Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon HD 8750M

AMD Radeon HD 8750M

The AMD Radeon HD 8750M (sometimes known as the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 8750) is a DirectX 11.1 graphics card for laptops. It is based on the Mars chip (28nm GCN architecture) with 384 shader cores, 24 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The core is clocked at 775 - 825 MHz (DDR3) or 620 - 670 MHz (GDDR5) and can access up to 2 GB of memory (128 bit, 1000 MHz).

The performance of the Radeon HD 8750M is similar to the Nvidia GeForce GT 730M and 740M. Overall, the DDR3 and the GDDR5 versions of the card are offering almost the same performance, as the higher core clock of the DDR3 modell is compensated by the additional memory bandwidth of the GDDR5 variant. Current and demanding games of 2013/2014 like Battlefield 4 will run fluently in medium resolutions and detail settings.

The 384 shaders can be used with OpenCL 1.2 for general-purpose calculations (as 6 compute units). Compared to old TeraScale 2 chips, the GCN-based Mars architecture offers improved performance in this framework.

Features of the 8750M include video decoding via UVD3 for decoding MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, VC-1, MPEG-2, and Flash directly from the AMD GPU. Multi-View Codec (MVC) and MPEG-4 part 2 (DivX, xVid) HD videos are now compatible as well.

The 8700M series also supports automatic graphics switching between the integrated GPU and discrete GPU. Called Enduro, the technology supersedes AMD's Dynamic Switchable Graphics and is similar to Nvidia's Optimus. Furthermore, the 8750M can directly support up to 2 connected monitors using Eyefinity Technology if Enduro is disabled.

Other features of the 8700M series include ZeroCore for reducing power consumption when the display is turned off and Power Gating to power down areas of the chip that are not used. PowerTune allows automatic overclocking and underclocking of the graphics card as long as the GPU is within its TDP limit. For example, the chip may be underclocked when running FurMark and OCCT, but will overclock in certain games like Lost Planet, Crysis or Resident Evil 5.

The integrated HD audio processor is able to transmit HD Audio (TrueHD or DTS Master Audio) over HDMI and DisplayPort (e.g., for Blu-Ray videos). Additionally, it now allows audio to output simultaneously and in parallel to multiple devices with the new Discrete Digital Multipoint Audio (DDMA) feature.

The power consumption should be similar to or slightly below that of the old HD 7670M. As a result, the 8750M is best suited for 13-inch notebooks or larger.

Radeon HD 8700M Series

Radeon HD 8790M compare 384 @ 0.85 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon HD 8770M compare 384 @ 0.78 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics compare 640 @ 0.72 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 8750M 384 @ 0.62 - 0.78 GHz128 Bit @ 2000 - 4000 MHz
Radeon HD 8730M compare 384 @ 0.65 GHz128 Bit @ 2000 MHz
CodenameMars Pro
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed620 - 775 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed2000 - 4000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5, DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0
Transistor Count900 Million
technology28 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement16.11.2012

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.6 pt (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5433     avg: 5910     median: 5610 (6%)     max: 7521 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 7690     avg: 8445     median: 8524.5 (2%)     max: 8882 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1090     avg: 1192     median: 1186 (2%)     max: 1281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1170     avg: 1278     median: 1276.5 (1%)     max: 1339 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 41642     avg: 55701     median: 54564 (7%)     max: 70678 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1512     avg: 1884     median: 1863.5 (3%)     max: 2515 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1379     avg: 1749     median: 1698 (1%)     max: 2662 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5951     avg: 6451     median: 6352 (4%)     max: 7610 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 8173     avg: 9095     median: 8901.5 (12%)     max: 10331 Points
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 sw-02 +
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
specvp11 ensight-04 +
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4687     avg: 6449     median: 6519 (5%)     max: 8055 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 29.12     avg: 34.9     median: 34.8 (12%)     max: 39.75 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
21  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
59.8 63.5 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.4 33.3 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.1 14 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
48.7 49.6 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33 37.9 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.4 28 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
70  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
43  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
80 92 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54 66 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
37 60 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23 29 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
229.4 253.6 316.3 ~ 266 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
146.5 147.9 182.7 ~ 159 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
122.5 142.3 157.9 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
78.3 97.5 99.2 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
41 62.3 66.9 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32 50 54.8 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23 40.4 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7 7.9 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
36.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
49.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
49.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
71.8 96.4 99.3 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52.7 53.9 70.3 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.5 30.7 34.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
28 30 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.1 24 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12 13.9 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
74 86.8 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52.5 57.4 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
41.6 50.7 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
17 36 41 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12 27.8 28.7 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7 16 16.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
59.7 59.8 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.8 36.8 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30.6 31 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6 11.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
181.2 187.2 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
71.7 79.1 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
42.8 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
42.5 66 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26 26.8 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19 20.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
71.2 92.6 94 104.4 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38.7 45.5 45.9 49.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.3 30.8 30.8 33.6 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.8 15.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
32.5 36 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.8 22 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14 14.5 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
119.8 138 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54 54.9 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
42 42.8 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
57  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
20.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
22.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
74.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
45  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
36.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
54.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
71.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
56.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
49.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
low 1024x768
258.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
141 174.5 ~ 158 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
128 143.2 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2012

