Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 760M

AMD Radeon 760M

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated GPU in the Ryzen 7040 series for laptops (Phoenix, e.g. Ryzen 5 7640HS). The iGPU is based on the new RDNA3 architecture and has 8 of the 12 CUs (= 512 shaders) clocked at up to 2.8 GHz (depending on the CPU model). As the predecessor Radeon 660M, the 760M supports hardware raytracing, although the performance is too slow to use it in current games.

Thanks to the new architecture and higher clock speeds, the Radeon 760M should be clearly faster then the old Radeon 660M.

Thanks to the modern 4nm process and clever power-saving features, the power consumption is comparatively low (according to AMD). The whole chip of the first two models can be configured between 15 - 54 Watt TDP.

AMD Radeon 700M Series

Radeon 780M compare 768 @ 1.5 - 3 GHz
Radeon 760M 512 @ 1.5 - 2.8 GHz
Radeon 740M compare 256 @ 1.5 - 2.5 GHz
CodenamePhoenix
ArchitectureRDNA 3
Pipelines512 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
Core Speed1500 - 2800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 2.1, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
technology4 nm
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesMiracast, FreeSync, Adaptive-Sync, UHBR10, HDR Metadata, SmartShift MAX, SmartAccess Memory, 8k60 AV1, 8k43 H.265, 4k175 H.264 De- and Encode
Date of Announcement05.01.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com
PredecessorRadeon 680M
CPU in Radeon 760MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS6 x 4300 MHz, 45 W? MHz2600 MHz
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS6 x 3500 MHz, 28 W? MHz2600 MHz
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS6 x 4300 MHz, 45 W? MHz2600 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2600 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.8 pt (8%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
57.6 Watt (8%)
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
55.5 Watt (8%)
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
33.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Crew Motorfest

The Crew Motorfest

2023
low 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
31.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
71.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
123.1
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
38.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
25.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
50.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
75.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
132.2
low 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
172.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
121 133.3 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.2 52.6 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.8 44.4 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.8 38 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
74  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
45.1 48.8 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.1 36.7 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.7 29.8 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
55.3 61.1 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.5 30.9 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.2 22.7 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
143.7 151.6 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
110.9 113.4 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.2 75.1 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64.8 68.2 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
115 123 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
73.9 78 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.9 38 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23 23.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
141 150.4 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
126.2 138.4 ~ 132 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.2 50.5 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.1 18.3 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
101.2
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
103.7
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Lies of P33.727.924
The Crew Motorfest252319
Starfield14.37.995.04
Armored Core 6
Immortals of Aveum15.413.3
Atlas Fallen31.129.224.2
Baldur's Gate 329.52519.1
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart20.5
F1 2371.663.645.5
Star Wars Jedi Survivor
Resident Evil 4 Remake23.516.814.6
Company of Heroes 346.438.929.6
Sons of the Forest3219.619
Atomic Heart38.628.816.7
Returnal201917
Hogwarts Legacy25.819.815.2
High On Life50.628.823.5
A Plague Tale Requiem18.815.713.7
F1 2275.966.549
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6302418
F1 2021172.182.561.626.1
Strange Brigade127514437
Far Cry 574383533
X-Plane 11.11473529
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark582922
Dota 2 Reborn1481127367
The Witcher 3119763623
GTA V1461325018
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
9
9
4
4
14
4
5
1
17
6
2
3
2
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 03:41:22

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.07s ... 0.071s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.071s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.071s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11566 +0.035s ... 0.106s

#7 got single benchmarks 11566 +0.012s ... 0.118s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.118s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.685s ... 0.804s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.804s

#11 Got 111 rows for game benchmarks. +0.026s ... 0.829s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.829s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.02s ... 0.849s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.899s ... 1.748s

#15 return log +0.066s ... 1.814s

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > AMD Radeon 760M GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-01-11)