Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R9 M265X

AMD Radeon R9 M265X

The 28 nm AMD Radeon R9 M265X is an mid-range notebook graphics card based on the GCN (Graphics Core Next) architecture. It was introduced in Spring of 2014 and supports up to DirectX 12 (FL 11_1). The underlying "Cape Verde" GPU features 640 unified shaders, a core clock of 625 MHz and a 128-Bit memory interface with 2 or 4 GB of GDDR5 memory at 1000 MHz (4000 MHz effective).

Architecture

The "Cape Verde" GPU codename is based on the Graphics Core Next (GCN) architecture and is processed in a 28 nm lithography. The GCN architecture features 10 processing units for a total of 640 stream processors. In addition, the AMD Radeon R9 M265X sports 40 texture units, 64 Z/Stencil ROP units, 16 color ROP units and a 512 KB L2 read/write cache.

The AMD Radeon R9 M265X is compatible with the lastest PCIe  3.0 Standard.

Performance

Depending on the clock rate (and maybe benefits from Boost), the AMD Radeon M265X ranks in the mid-range of mobile graphics cards as of mid 2014. Performance is sligthly above a GeForce 840M and a GeForce 940M. As a result, this AMD GPU can run current titles smoothly up to 900p with medium to high settings. Graphical settings will have to be reduced significantly when playing very demanding titles like Crysis 3 or Far Cry 3.

Features

A well-known feature of the AMD Radeon R9 M265X includes the “Eyefinity“ technology, which allows the user to connect up to 6 displays simultaneously. For notebooks, however, this feature is almost always limited by the number of available display ports.

The mid-range GPU also supports the “Enduro” technology for power efficiency, which is the counterpart to Nvidia's “Optimus”. While idle or in low load scenarios (Office, Internet, etc.), the system will deactivate the dGPU in favor of the more low-power integrated GPU.

The M265X also features the “Mantle” graphics API for gamers. This programming interface has been developed by the manufacturer as an alternative to Direct3D or OpenGL. Example titles with Mantle support include Battlefield 4, Thief, and The Sims 4 with more to come in the future.

With “App Acceleration”, AMD has also equipped the Radeon R9 M265X with technology for improving video quality and increasing application performance. However, support for OpenCL, DirectCompute, or DirectX video acceleration (DXVA) is required in order to use all described functions.

Power Consumption

With a TDP of about 35 to 40 Watt, the power consumption of the AMD Radeon R9 M265X ranges between the 840M (about 30 Watt) and the GTX 850M (~40 to 45 Watt). Thus, the graphics card is best suitable for 15-inch notebooks. Under low loads, automatic underclocking can save energy. When idle, the Enduro software can completely deactivate the card for additional power savings.

Radeon R9 M200 Series

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire compare 2560 @ 0.85 - 0.9 GHz2x 256 Bit @ 4800 MHz
Radeon R9 M295X compare 2048 @ 0.85 GHz256 Bit @ 5448 MHz
Radeon R9 M290X compare 1280 @ 0.85 - 0.9 GHz256 Bit @ 4800 MHz
Radeon R9 M280X compare 896 @ 0.9 - 1 GHz128 Bit @ 5500 MHz
Radeon R9 M275 compare 640 @ 0.93 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M270 compare 640 @ 0.73 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M265X 640 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
CodenameVenus Pro
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines640 - unified
Core Speed625 MHz
Memory Speed4000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0
Transistor Count1.5 Billion
technology28 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement07.01.2014

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.9 pt (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 10995     avg: 12639     median: 12510 (3%)     max: 13923 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 14953     avg: 15435     median: 15426 (20%)     max: 15926 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
32.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Crew

The Crew

2014
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
44.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
65.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
57.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
30.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
67.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
65.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
high 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
28.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
80.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
53.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
49.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
high 1366x768
76.8 84.5 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46 46.6 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
med. 1366x768
81.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46.4 47.2 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.3 29.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.6 15.6 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
67.5 71.2 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40 40.4 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.1 25.2 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
42.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.6 34.8 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.9 13.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.6 9.8 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1280x720
58  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
37.8 45 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.2 29.1 29.7 30 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.5 25.2 25.5 25.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.8 12.7 12.9 13 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
44.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
66.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
45.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
98  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63.3 64.3 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
42.1 42.7 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16 16.5 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
78  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
45  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
med. 1366x768
91  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
88  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1366x768
79.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
65.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
45.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
32.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
61.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
53.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
34.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
72.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
med. 1366x768
83.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
42.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
52.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
112.8 123.8 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.4 63 63.8 64.1 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
53.5 54 54.3 54.9 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.5 18.9 19.9 23.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
104.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
65.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
121.9 149.9 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
67.7 73.8 74.6 75.8 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
48.2 51.6 52 52.6 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.3 22.9 23 23.4 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
67.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.4 41.9 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.1 25.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.8 9.9 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
79.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
63.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
med. 1366x768
56.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
32.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
50.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.9 46 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30.7 31.1 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.3 14.7 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
110.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
90.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
53.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
56.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
47.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
104.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
85.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
75.9 78 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.5 44 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
92.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
74.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
68.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
95.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
80.6 82.2 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.2 51.6 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1366x768
55.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
med. 1366x768
39.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
157.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
81.7 81.7 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
48 49.6 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.9 21.9 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
94.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69.1 69.9 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46.7 47.4 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26 26.4 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
57.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
43.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
high 1366x768
65.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
205.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
122.8  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
90.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
med. 1280x720
48.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
CPU 1280x1024
26.6
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
high 1360x768
93.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
high 1024x768
80.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Evolve32.325.615.512.8
The Crew6044.520.911.4
Dragon Age: Inquisition65.929.819.916.8
Far Cry 457.84219.315.5
Assassin's Creed Unity30.12111.4
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare67.141.517.8
Civilization: Beyond Earth65.929.819.916.8
F1 20146437
The Evil Within28.120.812.1
Ryse: Son of Rome35.823.21614.1
Alien: Isolation80.753.722.117.6
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor49.52014.18
Fifa 158146
Sims 481.736.333.7
Risen 3: Titan Lords60472916
GRID: Autosport694024
Watch Dogs42.6351310
Wolfenstein: The New Order5827.8
Thief41292512
Assassin´s Creed IV: Black Flag44.53420.49.8
X-Plane 10.2566.830.514.79
Need for Speed: Rivals30303021.2
Call of Duty: Ghosts45.831.720.813.2
Battlefield 498644216
Batman: Arkham Origins784520
F1 2013918842
Total War: Rome II79.165.410.4
Saints Row IV45.132.820.8
The Bureau: XCOM Declassified61.553.134.321.5
Splinter Cell: Blacklist72.826.713
Dota 283.143.7
Company of Heroes 242.637.621.7
Metro: Last Light52.12713.3
BioShock Infinite118635420
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm104.665.724.1
Tomb Raider136735123
Crysis 367.5412510
Dead Space 379.763.339.8
Far Cry 356.932.510.4
Hitman: Absolution50.5463115
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2110.990.153.534.7
Medal of Honor: Warfighter56.947.918.8
Dishonored104.985.97744
Dirt Showdown92.974.568.921.8
Diablo III95.18151
Mass Effect 355.940.4
Alan Wake39.418.7
Anno 2070157.4824922
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim94.8704726
Battlefield 357.443.818.3
Deus Ex Human Revolution65.232.6
Dirt 3205.8122.890.932.1
Total War: Shogun 248.719.7
Resident Evil 593.158.8
Trackmania Nations Forever80.660.6
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
12
15
3
7
22
18
1
22
17
13
36
13
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 18:40:04

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Mar 2024 05:34:43 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.053s ... 0.054s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.054s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.054s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 5489 +0.031s ... 0.085s

#7 got single benchmarks 5489 +0.022s ... 0.107s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.107s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.451s ... 0.559s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.559s

#11 Got 241 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.574s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.574s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.042s ... 0.616s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.754s ... 2.37s

#15 return log +0.069s ... 2.439s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon R9 M265X graphics card

Toshiba Qosmio X70 Notebook Review

Toshiba Qosmio X70 Notebook Review

Performance break. Toshiba's multimedia notebook Qosmio X70 is available for 1,300 Euros (~$1411). For that money you get a lot of processing performance, but ...
Intel Core i7-4710HQ | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | 17.30" | 2.9 kg
Toshiba Satellite P70-B Notebook Review

Toshiba Satellite P70-B Notebook Review

All-rounder with weaknesses. Toshiba's 17.3-inch all-rounder is available for just under 1200 Euros (~$1346). The buyer gets a very well equipped computer with ...
Intel Core i7-4720HQ | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | 17.30" | 2.9 kg
Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T Notebook Review

Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T Notebook Review

Pixel machine. Outsider - trailblazer? While the competition is equipping their high-definition luxury-range with Nvidia GPUs, the Japanese manufacturer relies ...
Intel Core i7-4710HQ | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | 15.60" | 2.4 kg
Toshiba Satellite L70-B-130 Notebook Review

Toshiba Satellite L70-B-130 Notebook Review

Hot Gamer? Toshiba self-confidently advertises its new multimedia laptop, Satellite L70-B-130 with AMD's R9 M265X as "Enthusiast Graphics". Our review reveals w...
Intel Core i7-4710HQ | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | 17.30" | 2.9 kg
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106 Notebook Review Update

Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106 Notebook Review Update

The successor. The new version of the Satellite S70 doesn't rely on a GeForce GT 740M chip anymore, but on a Radeon R9 M265X graphics core which enhances gaming...
Intel Core i7-4700HQ | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | 17.30" | 2.8 kg

Toshiba Qosmio X70-B-10T: Intel Core i7-4720HQ, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X70-B-10T

Toshiba Qosmio X70-B-10P: Intel Core i7-4710HQ, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X70-B-10P

Toshiba Satellite P50-B-10V: Intel Core i7-4710HQ, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P50-B-10V

Toshiba Qosmio X70-B-10M: Intel Core i7-4710HQ, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X70-B-10M

Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T: Intel Core i7-4710HQ, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T

Toshiba Satellite P50-B-103: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P50-B-103

Toshiba Satellite P50-B-10D: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P50-B-10D

Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-108: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-108

Toshiba Satellite P50-B-108: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P50-B-108

Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite S70-B-10N

Toshiba Satellite P50t-BST2N01: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P50t-BST2N01

Toshiba Satellite P50T-B-10K: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P50T-B-10K

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter