Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU

Intel Arc 8-Cores

The Intel Arc iGPU with 8 cores (ID 7D55) is an integrated graphics card in Meteor Lake SoCs based on the Xe LPG architecture (similar to the dedicated Arc GPUs, but with a focus on efficiency). It offers all 8 Xe cores (128 Xe vector engines), 8 ray tracing units, 8 samplers and 4 pixel backends.

The Arc name may only be used if at least 16 GB RAM is used in dual channel mode. Otherwise, the only iGPU is called "Intel Graphics" and is also significantly slower.

According to Intel, performance has been doubled compared to the previous generation (probably still in Alder Lake).

The iGPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (probably DX 12_2 like the desktop Arc GPUs). The graphics unit also supports XeSS AI Super Sampling.

The media engine of Meteor Lake is in the SOC tile and supports up to 8k60 10-bit HDR encode and decode of MPEG2, AVC, VP9, HEVC and AV1. The display engine is also in the SoC tile and supports HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.1 20G with up to 8K60 HDR.

The GPU Tile of the Meteor Lake chip is manufactured at TSMC in 5nm (5N process).

Arc LPG Series

Arc 8-Cores 8 @ 2.3 GHz
Arc 7-Cores compare 7 @ 2.2 GHz
Graphics 4-Core compare 4 @ 1.95 GHz
CodenameMeteor Lake iGPU
ArchitectureXe LPG
Pipelines8 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
Core Speed2300 (Boost) MHz
CacheL1: 1.5 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.3
technology5 nm
DisplaysHDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.0 20G
Date of Announcement14.12.2023
CPU in Arc 8-CoresGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H16 x 3800 MHz, 45 W? MHz2350 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H16 x 3800 MHz, 28 W? MHz2300 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H16 x 3800 MHz, 28 W? MHz2250 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H14 x 3600 MHz, 28 W? MHz2200 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2200 - 2350 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.9 pt (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2178     avg: 3423     median: 3504 (10%)     max: 4151 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2018     avg: 3132     median: 3205.5 (8%)     max: 3756 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 18794     avg: 30031     median: 30231.5 (32%)     max: 37020 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 35698     avg: 43071     median: 43977.5 (12%)     max: 51286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5203     avg: 7509     median: 7874 (14%)     max: 9001 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5568     avg: 8228     median: 8561 (10%)     max: 9650 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 4294     avg: 5866     median: 5869 (7%)     max: 6558 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7756     avg: 11766     median: 12151 (17%)     max: 13904 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 8064     avg: 11823     median: 12230 (11%)     max: 13716 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 135.3     avg: 151.8     median: 151.8 (9%)     max: 176.3 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 227.7     median: 269 (2%)     max: 345 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 17911     avg: 31972     median: 34126 (10%)     max: 36188 points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 20875     avg: 30843     median: 32858 (11%)     max: 34520 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 35     avg: 47.6     median: 49.2 (7%)     max: 60.6 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27     avg: 42.6     median: 44.4 (6%)     max: 55.8 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 29.7     avg: 46.8     median: 46.6 (10%)     max: 60.9 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3826     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (49%)     max: 0.553 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.4516     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (44%)     max: 0.615 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 27     avg: 37.7     median: 37.8 (60%)     max: 46.3 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dragon's Dogma 2

Dragon's Dogma 2

2024
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
22.5
Horizon Forbidden West

Horizon Forbidden West

2024
low 1920x1080
30.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Alone in the Dark

Alone in the Dark

2024
low 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Last Epoch

Last Epoch

2024
low 1920x1080
45.8 73.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39.1 52.4 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.9 46.4 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.6 40.3 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
59.3
Skull & Bones

Skull & Bones

2024
low 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Helldivers 2

Helldivers 2

2024
low 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Enshrouded

Enshrouded

2024
low 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
40.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

2024
med. 1920x1080
183.9 208 ~ 196 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
128.6 142.8 ~ 136 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
120.9 134.2 ~ 128 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
60.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
The Finals

The Finals

2023
low 1920x1080
99.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
EA Sports WRC

EA Sports WRC

2023
low 1920x1080
35.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
82.7 116 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62.5 74.8 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.6 53.6 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.5 40.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
136.5
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
111.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
84.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
52.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
11.3 18.5 21.7 23.3 27.6 29.5 31.5 31.7 32.4 32.9 34.1 34.7 35.7 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.4 16.3 23.8 24.8 25.4 26.3 26.3 26.5 26.8 29.5 29.5 29.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.3 15.1 16.9 17.8 20.4 22.5 22.8 22.8 22.9 23.4 24 25 25.2 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 18.4 19.7 20.5 20.7 21.2 22 22.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
13.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
37.3
53.8
49
46.1
44.3
45.6
Steam Deck 1280x720
41.1
34.1
52
48.8
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
56.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
48.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
41.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
The Crew Motorfest

The Crew Motorfest

2023
low 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Starfield

Starfield

2023
med. 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
45.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
45.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
24.5 29.1 31.9 33.8 36.9 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.8 22.9 23.5 28.2 28.8 30.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.6 21.2 21.2 24.1 25 26.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19 19.1 19.9 23.4 24.4 24.4 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
52.6
52.2
med. 1920x1080
28.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
15.2 17.3 37.4 44.1 64.6 68.2 70.9 71.5 71.9 72.3 73.1 80.1 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15 25.1 35.4 36.3 59 59.5 62.1 62.9 65.1 65.8 66.8 74.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.6 25.6 26.6 27.1 35.9 37.6 38.7 40.7 44.8 44.9 46.1 50.4 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5 10 11.4 11.5 12.2 12.7 13.5 14 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
93.7
110.9
73.4
72.4
113.9
low 1920x1080
39.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
62.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
29.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
45.7 61 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.4 44.1 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.6 30.9 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.7 22.2 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
69
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
25.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
56.2 59.1 72.1 72.4 72.7 73.1 76.3 77.2 77.7 78.2 78.3 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.6 53.9 62.2 65.1 66.6 67 70.8 70.9 71.4 71.6 71.7 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.8 40.9 46.7 51.1 53.3 53.7 55 55.1 56.2 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.1 9.3 11.9 14.1 14.4 14.7 14.9 15 15.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
113.4
127.2
86.6
120.3
107.7
120.5
120.8
107.4
low 1920x1080
44.9 47.3 47.4 50.4 53.3 53.8 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35.3 36.3 40.6 41.2 42.6 42.7 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.7 25.7 29.1 30 30.1 31.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.2 20.2 24.1 24.3 25 25.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
80.8
87
81.2
82.5
83.8
82.1
low 1920x1080
67.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
80
med. 1920x1080
31.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
35.2
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
61.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
42.9
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
94.8 143.5 143.6 145.9 147.5 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.8 73.9 75.9 80.4 80.6 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.3 56.4 60 63.2 63.8 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.3 26.2 26.9 28.8 31 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
58  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33 35 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28 (!) 30 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26 27 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
68.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
55.8
low 1280x720
130  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
65  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
52.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
131.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
88.4
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
121 131.8 141 141.9 144 147.3 151.6 154.8 159.4 165.4 166 173.8 177.4 179.5 189 190.2 205 208 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.7 53 56 57 60.6 61.9 66 67.6 70 70.5 71 71.1 72 73.4 75.4 80.3 84 87.7 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39 41 41.4 50.4 52 52.4 53.3 56.4 57.8 57.8 58.9 59 59 59.7 61.4 64 66.7 72.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.1 31 32 35 38.8 38.9 41 43.2 43.8 44 44.3 46.1 46.8 47 47 50.3 52.5 53 58.9 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
42  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
47 54 54 59 61 63 63 63 65 67 69 69 72 84 91 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31 33 35 36 37 37 37 39 39 39 40 44 45 52 54 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22 29 31 33 33 34 35 35 35 36 37 37 37 38 41 48 50 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25 27 28 31 32 32 33 33 34 34 35 35 35 36 38 45 46 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
32  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
38
45
low 1280x720
46.1 47.1 47.4 47.5 49 50.3 50.9 51.4 52 52.2 52.4 52.7 53.4 54.4 54.5 55.4 55.4 56.1 58 61.5 63.1 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.2 35.8 36 37.7 38.3 38.9 39.2 39.8 40.1 41 41.1 41.1 41.3 42 42.5 44 45.1 46 46.6 46.7 46.9 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.9 30.2 30.8 31.2 31.3 32 32.1 32.1 32.4 33.4 33.5 35 35.7 36.1 36.8 36.9 37.6 37.8 38.2 38.2 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
