Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce MX450

NVIDIA GeForce MX450

The Nvidia GeForce MX450 (N18S-G5, N18S-G5-B, N18S-LP codename) is a dedicated entry-level mobile graphics card for laptops. It uses the same TU117 chip as the GeForce GTX 1650 but with a reduced memory bus of 64 Bit. Furthermore, the MX450 is the first mobile GPU with PCIe Gen 4 x4 support. 

Currently four different versions are available with different specifications and performance:

N18S-G5-B: GBD-128 Package, 1395 - 1575 MHz, GDDR6 5001 MHz, 28.5 W
N18S-G5: GB2E-64 Package, 1395 - 1575 MHz, GDDR6 5001 MHz, 25 W
N18S-G5: GB2E-64 Package, 1395 - 1575 MHz, GDDR5 3501 MHz, 25 W
N18S-LP: GB2E-64 Package, 720 - 930 MHz, GDDR6 5001 MHz, 12 W

Especially the LP = Low Power variant is significantly slower than the typical 25 Watt variant.

The 25 Watt GDDR6 N18S-G5 should be up to 20% faster than a GeForce GTX 1050 but of course below a GTX 1650 (Max-Q). Therefore, demanding games like Horizon Zero Dawn should run lowest settings. Less demanding games like F1 2020 can be played in medium to high settings and full HD.

The TU117 chip is manufactured in 12nm at TSMC and thanks to the relatively low power consumption (TGP specified between 12 and 28.5 W) the dGPU is also suited for thin and light laptops. Mostly it is intended as an additional graphics card for Tiger Lake-U based laptops.

GeForce MX300 Series

GeForce MX450 896 @ 1.4 - 1.58 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce MX350 compare 640 @ 1.35 - 1.47 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce MX330 compare 384 @ 1.53 - 1.59 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
CodenameN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines896 - unified
TMUs56
ROPs16
Core Speed1395 - 1575 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed10000 effective = 1250 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5, GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth80 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Transistor Count4.7 Billion
Die Size 200 mm²
technology12 nm
PCIe4.0
FeaturesVulkan 1.1, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 1.2, GPU Boost 3.0, Multi Monitor, Optimus, PCIe 3.0, GameWorks
Date of Announcement01.08.2020

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.2 pt (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1204     avg: 1995     median: 2099 (6%)     max: 2586 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1086     avg: 1796     median: 1900 (5%)     max: 2300 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 302347     avg: 330908     median: 335125 (38%)     max: 365909 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 29368     avg: 50045     median: 48270.5 (6%)     max: 85281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 14229     avg: 18957     median: 18399 (20%)     max: 27571 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 25467     avg: 29167     median: 27570 (7%)     max: 33806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4131     avg: 4649     median: 4306 (8%)     max: 6833 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4336     avg: 4869     median: 4725 (5%)     max: 5753 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 29374     avg: 57100     median: 54872.5 (7%)     max: 88274 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 11448     avg: 13149     median: 12794.5 (6%)     max: 15557 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3693     avg: 4040     median: 3830 (4%)     max: 4597 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6745     avg: 8101     median: 8068 (11%)     max: 9885 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6341     avg: 8129     median: 8250 (7%)     max: 9580 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 84.6     avg: 127     median: 130 (8%)     max: 150 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 30.9     avg: 54.9     median: 59.5 (8%)     max: 68.8 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.4     avg: 54     median: 53.4 (7%)     max: 69.7 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 39.2     avg: 56     median: 55.6 (12%)     max: 73.5 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.2829     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (39%)     max: 0.571 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.2984     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (33%)     max: 0.627 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 37.6     avg: 41.2     median: 40.5 (65%)     max: 46.3 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
45.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
75.8
low 1920x1080
29.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
36.3
low 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280x720
60
low 1920x1080
28.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
47.4
low 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
39.4
low 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Basic Quality Preset T2X SMAA 1280x720
60
low 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
5.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
20.6
low 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
32.7
FIFA 23

