Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarHP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A in review: Strong office notebook that relies on Zen 4
In 2023, the Firefly 14 offers a range of configurations to choose from. Intel enthusiasts can opt for a processor from the Raptor Lake series, while AMD versions are equipped with a Zen 4 chip. Alongside the Ryzen 7 7840HS, HP also offers the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS, which powers the model we reviewed. Instead of the Radeon 780M, the laptop features the Radeon 760M as the iGPU, but the latter still offers a respectable performance compared to the Intel iGPUs. The present 5G3G5ES#ABD model, was priced at around $1260 to $1360 USD during our evaluation. This variant comes with 16 GB of DDR5-5600 RAM and a 512 GB NVMe SSD and features a matte IPS panel with a 16:10 aspect ratio and a resolution of 1920 x 1200 pixels. The display is designed to achieve 400 cd/m² brightness and covers 100% of the sRGB color space (more details on this shortly). Windows 11 Pro version completes the package.
The Firefly 14 faces competition from other office notebooks featuring current AMD CPUs like the Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 and the HP EliteBook 845 G10, as well as devices powered by Intel CPUs such as the Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 and the Huawei MateBook X Pro. These devices are included in our comparison tables for reference.
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.4 % | 10/2023 | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M | 1.5 kg | 20 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
08/2023 | Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 R5 7640HS, Radeon 760M | 2.5 kg | 25.2 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 90.1 % | 08/2023 | HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 89.3 % | 03/2023 | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.25 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 89.6 % | 06/2023 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.20" | 3120x2080 |
As the case appears to be identical to the Firefly 14 G9 tested in 2022, except for the changed logo on the lid (now HP instead of Z), we will not delve into the casing, equipment (ports, etc.), and input devices in this article. You can refer to the linked article for detailed information on these aspects.
Communication
Webcam
Display
There have been no changes in the display department. HP continues to use the same IPS panel (CMN1435) as in the predecessor model. Any slight deviations in the rates compared to the last test are partly attributed to the typical series variation.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 397 cd/m²
Contrast: 1588:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.35 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.15
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.067
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A CMN1435, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AUO6DA8, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 22% | 29% | 17% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 68.7 | 98.3 43% | 99.9 45% | 89.8 31% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.2 | 99.8 2% | 100 2% | 99.4 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.8 | 86.2 22% | 98.3 39% | 84.2 19% |
| Response Times | 73% | 97% | 68% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56.2 ? | 12.7 ? 77% | 1.04 ? 98% | 20 ? 64% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25.2 ? | 7.9 ? 69% | 0.95 ? 96% | 7 ? 72% |
| PWM Frequency | 360 ? | 156000 ? | ||
| Screen | 12% | 83% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle | 397 | 546 38% | 378 -5% | 595 50% |
| Brightness | 367 | 564 54% | 379 3% | 550 50% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 86 0% | 98 14% | 85 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.38 -52% | 0.03 88% | 0.25 -0% |
| Contrast | 1588 | 1437 -10% | 12600 693% | 2380 50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.35 | 1.3 45% | 2.5 -6% | 2.01 14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.68 | 5.3 -13% | 4.7 -0% | 6.9 -47% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.15 | 1.2 -4% | 1.9 -65% | 1.22 -6% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 1.1 54% | 1.9 21% | 2.74 -14% |
| Gamma | 2.067 106% | 2.27 97% | 2.2 100% | 2.4 92% |
| CCT | 6409 101% | 6463 101% | 6222 104% | 6319 103% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 36% /
23% | 70% /
73% | 32% /
20% |
* ... smaller is better
Our review sample fell slightly short of the advertised brightness at 400 cd/m², measuring an average of 367 cd/m². While this is a solid, though not exceptional value, some competitors such as the EliteBook 845 G10 and Huawei's MateBook X Pro achieve significantly higher brightness levels. However, thanks to the acceptable black value of 0.25 cd/m², the contrast ratio remains respectable at 1,588:1, which is quite decent for an IPS panel.
The response time, on the other hand, falls noticeably behind the competition, with 25 ms for black-to-white transitions and 56 ms for gray-to-gray changes, making it quite modest even for an office notebook. Despite this, most buyers should find the color space satisfactory. While the Firefly 14 doesn't fully cover DCI-P3 and AdobeRGB (unlike some competitors), its approximately 98% sRGB coverage is respectable. Moreover, the colors are already pretty natural as given, making calibration unnecessary.
The viewing angles are based on the usual IPS level, ensuring relatively good visibility even from slanted positions.
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Performance
As long as you don't intend to run demanding 3D applications, the Firefly 14 should have sufficient resources to last for the coming years with its current hardware configuration. The only drawback is the somewhat limited storage capacity of 512 GB. If needed, a larger M.2 model could be installed to address this issue.
Processor
As mentioned earlier, the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS is a recent addition to the Zen 4 family, boasting 6 cores that can handle up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to SMT. Operating at a clock speed ranging from 4.3 to 5 GHz under load, offering impressive performance. Additionally, the processor features a substantial 16 MB L3 cache, enhancing its capabilities further.
The Ryzen 5 Pro demonstrates strong performance in benchmarks. While the 7640HS (Non-Pro) in Lenovo's LOQ calculates slightly faster, it doesn't quite match the performance level of the Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS found in the HP EliteBook 845. One of Intel's main rivals, the Core i7-1360P, lags behind in the Cinebench loop due to a more consistent performance development.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
| CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Workstation | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| Average of class Workstation | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average of class Workstation (2619 - 25776, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average of class Workstation (12909 - 109059, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| Average of class Workstation (824 - 4981, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average of class Workstation (26716 - 131931, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average of class Workstation (3105 - 14742, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average of class Workstation (6967 - 58181, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average of class Workstation (19489 - 132156, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average of class Workstation (314 - 1472, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average of class Workstation (1473 - 13800, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (18157 - 51637, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
System Performance
In terms of system performance, the Firefly 14 secures the second position among the comparison devices. It scores 6,336 points, narrowly trailing behind the EliteBook 845 G10 in PCMark 10.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Workstation (5488 - 8587, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (9151 - 12197, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average of class Workstation (7846 - 10820, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Workstation (5399 - 13947, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (1154 - 1972, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (1188 - 1842, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average of class Workstation (1180 - 2248, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (990 - 1865, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6336 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| Average of class Workstation (30324 - 95718, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average of class Workstation (30787 - 85570, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (32728 - 93871, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average of class Workstation (83.4 - 139.3, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latency
The latency values are not optimal, a common issue with many devices. According to the LatencyMon tool, certain activities such as real-time audio and video editing might face issues.
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
Despite the system performance being at the top, the mass storage device ranks last in the test field. The 512 GB Samsung drive (PM9B1) is not slow by any means, but it still falls short when compared to the faster NVMe drives offered by the competition. At least the speed remains constant even under permanent load.
* ... smaller is better
Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card
One of the biggest highlights of the Firefly 14 is the relatively fast iGPU. Despite having 512 shader units compared to the 768 in the Radeon 780M, the Radeon 760M outperforms the Intel counterpart, Iris Xe Graphics G7, in most scenarios. This is largely due to AMD's superior graphics drivers, particularly in terms of gaming support. In 3DMarks, the Firefly 14's performance aligns with the Lenovo LOQ, which is also equipped with a Radeon 760M.
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Workstation | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 -1! | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 35337 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 32985 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9564 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 176563 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 27608 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5724 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2244 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Gaming Performance
If we overlook the absence of a current GPU driver from HP during the testing period (the official AMD driver didn't work with the Firefly 14), and the resulting problems in certain games (such as Star Wars Jedi Survivor and Armored Core 6, both of which crashed at startup), the Radeon 760M proves to be suitable for gaming older or less demanding titles. As shown in the table below, the iGPU can handle high to maximum details in optimal scenarios. However, users often have to compromise by selecting lower settings, provided they deliver a reasonably smooth performance in Full HD.
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Workstation | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Workstation (19.6 - 156.5, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Workstation (18.3 - 124.4, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Workstation (21.2 - 149.1, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Workstation (33.2 - 283, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Average of class Workstation (57.8 - 166.7, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Workstation (73 - 430, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 760M (73.9 - 78, n=2) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Workstation (34.9 - 298, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 760M (34.9 - 38, n=2) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Workstation (19.6 - 156.5, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average AMD Radeon 760M (23 - 23.3, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 Ryzen 5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
We tested the 3D performance over an extended period with the role-playing game The Witcher 3, running it for about an hour at Full HD resolution with Ultra settings. Apart from a short performance drop, the frame rate was pretty stable.
Witcher 3 FPS chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| GTA V (2015) | 150.4 | 138.4 | 50.2 | 18.3 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 115 | 73.9 | 34.9 | 23.3 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 143.7 | 113.4 | 70.2 | 64.8 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 55.3 | 27.5 | 21.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 45.1 | 33.1 | 27.7 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 121 | 50.2 | 42.8 | 35.8 |
| A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) | 18.8 | 15.7 | 13.7 | |
| High On Life (2023) | 50.6 | 28.8 | 23.5 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 25.8 | 19.8 | 15.2 | |
| Returnal (2023) | 20 | 19 | 17 | |
| Atomic Heart (2023) | 38.6 | 28.8 | 16.7 | |
| Company of Heroes 3 (2023) | 46.4 | 38.9 | 29.6 | |
| Sons of the Forest (2023) | 32 | 19.6 | 19 | |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023) | 23.5 | 16.8 | 14.6 | |
| Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | |
| Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) | 20.5 | 0 () | 0 () | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 29.5 | 25 | 19.1 | |
| Atlas Fallen (2023) | 31.1 | 29.2 | 24.2 | |
| Immortals of Aveum (2023) | 15.4 | 13.3 | ||
| Armored Core 6 (2023) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | |
| Starfield (2023) | 14.3 | 7.99 | 5.04 | |
| The Crew Motorfest (2023) | 25 | 23 | 19 | |
| Lies of P (2023) | 33.7 | 27.9 | 24 |
Emissions
System Noise
The Firefly 14 stands out as one of the few notebooks theoretically suitable for noise-sensitive users, especially during simple tasks. While the fan isn't always completely silent during idle mode and light activities such as office work, video playback, and web browsing, it runs at a sufficiently low level that it's hardly noticeable even in quiet environments. The only problem: Our review sample had to deal with a noticeable coil whine, especially when idling, which might bother some users. Under load, it generally does not perform that well. 45 to 46 dB(A) are clearly audible and - despite the weaker CPU/GPU - sometimes noticeably more than the EliteBook 845 G10 (34 to 43 dB).
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 26 / 27 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 45 / 46 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M | HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 6% | 5% | 1% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 25.3 -1% | 23.6 6% | 25.4 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 25.3 -1% | 23.6 6% | 25.4 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 26 | 25.3 3% | 23.6 9% | 25.4 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27 | 25.3 6% | 24.6 9% | 29.6 -10% |
| Load Average * | 45 | 34.4 24% | 45 -0% | 42 7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 | 43.4 4% | 45 -0% | |
| Load Maximum * | 46 | 43.4 6% | 45 2% | 40.9 11% |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
In terms of temperature, the Firefly 14 behaves similarly to its EliteBook predecessor. The case surfaces barely warm up to roughly 25°C on average during idle mode, which is really comfortable. In 3D mode, our test equipment measured temperatures of up to 50°C (top) and 51°C (bottom) in the chassis's rear third. Nonetheless, an average temperature of 42°C is still tolerable, albeit its Intel competitors, the Lenovo Yoga 9 and Huawei Matebook X Pro, manage to sustain lower temps.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-10.2 °C / -18.4 F).
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M | HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 0% | 8% | -11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 45.6 9% | 39.7 21% | 46.5 7% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 51 | 51.9 -2% | 45.4 11% | 44.7 12% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25 | 26.5 -6% | 25.7 -3% | 34.9 -40% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27 | 27 -0% | 26.4 2% | 32.9 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
Stress Test
Furmark and Prime95 stress tests revealed no serious concerns. It is not uncommon for the CPU to throttle below its base rate (as seen in the screenshot), especially given the average CPU temperature of roughly 75°C, which is far below critical limits. The behavior when gaming, particularly during The Witcher 3, proved to be more troublesome during the test. While the Radeon 760M maintained high clock speeds, the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS slowed to 1.4 GHz. HP should think about addressing and improving this practice.
Speakers
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy Management
Power Consumption
The Firefly 14 deserves special praise for its low power consumption. Its idle consumption of 3 to 8 watts is an excellent rate, unmatched by any competitor in the test field. Under load, the power consumption ranging from 56 to 66 watts is also commendable given the device's performance level. Moreover, the included 65-watt power supply is sufficiently sized to support the device.
| Off / Standby | 0.5 / Watt |
| Idle | 3 / 4 / 8 Watt |
| Load |
56 / 66 Watt |
   
| |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M | HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Average of class Workstation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -42% | -59% | -24% | -145% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3 | 4.3 -43% | 7.8 -160% | 4.1 -37% | 7.82 ? -161% |
| Idle Average * | 4 | 10.1 -153% | 9.3 -133% | 6.6 -65% | 12.7 ? -218% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8 | 11.2 -40% | 9.8 -23% | 8 -0% | 18.7 ? -134% |
| Load Average * | 56 | 64.4 -15% | 62.8 -12% | 61 -9% | 96.5 ? -72% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 58.2 | 59.4 -2% | 46.5 20% | 56 4% | |
| Load Maximum * | 66 | 66.7 -1% | 96 -45% | 90 -36% | 158.9 ? -141% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
Battery Life
The laptop has outstanding battery runtimes due to its low energy usage. Despite not having the most powerful battery among its competitors, it produces by far the greatest performance in the test lineup, with about 13 hours of internet browsing at a brightness of 150 cd/m2.
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M, 51 Wh | HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, 51 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Average of class Workstation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -40% | -40% | -26% | -31% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 782 | 471 -40% | 472 -40% | 580 -26% | 541 ? -31% |
| H.264 | 557 | 651 | 527 | 717 ? | |
| Load | 56 | 81 | 124 | 81.3 ? | |
| Reader / Idle | 1292 | 700 ? |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
HP's Firefly 14 G10 A stands out as a compelling office notebook with AMD components and workstation-like capabilities.
The test model, equipped with the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS, stands out not only for its energy efficiency but also for its impressive performance (particularly in the case of the Radeon 760M integrated GPU).
The powerful hardware is encased in an elegant, sturdy, and high-quality body that boasts excellent input devices and modern ports, including 2x USB 4. Other notable features include outstanding battery life and robust audio quality.
The 14-inch laptop's emissions generate different reactions. Despite the coil whining, it stays very silent and cool under modest loads. However, with heavy loads, the gadget becomes relatively noisy and heated. Additionally, there is room for improvement in the display's response time, highlighting an area for potential enhancement by HP.
Considering the mentioned shortcomings, the Firefly 14 G10 A is undeniably the best, office notebooks currently available on the market. Competition still exists, as demonstrated by laptops from Lenovo (Yoga 9 14IRP G8) and Huawei (MateBook X Pro) mentioned in the article, though at somewhat higher prices.
Price & Availability
The reviewed HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A with Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS is currently available at various online retailers, such as (e.g. Connection).
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A
-
10/11/2023 v7
Florian Glaser
More articles related to this device
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A (ZBook Firefly 14 Series)Related Articles
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
