Notebookcheck Logo

Intel HD Graphics 5300

Intel HD Graphics 5300

The Intel HD Graphics 5300 (GT2) is an integrated Broadwell graphics card revealed in late 2014. It can be found in Core M ULV SoCs such as the Core M-5Y70. While the GPU shines with its extremely low power consumption, raw performance is quite low and barely sufficient for modern games.

Architecture and Features

Broadwell features a GPU based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which has been optimized in various aspects compared to the previous Gen7.5 (Haswell). Inter alia, the shader arrays called "subslice" have been reorganized and now offer 8 Execution Units (EUs) each. Three subslices form a "slice" for a total of 24 EUs. Combined with other improvements such as larger L1 caches and an optimized frontend, the integrated GPU has become faster and more efficient than its predecessor.

The HD Graphics 5300 represents the mid-range version of the Broadwell GPU family and consists of one slice with 24 EUs. Beyond that, there is also a low-end variant (GT1, 12 EUs) as well as higher-end models (GT3/GT3e + eDRAM, 48 EUs).

All Broadwell GPUs support OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11.2. The video engine can now decode H.265 using both fixed function hardware as well as available GPU shaders. Up to three displays can be connected via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz) or HDMI 1.4a (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz). HDMI 2.0, however, is not supported.

Performance

Depending on the specific CPU, the maximum GPU frequency varies between 800 and 900 MHz. Due to the very low TDP, however, the average clock in 3D applications will be significantly lower. Therefore, the HD 5300 just barely outperforms the old HD 4000 or HD 4200, but requires much less energy for the same performance.

Only a few games as of 2014/2015 will run fluently at low settings, e.g. Dota 2 or Sims 4.

Power Consumption

Thanks to a new 14 nm process, the entire Core M chip is specified at just 4.5 W TDP and is suited for passively cooled tablets. The TDP is flexible and can be reduced or increased, which has a significant impact on performance.

HD Graphics Series

HD Graphics P530 compare 24 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5600 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 6000 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4600 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5500 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5000 compare 40 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4400 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5300 24 @ 0.1 - 0.9 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4000 compare 16 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Broadwell) compare 12 @ 0.1 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4200 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Skylake) compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.8 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) compare 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Braswell) compare 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) compare 12 @ 0.32 - 0.64 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Haswell) compare 10 @ 0.2 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) compare 16 @ 0.2 - 0.6 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 3000 compare 12 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2500 compare 6 @ 0.65 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) compare 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2000 compare 6 @ 0.85 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) compare 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Bay Trail) compare 4 @ 0.31 - 0.9 GHz32/64/128 Bit
CodenameBroadwell GT2
ArchitectureGen. 8 Broadwell
Pipelines24 - unified
Core Speed100 - 900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_1), OpenGL 4.3
Transistor Count1.3 Billion
technology14 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement05.09.2014
CPU in HD Graphics 5300GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core M-5Y712 x 1200 MHz, 4.5 W300 MHz900 MHz
Intel Core M-5Y512 x 1100 MHz, 4.5 W300 MHz900 MHz
Intel Core M-5Y702 x 1100 MHz, 4.5 W100 MHz850 MHz
min. - max.100 - 300 MHz800 - 900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.2 pt (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 1361     avg: 3085     median: 3041 (3%)     max: 4274 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 2895     avg: 3862     median: 3720 (1%)     max: 5512 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 327     avg: 413.8     median: 407 (1%)     max: 620 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 352     avg: 453.8     median: 439 (0%)     max: 671 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 27164     avg: 35716     median: 34405 (4%)     max: 48901 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 498     avg: 721     median: 731 (1%)     max: 973 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 458     avg: 648     median: 647 (1%)     max: 885 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 3951     avg: 5044     median: 4775 (6%)     max: 6754 Points
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 0.97     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (1%)     max: 8.44 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 1.07     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (0%)     max: 1.28 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 2.69     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (1%)     max: 6.69 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 0.58     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 1.1 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 2.13     avg: 4     median: 4 (1%)     max: 5.79 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 0.91     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 4.73 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2978     avg: 4412     median: 4018 (3%)     max: 6679 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 11.6     avg: 16.4     median: 15.9 (6%)     max: 23.2 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 16.04     avg: 19     median: 18.4 (1%)     max: 23.64 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 98     avg: 98.1     median: 98 (98%)     max: 99.3 %
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
9.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
4.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
2.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
5.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
2.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
13.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
9.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1366x768
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
6.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
3.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
15.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
2.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
1.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
11 11.9 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.6 8.2 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3 3.1 ~ 3 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
1.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
9.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
1.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
21.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
33 34 39 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20 20 25 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 13 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
7.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
17.8 20.1 23.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.6 13.9 15.9 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.6 7.6 8.5 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.3 14.2 16.7 16.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
4.7 7.9 9.3 10 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.3 5 5.3 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
19.1 21.1 28.2 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.8 16.2 21.2 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
91  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
17.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
48.3 48.6 51.6 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14 16.2 16.5 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.5 12.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
18.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
11.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
8.3 9.3 9.5 10.8 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5.1 5.3 5.5 6.9 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
4.3 4.3 4.4 4.6 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2 2.2 ~ 2 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
26.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
3.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
15.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
91.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
48.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
45.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
24.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
33.1 48 50.9 51.2 53.6 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
21.4 23.2 26.7 28.6 29.7 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.8 12.2 14.9 15.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
13.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
22.5 24.7 27.1 27.4 27.8 28.2 30.8 33.8 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.2 12.3 14.3 14.4 14.6 14.8 15 15.6 18.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.4 10.6 10.8 11.2 11.8 11.9 12.6 13 15.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.9 ~ 3 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
99.5 143.4 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.3 35.7 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18 20.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
23 24.5 27.1 28.9 31 31.3 31.5 35.9 37.4 37.5 39.9 40.3 40.8 49.1 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.7 14 15 15.4 15.7 16.2 16.3 18.1 18.8 18.8 19.8 20 20.5 25.2 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.6 9.1 9.8 10.2 10.6 10.6 10.7 11.8 12.3 12.6 12.8 13.5 14.7 16.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.1 5.4 6.1 7.9 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
12.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
4.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
1.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
19.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
20.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
46.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
53.5 62 73 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.7 49.7 51 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.7 25.1 38 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.8 19.8 23 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
20.2 21.3 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.1 17 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.1 7.2 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
21 28.5 57.1 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17 21.3 31.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12 18 28.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6 20 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
11.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
40.5 45 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.5 20.1 23 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.6 11.6 13 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
19.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
5.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
16.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
40.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
57.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
26.5  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
16.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
18.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
15.4  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
13.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 800x600
16  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
8.1  fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
4.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
33.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
20.3 60 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
14.5 22.7 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
48.1  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
21.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
188  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
52.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
92  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
39 43.6 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
12.6 31 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Mirror's Edge Catalyst12.26.9
Need for Speed 20169.17.7
Hitman 20164.72.1
The Division10.87.3
Far Cry Primal83
XCOM 25.72.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider6.63.9
Rainbow Six Siege13.28.55
Just Cause 39.97.7
Star Wars Battlefront13.87.4
Anno 220510.66.1
FIFA 1626.315.3
World of Warships2617.78.4
Metal Gear Solid V20.612.4
Batman: Arkham Knight54
The Witcher 36.23.7
Dirt Rally4112.5
Battlefield Hardline15.31153.1
Evolve75.12.81.1
Dragon Age: Inquisition11831.6
Far Cry 49.26.83.51.7
Civilization: Beyond Earth21.28.85.84.5
F1 201435221312
The Evil Within86.5
Ryse: Son of Rome7.14.6
Alien: Isolation211484.63
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor1585
Fifa 1523178.3
Sims 49117.68.56.6
Risen 3: Titan Lords17.311.74.6
GRID: Autosport50161312.5
Wolfenstein: The New Order18.311.17.6
Thief9642
X-Plane 10.2526.710.73.93.4
Battlefield 415.211.67.5
Fifa 1491.448.845.221.6
Total War: Rome II24.917.4133.6
Splinter Cell: Blacklist18.211.7
Dota 2472613
Company of Heroes 28.3
GRID 24121.3415
Metro: Last Light13.310.16.13.2
BioShock Infinite2815123
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm12132196.5
SimCity2612.48
Tomb Raider3418126
Crysis 312.57.54.21.7
Dead Space 335.918.313.97.1
Far Cry 319.412.66.5
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2332411.8
Borderlands 220.211.39.54
Guild Wars 246.612.95.6
Counter-Strike: GO63462918
Sleeping Dogs21167
Diablo III36232015
Alan Wake11.26.4
Anno 20704321124.8
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim19.59.25.83.2
Battlefield 316.312.79.7
Deus Ex Human Revolution40.921.5
Dirt 357.426.516.7
Mafia 218.915.413.48.8
Metro 2033168.14.7
Battlefield: Bad Company 233.12516
Risen401916
Resident Evil 548.121.410.3
Trackmania Nations Forever18852.321.8
World of Warcraft9241228
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
46
16
4
2
57
4

46
2

31








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 18:03:25

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Mar 2024 05:34:43 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.068s ... 0.07s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.07s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.07s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 5939 +0.034s ... 0.103s

#7 got single benchmarks 5939 +0.059s ... 0.162s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.162s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.669s ... 0.831s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.831s

#11 Got 556 rows for game benchmarks. +0.047s ... 0.878s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.878s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.046s ... 0.924s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.968s ... 2.892s

#15 return log +0.073s ... 2.965s

Notebook reviews with Intel HD Graphics 5300 graphics card

Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE Convertible Review

Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE Convertible Review

A lot of room for improvements. Lenovo charges around 1,000 Euros ($1112) for the Yoga 3 Pro. You will get a thin and attractive 13.3-inch convertible with a fo...
Intel Core M-5Y70 | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | 13.30" | 1.2 kg
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 Tablet Review

Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 Tablet Review

Business tablet. The Stylistic Q665 is primarily aimed at companies. Its configuration and the available accessories are tailored for this group of customers. I...
Intel Core M-5Y31 | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | 11.60" | 1.5 kg
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet Review

Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet Review

Tough. Rugged devices sometimes have to operate under the most adverse conditions. Dell's Latitude 12 Rugged tablet presents itself as a robust workhorse with s...
Intel Core M-5Y71 | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | 11.60" | 1.8 kg
Acer Aspire Switch 11V SW5-173-614T

Acer Aspire Switch 11V SW5-173-614T Convertible Review

Rarity. The conventional hard drive in the dock makes Acer unique in the market. However, other features are disappointing, and thus, a list of controversial pr...
Intel Core M-5Y10c | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | 11.60" | 1.6 kg
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 Convertible Review

HP Elite x2 1011 G1 Convertible Review

Limited performance. HP advertises its new business detachable as: "The one device you need...". In fact, the Elite x2 is a versatile multi-talent, but it ultim...
Intel Core M-5Y51 | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | 11.60" | 1.7 kg

Asus Zenbook UX305FA-FC004H: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  Review » Asus Zenbook UX305FA Subnotebook Review

Lenovo Yoga 3 11 80J8001WGE: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 11.60", 1.1 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga 3 11 Convertible Review

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz: Intel Core M-5Y31, 12.00", 0.9 kg
  Review » Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz Review

  Review » Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) Notebook Preview

Asus Transformer Book T300FA-FE001H: Intel Core M-5Y10, 12.50", 1.6 kg
  Review » Asus Transformer Book T300FA Convertible Review

Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C: Intel Core M-5Y71, 12.50", 1.5 kg
  Review » Toshiba Portege Z20t-B Convertible Review

HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1: Intel Core M-5Y51, 12.50", 1.2 kg
  Review » HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 Ultrabook Review

Asus Transformer Book T300 Chi: Intel Core M-5Y71, 12.50", 1.4 kg
  Review » Asus Transformer Book T300 Chi Convertible Review

Acer Aspire Switch 12 SW5-271-61X7: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 12.50", 1.5 kg
  Review » Acer Aspire Switch 12 Convertible Review

Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  Review » Asus Zenbook UX305 Subnotebook Review

Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2: Intel Core M-5Y71, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2 Tablet Review

Dell Latitude 13 7350: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.7 kg
  Review » Dell Latitude 13 7350 Convertible Review

Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140: Intel Core M-5Y10a, 10.80", 1.4 kg
  Review » Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 Convertible Tablet Review

HP Envy x2 15-c000ng: Intel Core M-5Y10, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  Review » HP Envy x2 15-c000ng Convertible Review

Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro: Intel Core M-5Y70, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  Review » Intel Core M-5Y70 "Broadwell" Review

HP Envy X2-j001ng: Intel Core M-5Y70, 13.30", 1.8 kg
  Review » HP Envy x2-j001ng Convertible Review

Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro: Intel Core M-5Y70, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro Convertible Review

  Review » First Impressions: Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro in Review

Fujitsu Stylistic Q665: Intel Core M-5Y31, 11.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu Stylistic Q665

Asus UX305FA-FB033H: Intel Core M-5Y71, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus UX305FA-FB033H

Acer Aspire Switch 11V SW5-173-63NV: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 11.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Switch 11V SW5-173-63NV

HP EliteBook Folio 1020, Core M-5Y71: Intel Core M-5Y71, 12.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook Folio 1020, Core M-5Y71

Asus UX305FA-FB012H: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus UX305FA-FB012H

Lenovo ThinkPad Helix-20CG0019GE: Intel Core M-5Y71, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Helix-20CG0019GE

Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10E: Intel Core M-5Y31, 12.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10E

Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet: Intel Core M-5Y71, 11.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet

Acer Aspire Switch 11V-SW5-173-62J8: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 11.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Switch 11V-SW5-173-62J8

Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C: Intel Core M-5Y71, 12.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C

HP Elite x2 1011 G1: Intel Core M-5Y51, 11.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP Elite x2 1011 G1

Lenovo ThinkPad Helix-20CG001BMH: Intel Core M-5Y71, 11.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Helix-20CG001BMH

Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-107: Intel Core M-5Y51, 12.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-107

Acer Aspire Switch 11 V SW5-173: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 11.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Switch 11 V SW5-173

Asus Zenbook UX305FA-FB033H: Intel Core M-5Y71, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook UX305FA-FB033H

Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10: Intel Core M-5Y71, 12.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10

HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1: Intel Core M-5Y51, 12.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1

Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10G: Intel Core M-5Y51, 12.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10G

Asus UX305FA-FB041H: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus UX305FA-FB041H

Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2-20CHS02A00: Intel Core M-5Y70, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2-20CHS02A00

HP Pavilion 11-n108TU x360: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 11-n108TU x360

Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-103: Intel Core M-5Y51, 12.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-103

Asus Transformer Book T300FA-FE001H: Intel Core M-5Y10, 12.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Transformer Book T300FA-FE001H

Lenovo Yoga 3 11 80J8001WGE: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 11.60", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 3 11 80J8001WGE

HP Elite x2 1011 G1-L8D67UT: Intel Core M-5Y71, 11.60", 0.9 kg
  External Review » HP Elite x2 1011 G1-L8D67UT

Lenovo Yoga 3 11: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 11.60", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 3 11

Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140: Intel Core M-5Y10a, 10.80", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140

Asus Transformer Book T300 Chi: Intel Core M-5Y71, 12.50", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Transformer Book T300 Chi

Samsung 930X2K-K02US: Intel Core M-5Y31, 12.20", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Samsung 930X2K-K02US

Asus Zenbook UX305FA-FC007H: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook UX305FA-FC007H

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz: Intel Core M-5Y31, 12.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz

HP Envy x2 15-c000ng: Intel Core M-5Y10, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x2 15-c000ng

Acer Aspire Switch 12 SW5-271-61X7: Intel Core M-5Y10c, 12.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Switch 12 SW5-271-61X7

Asus Zenbook UX305FA-ASM1: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook UX305FA-ASM1

Asus Zenbook UX305FA-FC008H: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook UX305FA-FC008H

Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2: Intel Core M-5Y71, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2

Toshiba Portege Z20t-B2112: Intel Core M-5Y71, 12.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portege Z20t-B2112

Acer Aspire Switch 12: Intel Core M-5Y10a, 12.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Switch 12

HP Envy X2-j001nf: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Envy X2-j001nf

Dell Latitude 13 7350: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 13 7350

Asus Transformer Book T300FA-FE010H: Intel Core M-5Y10a, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Transformer Book T300FA-FE010H

HP Elitebook Folio 1020: Intel Core M-5Y51, 12.50", 1 kg
  External Review » HP Elitebook Folio 1020

HP Envy X2-j001ng: Intel Core M-5Y70, 13.30", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Envy X2-j001ng

Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro: Intel Core M-5Y70, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro

Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H: Intel Core M-5Y10, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook UX305

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter