Notebookcheck Logo

Intel HD Graphics 5000

Intel HD Graphics 5000

The Intel HD Graphics 5000 (GT3) is a processor graphics card included in some of the ULV Haswell processors of 2013 (e.g. Core i5-4250U). It represents the highest configuration of the integrated graphics unit (40 execution units), but lacks the additional eDRAM cache of the Iris Pro Graphics 5200. The relatively low base clock can be automatically overclocked using Turbo Boost technology. Depending on the processor model, the base and turbo clock rates may differ, resulting in varying graphics performance between CPU models.

In comparison to the HD 4000, the graphics core has been modified extensively. The GPU supports DirectX 11.1, OpenCL 1.2 and OpenGL 4.0. It also features an improved decoder for 4K videos and the fast Quick Sync encoder.

According to benchmarks in 3DMark 11, the HD Graphics 5000 is up to 50 percent faster than the previous HD 4000. In games, however, the performance advantage is significantly lower. With simultaneous load on the CPU, the low TDP of the ULV models (15 W) limits the Turbo Boost of the GPU. Although the HD 5000 features 40 Execution Units, the graphics performance is still somewhat below the HD Graphics 4600 with only 20 EUs (HD 4000: 16 EUs). Overall, the HD 5000 is thus just behind the AMD Radeon HD 7660G and at the level of a dedicated Radeon HD 7650M. Current games (as of 2013) will run fluently in low to medium-low settings.

Due to the 22nm 3D Tri-Gate production process, power consumption is relatively low. The HD Graphics 5000 is available on certain ULV dual-core Haswell models in the 15 Watt TDP range.

HD Graphics Series

HD Graphics P530 compare 24 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5600 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 6000 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4600 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5500 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5000 40 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4400 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5300 compare 24 @ 0.1 - 0.9 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4000 compare 16 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Broadwell) compare 12 @ 0.1 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4200 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Skylake) compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.8 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) compare 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Braswell) compare 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) compare 12 @ 0.32 - 0.64 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Haswell) compare 10 @ 0.2 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) compare 16 @ 0.2 - 0.6 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 3000 compare 12 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2500 compare 6 @ 0.65 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) compare 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2000 compare 6 @ 0.85 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) compare 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Bay Trail) compare 4 @ 0.31 - 0.9 GHz32/64/128 Bit
CodenameHaswell GT3
ArchitectureGen. 7.5 Haswell
Pipelines40 - unified
Core Speed200 - 1100 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.0
technology22 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement05.06.2013
CPU in HD Graphics 5000GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-4650U2 x 1700 MHz, 15 W200 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Core i7-4550U2 x 1500 MHz, 15 W200 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Core i5-4360U2 x 1500 MHz, 15 W200 MHz1100 MHz
min. - max.200 MHz1000 - 1100 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.3 pt (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 4331     avg: 4586     median: 4496.5 (5%)     max: 5059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 5381     avg: 5981     median: 5693.5 (1%)     max: 6762 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 35584     avg: 41867     median: 40454 (5%)     max: 52302 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 962     avg: 1088     median: 1125.5 (2%)     max: 1163 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 859     avg: 993     median: 1033.5 (1%)     max: 1072 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 4751     avg: 5775     median: 5940 (8%)     max: 6160 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 sw-02 +
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
specvp11 ensight-04 +
specvp11 catia-03 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 5143     avg: 6901     median: 6946.5 (5%)     max: 7959 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 15.01     avg: 19.6     median: 19.6 (7%)     max: 24.76 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
19.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
20.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
12.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
17.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
14.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
5.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
25.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
15.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
51  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
14.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
14.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
28.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
20.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
13  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
36.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
168.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
28.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
85.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
17 18.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.9 11.6 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
27.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
22.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Titanfall

Titanfall

2014
low 1024x768
33.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
11.9 14.8 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.4 9.7 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
28.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
51  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
165.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
100.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
71.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
39.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
59.6 69.8 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.5 36.8 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.4 15.5 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
13.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
58.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
18.8 18.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.9 13.9 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.6 10.4 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
32 34.3 34.3 38.3 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17 20.1 20.9 22.5 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14 14.2 16.6 18.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
44 52.5 53.9 54.3 55.3 56 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23 25 26 27.5 28.3 28.6 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14 14.9 15 15.8 17.4 17.5 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.9 8 9.5 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
20.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
28.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1366x768
16.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
22.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
40.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Torchlight 2

