Notebookcheck Logo

Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs

The Intel UHD Graphics 80EUs (12th Gen Alder Lake GPU, Xe Architecture with 80 EUs) is an integrated graphics card in the mid range Alder-Lake CPUs. It is using the new Xe architecture (Gen12) and was introduced with the Alder Lake-H series. In theoretical benchmarks the GPU is on par with the Radeon RX Vega 8 (iGPU of Ryzen 4000 CPUs) but in games the performance is a bit worse due to less optimized drivers (in 2022). E.g. in our tests only low demanding games like GRID Legends were playable in low settings.

The SoC is manufactured in an improved 10nm process (called Intel 7).

Gen. 12 / Xe Series

Iris Xe G7 96EUs compare 96 @ 0.4 - 1.35 GHz
Iris Xe G7 80EUs compare 80 @ 0.4 - 1.35 GHz
UHD Graphics 64EUs 64 @ 1.4 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compare 48 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics 32EUs compare 32 @ 1.25 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compare 32 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compare 32 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) compare 24 @ 0.45 - 0.75 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compare 16 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
CodenameAlder Lake Xe
ArchitectureGen. 12
Pipelines64 - unified
Core Speed1400 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
technology10 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement04.01.2022
CPU in UHD Graphics 64EUsGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-13620H10 x 1800 MHz, 45 W? MHz1500 MHz
Intel Core i7-12650H10 x 1700 MHz, 45 W? MHz1400 MHz
Intel Core i3-1220P10 x 1100 MHz, 28 W? MHz1100 MHz
min. - max.? MHz850 - 1500 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.8 pt (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 935     avg: 1206     median: 1243 (4%)     max: 1537 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 830     avg: 1056     median: 1106 (3%)     max: 1336 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 192047     avg: 233684     median: 209544 (24%)     max: 279392 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 44105     avg: 77363     median: 82608 (11%)     max: 92077 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 15139     avg: 18914     median: 18265 (20%)     max: 24767 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 19949     avg: 21951     median: 21383 (6%)     max: 27185 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2275     avg: 3387     median: 3494 (6%)     max: 4318 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2592     avg: 3635     median: 3891 (4%)     max: 4567 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 59484     avg: 109652     median: 119715 (14%)     max: 128009 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1719     avg: 2343     median: 2342.5 (3%)     max: 2966 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 4116     avg: 5210     median: 5324 (7%)     max: 6259 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 3886     avg: 4678     median: 5030 (4%)     max: 5566 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 15454     avg: 18595     median: 18748.5 (5%)     max: 22757 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 12674     avg: 15409     median: 16126 (9%)     max: 18466 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 26272     avg: 35662     median: 36705 (40%)     max: 41013 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 22825     avg: 26660     median: 25362 (33%)     max: 33042 Points
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 38.3     avg: 40.7     median: 38.9 (10%)     max: 44.5 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 2.81     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 3.89 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 5.06     avg: 6     median: 6.1 (1%)     max: 6.68 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 13.1     avg: 14.3     median: 15 (3%)     max: 15.7 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 32.1     avg: 36.8     median: 38.2 (4%)     max: 41.3 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 26.5     avg: 30.3     median: 32.4 (5%)     max: 33.1 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 32.7     avg: 39.6     median: 42.8 (5%)     max: 49.6 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 29.3     avg: 32.4     median: 34.1 (6%)     max: 36 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
min: 5.05     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (2%)     max: 5.1 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 0.78     avg: 1.2     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 2.54 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 15.3     avg: 16.8     median: 15.4 (3%)     max: 21.2 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 0.52     avg: 1     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 1.9 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 9.17     avg: 10.2     median: 9.4 (4%)     max: 12.7 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 5.24     avg: 5.8     median: 5.3 (3%)     max: 7.63 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 6.95     avg: 7.4     median: 7 (3%)     max: 8.65 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 14413     avg: 17390     median: 17783 (13%)     max: 19969 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 68.25     avg: 83.7     median: 81.5 (28%)     max: 95.55 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 74.5     avg: 94.5     median: 93.4 (5%)     max: 117.3 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
17.9 fps (7%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