FIFA 23

2022
low 1920x1080
57.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Rendering Quality 1280x720
94.7
low 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
46.5
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
54.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
120
low 1920x1080
96.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
50.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
111.6
low 1920x1080
32.7 38.2 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.8 32.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.8 31.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.9 26 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
11.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings 1280x720
65.3
low 1920x1080
37.2 38.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.7 27.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14 15.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.5 13.4 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
87.7
low 1920x1080
30.1 33.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.8 21.9 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.7 13.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
45.9
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
low 1920x1080
6.7 23.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low / Off 1280x720
33.6
low 1920x1080
67.7 88.1 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.8 62 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.7 53.2 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.9 33.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
80.9
low 1920x1080
31 32 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19 31.5 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.2 30.5 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.1 26.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
13.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
46
low 1920x1080
22 25.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7 20 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.8 16.8 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
9.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Quality 1280x720
37.5
low 1920x1080
54 94 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28 39 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26 40 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16 18 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality) 1280x720
98
low 1920x1080
25.8 32.1 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.4 26.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.5 8.7 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
3.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
40.3
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
10.7
0 (!)
med. 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
139.4
low 1280x720
4.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
20.4
low 1280x720
72  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28 40 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23 28 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 13 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
40
56
low 1280x720
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28 39 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23 29 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20 23 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
40
52
low 1280x720
128.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46.3 46.9 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.4 35.3 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.7 33 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
77
73.8
low 1280x720
25.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.3 16.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.8 13.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
12.6
20.4
FIFA 22

FIFA 22

2021
med. 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
75.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Rendering Quality 1920x1080
121
New World

New World

2021
low 1280x720
41.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.9 32 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.1 21.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.5 12.5 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
8.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Video Quality 1920x1080
33.7
30.4
Deathloop

Deathloop

2021
low 1280x720
27.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
6.9 13.5 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.3 11 ~ 9 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
11.1
19.3
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
115 161 174 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40 53 57.7 58.7 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26 37 45.8 46.9 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1920x1080
82
89
92.1
low 1280x720
136  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
63.4 83 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
56.7 72.9 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
44.9 58.1 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
28.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
72.2
92.5
Days Gone

Days Gone

2021
low 1280x720
60.3 77.7 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.7 29.9 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23 26.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.2 15.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
10.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
38.5
51.3
low 1280x720
88.7 90 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
48.6 64.9 ~ 57 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
41.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
24.6 42.2 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13 22.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.4 20.6 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
10.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1920x1080
17.7
28
Outriders

Outriders

2021
low 1280x720
52.6 80 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.8 31.9 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.7 25.9 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16 22.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
17.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
33.8
51.3
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
53.9 79.2 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.7 41.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20 30.3 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.2 26.9 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
17.7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
40
55.6
low 1280x720
33.9 34.2 35.5 39.5 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.6 14 14.5 17.5 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.3 9.4 9.7 11.4 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
3.2 4.1 ~ 4 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
25.9
low 1280x720
41 47 65 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17 18 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11 12 21 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10 11 19 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
66.9 91.7 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.8 34.4 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.9 33.3 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.7 29 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
17.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
53.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
23 33 51 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6 10 17 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5 6 13 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
75.7 92.8 94.2 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.6 25.8 25.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.8 16.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.3 11.4 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
8.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
43 49.2 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24 26.8 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16 20 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6 7.6 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
4.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
low 1280x720
135  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
93.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
89.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
75.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
146  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
64.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
57.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
54.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
53.9 71.9 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.3 33 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.7 29.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
19.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
77.6 86.4 96.6 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.8 14.1 19 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
7.1 10.8 14.1 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
85.9 108 ~ 97 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31 32.2 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.4 17 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
35.8 61 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.3 22.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.7 14.8 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
27
38.5
low 1280x720
37 51 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21 29 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17 24 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6 9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
49.2 55.5 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.8 25.9 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.6 25.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.4 23.7 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
79.7 121 126 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53 54.5 57 57.1 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.1 39.4 39.6 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.3 23.7 24.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
142 187.2 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.3 72 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.7 48.7 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.7 30.7 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
76.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
44.5 63 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.6 25.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1920x1080
39 51.2 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.7 42 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25.6 35.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
25.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
70.8 79.5 80.3 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28.6 31.7 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.3 18.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.3 13.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
51.3
45.4
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
70.8 74.8 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.8 24.7 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15 15.7 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
101.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
59.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
81.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
56 74 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34 35 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26 26 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17 17 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
64  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
34.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
134.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
89.4 99.1 ~ 94 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
44.9 53.2 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.9 41.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.4 31.9 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
74.4 81 99 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30 31.9 36 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21 23.8 26 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14 19 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
54
71
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
61.4 104 106 106 106 124.8 127 127 134 135 135 137.7 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.6 40.5 40.6 40.9 47.7 49.6 49.6 53 53.1 53.1 53.2 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.2 34.2 35.4 35.6 36.1 36.9 42.4 44.8 46.2 46.3 46.6 46.7 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.9 21.6 25 25.2 26 27.7 32.1 32.2 33.1 33.1 36 36.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
13.1 22.4 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
47 63 71 72 73 91 94 96 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24 32 33 34 34 36 41 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26 27 28 29 30 35 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24 26 27 27 28 33 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
19 20 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
41
52
52
low 1280x720
49.9 58.4 62.7 62.8 64.9 64.9 65 68.8 70.4 71.5 78.3 79.6 84.9 86.5 86.8 87.2 87.3 88.3 91.2 94.9 98.5 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.2 41.4 51.3 51.3 53.4 53.4 53.7 54.6 58 60.6 63.5 63.9 64.9 68.3 73.4 73.5 74.1 76.6 77.9 81.6 87.8 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.4 39.6 41.4 44.4 45.1 47 48.5 50.9 51.2 57.4 57.7 59.2 59.3 62.6 62.8 65.6 65.7 66 67.4 71.4 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40.1 41.5 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
27.6 51.5 51.5 52.8 54.1 55.1 55.7 56.2 58.3 58.3 58.8 60.3 65.3 69.3 69.5 72.2 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25 25.1 25.3 25.5 25.5 26 27.5 27.7 31.6 32.9 33 33.4 34.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.7 13.8 14.9 15 16.1 16.2 17.8 18 18 21.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
9.2 12.5 13.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
2.8  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
122.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
36.1 100.9 101 104 109 119 123 123 125 125 126 130 130.1 131 133 135.6 136 136 137 139 144 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.5 90.5 91.5 92.8 95.3 103 109 110 110 111 112 115 115 117 118 118.3 119 121 122.6 126 133 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.4 46.7 75.3 80.7 82.5 85.1 86 86.6 87.2 87.5 87.6 88.6 91.5 92 95.6 102 103 103.1 104 106 115 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.9 42.7 75.2 75.3 77.7 78.6 79.3 79.4 80.2 80.7 81.6 81.9 82.1 82.9 84 87.7 95.5 96.1 97.4 104.6 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.5 33.3 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
92.6 98.1 98.5 99.3 103 107 112 112 121.4 124.9 136 140 ~ 112 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
34 53.8 55.3 57.8 58 58.5 59 59.9 62.4 65 69.7 71 76.8 81.4 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21 28.1 30.7 30.8 32.1 32.5 33 33 33 34 35 39.7 42.2 42.8 43.5 46 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.2 17.7 17.7 18 18 18.6 19.9 19.9 20 22.9 23 23.1 23.6 23.8 24.3 24.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
37.2
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
115 118 125 143.3 151 154 165 172 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
95.8 101 109 113 130.2 135 141 154 160 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.6 50 51.2 51.5 51.7 51.8 52.2 53 66.3 68.1 68.3 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.3 22.8 23 23.4 23.6 23.8 23.9 28.4 30.5 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
10.9 11 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
100.7
120
107
135
76.6
78.4
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
102.3
113
108
141
83.4
83.4
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 v4.0045.832.424.914.1
High On Life29.415.81412.4
The Callisto Protocol34.21587.4
Need for Speed Unbound28.721.413.5
Spider-Man Miles Morales22.92117.611.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 202237331517
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection9.738.415.835.51
A Plague Tale Requiem22.618.312.48.51
FIFA 2357.442.137.833.9
The Quarry3021.114.99.31
F1 2254.749.23622.2
Vampire Bloodhunt96.559.350.733.4
Ghostwire Tokyo3529292511.6
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands38251512
Cyberpunk 2077 1.63222137.6
Elex 21510.76.62
GRID Legends7854462923.812.8
Elden Ring3225242113.5
Dying Light 22418149.4
Rainbow Six Extraction74343317
God of War292283.09
Halo Infinite08.6
Farming Simulator 22795524.219.2
Battlefield 20424.517.84.4
Forza Horizon 572342613
Riders Republic623426228
Back 4 Blood128.3473230
Alan Wake Remastered25.51311
FIFA 2211210375.8
New World41.62921118.7
Deathloop27.71095.81
F1 202115052395.37
Monster Hunter Stories 213673655228.4
Days Gone6928251210.3
Mass Effect Legendary Edition895741.2
Resident Evil Village33181814.710.3
Outriders6628221917.9
Hitman 36736252217.7
Cyberpunk 2077 1.03615104
Immortals Fenyx Rising5120151312
Yakuza Like a Dragon7930292517.9
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War53.920.818.7
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla36118117
Dirt 588231398.6
Watch Dogs Legion46251874.67
FIFA 2113593.789.175.9
Star Wars Squadrons14664.557.754.2
Mafia Definitive Edition63292619.3
Serious Sam 4871511
Crysis Remastered9732159.92
Flight Simulator 20204820137.86
Horizon Zero Dawn44252187
Death Stranding5224232215
F1 2020109553923
Gears Tactics16563432820.2
Doom Eternal54.5
Hunt Showdown76.629.222
Red Dead Redemption 2542310.9
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order45353125.9
Borderlands 377301813
Control732315
Total War: Three Kingdoms101.434.2147.5
Rage 259.310.59.5
Anno 180081.74022.711.8
The Division 265352617
Far Cry New Dawn64343128
Metro Exodus34.817.211.3
Apex Legends134.655.239.335.5
Battlefield V9449383022.4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider8533241713
Strange Brigade11747392918
Far Cry 57633292820
X-Plane 11.1176635541
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark572916122.8
Fortnite122.861.339.324.6
Dota 2 Reborn121108888032
The Witcher 3112623521
GTA V143127542511
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
11
25
28
10
39
26
10
1
51
20
4
49
8
3
27
2

3
2

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 13:56:21

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.059s ... 0.06s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.06s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.06s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10349 +0.033s ... 0.092s

#7 got single benchmarks 10349 +0.071s ... 0.164s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.164s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.807s ... 0.971s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.971s

#11 Got 830 rows for game benchmarks. +0.13s ... 1.101s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.101s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.056s ... 1.157s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +2.912s ... 4.069s

#15 return log +0.046s ... 4.115s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce MX450 graphics card

The GeForce MX450 is falling behind: Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U convertible review

The GeForce MX450 is falling behind: Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U convertible review

An AMD Zen + Nvidia MX ultrabook sounded nice a few years ago, but it's too little too late now that Zen 3+ CPUs are available with the faster, smaller, and mor...
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | 15.60" | 1.9 kg
ASUS ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W with 3K-OLED and Nvidia MX 450

Asus ZenBook 14X OLED Review: Games & Strong 3K Colors

Asus has gone the extra mile: The 14-incher combines the easily adjustable graphics performance of an MX450 with a scalable Tiger Lake Core i7. On top of that, ...
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED review: A subnotebook with a lot of CPU power

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED review: A subnotebook with a lot of CPU power

Optionally, Lenovo also offers its compact 14-inch Yoga Slim 7 Pro subnotebook with an OLED display and dedicated GeForce MX450. At the same time, you also don'...
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E

Asus Zenbook 14X OLED pre-production unit review: That's some punchy colors!

The 14-inch laptop from Asus combines a stunning OLED display with a first-class case that is both sturdy and high-quality. Performance should also be great tha...
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
Dell Inspiron 15 5518 laptop in review: The CPU is slowed down

Dell Inspiron 15 5518 laptop in review: The CPU is slowed down

The Inspiron 15 5518 offers a Core i5-11300H processor, a GeForce-MX450 GPU and 8 GB of working memory. The latter works in single-channel mode. Positive: The n...
Intel Core i5-11300H | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | 15.60" | 1.8 kg

Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J: Intel Core i5-11300H, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  Review » Dell Inspiron 13 5310 review: More graphics, more battery life

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6: Intel Core i5-11300H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 in review: 16-inch all-rounder with good battery life

HP Envy 17-cg: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  Review » HP Envy 17 cg1356ng review: A large multimedia laptop

MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » MSI Modern 14 B11SB review: 14-inch allrounder suffers from heat development

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15: Intel Core i7-11370H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 (2021) in review: Affordable laptop with strong features

HP Pavilion 15-eg: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  Review » HP Pavilion 15 (2021) Laptop Review: 11th Gen Intel and GeForce MX450 Combo

HP Envy 13-ba1475ng: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  Review » HP Envy 13 with Intel Tiger Lake and GeForce MX450 in review

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen2-20W1S00000: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 2 laptop review: Familiar benefits from Intel Tiger Lake

Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen2-20W5S00100: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen2 laptop in review: Business combined with media GPU and Tiger Lake

Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen 2 Review: Tiger Lake laptop with an Nvidia GeForce MX450

Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX435EG Review: A compact, mobile multimedia allrounder with an unnecessary touchscreen

Asus Zenbook Flip 15 UM562UG-AC018WS: AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook Flip 15 UM562UG-AC018WS

HP Envy 17-ch1056nf: Intel Core i7-1195G7, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-ch1056nf

Dell Inspiron 15 5510, i7-11390H MX450: Intel Core i7-11390H, 15.60", 0 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 5510, i7-11390H MX450

Dell Inspiron 15 5518-NP37P: Intel Core i5-11320H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 5518-NP37P

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14IHU5-82NH002QGE: Intel Core i7-11370H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14IHU5-82NH002QGE

Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-59GP: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-59GP

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9

Dell Latitude 15 5521, i5-11500H MX450: Intel Core i5-11500H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 15 5521, i5-11500H MX450

MSI Modern 14 B11SB, i5-1135G7 MX450: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 B11SB, i5-1135G7 MX450

Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400EG, i5-1135G7: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400EG, i5-1135G7

HP Envy 13-ba1002ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 13-ba1002ns

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Carbon 14ACN6, 5800U: AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Carbon 14ACN-6, 5800U

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ARH5-82NK001PSB: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ARH5-82NK001PSB

Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E

HP Envy 13-ba1012ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 13-ba1012ns

HP Pavilion 15-eg0006ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-eg0006ns

HP Pavilion 15-eg0007ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-eg0007ns

HP Envy 17-ch0000ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-ch0000ns

MSI Prestige 15 A11SB-449: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A11SB-449

HP Pavilion 15-eg: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl

MSI Modern 14 B11SB-008ES: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 B11SB-008ES

MSI Modern 15 A11SB-011ES: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 15 A11SB-011ES

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro 15, i5-11300H MX450: Intel Core i5-11300H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro 15, i5-11300H MX450

HP Envy 17-cg1000ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-cg1000ns

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2021, i7-1165G7 MX450: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2021, i7-1165G7 MX450

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15, i5-11300H MX450: Intel Core i5-11300H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15, i5-11300H MX450

HP Pavilion 14-dv0005ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 14-dv0005ns

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ITL05-82FE005QGE: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00"
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ITL05-82FE005QGE

MSI Modern 14 B11SB-009XES: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 B11SB-009XES

HP Envy 13-ba1033tx: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 13-ba1033tx

HP Pavilion 14-dv0065tx: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 14-dv0065tx

HP Pavilion 14-dv0067tx: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 14-dv0067tx

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro

HP Envy 17-cg1490nd : Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-cg1490nd

Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG

MSI Modern 15 A11SB-039RU: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 15 A11SB-039RU

HP Envy 17-cg1279ng: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-cg1279ng

Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U: AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
   » The Nvidia GeForce MX series is struggling against the AMD Radeon 680M

Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Fast MX450 & Flawless OLED: Asus ZenBook 14X Review

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Intel's Alder Lake is slower than AMD's Cezanne Zen 3 at 45W TDP

Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Asus Zenbook 14X OLED: Vibrant display, weak long-term performance

Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J: Intel Core i5-11300H, 13.30", 1.3 kg
   » Overextended cooling: The Dell Inspiron 13 5310

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6: Intel Core i5-11300H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » First place among GeForce MX450 laptops

HP Envy 17-cg: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 17.30", 2.7 kg
   » HP Envy 17 cg1356ng: A multimedia office allrounder

MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » For 1200 Euros (~$1420), MSI only offers working memory in single-channel mode

HP Pavilion 15-eg: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
   » Nvidia gave laptop makers a useless overblown GeForce MX450 3DMark score that has proven impossible to reach

Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen 2: Who would like some Intel, who needs AMD?

Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » 12-Watt GeForce MX450 beats the 25-Watt GeForce-MX350 - Testing the Asus ZenBook 14 UX435EG

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce MX450 N18S-G5 GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-04-11)