Torchlight 2

2012
low 1024x768
83  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
54 58 59 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38 42 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
31 32 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 19 21 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
57.8 59.2 61 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30 32.2 32.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.2 18 20.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
29.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
126 169 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
38 43 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
24 26 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10 16 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
122  fps    + Compare
ultra 1280x1024
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
162  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
78  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
31  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V19.2164.42.6
Battlefield Hardline20.815.174.3
Evolve12.79.65.52.9
The Crew15.810.6
Dragon Age: Inquisition17.4124.52.1
Far Cry 414.310.6
Assassin's Creed Unity5.4
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare25.416.29.7
Civilization: Beyond Earth15.512.2
F1 201451352013
The Evil Within14.210.6
Ryse: Son of Rome14.79.2
Alien: Isolation28.920.911.4
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor20.1137.2
Fifa 1536.228.117.4
Sims 4168.332.814.210
Risen 3: Titan Lords28.717.66.65.2
GRID: Autosport85.730.214.912.5
Watch Dogs1811
Wolfenstein: The New Order27.222.110.7
Titanfall33.220.213.2
Thief1397.63.9
Call of Duty: Ghosts2420.56.2
Battlefield 428.619.913.3
F1 201351342812
Fifa 14165.1100.271.439.3
Total War: Rome II39.829.421.66.6
Dota 2653415
Company of Heroes 213.310.46
GRID 258.631.322.712.5
Metro: Last Light191410
BioShock Infinite3520167.7
Tomb Raider5326168
Crysis 320.8912.989.44
Far Cry 328.5819.187.07
Assassin´s Creed III16.5611.23
Hitman: Absolution22.315.77.3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 240.52814.1
Torchlight 2834628
Diablo III57403218
Anno 20705932189
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim29.518.411.6
Total War: Shogun 288.8
StarCraft 2148412513
Anno 140412218
World of Warcraft16278319
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
25
11
4
5
30
10
2
32
2
1
22
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 19:37:20

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Mar 2024 05:34:43 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.056s ... 0.057s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.057s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.057s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4574 +0.033s ... 0.09s

#7 got single benchmarks 4574 +0.026s ... 0.116s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.116s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.855s ... 0.97s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.97s

#11 Got 197 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.988s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.988s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.037s ... 1.025s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.307s ... 2.333s

#15 return log +0.047s ... 2.38s

Notebook reviews with Intel HD Graphics 5000 graphics card

Asus ASUSPRO BU201LA Subnotebook Review

Asus ASUSPRO BU201LA Subnotebook Review

Limited stamina. Asus can compete with the established competitors from Lenovo, Dell, Fujitsu and HP with the 12-inch business subnotebook called BU201LA. It co...
Intel Core i7-4650U | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | 12.50" | 1.3 kg
Asus AsusPro Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G Ultrabook Review

Asus AsusPro Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G Ultrabook Review

Quality for little money? Asus wants to put the competition under pressure with affordable business laptops and equips its new 14-inch flagship with the current...
Intel Core i7-4650U | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | 14.00" | 1.7 kg
Apple MacBook Air 13 MD761D/B 2014-06

Apple MacBook Air 13 MD761D/B 2014-06 Notebook Review Update

Heart transplant. The new Apple MacBook Air 13 Mid 2014 is once again an evolution instead of a revolution, because there are not many differences compared to t...
Intel Core i5-4260U | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | 13.30" | 1.4 kg
Review Update HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G1 (F2R72UT) Ultrabook

Review Update HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G1 (F2R72UT) Ultrabook

Business luxury. Our latest Folio 1040 G1 review unit arrived with a 1080p IPS display panel and an upgraded CPU—not to mention a bevy of preloaded security sof...
Intel Core i7-4650U | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
Review Update Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Touch 20A7-002DGE Ultrabook

Review Update Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Touch 20A7-002DGE Ultrabook

Luxury for the executive level. Ultrabooks are normally designed for home users – but that's not always the case. Lenovo's ThinkPad X1 Carbon, for example, targ...
Intel Core i7-4550U | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | 14.00" | 1.4 kg

Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2013-06 1.7 GHz 256 GB: Intel Core i7-4650U, 11.60", 1.1 kg
  Review » Review Apple MacBook Air 11 inch Mid 2013 1.7 GHz 256 GB Subnotebook

Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2013 MD760D/A: Intel Core i5-4250U, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  Review » Review Apple MacBook Air 13 Mid 2013 MD760D/A Subnotebook

Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2013-06 MD711D/A: Intel Core i5-4250U, 11.60", 1.1 kg
  Review » Review Apple MacBook Air 11 Mid 2013 i5 1.3 GHz 128 GB

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Touch 20A7-002DGE: Intel Core i7-4550U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Touch 20A7-002DGE

Apple MacBook Air 13" Mid 2013: Intel Core i7-4650U, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Air 13" Mid 2013

Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2014-06 MD711LL/B: Intel Core i5-4260U, 11.60", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2014-06 MD711LL/B

Apple MacBook Air 13 MD761D/B 2014-06: Intel Core i5-4260U, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Air 13 MD761D/B 2014-06

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Touch-G2: Intel Core i7-4550U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Touch-G2

Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon-20A7003UBM: Intel Core i7-4550U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon-20A7003UBM

Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon-20A7005JGE: Intel Core i7-4550U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon-20A7005JGE

Sony Vaio Tap 11: Intel Core i5-4210Y, 11.60", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio Tap 11

Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2013-06 MD711D/A: Intel Core i5-4250U, 11.60", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2013-06 MD711D/A

Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2013 MD760D/A: Intel Core i5-4250U, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2013 MD760D/A

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter