Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED review: A subnotebook with a lot of CPU power

With the Yoga Slim 7 Pro, Lenovo offers a compact 14-Zoll subnotebook that distinguishes itself particularly with its powerful 45-Watt processor from AMD. We already had the configuration with the Ryzen 9 5900HX, the integrated Vega 8 GPU, and the IPS display for about 1200 Euros (~$1313) in our test, and now we are taking a look at the model with the Ryzen 9 5900HS in combination with a dedicated GeForce MX450 graphics card and high resolution 90-Hz OLED display for 1399 Euros (~$1531).
We won't discuss the case, the input devices, or speakers in this article again, but we are now interested in the quality of the OLED panel and whether the cooling of the slim laptop is able to handle the additional dedicated GPU. For all the other information, you can take a look at our extensive review of the Yoga Slim 7 Pro (Ryzen 9, iGPU, IPS):
Possible Competitors for Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.8 % | 03/2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 R9 5900HS, GeForce MX450 | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.6 % | 10/2021 | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 16.7 mm | 14.20" | 2520x1680 | |
87.7 % | 01/2022 | SCHENKER Vision 14 i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.1 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
10/2021 | Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | ||
86.1 % | 12/2021 | Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW i7-1165G7, Xe MAX | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
82.2 % | 07/2021 | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Case and Equipment
While we already know the metal case, our current test unit is the lighter color version in light silver. The quality of the Yoga Slim 7 Pro is at a very good level, and there are also no problems with the stability. The keyboard with the dark grey keys and two-step illumination offers a fairly short stroke and its quality is noticeably lower than that of the ThinkPad models, but it should definitely be sufficient for everyday input tasks. We didn't run into any problems with the ClickPad in our test. However, you still shouldn't press down to click it but tap on the pad instead, since it will otherwise produce some very loud clicking noises.
The bottom of the case is secured with a total of seven Torx screws (T5) and can be removed easily. The user will then get access to the fans, the battery, the M.2-2280 SSD, and the WLAN module. However, the working memory is soldered onto the mainboard and can neither be replaced nor expanded.
Although Lenovo has equipped the Yoga with a Wi-Fi 6 module from Broadcom, it is only a 1x1 module. This means that the transfer rate is limited to 866 Mbit/s, which was also confirmed in our test with our Netgear AX12 reference router. However, the transfer rates are still stable, and there shouldn't be any limitations in everyday operation.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Average of class Subnotebook (254 - 1453, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE (424 - 928, n=20) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (182 - 1690, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE (621 - 877, n=20) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E |

Display - Yoga with a high-resolution OLED panel
As was already the case in our earlier test unit, a reflective 14-inch panel with a resolution of 2880 x 1800 pixels (16:10) and 90 Hz refresh rate is also used here, but in this case, it is an OLED display instead of an IPS display. The subjective impression of the image quality is excellent, benefitting particularly from an extremely high contrast ratio. The 90-Hz refresh rate becomes mainly noticeable with movement (such as scrolling through web sites and documents), and in combination with the extremely fast response times of the OLED panel, this leads to an extremely smooth image impression.
The brightness lies at 400 cd/m² at almost all measurement points, resulting in an extremely good brightness distribution of 98%. As expected, the black value is zero, which results in an infinitely high contrast ratio in theory. Due to the OLED technology, light halos are not a problem. However, we measure PWM at brightness levels of 80% or lower. The PWM frequency is at around 360 Hz, which can lead to problems for more sensitive people.
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 399 cd/m²
Contrast: 399000:1 (Black: 0.001 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 2.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 CSOTT3 U17B MNE208ZA1-3, LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.20 | SCHENKER Vision 14 MNE007ZA1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E Samsung SDC4154, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW AU Optronics AUO683D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 BOE CQ NV140FHM-N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 Lenovo LEN8A90, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -21% | -17% | -1% | -18% | -53% | -16% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 67.8 -32% | 74.3 -26% | 100 0% | 71.5 -28% | 39.9 -60% | 76 -24% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98.3 -2% | 97.6 -2% | 100 0% | 99 -1% | 58.8 -41% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.6 | 70.1 -28% | 75.7 -22% | 96 -2% | 72.5 -26% | 41.2 -58% | 75.6 -23% |
Response Times | 1767% | -1125% | 17% | -1484% | -528% | -661% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.4 ? | 37.6 ? -1467% | 40.4 ? -1583% | 2 ? 17% | 48 ? -1900% | 25 ? -942% | 37 ? -1442% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2.4 | 21.6 ? -800% | 18.4 ? -667% | 2 ? 17% | 28 ? -1067% | 16 ? -567% | 15 ? -525% |
PWM Frequency | 362.3 ? | 27780 ? 7568% | 92 ? -75% | 300 ? -17% | |||
Screen | -2551% | -2782% | -1114% | -2379% | -1552% | -3262% | |
Brightness middle | 399 | 419 5% | 407 2% | 379 -5% | 364 -9% | 347 -13% | 392 -2% |
Brightness | 401 | 407 1% | 407 1% | 381 -5% | 372 -7% | 311 -22% | 390 -3% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 93 -5% | 94 -4% | 93 -5% | 89 -9% | 81 -17% | 80 -18% |
Black Level * | 0.001 | 0.23 -22900% | 0.25 -24900% | 0.1 -9900% | 0.19 -18900% | 0.12 -11900% | 0.29 -28900% |
Contrast | 399000 | 1822 -100% | 1628 -100% | 3790 -99% | 1916 -100% | 2892 -99% | 1352 -100% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 1.9 24% | 2.6 -4% | 2.3 8% | 2.18 13% | 5.05 -102% | 3.4 -36% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.6 | 3.6 22% | 4.4 4% | 4.16 10% | 4.01 13% | 16.98 -269% | 6.41 -39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.2 | 0.9 59% | 2 9% | 2.42 -10% | 3.44 -56% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 2.9 -61% | 2.7 -50% | 2.12 -18% | 2.34 -30% | 1.63 9% | 5.44 -202% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.14 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.42 91% | 2.37 93% | 2.3 96% | 2.44 90% |
CCT | 6368 102% | 6733 97% | 6316 103% | 6533 99% | 6666 98% | 6013 108% | |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 69.1 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 100 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -268% /
-1181% | -1308% /
-1953% | -366% /
-714% | -1294% /
-1696% | -711% /
-1011% | -1313% /
-2092% |
* ... smaller is better
We measured the display with the professional CalMAN software (X-Rite i1 Pro 2). The image quality is already good in the state of delivery, since there is no visible tint and the color temperature isn't too cool either. There are some separate outliers in the colors that are above the important deviation target value of 3, and we were also unable to correct this completely with our own calibration. However, thanks to the complete coverage of the DCI-P3 color space (the OLED is also superior to the IPS model in this regard), the Yoga is still suitable for image processing. You can download our calibrated profile for free from the link above.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise | |
↘ ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.3 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 362.3 Hz | ≤ 80 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 362.3 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 362.3 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18694 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
On very bright and sunny days, the brightness is insufficient to reasonably compensate for the reflections on the glossy display. In principle, there are no complaints about the viewing angle stability, but you can still notice the slight blue tint from some specific viewing angles that is typical for OLED displays.
Performance - Yoga Slim Pro with full Ryzen power
Test Conditions
Lenovo offers three different performance profiles in the preinstalled Vantage app: a battery saving mode, intelligent cooling (preset), and highest performance. You can switch between them either via the software or using the Fn+Q key combination. We ran the benchmarks and measurements below with the intelligent cooling preset, since the highest performance mode only offered a small performance increase in the processor (and not the graphics card), which didn't justify the louder fans in our opinion. The battery saving mode reduces the performance very significantly and is mainly suitable if you want a quiet notebook at all times in everyday operation.
Processor - Ryzen 9 5900HS
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS has 8 cores (16 threads) that are based on the Zen 3 architecture. Compared to the 5900HX, the clock speeds are slightly lower, but the performance is practically identical in the case of the Yoga Slim 7 Pro. In the normal mode, the power consumption of the processor remains constant at 42 watts, which leads to very good results. In highest performance mode, the consumption briefly rises to more than 60 watts, but the difference is small under longer load.
Overall, the single-core performance is slightly lower than that of the mobile Intel processors such as the Core i7-11370H, which is currently used in many laptops. However, the quad-cores from Intel have no chance in the multi-core tests, and the Ryzen 9 5900HS offers almost twice the performance at a comparable TDP. The CPU performance is not reduced in battery operation. You can find additional benchmarks here.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (11426 - 13214, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 15102, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Average of class Subnotebook (598 - 1934, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (1457 - 1488, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (4414 - 5167, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (810 - 5912, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (216 - 738, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (560 - 584, n=4) | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (1927 - 2180, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (514 - 2497, n=72, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (211 - 240, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Average of class Subnotebook (91.8 - 276, n=62, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (213 - 1600, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (231 - 305, n=4) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (47553 - 59680, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15347 - 64696, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (5540 - 5804, n=4) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2197 - 6328, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (7767 - 7910, n=3) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2972 - 12304, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (672 - 1975, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (1410 - 1547, n=3) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (12.7 - 15.4, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1.5 - 18.6, n=56, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Subnotebook (40.1 - 120.5, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (50.7 - 54.9, n=4) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.4397 - 1.236, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (0.51 - 0.538, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (12925 - 15146, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (343 - 23871, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (83152 - 96811, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11867 - 101424, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (2863 - 3305, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Average of class Subnotebook (453 - 4325, n=58, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (94614 - 103846, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15447 - 111849, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (11747 - 12597, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1223 - 14157, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (45121 - 53430, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6379 - 53944, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (113708 - 132620, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 113708, n=58, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (743 - 853, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (229 - 982, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (7060 - 7873, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (204 - 12680, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7622 - 49328, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (15082 - 19295, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
System Performance
In the synthetic system benchmarks, the Yoga does very well, which is also confirmed by our subjective impression of the performance during the test. This is a very powerful subnotebook that won't force you to wait for long time periods during everyday operation. We also did not encounter any problems with crashes or other delays.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3303 - 9264, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1876, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1829, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 2080, n=57, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1899, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 |
PCMark 10 Score | 5844 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (19632 - 73486, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (37979 - 39645, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (23471 - 73719, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (40111 - 45459, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22486 - 93382, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (30954 - 36826, n=4) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.8 - 126.5, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS (78.7 - 101, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Solution
Our test unit uses a PCIe 3.0 x4 SSD in the M.2-2280 form factor. The drive comes from SK Hynix (PC711) and offers a 1-TB storage capacity, 904 GB of which are still available to the user after the first startup. Even though the most current PCIe 4.0 standard is not supported yet, the transfer rates are still very good and it won't lead to any bottlenecks in everyday operation. You can find additional SSD benchmarks here.