 69049 (90%)     max: 69161 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 88.5     avg: 128.3     median: 139.8 (46%)     max: 145.2 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 48.75     avg: 78.5     median: 65.1 (16%)     max: 135 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 8.58     avg: 114.5     median: 107.7 (16%)     max: 234 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 80.2     avg: 121.9     median: 131.7 (29%)     max: 144 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 28.22     avg: 63.5     median: 69.8 (18%)     max: 86.3 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 79.7     avg: 136.1     median: 124.3 (34%)     max: 216 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 7.75     avg: 15.1     median: 16.3 (15%)     max: 19.78 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 40.53     avg: 81.9     median: 59.6 (24%)     max: 168 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 62.6     avg: 125.4     median: 91.9 (15%)     max: 255 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 144     avg: 174.6     median: 151.9 (27%)     max: 228 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 71.7     avg: 104.6     median: 82.1 (22%)     max: 160 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 15.35     avg: 269.1     median: 370.9 (41%)     max: 421 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 78.6     avg: 119.5     median: 136.8 (30%)     max: 143 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 40.57     avg: 63     median: 71.4 (15%)     max: 76.9 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 11.31     avg: 25.3     median: 32 (10%)     max: 32.46 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 134     avg: 204.7     median: 185.2 (27%)     max: 295 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 91     avg: 218.8     median: 161.4 (18%)     max: 404 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 143     avg: 174.8     median: 153.4 (27%)     max: 228 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
min: 64.1     avg: 85.6     median: 85.6 (25%)     max: 107 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 11.7     avg: 161.9     median: 161.9 (17%)     max: 312 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 113     avg: 154.5     median: 154.5 (25%)     max: 196 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 13.76     avg: 26.4     median: 26.4 (6%)     max: 39 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 20.53     avg: 43.7     median: 43.7 (29%)     max: 66.9 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 42.19     avg: 55.6     median: 55.6 (23%)     max: 69 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 21512     avg: 21682     median: 21682 (23%)     max: 21852 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 377     avg: 381.7     median: 381.7 (54%)     max: 386.4 Watt
0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 378.5     avg: 381.8     median: 381.8 (53%)     max: 385 Watt
0306090120150180210240270300330360390420450480510Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.26
log 27. 18:45:12

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 getting avg benchmarks for device 7461 +0.016s ... 0.017s

#4 got single benchmarks 7461 +0.022s ... 0.039s

#5 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#6 min, max, avg, median took s +0.929s ... 0.968s

#7 return log +0s ... 0.968s

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dragon's Dogma 2

Dragon's Dogma 2

2024
low 1920x1080
51.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
48.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
34.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
69.2
Horizon Forbidden West

Horizon Forbidden West

2024
low 1920x1080
259  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
244  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
180.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
61.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
46.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
28  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
3840x2160
36.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
243
Alone in the Dark

Alone in the Dark

2024
low 1920x1080
230  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
193  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
159.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
89.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
54.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
3840x2160
38  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
310
Last Epoch

Last Epoch

2024
low 1920x1080
292  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
232  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
198.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
158.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
103.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
46.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
298
Skull & Bones

Skull & Bones

2024
low 1920x1080
99  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
50  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27  fps    + Compare
3840x2160
42  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
123
Helldivers 2

Helldivers 2

2024
low 1920x1080
120.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
92.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
81.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
80.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
57.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
32.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
158.9
Enshrouded

Enshrouded

2024
low 1920x1080
63.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
55.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
38.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
30.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
3840x2160
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Max. Performance 1280x720
99.5
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
133.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
112.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
90.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
83.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
57.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
32.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
229
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

2024
med. 1920x1080
359  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
359  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
359  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
357  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
196.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
209  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
184  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
164.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
105.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
62.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
26.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Finals

The Finals

2023
low 1920x1080
200  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
145.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
128.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
97.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
61.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
29.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
295
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023
low 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
89
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

2023
low 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
45  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
151
EA Sports WRC

EA Sports WRC

2023
low 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
85.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
78.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
71.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
53.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
31.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720
215
Alan Wake 2

Alan Wake 2

2023
low 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
15.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
10.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
23.7
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
65.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
55.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
42.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
29.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
93.9
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
398.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
266.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
149.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
118.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
80.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
544.6
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
51  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) 1280x720
110
EA Sports FC 24

EA Sports FC 24

2023
low 1920x1080
205  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
184.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
153.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
136.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
105.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
66.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
280
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
337  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
291  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
228  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
181  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
110.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
343
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
91.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
33.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
133.9
Steam Deck 1280x720
150
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
133.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
115.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
103.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
70.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
36.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
207
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
50.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
25.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
62.7
low 1920x1080
119.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
118.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
115.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
99.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
75.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
45.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
119.6
low 1920x1080
48.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
12.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 1280x720
78.6
low 1920x1080
117.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
109.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
104.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
86.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
60.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
34.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
191.4
low 1920x1080
108.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
88.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
72.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
48.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
25.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
169.2
low 1920x1080
98.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
85.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
64.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
55.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
44.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
27.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
138.1
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
267  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
234  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
167.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
88.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
51.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
384
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
248  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
183.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
210  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
152.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
100.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
48  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
381
low 1920x1080
67.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
60.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
56.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
52.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
34  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
17.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
113.9
Dead Island 2

Dead Island 2

2023
low 1920x1080
232  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
198.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
142.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
110.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
73.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
35.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
338
The Last of Us

The Last of Us

2023
low 1920x1080
72.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
60.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
55.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
48.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
30.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
98.1
low 1920x1080
126.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
86  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
73.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
52.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
29.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1280x720
188.6
low 1920x1080
128.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
113.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
92.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1280x720
167.8
low 1920x1080
97.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
79.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
76.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
75.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
56  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
33.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1280x720
128.1
low 1920x1080
172.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
126.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
78.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
62.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
48.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
28.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
247
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
51  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
102
low 1920x1080
119.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
90.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
71.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
55.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
40.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
21.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
157.1
low 1920x1080
74.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
70.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
59.3 59.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
19.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
113.2
low 1920x1080
212  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
172.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
144.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
112.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
79.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
44.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
286
low 1920x1080
231  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
147.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
115.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
57.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
25.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
323
low 1920x1080
130.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
43.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280x720
178.5
Ultra Preset (without FSR Upscaling) + Full Ray-Tracing 1920x1080
8.7
low 1920x1080
127.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
113.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
90.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
77.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
57.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
33.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
167.3
low 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
88.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
84.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
60.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
36.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
136.5
low 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
105  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
76  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
52  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Basic Quality Preset T2X SMAA 1280x720
166
low 1920x1080
57.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
57.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
53.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
52.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
41.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
26.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
68.9
low 1920x1080
100  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
77.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
33.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
18.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
126.8
FIFA 23

FIFA 23

2022
low 1920x1080
254  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
228  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
160.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
158.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
118.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
72.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Rendering Quality 1280x720
320
low 1920x1080
144.5 149 ~ 147 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
108.9 111.7 ~ 110 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
88 90.7 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
68.6 69.9 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
47.3 47.8 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
25.1 25.3 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
198.9
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
283 285 ~ 284 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
250 254 ~ 252 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
184.6 188 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
132.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
100.2 101.5 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
59.5 59.5 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
425
444
low 1920x1080
337 391 ~ 364 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
198 267 ~ 233 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
185.4 252 ~ 219 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
179.2 244 ~ 212 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
121.8 173.2 ~ 148 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
65.3 93.6 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
391
411
low 1920x1080
138.9 205 ~ 172 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
137.9 203 ~ 170 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
137.9 196.8 ~ 167 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
136.5 202 ~ 169 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
92.5 141 ~ 117 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
48 73.3 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings 1280x720
224
203
Highest Settings + Maximum Ray Tracing 1920x1080
74.5
14.1
low 1920x1080
171 176.9 180.3 245 ~ 193 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
141.6 142 146.3 201 ~ 158 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100.3 103.2 103.4 151.3 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
80.5 82.2 84.6 124.3 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
56.3 57.6 62.3 92.4 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.9 31.5 34.1 50.4 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
330
268
303
low 1920x1080
79.1 86.6 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70.4 77.6 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.5 69.2 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55.5 59.2 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
35.2 37.9 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.6 17.5 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
79.7
129.9
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
med. 1920x1080
90.2 94 ~ 92 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
81.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
73.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
56.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
33.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low / Off 1280x720
100
low 1920x1080
205 224.1 234 ~ 221 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
164.2 172.6 180.3 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
137 139.9 146 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
104.5 110.4 115.9 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
84.4 88.6 91.6 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
53.4 56.1 57.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
204.4
283
low 1920x1080
59.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
59.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
59.9 59.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
47.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
59.9
low 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
72  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
43.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
22.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Quality 1280x720
158
low 1920x1080
172  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
161  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
149  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
125  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
84  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
44  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality) 1280x720
286
low 1920x1080
115 116.3 116.6 ~ 116 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
98.2 98.8 102.6 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
82.2 82.2 84.6 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
59.7 60 62.4 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
49.3 50 50.9 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
33.3 33.6 34.2 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
154
163.8
med. 1920x1080
95  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
83.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
79.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
67.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
67  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
110
low 1280x720
281  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
223  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
178  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
154  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
124  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
78.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
291
low 1280x720
148  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
115  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
96.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
65.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
39.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
135
low 1280x720
178 206 211 ~ 198 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
115 119 123 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
103 106 110 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64 66 68 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
56 57 58 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41 41 42 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
135
148
low 1280x720
101  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
113  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
95  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
72  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
45  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
78.3
low 1280x720
173  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
124  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
71  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
143
low 1280x720
136  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
111  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
80  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
114
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray-Tracing 1920x1080
25
med. 1920x1080
219  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
191  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
177  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
121  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
64.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
292
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
132 154.8 154.9 ~ 147 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
101 104.1 104.9 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
84.7 87.4 88.8 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
76.1 77.2 78.4 ~ 77 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59.9 60.6 61.1 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
37.7 39 39.6 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
121
125.8
med. 1920x1080
92.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
88.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
88.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
85.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
95.4
New World

New World

2021
low 1280x720
206  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
128  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
70.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
37.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Video Quality 1920x1080
161
Deathloop

Deathloop

2021
low 1280x720
120  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
111  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
94.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
78.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
57.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
31.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
120
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
391 428 575 ~ 465 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
286 297 307 ~ 297 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
225 235 240 ~ 233 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
158 159.9 161.2 ~ 160 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
123.2 124 125.2 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
75.2 76 77.4 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
144  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
142  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
144
Days Gone

Days Gone

2021
low 1280x720
192  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
142  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
94.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
71.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
43.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
167
low 1280x720
106  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
113  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
112  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
303  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
162  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
163  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
141  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
96.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
49  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1920x1080
235
Outriders

Outriders

2021
low 1280x720
123  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
125  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
111  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
78.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
40.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
144
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
289  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
163  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
150  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
135  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
87  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
116  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
71.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
51.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
34.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
16.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
84.3
low 1280x720
108  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
55  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
105  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
92.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
66  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
34.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
161  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
125  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
99.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
57.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
32.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings + Ultra Ray Tracing 1920x1080
24.5
low 1280x720
104  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
95  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
85  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
51  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
166  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
108  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
91.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
63.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
46  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
26  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing (DX12) 1920x1080
22.5
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
low 1280x720
231  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
226  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
216  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
211  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
212  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
176  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
429  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
316  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
264  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
245  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
166  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
94.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
150  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
115  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
75  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
141.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
107.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
71.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
45.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
287  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
170  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
77  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
56.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
31.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
128  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
107  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
60  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
167  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
129  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
88.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
49.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
291 477 495 ~ 421 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
245 275 285 ~ 268 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
202 221 226 ~ 216 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
141 149.7 153.5 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
109 117.7 119.2 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
64.9 69.5 69.5 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Valorant

Valorant

2020
low 1280x720
319  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
296  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
275  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
258  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
257  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
361.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
231.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
142  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
106.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
67.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
225  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
212  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
182  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
181  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
110  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
57.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
237  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
152  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
78  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
120  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
115  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
86.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
45.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
143  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
71  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
36.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
125  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
120  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
92  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
46.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
115  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
110  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
77  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
45.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
200  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
155  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
132  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
84  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 1920x1080
42.8
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 3840x2160
15.3
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
222  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
193  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
152  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
94  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
142  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
108  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
58  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
260  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
254  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
241  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
239  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
237  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
197  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
148.5 233 239 ~ 207 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
128.5 154 159.3 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100.7 107.5 109.9 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81.5 84.1 85.8 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
58.3 59.3 60.1 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32 32.4 32.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
217
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
240  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
25.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
22.1
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
224  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
209  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
179  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
133  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
95  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
59  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
237.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
147.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
45.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
231  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
128  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
95  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
25.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
179  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
69  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
236.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
168.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
159.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
101.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
80.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
49.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
106.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
99.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
89.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
74.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
117 194 200 ~ 170 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
103 150 154 ~ 136 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
99 140 144 ~ 128 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
90 127 131 ~ 116 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
84 101 102 ~ 96 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
55 56 56 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
127.7 240 246 ~ 205 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
103.3 123.5 129.2 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81.2 91.3 95 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.3 72.1 74.8 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54.2 57.5 59.3 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35.3 36.3 37.1 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
143  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
143  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
143  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
113  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
67  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
179  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
137.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
110  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
105.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
187.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
118.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
109.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
106.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
54.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
160  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
153  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
146.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
137  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
71.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
146.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
120.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
99.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
89.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
59.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
75.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
67.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
196  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
173.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
168.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
160.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
62.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
120  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
141  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
73  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 19

FIFA 19

2018
low 1280x720
242.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
240  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
225  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
221  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
206.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
117 279 285 ~ 227 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
112 136.3 137.3 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
109 125.9 126.2 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87 103 113.8 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
78 78.4 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42.3 42.4 43 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
214
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
416 515 545 ~ 492 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
248 251 256 ~ 252 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
189 194.2 196.9 ~ 193 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
161 167.4 169.5 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
117 122.3 122.3 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
67.5 69.5 69.7 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
182  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
161  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
137  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
74  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
130.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
120.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
104.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
49.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
96 232 242 ~ 190 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
88 162 166 ~ 139 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
84 149 152 ~ 128 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
80 140 144 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
99 103 ~ 101 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
52 53 53 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
187
low 1280x720
169.8 221 ~ 195 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
165.3 195.9 ~ 181 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
141.3 151.1 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
120.5 127.3 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
92.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
148.9 231 233 ~ 204 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
124.7 140.5 140.6 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
91 104.7 105.6 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
76.8 77.3 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
43.4 43.5 44.3 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
370.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
210.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
198.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
169.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
60.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
189.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
163  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
146.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
138.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
59  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
108.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
102.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
95.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
67.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
241.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
195.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
162.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
150.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
68  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
105  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
95  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
56  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
129.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
129.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
127.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
126.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
121.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
119.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
114.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
44.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
103.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
80.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
125  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
55  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
346.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
355.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
310.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
303.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
249.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
101.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
95.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
94.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
217  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
149  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
70  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
129.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
113.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
113  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
101.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
44.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
116  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
108.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
105.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
105.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3820x2160
104.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
315.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
253  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
217.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
146  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
91.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
250  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
250  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
250  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
114  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
143  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
143  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
142  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
142  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
96  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
137  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
76  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
102.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
90.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
74.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
49.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
182  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
248  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
219  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
213  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
176  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
79  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
461  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
444  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
359  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
310  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
108  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
125  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
111  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
50  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
105.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
86.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
83.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
70.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
125  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
125  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
124  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
124  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
96  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
86  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
220  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
193  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
179  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
162  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
179  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
175.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
156.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
138.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
124.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
104  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
85.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
67  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
59.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mafia 3

