
Acer Swift Edge 16 review: A lightweight 16-inch laptop with an OLED display
Slim build.
Traditionally, 16-inch laptops are only partly intended to be used as portable companions for frequent trips or traveling. Acer's Swift Edge 16 shows, however, that things can be done differently. Our review will reveal what the rather rare Ryzen 5 8640U has to offer.Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Verdict - Generally super portable, but weaknesses in its runtime
If you're looking for a particularly lightweight laptop with a decent display size, then you might like the Swift Edge 16 from Acer. Thanks to its low weight of just over 1.2 kg, the 16-inch laptop is not only suitable for use on your desk, but also cuts a fine figure on the move. Its installed OLED panel, on the other hand, faces the usual advantages and disadvantages. While its black level, contrast and response times are impressive, its flickering and highly reflective surface can prove to be problematic for certain people. Meanwhile, professional users will be pleased with its lush color space coverage (virtually full AdobeRGB and DCI-P3 coverage).
Its connectivity doesn't have to hide behind the competition either, as it features 2x USB 4, for example. The laptop's input devices are good, but not totally outstanding. The quality of its case is similar. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 5 8640U, which we have yet to test, delivered good performance both in the CPU benchmarks and its iGPU values (Radeon 760M). There is room for improvement in terms of its speaker sound, emissions and battery life, as the device's idle consumption is surprisingly high.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
Price-wise, the different configurations of the Acer Swift Edge 16 vary quite a bit—our test configuration usually retails for around $1,000.
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV AMD Ryzen 5 8640U ⎘ AMD Radeon 760M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1000 EUR | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,029.99 List Price: 1300 USD | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng AMD Ryzen 5 8540U ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 730 EUR | 1.7 kg | 18.6 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $799.99 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9... 2. $679.99 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9... 3. $849.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9... List Price: 800 USD | 1.8 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U Intel Core i5-1335U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $1,159.00 List Price: 780 USD | 1.8 kg | 19.85 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
Specifications
Case
The Swift Edge 16's design is more understated, and it looks quite compact for a 16-inch device thanks to its small dimensions (keyword: height). Its surfaces feel neither cheap nor extremely high-quality and feature solid stability overall. We also have nothing negative to say about its hinges. With a weight of 1.24 kg, the Acer offspring's weight is clearly below the competitor devices that we have selected for this article. You can find out more about its case (and its interior) in our review of the externally identical predecessor model with the Ryzen 7 7840U.
Connectivity
Acer has equipped its 16-inch laptop with four USB ports (2x Type-C 4 incl. DisplayPort & 2x Type-A 3.0) as well as an audio jack, an HDMI 2.1 output and an opening for Kensington locks. Unfortunately, the device's integrated microSD card reader only achieves low speeds at the level of USB 2. Things look better when it comes to its wireless module from MediaTek (RZ616), which at least achieves very good values when receiving data.
Its webcam has a resolution of 1,440p, which is significantly higher than that of most competing products and delivers quite sharp images by laptop standards—although they are somewhat lacking in color accuracy. The device comes with a very light and compact 65-watt power adapter (USB-C) as an accessory. Acer not only uses cardboard as packaging material, but also some plastic.
SD card reader
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Office (22.4 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U (AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U (AV Pro V60) |
Communication
Webcam

Input devices
As mentioned at the beginning, the laptop's input devices are great. Its keyboard has white backlighting (two intensity levels) and a dedicated numeric keypad, although it has to make do with narrower keys and three instead of four columns. We would describe its typing feel (feedback etc.) as fine.
The touchpad is generously sized at around 12.5 x 8 cm. Its smooth surface usually reacts precisely and provides quite a good gliding feel. The click areas along the lower edge triggered reliably during our test, but sounded rather rickety.
Display
OLED panels have always been a matter of taste. On the one hand, they boast great contrast ratios and rich blacks compared to other panel types such as IPS, but on the other hand, sensitive users may have difficulties with the flickering that's typical of OLEDs (in this case 120 to 240 Hz). Due to its reflective surface, outdoor use may also become an issue, even if its average brightness of around 400 cd/m² is more than decent. One of the highlights, however, is its large color space coverage, which leaves nothing to be desired. Gamers, on the other hand, will be delighted with its short response times.
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 407 cd/m²
Contrast: 407000:1 (Black: 0.001 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.27 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}
calibrated: 2.17
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.231
CCT: 6443 K
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng CMN1640, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U R160NW41 R2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -51% | -51% | -50% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 41.6 -58% | 41.5 -58% | 42 -58% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 62.4 -38% | 61.2 -39% | 62.6 -37% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98 | 100 2% | 43 -56% | 42.9 -56% | 43.3 -56% |
Response Times | -55% | -5471% | -3746% | -8000% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.4 ? | 0.57 ? -43% | 30.7 ? -7575% | 20.7 ? -5075% | 46.4 ? -11500% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.6 ? | 1 ? -67% | 20.8 ? -3367% | 15.1 ? -2417% | 27.6 ? -4500% |
PWM Frequency | 120 ? | 238.8 | |||
Screen | -7% | -2285% | -4213% | -3269% | |
Brightness middle | 407 | 379.8 -7% | 324 -20% | 313.3 -23% | 318.6 -22% |
Brightness | 405 | 383 -5% | 295 -27% | 308 -24% | 302 -25% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 88 -10% | 91 -7% | 91 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.001 | 0.2 -19900% | 0.37 -36900% | 0.29 -28900% | |
Contrast | 407000 | 1620 -100% | 847 -100% | 1099 -100% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.27 | 4.7 -107% | 5.13 -126% | 8.42 -271% | 3.73 -64% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.46 | 7.51 -68% | 16.11 -261% | 19.09 -328% | 16.51 -270% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.17 | 0.55 75% | 2.99 -38% | 2.16 -0% | 2.03 6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 0.8 65% | 4.24 -84% | 8.3 -261% | 3.2 -39% |
Gamma | 2.231 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.3 96% | 2.83 78% | 2.28 96% |
CCT | 6443 101% | 6381 102% | 7318 89% | 6296 103% | 6780 96% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -20% /
-13% | -2602% /
-2261% | -2670% /
-3254% | -3773% /
-3255% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3 ms rise | |
↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.2 ms rise | |
↘ 0.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Performance
The Swift Edge 16 is intended for users who are looking for a versatile and portable device that is suitable for typical everyday applications such as office, video and web work. (Occasional) gamers won't be terribly happy with its Radeon 760M iGPU, as we will see in a moment.
Testing conditions
You can choose between Quiet, Normal and Performance profiles via the manufacturer's AcerSense tool. While its TDP and CPU performance don't or hardly differ, deviations can be found in its GPU performance and noise development. With the exception of the battery test, all measurements were carried out using the Performance profile.
AcerSense Mode | Quiet | Normal | Performance |
Cyberpunk 2077 Noise | 37 dB(A) | 41 dB(A) | 43 dB(A) |
Cyberpunk 2077 Performance (FHD/Ultra) | 12.5fps | 14.1fps | 16.2fps |
Cinebench R15 Multi Score | 1614 points | 1639 points | 1647 points |
CPU PL1 | 25 watts | 25 watts | 25 watts |
CPU PL2 | 30 watts | 30 watts | 30 watts |
Processor
Like its predecessor—the Ryzen 5 7640U—the Ryzen 5 8640U contains six cores that can process up to 12 threads in parallel via SMT. There is also a 16 MB L3 cache on board and a 4 nm manufacturing process is used (Zen 4 architecture). In the case of the Edge 16, the speed of the Ryzen 5 8640U is roughly comparable to the Intel Core 7 150U, whereas the Ryzen 7 7840U in the old Swift is on average a little more than 10% faster. It deserves praise for its constant power delivery (see Cinebench loop), which isn't always a matter of course.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average of class Office (1685 - 31245, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (8977 - 125394, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5398, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (20636 - 115197, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average of class Office (1064 - 18321, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average of class Office (4415 - 66922, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average of class Office (138.6 - 1366, n=86, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average of class Office (859 - 17834, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average of class Office (9310 - 55359, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
System performance
Its system performance is also impressive. During PCMark 10, the new Swift Edge took second place among the comparison devices. The laptop copes with everyday tasks without any major difficulties.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M (n=1) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Office (2823 - 7578, n=76, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average of class Office (6567 - 20841, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (2049 - 11108, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1880, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Office (319 - 2155, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M (272 - 272, n=2) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=82, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average of class Office (391 - 1966, n=90, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M (551 - 551, n=2) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6456 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Office (19648 - 108783, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Office (10084 - 127282, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Office (20073 - 117935, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Office (7.6 - 162.9, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
* ... smaller is better
Storage device
Not everything is perfect about its 512-GB M.2 SSD from Micron, either. Although it generally delivers pretty good read and write rates, the DiskSpd loop sometimes showed massive drops over time. This also applied to the predecessor model. Acer should work on its cooling in this respect.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card
The Radeon 760M iGPU has been on the market for several years now, which often makes itself clearly known in its performance. During the synthetic benchmarks, however, the situation still looked relatively good compared to the competition. The 3DMark tests saw the entry-level model almost 40% above the Radeon 740M or Iris Xe Graphics G7 with 96 EUs.
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 34649 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 9948 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 139754 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 26354 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6086 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2541 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Gaming performance
The situation didn't look quite so rosy in the gaming tests. Although the aforementioned iGPUs were still left behind, the gap shrank significantly and the Radeon 760M performed around 7% below our previously determined average. While older or undemanding games such as Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown sometimes ran smoothly even in higher resolutions and settings, the 16-inch device often failed with current or more demanding titles such as Stalker 2 at 1,920 x 1,080 pixels and minimal settings (even including FSR).
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average AMD Radeon 760M (16.2 - 18, n=3) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (6.65 - 29.6, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Office (7.96 - 31.6, n=40, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon 760M (16.3 - 18.9, n=2) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average AMD Radeon 760M (17.3 - 23.2, n=4) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=75, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Average AMD Radeon 760M (28.9 - 33.2, n=3) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (4.35 - 50.5, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
Average AMD Radeon 760M (22.8 - 26, n=3) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (3.33 - 39.6, n=54, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average AMD Radeon 760M (17.8 - 20.5, n=3) | |
Average of class Office (5.71 - 33.4, n=54, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 126.9 | 122.7 | 52.7 | 17.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 127.6 | 105.4 | 41.2 | 39 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 61.7 | 28.7 | 21.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 41.4 | 29.9 | 25.6 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 135.9 | 55.2 | 45.1 | 37.8 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 27.2 | 22.6 | 18.3 | 16.3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 28.9 | 22.8 | 19.1 | 16.2 |
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 135.7 | 102.5 | 96.8 | |
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) | 13.3 | 10.5 | ||
Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 7.15 | 5.71 | 4.5 | |
Space Marine 2 (2024) | 14.3 | 10.6 | 10.1 | |
Final Fantasy XVI (2024) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | |
Until Dawn (2024) | 26.7 | 16.5 | 11 | |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 36 | 33 | 20 | |
Stalker 2 (2024) | 14.3 | 11 | 8.19 | |
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 16.6 | 0 () | ||
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 17.4 | 13.2 | 10.9 | |
Civilization 7 (2025) | 62.6 | 34.8 | 14.5 |
Another point of criticism is its 3D performance over a longer period of time. During our 30-minute test with Cyberpunk 2077, its frame rate dropped measurably after a while (compare the graph).