118.5 fps (9%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
320.3 fps (3%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 157.9     median: 148 (1%)     max: 289 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 8.7     median: 9.4 (2%)     max: 11.6 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 8359     avg: 10212     median: 11174 (3%)     max: 12297 points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 10236     avg: 12504     median: 13760 (4%)     max: 14850 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 1164     avg: 1623     median: 1717 (3%)     max: 2059 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 1724     avg: 2185     median: 2353 (3%)     max: 2657 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.6     avg: 44.1     median: 42.2 (6%)     max: 62.1 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.4     avg: 46     median: 47.6 (7%)     max: 66.5 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 34.5     avg: 41.5     median: 34.9 (8%)     max: 55.2 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.2023     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (22%)     max: 0.25 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.1789     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (18%)     max: 0.25 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 36.2     avg: 39.5     median: 38.3 (61%)     max: 45.2 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
24.2 24.6 28.6 31.1 32.3 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.6 22.1 26.2 28.3 29.2 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.8 15.2 18.2 19.5 19.9 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.1 15.1 15.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
46
47.1
57
57.7
49.8
low 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1280x720
48.2
low 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1280x720
22
low 1920x1080
24.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
34.9
low 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
24.2
low 1920x1080
11.7 (!)  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
18.9 (!)
low 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
50.1
low 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280x720
33
low 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
33.1
low 1920x1080
22.4 (!)  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.5 (!)  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.5 (!)  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
35.9 (!)
low 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Basic Quality Preset T2X SMAA 1280x720
39
low 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
17.9
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
27.1 27.3 27.9 31.7 34.4 35.2 37.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.3 24.5 24.9 29.4 31.3 31.9 34 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.2 17.5 17.7 21.1 21.9 22.1 24.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.4 13.5 13.6 16.6 17.3 17.3 18.8 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
66.2
50.2
48.4
49.8
61.5
61.2
56.4
low 1920x1080
63.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
38.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
31.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
107.3
low 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings 1280x720
35.6
low 1920x1080
16.7 17.6 19.4 22.9 25.1 25.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.7 13.8 16.4 17.8 19.6 19.9 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.3 8.7 10.6 11 12.1 12.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6 6.4 6.7 8.1 9.3 9.7 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
48.2
46.8
32.3
29.4
43.6
27
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
31.8
low 1920x1080
56.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
80.8
low 1920x1080
35.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
54.4
low 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality) 1280x720
66
low 1920x1080
13.1 18.8 ~ 16 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.3 16.6 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.9 13.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
28.3
20.4
med. 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
13.4
low 1280x720
55  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
33
low 1280x720
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
22
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
44.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
26.3
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
68.4 69.2 71.5 76.9 82.9 84.8 92.1 96.3 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.4 31.1 31.4 34.8 38 39 42.6 44.1 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.4 24.8 25.2 27.6 30.3 30.7 33.2 35.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16 16.1 16.2 19.7 20.7 20.9 22.5 24.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
71  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
13.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
40.8
low 1280x720
31  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
41.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
27  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
19.2
low 1280x720
41.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
58.2 60.2 67 72.1 73 78.4 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.5 28.3 32.4 35.1 35.5 38.2 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.5 21 25.7 26.6 26.9 29 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.9 13 16.8 16.9 16.9 18.3 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
109.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
49.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