35.6 42.8 43.8 47.6 51.5 52.8 56.6 56.9 57.2 58.1 59.1 61 63 63.3 64 68.4 83.3 84.1 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28 29.7 30.3 32.1 32.1 33.5 34.8 35.8 36 36.1 36.3 36.5 37.3 37.9 38 38.8 45 45.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.7 17 18.2 19.2 21 21.2 21.8 23.2 23.9 24.1 24.1 24.4 24.4 24.4 24.6 24.9 26.6 30.6 31.7 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
13.4 14 23 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
78.3 89.9 98.4 98.9 98.9 99.3 99.4 100.9 100.9 101.2 101.7 102.4 102.5 103.2 103.5 104.1 104.6 105.7 106.5 106.8 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.8 69.4 71.4 75.6 75.9 79.2 83 84.3 89.4 90.4 90.9 92.6 92.8 92.9 94.1 94.1 95.3 96.5 96.9 97.4 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.8 57.7 61.5 64.1 66.8 67.2 69.3 70.3 72.3 74.5 74.9 75.7 76 76.7 76.8 77.3 79.1 83 84.6 85.2 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.7 53.3 59.6 60.4 63.6 63.9 66.5 67.1 68.3 71.1 71.1 72.3 73.4 73.6 74 74.4 75.4 75.6 79.8 80.2 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
92 120 126 126 128 131.2 131.3 132 132.9 135.1 135.6 141 142.7 156 157 ~ 132 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
59 68 73 76.8 78 78 79.1 80 88.1 88.2 88.4 89 91.5 97 100 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36 40 40 40.4 42 42.4 44 44.8 51 51.7 54.1 54.3 54.3 56 57 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.5 18.4 19.2 20.1 20.4 20.5 20.8 20.9 23 23.1 23.3 23.8 24.5 24.6 25.1 25.2 25.5 26.1 28 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
53.8
51.7
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
99.1 101.3 102.4 110.5 124.1 126.5 139.1 147.3 153.3 160.3 160.3 161 163.3 166.9 171.5 175 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
59.9 85.7 90.4 93.8 107.7 120.8 124.1 134.8 135.8 139.5 148 148.2 152.8 154.9 160.9 164.4 168.4 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.1 22.6 24.2 26.2 31.3 32.2 33.1 33.4 33.5 33.9 34.8 35.2 36.2 36.3 36.9 37.6 41.2 41.3 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.6 10 11 12.1 12.3 12.7 13.1 13.3 13.7 13.8 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.3 14.6 15.9 15.9 16.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
123.9
121.8
108.9
118.4
156
139.7
90.4
69.3
111
101
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
138.3
130.9
130.5
128.3
167.5
152.7
62.9
119.5
122.2
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dragon's Dogma 21814.5
Horizon Forbidden West30.627.118.516.2
Alone in the Dark69564929
Last Epoch60464034
Skull & Bones36322721
Helldivers 239.23027.527.2
Enshrouded272216.8
Palworld40.637.129.527.3
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown196136128
Ready or Not60.446.945.832.5
The Finals99.568.960.546.4
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora18161411
EA Sports WRC35.826.624.722.4
Lords of the Fallen20.21816.314.2
Total War Pharaoh99695038
Assassin's Creed Mirage34333025
Counter-Strike 2111.184.552.131.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty2825202013.1
Lies of P56.948.141.733.2
The Crew Motorfest32302521
Starfield11.5
Armored Core 65040.136.232.2
Atlas Fallen45.945.739.529.2
Baldur's Gate 331262322
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart28.42925.921.1
F1 2357523612
Resident Evil 4 Remake39.630.526.718.4
Company of Heroes 362.250.13938.6
Sons of the Forest29.82119.418.7
Atomic Heart53402820
Returnal37363228
Hogwarts Legacy25.719.315.6
F1 2272665013
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands50402923
GRID Legends67.751.841.736.6
Dying Light 231.129.9
God of War272418.312.9
Far Cry 661.937.732.127.2
F1 2021135725727
Horizon Zero Dawn58342927
Borderlands 368.538.527.722.6
Total War: Three Kingdoms130594633
Far Cry New Dawn65393735
Metro Exodus52.233.92519.7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider131.462.549.548.2
Strange Brigade16468564342
Far Cry 56540363432
X-Plane 11.11534134
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark58362317
Dota 2 Reborn100867268
The Witcher 3132824722
GTA V1411293313
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
7
20
14
6
12
28
9
2
24
24
2
1
30
14
1
1
3
2




For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 12:21:07

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.045s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.045s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12086 +0.037s ... 0.082s

#7 got single benchmarks 12086 +0.083s ... 0.165s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.165s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +1.257s ... 1.422s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.422s

#11 Got 885 rows for game benchmarks. +0.167s ... 1.589s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.589s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.036s ... 1.625s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +2.018s ... 3.643s

#15 return log +0.048s ... 3.691s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU graphics card

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 review - Perhaps the best Meteor Lake laptop with a long battery life

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 review - Perhaps the best Meteor Lake laptop with a long battery life

A metal case, Core Ultra 7, 32 GB of RAM, a 3K IPS display, and a good keyboard - the RedmiBook Pro 16 offers all that for less than 1,000 Euros (~$1,066). In a...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 review – Expensive everday laptop with OLED touch screen

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 review – Expensive everday laptop with OLED touch screen

The Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 is Samsung's slim and light notebook for everyday use. It features a recent Meteor Lake processor as well as a high-resolution 120-Hz OL...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | 14.00" | 1.2 kg
LG Gram 17 (2024)

LG Gram 17 (2024) laptop review - Small improvements and a new Core Ultra 7

LG's new Gram has stayed true to the series. From the outside, barely anything has changed about the slim 17-inch device. On the inside, a Meteor Lake processor...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | 17.00" | 1.3 kg
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 review: Smaller and lighter with faster Arc graphics

Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 review: Smaller and lighter with faster Arc graphics

The Yoga 9 2-in-1 G9 improves upon several aspects of the Yoga 9 2-in-1 G8, but some core drawbacks remain including the unfortunate moire effect that makes the...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | 14.00" | 1.3 kg
Acemagic F2A

Acemagic F2A review: AI mini-PC gets Intel's Meteor Lake Core Ultra 7 155H processor along with 32 GB of DDR5 RAM and Wi-Fi 7

Acemagic markets high-performance office PCs with Intel’s latest Meteor Lake processors under the F2A name. We have taken a closer look at the Acemagic F2A with...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | | 768 g

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Laptop Review: Samsung's alternative to the Apple MacBook Air 15

AcePC Wizbox AI: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 0.8 kg
  Review » AcePC Wizbox AI mini PC review: Intel Meteor Lake goes mini

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 laptop review: Dropping GeForce RTX for integrated Intel Arc

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14 G9 laptop review: New smaller size with integrated Co-Pilot key

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 laptop review: Intel Arc confronts Radeon 780M

MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.30", 1 kg
  Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo laptop review - Core Ultra 7 and OLED weighing under 1 kg

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » Asus Zenbook Duo OLED (2024) convertible review: Multitasking champion with Core Ultra 9

HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 2-in-1 Convertible HP Spectre x360 16 (2024) laptop review: A powerful Core-Ultra allrounder with OLED

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 laptop review: First major refresh in three years

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED review - The 1.2-kg subnotebook with 120-Hz OLED and Core Ultra 7

HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » HP Spectre x360 14 review - High-end convertible now with a larger 120-Hz OLED

MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » MSI Prestige 16 B1MG laptop review: From Core i7 Xe to Core Ultra 7 Arc

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » Acer Swift Go 14 review - The Meteor Lake Core Ultra 7 impresses with its AI core

  Review » Intel Meteor Lake Analysis - Core Ultra 7 155H only convinces with GPU performance

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  Review » Intel Meteor Lake Analysis - Core Ultra 7 155H only convinces with GPU performance

LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 17.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED Q425: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED Q425

LG gram Pro 17Z90SP: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 17.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 17Z90SP

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9

LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360, Ultra 7 155H: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360, Ultra 7 155H

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16

MSI Claw: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 7.00", 0.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Claw

HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng

Lenovo Yoga 9 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 9 14IMH9

HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng

MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72

Medion E15443: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Medion E15443

MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 13.30", 1 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » Xiaomi's RedmiBook Pro 16 is a real price-performance champion and one of the best multimedia laptops without dGPU

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
   » Samsung's Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 is too expensive and limited to 16 GB of RAM

AcePC Wizbox AI: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 0.8 kg
   » Our first Meteor Lake mini PC review: AcePC Wizbox AI shows solid gains over Raptor Lake

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 12 with 2.8K OLED, Core Ultra 7 and 32GB RAM already discounted by 51%

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » Asus Zenbook Duo OLED (2024) currently the best multi-screen device on the market

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » The new Asus Zenbook 14 OLED 2024 has one major flaw

HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » HP Spectre x360 14 convertible with 2.8K 120 Hz OLED touchscreen and Meteor Lake processor discounted by up to 32%

   » HP's new Spectre x360 14 convertible impresses with a great OLED panel and quiet cooling

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Acer Swift Go 14 - Smooth gaming on the office laptop with and without XeSS thanks to Meteor Lake

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Xclipse 530

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-12-14)