Mafia 3

2016
low 1280x720
78.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
75.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 17

FIFA 17

2016
low 1280x720
373  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
393.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
378.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
367.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
309.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
134.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
126.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
106.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
116.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
118.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
118.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
88.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
79.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium 4x AF Off AA 1920x1080
120.3
low 1280x720
160.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
140  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
130.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
125.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
61.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1920x1080
142.2
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
299.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
299.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
253.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
196.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
165.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
299.6
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
143.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
129.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
114.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
86.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
136.1
low 1280x768
91.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
58.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
120.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
111.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
75.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
79.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
80.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
62.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
218.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
205  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
148.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
122.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1920x1080
189.8
Low Preset 1xAF 1920x1080
255.5
Ultra Preset 16xAF 3840x2160
52.8
low 1280x720
102  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
62  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
98
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
96.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TrilinearAF 1920x1080
98.2
low 1024x768
288  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
224.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
155.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
138.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
68.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
408.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
332.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
270.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
239.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
106.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset 16xAF TAA 3840x2160
88.7
low 1024x768
176.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
145.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
126.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
131.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
81.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
169.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
165.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
162.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
158.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
88.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
125.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
125.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
65.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
156  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
150  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
120  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
120  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
74  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
112.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
114  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
101.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
76  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
88.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
304.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
290.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
289.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
270.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1366x768
162.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
136.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
114.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840 x 2160
104.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
295.8 303.7 ~ 300 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
245.1 272.2 ~ 259 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
241.2 263 ~ 252 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
224.1 240.6 ~ 232 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
159 160.5 ~ 160 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
269.8 451 483 ~ 401 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
225.6 299 319 ~ 281 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
159.7 183.9 199.3 ~ 181 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
89.5 94.5 102.1 ~ 95 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
68.1 68.1 70.8 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
48.3
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
223
low 1024x768
234  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
153.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
97  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
168.5 187.4 187.8 ~ 181 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
161.9 187.2 187.6 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
136.3 186.1 187.6 ~ 170 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
112.5 134.5 137.7 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
101.9 103.5 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
95.5 98.5 100.1 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
51.7
52.4
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
187.1
187.7
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
187.5
187.8
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
181.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
166.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
161.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
159.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
199.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
199.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
199.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
198.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
126.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
133  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
132.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
130.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
116.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
219.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
208.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
186.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
165.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dragon's Dogma 251.348.534.620.5
Horizon Forbidden West259244180.161.446.928
Alone in the Dark230193159.289.254.122.9
Last Epoch292232198.3158.2103.246.5
Skull & Bones999073655027
Helldivers 2120.392.781.180.457.332.2
Enshrouded63.955.246.538.830.718.8
Palworld133.5112.290.383.757.832.2
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown359359359357196.6
Ready or Not209184164.3105.762.626.4
The Finals200145.2128.297.461.429.2
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora60544432219.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023988970654526
EA Sports WRC11885.478.671.753.731.8
Alan Wake 220.219.819.215.510.8
Lords of the Fallen65.455.542.229.720.510.9
Total War Pharaoh398.7266.7149.4118.180.641.8
Assassin's Creed Mirage878279645132
EA Sports FC 24205184.1153.4136.2105.566.6
Counter-Strike 2337291228181110.9
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty91.773.563.155.233.915.3
Lies of P144133.7115.4103.170.636.5
Starfield50.843.1333125.516.7
Armored Core 6119.6118.7115.599.275.145.6
Immortals of Aveum48.842.633.522.612.5
Atlas Fallen117.4109.2104.386.760.534.6
Baldur's Gate 3108.688.572.87048.225.2
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart98.685.264.955.344.827.8
F1 23267234167.111788.151.7
Diablo 4248183.5210152.3100.748
Star Wars Jedi Survivor67.760.356.252.73417.3
Dead Island 2232198.4142.5110.873.535.9
The Last of Us72.560.555.848.630.815
Resident Evil 4 Remake126.3948673.652.429.1
Company of Heroes 3128.2113.89792.372.347.9
Sons of the Forest97.779.476.175.55633.1
Atomic Heart172.5126.678.462.248.428.6
Returnal848073655130
Hogwarts Legacy119.190.371.555.140.621.8
Dead Space Remake74.470.738.75919.7
The Witcher 3 v4.00212172.3144.6112.279.544.4
High On Life231147.2115.59357.525.1
The Callisto Protocol130.391.259.158.643.826.4
Need for Speed Unbound127.9113.390.877.657.933.1
Spider-Man Miles Morales9888.384.38360.836.1
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 202211610579765232
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection57.357.253.752.241.526.6
A Plague Tale Requiem10077.958.646.133.318.9
FIFA 23254228160.4158.6118.872.4
The Quarry14711089694825
F1 22284252186132.110160
Vampire Bloodhunt36423321921214879
Ghostwire Tokyo17217016716911761
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands193158115936737
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6837465573717
Elex 29281.273.956.333.2
GRID Legends2211721411108856
Elden Ring59.959.959.96059.947.5
Dying Light 2126726143.122.3
Rainbow Six Extraction1721611491258444
God of War11610083615034
Halo Infinite9583.379.267.267
Farming Simulator 2228122317815412478.6
Battlefield 204214811596.587.465.239.3
Forza Horizon 5198119106665741
Call of Duty Vanguard101114113957245
Riders Republic173124104977140
Guardians of the Galaxy1361121111098047
Back 4 Blood21919117712164.9
Far Cry 614710387776139
Alan Wake Remastered92.588.388.285.4
New World20612811610370.737.3
Deathloop12011194.878.957.131.3
F1 202146529723316012476
Monster Hunter Stories 2144144144144142
Days Gone19214212694.871.243.6
Mass Effect Legendary Edition106113112
Resident Evil Village30316216314196.749
Outriders12314412511178.340.7
Hitman 32891631501358747
Cyberpunk 2077 1.011671.76051.334.116.1
Immortals Fenyx Rising1087970635539
Yakuza Like a Dragon10510410492.76634.2
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War16112599.37957.332.9
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla1049585635132
Dirt 516610488.475.359.237.7
Watch Dogs Legion10810491.163.64626
FIFA 21231226216211212176
Star Wars Squadrons42931626424516694.4
Mafia Definitive Edition1501151077541
Serious Sam 4141.6107.4100.48471.445.2
Crysis Remastered287170
Flight Simulator 20207766.956.340.931.819.4
Horizon Zero Dawn12810793756034
Death Stranding16712912111788.449.2
F1 202042126821614811568
Valorant319296275258257
Gears Tactics361.8231.9142106.767.939
Doom Eternal22521218218111057.6
Hunt Showdown2371521177835.2
Escape from Tarkov12011611511286.645.3
Red Dead Redemption 21431047145.436.723.5
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order1251201189246.8
Need for Speed Heat115110102937745.1
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 20192001551321148448.5
GRID 20192221931521049452.2
Ghost Recon Breakpoint14210898755834
FIFA 20260254241239237197
Borderlands 3207147106845932
Control2401128353.525.8
F1 20192242091791339559
Total War: Three Kingdoms237.7147.911273.945.722.1
Rage 22311281121097235.9
Anno 180095937843.839.425.9
The Division 2179144117976939
Dirt Rally 2.0236.6168.7159.3101.480.249.7
Anthem106.999.496.289.974.342.7
Far Cry New Dawn1701361281169656
Metro Exodus20511989715736
Apex Legends14414314314311367
Just Cause 4179137.7110105.748.1
Darksiders III187.9118.6109.6106.154.6
Battlefield V160153146.513771.2
Farming Simulator 19146.4120.5107.999.289.1
Fallout 76606059.959.959.6
Hitman 275.972.267.564.452.7
Call of Duty Black Ops 4196173.9168.4160.962.6
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey120104876738
Forza Horizon 414112712111273
FIFA 19242.8240225221206.7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider2271291201017843
Strange Brigade49225219316612169
F1 201818216113711774
Monster Hunter World130.4121.2120.3104.435.4
The Crew 26060606049.7
Far Cry 519013912812110153
X-Plane 11.11195181146124
Kingdom Come: Deliverance14412192.166.632.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark2041351007744
Fortnite370.8210.2198.8169.660.2
Star Wars Battlefront 2189.9163146.5138.759
Need for Speed Payback108.7102.498.695.567.1
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus241.2195.9162.7150.368
Assassin´s Creed Origins10595938456
Destiny 2129.5129.8127.2126.552.8
ELEX121.7119.3114.944.2
The Evil Within 2103.484.380.779.136.8
Middle-earth: Shadow of War12511911210155
FIFA 18346.4355.1310.4303.2249.3
Ark Survival Evolved101.295.594.963.627
F1 201721714912710470
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)129.6113.3113101.944.2
Team Fortress 2116108.4105.2105.8104.2
Dirt 4315.5253217.914691.1
Rocket League250250250114
Prey14314314214296
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III13780787633
Mass Effect Andromeda102.790.374.171.849.7
Ghost Recon Wildlands1821271176747
For Honor24821921317679
Resident Evil 7461444359310108
Watch Dogs 21251211119150
Dishonored 2105.986.883.679.570.9
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare12512512412496
Titanfall 214414414414486
Farming Simulator 17220193179162179
Battlefield 1175.9156.8138.2124.9104
Civilization VI85.66758.559.159.3
Mafia 378.175.96835.3
FIFA 17373393.5378.9367.7309.9
Deus Ex Mankind Divided134.2126.7106.96741.1
No Man's Sky116.8118.3118.788.479.9
Mirror's Edge Catalyst160.4140130.9125.461.1
Overwatch299.9299.9253.4196.8165.8
Doom143.6129.5117114.986.4
Ashes of the Singularity91.38182.558.3
Need for Speed 2016120.7111.198.979.275.6
Hitman 201679.780.568.66662.4
The Division218.7205148.5122.252.4
Far Cry Primal10291837862
XCOM 296.681.878.17842.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider288224.3155.5138.968.4
Rainbow Six Siege408.2332.6270.7239.8106.9
Just Cause 3176.3145.3126.3131.981.6
Star Wars Battlefront169.6165.4162.9158.688.6
Assassin's Creed Syndicate125.6125.312775.765.1
Fallout 415615012012074
Anno 2205112.2114101.17688.1
FIFA 16304.1290.1289.1270.9
World of Warships162.4136.4117.3114.1104.1
Dota 2 Reborn300259252232160
The Witcher 34012811819569
Dirt Rally234153.395.594.397
GTA V18117917012810398
Sims 4181.1166.3161.8159.7
Battlefield 4199.5199.5199.6198.7126.2
Metro: Last Light133132.2130.2116.9
BioShock Infinite219.2208.4186.7165.7
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
5
52
134
1
6
79
107
1
16
94
85
1
20
107
55
5
48
59
11
37
91
50
14

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 27. 18:45:21

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 0.002s

#4 Got 1318 rows for game benchmarks. +0.102s ... 0.104s

#5 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.104s

#6 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.142s ... 0.246s

#7 benchmarks composed for output. +8.715s ... 8.961s

#8 return log +0.011s ... 8.972s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Nvidia Titan X Pascal Review - The Fastest Consumer GPU Available
Sebastian Bade, 2016-10- 7 (Update: 2016-10- 8)