57.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
31.4 32.2 32.9 36.8 42.2 43.2 46 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.9 14.2 14.4 16.7 18.6 19.1 20.1 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.3 8.5 8.5 10.7 11.2 11.4 12.1 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6 6.2 6.2 8 8.3 8.3 9 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
30.3
21.6
20.9
21.4
27.8
28.7
25.7
low 1280x720
45  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
33 34 34 35 44 45 48 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17 17 17 19 23 23 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16 16 16 18 22 22 23 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15 15 15 16 20 20 21 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
22.3 27.3 27.5 33.1 33.2 37.6 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.1 12.3 12.9 15.9 15.9 17 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.5 9.6 10 11.7 11.7 12.5 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.7 7.9 8 9.5 9.5 10.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
33.4 34.2 34.9 36.1 40.5 40.7 41.2 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15 15.3 15.5 17.7 18.8 19.2 19.9 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.1 14.3 16.5 17.6 17.9 18.8 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.9 14.1 15 15.2 15.7 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
30.2
24.7
23.9
24.3
29.1
29.8
27.2
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
47.9 61.7 63.4 67.4 76.4 77.3 78.1 84.5 89.1 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.9 25.1 25.1 29.9 32.2 32.3 32.4 34.5 38.6 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.3 19.8 19.9 23.3 25.5 25.5 25.6 27.2 30 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 16.8 16.8 20.2 20.3 20.5 22.1 24.4 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
25 35 36 36 36 46 46 50 53 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13 17 17 17 18 22 22 24 25 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16 16 16 17 21 21 22 23 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14 15 15 16 19 19 21 21 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
28
27
19
19
19
25
26
21
low 1280x720
29.1 34.2 36.2 36.8 41.3 43 47.6 48.1 52.6 61 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.2 24.4 24.9 25.3 31.2 33.1 34.3 34.4 39.7 42.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.5 21.9 22 23.3 26 27.1 29.6 29.7 35.4 38 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
21.9 28.1 29.3 30.6 31.8 36.1 36.2 38.2 39.6 39.9 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.4 14.5 15.3 16.5 17.4 19.1 19.4 20.1 21.4 21.9 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.4 10.4 11 11.3 13 13.5 13.8 14.5 15.2 21.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
76 100.7 106.2 106.9 112.4 115.2 119.5 125.5 133.3 134.7 134.7 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.1 70.5 74.6 79.2 84.1 84.7 86.5 88.9 93.4 99.6 100.9 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.1 43.3 44.4 44.7 47.9 48.3 54.8 55 57.8 58.3 62.7 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.4 40.4 41 41.6 43.9 45.1 50.2 50.7 53.3 54 57.5 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
48 51 59.5 60.8 62.4 64.3 74 77.3 78.9 80.8 85.3 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
31 36.4 37 37.5 39 41.5 48.9 49.8 52.4 56 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15 19.2 20 20 20.2 22.7 25.7 26.2 26.9 30.1 30.2 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
7.1 9.6 10 10.2 10.2 11 11.4 11.4 11.9 13.1 13.8 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
31.6
23.9
22.4
23.7
24.9
30.6
27.1
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
55.6 92.6 97.7 108.8 108.9 116.1 117.3 118.3 129.9 141.9 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.5 71.8 83 90.1 91.9 97.1 97.4 100.9 113.4 121.2 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.6 14.4 14.6 16.4 16.9 17.1 17.6 18.5 20.8 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.2 6.3 7.1 7.1 7.4 8 8.9 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
5.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
81.1
63.3
73.4
61.5
59.2
61.3
70.4
70
60.5
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
95.1
74
61.2
58.8
60.7
72.3
71.4
61.4
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2328251815
Company of Heroes 323.321.416.7
Sons of the Forest12.4
Atomic Heart24.417.512.5
Hogwarts Legacy17.111.6
Dead Space Remake11.7
High On Life33.420.118.2
The Callisto Protocol19.713.6
Need for Speed Unbound20.817.114.1
Spider-Man Miles Morales22.419.518.5
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022242118
The Quarry13.8
F1 2232292016
Vampire Bloodhunt63.238.931.428.1
Ghostwire Tokyo18.618.618.418.1
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands2117118
Cyberpunk 2077 1.61814.711.3
GRID Legends56.141.634.425.320.2
Elden Ring35.529.124.720.3
Rainbow Six Extraction332524
God of War1614116.64
Halo Infinite12.1
Forza Horizon 5552522
Riders Republic30191513
Far Cry 644.821.617.514.7
F1 202180362920
Hitman 37130.924.622.513.8
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla311815
Dirt 541.417.614.6
Flight Simulator 20202712.5
Death Stranding41.723.822.321.6
F1 202068332516
Gears Tactics109.941.725.417.6
Doom Eternal49.82522.622.2
Hunt Showdown57.32217.9
Borderlands 33817107
The Division 2452216
Far Cry New Dawn39201917
Metro Exodus3014119
Shadow of the Tomb Raider37171714
Strange Brigade72302418
Far Cry 54019191814
X-Plane 11.11433127
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark331813
Dota 2 Reborn115845047
The Witcher 367432311
GTA V109911675.61
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
16
21
9
33
9
2
37
3

24
1

4





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 01:01:53

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.067s ... 0.068s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.068s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.068s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11122 +0.044s ... 0.112s

#7 got single benchmarks 11122 +0.083s ... 0.195s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.195s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +1.411s ... 1.605s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.605s

#11 Got 583 rows for game benchmarks. +0.108s ... 1.713s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.713s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.039s ... 1.752s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.948s ... 3.699s

#15 return log +0.06s ... 3.759s

Notebook reviews with Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) graphics card

Nipogi AD08 mini PC review: The stylish PC with an Intel Core i7-12650H features a mini-tower design and three power modes

Nipogi AD08 mini PC review: The stylish PC with an Intel Core i7-12650H features a mini-tower design and three power modes

NiPoGi has given its AD08 an Intel Core i7-12650H which delivers enough performance to master everyday office tasks. As a compact gaming PC taking on a tower fo...
Intel Core i7-12650H | Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) | | 878 g
Nipogi AD08 mini PC review: The stylish PC with an Intel Core i7-12650H features a mini-tower design and three power modes

Nipogi AD08 mini PC review: The stylish PC with an Intel Core i7-12650H features a mini-tower design and three power modes

NiPoGi has given its AD08 an Intel Core i7-12650H which delivers enough performance to master everyday office tasks. As a compact gaming PC taking on a tower fo...
Intel Core i7-12650H | Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) | | 878 g
Nipogi AD08 mini PC review: The stylish PC with an Intel Core i7-12650H features a mini-tower design and three power modes

Nipogi AD08 mini PC review: The stylish PC with an Intel Core i7-12650H features a mini-tower design and three power modes

NiPoGi has given its AD08 an Intel Core i7-12650H which delivers enough performance to master everyday office tasks. As a compact gaming PC taking on a tower fo...
Intel Core i7-12650H | Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) | | 878 g
HP 250 G9 review - An affordable office laptop with a Core i3 and an IPS panel

HP 250 G9 review - An affordable office laptop with a Core i3 and an IPS panel

With the 250 G9, HP is offering a reasonably-priced 15.6-inch office laptop equipped with an Intel Core i3 processor and a matte IPS display - all of which can ...
Intel Core i3-1215U | Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) | 15.60" | 1.7 kg
Geekom Mini IT12

Geekom Mini IT12 with Intel Core i5-12450H in review - Mini PC with good performance and two USB 4 ports

The Geekom Mini IT12 follows the well-known Intel NUC design. Equipped with a mobile Intel Alder Lake SoC featuring 8 cores and 12 threads, we thoroughly examin...
Intel Core i5-12450H | Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) | | 572 g

NiPoGi CK10: Intel Core i5-12450H, 0.5 kg
  Review » NiPoGi CK10 review - The mini PC with an Intel Core i5-12450H and 16 GB RAM falls short of expectations

Minisforum Venus Series UN1245: Intel Core i5-12450H, 0.5 kg
  Review » Minisforum Venus Series UN1245 review: A powerful mini PC with an Intel Core i5-12450H starting at $310

GMK NucBox K3 Pro: Intel Core i7-12650H, 0.4 kg
  Review » GMK NucBox K3 Pro mini PC review: The NucBox K2 is better

Minisforum Venus Series NAB6: Intel Core i7-12650H, 0.6 kg
  Review » Minisforum Venus Series NAB6 review: The sleek mini PC with a fast Intel Core i7-12650H and active SSD cooling!

Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IAU7-82R7007TGE: Intel Core i3-1215U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 convertible review: Powerful entry of the small i3-1215U

HP 240 G9: Intel Core i3-1215U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP 240 G9

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRU8: Intel Core i3-1315U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRU8

Acer Aspire 5 A514-55: Intel Core i3-1215U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A514-55

Lenovo IP Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7 Plus: Intel Core i3-1315U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IP Flex 5 Chrome 14IAU7

HP 15s-fq5000TU: Intel Core i3-1215U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP 15s-fq5000TU

Acer Chromebook Plus 515 CB515-2H: Intel Core i3-1215U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook Plus 515 CB515-2H

Asus Chromebook Plus CX3402: Intel Core i3-1215U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook Plus CX3402

Lenovo IP 5 Chrome 16IAU7: Intel Core i3-1215U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IP 5 Chrome 16IAU7

MSI Modern 15 B12M, i3-1215U: Intel Core i3-1215U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 15 B12M, i3-1215U

Lenovo V17 G4 IRU: Intel Core i3-1315U, 17.30", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo V17 G4 IRU

HP Chromebook x360 14c-cd000: Intel Core i3-1215U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Chromebook x360 14c-cd000

Acer Aspire 5 A515-58, i3-1315U: Intel Core i3-1315U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-58, i3-1315U

Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IAU7: Intel Core i3-1215U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IAU7

Asus ExpertBook B1 B1502CBA: Intel Core i3-1215U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ExpertBook B1 B1502CBA

Asus Vivobook 14 A1405VA, i3-1315U: Intel Core i3-1315U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 14 A1405VA, i3-1315U

Asus Vivobook 14 A1405ZA: Intel Core i3-1215U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 14 A1405ZA

Asus VivoBook 14 F1402ZA, i3-1215U: Intel Core i3-1215U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 F1402ZA, i3-1215U

Acer Chromebook Vero 514 CBV514-1H-321H: Intel Core i3-1215U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook Vero 514 CBV514-1H-321H

Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 5 12IAU7, i3-1215U: Intel Core i3-1215U, 12.40", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 5 12IAU7, i3-1215U

Nokia PureBook Pro 15, i3-1220P: Intel Core i3-1220P, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Nokia PureBook Pro 15, i3-1220P

Asus Vivobook 15 X1502ZA, i3-1220P: Intel Core i3-1220P, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 15 X1502ZA, i3-1220P

Asus Vivobook 16X X1603ZA, i3-1220P: Intel Core i3-1220P, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 16X X1603ZA, i3-1220P

Acer Aspire 5 A515-57-335Y: Intel Core i3-1220P, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-57-335Y

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16, i3-1215U: Intel Core i3-1215U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16, i3-1215U

Lenovo Ideapad 3 15IAU7-82RK001VGE: Intel Core i3-1215U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 3 15IAU7-82RK001VGE

Acer Aspire 3 A315-59, i3-1215U: Intel Core i3-1215U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-59, i3-1215U

Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-79ZW: Intel Core i7-12650H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-79ZW

Acer Aspire 5 A515-57-3488: Intel Core i3-1215U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-57-3488

Nokia PureBook Pro 17: Intel Core i3-1220P, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Nokia PureBook Pro 17

Geekom Mini IT12: Intel Core i5-12450H, 0.6 kg
   » Geekom Mini IT12 with Intel Core i5-12450H reviewed

Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IAU7-82R7007TGE: Intel Core i3-1215U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Convertible with fitting equipment: Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 succeeds in the test

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-02-25)