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
Emissions
Noise emissions
Its noise emissions left some mixed feelings. As long as the Swift Edge 16 was only running in Quiet mode, its two case fans were relatively quiet. From Normal mode onwards, however, the 16-inch device became clearly audible under load and sometimes even started to roar unnecessarily in idle mode—and even more so in performance mode. The (thicker) competitor devices were quieter during the test.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26 / 29 / 39 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45 / 45 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 13% | 15% | 14% | 17% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 23.4 6% | 24 4% | 23 8% | 24.6 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 26 | 24.1 7% | 24 8% | 23 12% | 24.6 5% |
Idle Average * | 29 | 24.3 16% | 25 14% | 23 21% | 24.6 15% |
Idle Maximum * | 39 | 28 28% | 26 33% | 23 41% | 24.6 37% |
Load Average * | 45 | 41 9% | 38 16% | 43.3 4% | 32.7 27% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 43 | 37 14% | 40.8 5% | ||
Load Maximum * | 45 | 40.9 9% | 39 13% | 40.9 9% | 39.2 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.9 | 34.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
Its thin design also has a negative effect on its temperatures. In this case, the Swift Edge 16 came above the comparison devices in 3D mode, with a maximum of 48 °C on the top and a maximum of 60 °C on the bottom of the case. Things looked better in idle mode—between 23 and 31 °C is more than acceptable.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-5.4 °C / -9.7 F).
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 7% | 14% | 17% | 9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 48 | 41.6 13% | 42 12% | 35.4 26% | 44 8% |
Maximum Bottom * | 60 | 46.6 22% | 44 27% | 33 45% | 50.4 16% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 30.4 -9% | 26 7% | 30.2 -8% | 27.2 3% |
Idle Bottom * | 31 | 31 -0% | 28 10% | 30.2 3% | 27.8 10% |
* ... smaller is better
Stress test
Speakers
The sound quality of its 2.0 system is average. As usual, there are some weaknesses in its bass in particular. For more frequent media enjoyment, you should connect a headset or an external system if possible.
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power management
Power consumption
Its power consumption is surprisingly high in idle mode. 8 to 15 watts are similar to the old Swift Edge 16, but the competition is sometimes much more frugal, which is probably due to the display technology the laptop uses, among other things. Under load, on the other hand, the 16-inch device doesn't stray out of line.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | 26% | 9% | 12% | 16% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8 | 7.1 11% | 4 50% | 3.3 59% | 4.9 39% | 4.56 ? 43% |
Idle Average * | 10 | 10.1 -1% | 5 50% | 7.5 25% | 8.3 17% | 7.54 ? 25% |
Idle Maximum * | 15 | 18.6 -24% | 6 60% | 7.8 48% | 8.6 43% | 8.98 ? 40% |
Load Average * | 42 | 45.3 -8% | 40 5% | 56.9 -35% | 42.9 -2% | 42.2 ? -0% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 42.8 | 39.1 9% | 41.2 4% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 44.4 | 43 3% | 48.7 -10% | |||
Load Maximum * | 49 | 52.9 -8% | 46 6% | 62.4 -27% | 67 -37% | 61.7 ? -26% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.5 | 44.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
Runtimes
The laptop's combination of above-average idle consumption and a mediocre battery capacity of 54 Wh (although the competition only has 47 to 59 Wh) doesn't ensure particularly good runtimes. Just under 5 hours of web surfing via WLAN with the brightness reduced to approx. 150 cd/m² is rather poor for such a portable device and lowers its overall rating.
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M, 54 Wh | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M, 59 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 47 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 16% | 136% | 162% | 8% | 133% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 290 | 336 16% | 684 136% | 761 162% | 314 8% | 675 ? 133% |
Reader / Idle | 1568 | 1331 ? | ||||
Load | 94 | 111.1 ? |
Notebookcheck total rating
The Acer Swift Edge 16 is a nice and lightweight 16-inch all-rounder—although it has some catching up to do when it comes to its battery life.
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV
- 02/25/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.