F1 2012

2012
low 1024x768
73  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
39  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
53  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
31.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
59.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
135  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
100.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
82.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1366x768
51.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
31.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
33.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
42.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
71.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
44.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
35.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
80.5 81.2 85.2 93 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57.4 57.7 57.7 68 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
49.2 49.3 49.5 56 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.3 30.8 31.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
44.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
57 57.6 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
44.3 45 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
43.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
97 103.6 109.8 126.5 129.5 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
48.1 50.4 52.5 54.1 58.5 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
29.4 29.7 31.4 32.1 34.6 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.1 14.4 15 15 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
55 70.7 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38.8 46.5 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.4 32.4 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
130.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
79.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
43.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
86  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
99.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
52.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
125.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
31.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
CPU 1280x1024
15.3
Civilization 5

Civilization 5

2010
low 1024x768
45.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
57.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
53.6  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
48.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
126  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
47  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
35  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Just Cause 2

Just Cause 2

2010
ultra 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 800x600
72  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
40  fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
78.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
44.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
96  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
55.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
low 800x600
84.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
64  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
37.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
154  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
48.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
108.9  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
40.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
106.2  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
33.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
64  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
64  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
31  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Thief2114.811.1
X-Plane 10.2562321411.7
Need for Speed: Rivals3028.823.7
Call of Duty: Ghosts35.332.714.3
Battlefield 44935258.1
Batman: Arkham Origins704327
F1 201386604926
Fifa 1426615914192
Total War: Rome II5746327
Saints Row IV36.829.118.612.5
The Bureau: XCOM Declassified49.933.122.412.5
Splinter Cell: Blacklist49.921.5
Dota 2895932
Company of Heroes 22923132.1
GRID 280554615.5
Metro: Last Light3123137.9
BioShock Infinite60363111
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm184754315.3
SimCity54262010.8
Tomb Raider91453014
Crysis 33421145.8
Dead Space 3129544225.5
Far Cry 3574018.56
Assassin´s Creed III20.919.47.3
Hitman: Absolution22.720.115.76
Call of Duty: Black Ops 274.654.32618.3
Need for Speed: Most Wanted4536.622.514.3
Medal of Honor: Warfighter54.733.825.69.7
Dishonored71.756.449.327.8
Fifa 13258.615813684.5
F1 201273573930
Borderlands 2534131.318.1
Guild Wars 259.726.410.4
Counter-Strike: GO135100.682.353.5
Darksiders II51.229.5
Sleeping Dogs31.330.223.67
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier33.417.5
Max Payne 342.726.825.616.5
Dirt Showdown71.344.335.115.9
Diablo III85605131
Risen 2: Dark Waters44.830.32311.2
Mass Effect 3574526.3
Alan Wake43.72612.2
Anno 2070113533115
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim63433018.1
CoD: Modern Warfare 3130.379.846.627.4
Battlefield 343.432.225.510.3
Batman: Arkham City866930
Deus Ex Human Revolution99.752.422.9
Total War: Shogun 2125.331.623.5
Civilization 545.715.1
Mafia 257.153.648.2
StarCraft 21264735
Just Cause 224.9
Metro 2033724023
Battlefield: Bad Company 278.660.244.1
Resident Evil 59655.133.5
Need for Speed Shift84.86437.1
Trackmania Nations Forever15448.425.1
Crysis - GPU Benchmark108.940.4
Crysis - CPU Benchmark106.233.7
World of Warcraft64643118.7
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
24
23
9
13
29
9
2
24
27
1
2
41
5
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 19:56:52

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Mar 2024 05:34:43 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.074s ... 0.076s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.076s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.076s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3727 +0.031s ... 0.107s

#7 got single benchmarks 3727 +0.048s ... 0.155s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.155s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.792s ... 0.947s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.947s

#11 Got 315 rows for game benchmarks. +0.029s ... 0.976s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.976s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.049s ... 1.025s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +2.06s ... 3.084s

#15 return log +0.052s ... 3.137s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon HD 8750M graphics card

Acer TravelMate P645-MG-74508G75tkk Notebook Review

Acer TravelMate P645-MG-74508G75tkk Notebook Review

Beautiful without frills. Acer now offers a premium business notebook with the TravelMate P645. We check if the new Ultrabook flagship can compete with the prem...
Intel Core i7-4500U | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
Review Update HP EliteBook 850 G1-H5G44ET Notebook

Review Update HP EliteBook 850 G1-H5G44ET Notebook

Slowed down. Besides the Core i7 processor and the improved memory equipment, it is the dedicated Radeon HD 8750M in particular that is supposed to justify the ...
Intel Core i7-4600U | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | 15.60" | 2 kg
Review Update HP ProBook 470 G1 E9Y75EA Notebook

Review Update HP ProBook 470 G1 E9Y75EA Notebook

Now featuring Haswell. HP's ProBook 470 is an office laptop for both the private and professional field. Its price range of approx. 700 Euros (~$959) and the in...
Intel Core i5-4200M | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | 17.30" | 2.9 kg
Review Acer TravelMate P645-MG-9419 Ultrabook

Review Acer TravelMate P645-MG-9419 Ultrabook

Ultra-TravelMate. Acer updates their venerable TravelMate-series and adds a 14-inch business Ultrabook to the lineup. Is the 14-inch Haswell-equipped P645 with ...
Intel Core i7-4500U | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | 14.00" | 1.6 kg
 

Review HP ProBook 470 G0 (H6P56EA) Notebook

Big Business. The new HP ProBook 470 promises professional quality at a bargain price, but what is the catch? Despite a Core-i7 chip, a lot of memory and a dedi...
Intel Core i7-3632QM | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | 17.30" | 2.9 kg

Acer Aspire V5-552PG-X809: AMD A10-5757M, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  Review » Review Acer Aspire V5-552PG-X809 Notebook

Acer Aspire E1-572G-54204G75Mnkk: Intel Core i5-4200U, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » Review Acer Aspire E1-572G-54204G75Mnkk Notebook

Dell Inspiron 15-3521-0620: Intel Core i5-3337U, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » Review Dell Inspiron 15-3521-0620 Notebook

Samsung 510R5E-S01DE: Intel Core i5-3210M, 15.60", 2 kg
  Review » Review Samsung Series 5 510R5E Notebook

Samsung 530U4E-S02DE: Intel Core i5-3337U, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Review Samsung Series 5 530U4E-S02DE Ultrabook

Lenovo G510-59406666: Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo G510-59406666

HP ProBook 650 G1: Intel Core i5-4200M, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP ProBook 650 G1

Acer TravelMate P455-MG: Intel Core i5-4200H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P455-MG

Acer Travelmate Pro TMP645-MG: Intel Core i5-4200U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Travelmate Pro TMP645-MG

HP ProBook 470 G1 E9Y75EA: Intel Core i5-4200M, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » HP ProBook 470 G1 E9Y75EA

HP ProBook 455 H0W29EA: AMD A8-4500M, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP ProBook 455 H0W29EA

Acer TravelMate P645-MG-9419: Intel Core i7-4500U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P645-MG-9419

Acer Aspire E1-572G-54204G75Mnkk: Intel Core i5-4200U, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire E1-572G-54204G75Mnkk

Acer Aspire V5-552G-8632: AMD A8-5557M, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V5-552G-8632

HP EliteBook 850 G1-H5G44ET: Intel Core i7-4600U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 850 G1-H5G44ET

HP EliteBook 840 G1: Intel Core i7-4600U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 840 G1

Lenovo IdeaPad G510: Intel Core i5-4200M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad G510

Acer TravelMate P255-MG-54204G50Mnkk: Intel Core i5-4200U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P255-MG-54208G50Mnkk

Acer Aspire V5-552G-X414: AMD A10-5757M, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V5-552G-X414

Lenovo IdeaPad G500s-59381252: Intel Core i7-3612QM, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad G500s-59381252

HP ProBook 450-H0U97EA: Intel Core i5-3230M, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP ProBook 450-H0U97EA

Samsung 370R5E-S06PL: Intel Pentium 997, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Samsung 370R5E-S06PL

Asus N56DY: AMD A8-5550M, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N56DY

Samsung 510R5E-S01DE: Intel Core i5-3210M, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Samsung 510R5E-S01DE

Samsung 300E5E-S01PL: Intel Core i3-3120M, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung 300E5E-S01PL

Samsung NP370R5V: Intel Core i3-3110M, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Samsung NP370R5V

Samsung 530U4E-S02DE: Intel Core i5-3337U, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Samsung 530U4E-S02DE

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter