Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon HD 8750M

AMD Radeon HD 8750M

The AMD Radeon HD 8750M (sometimes known as the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 8750) is a DirectX 11.1 graphics card for laptops. It is based on the Mars chip (28nm GCN architecture) with 384 shader cores, 24 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The core is clocked at 775 - 825 MHz (DDR3) or 620 - 670 MHz (GDDR5) and can access up to 2 GB of memory (128 bit, 1000 MHz).

The performance of the Radeon HD 8750M is similar to the Nvidia GeForce GT 730M and 740M. Overall, the DDR3 and the GDDR5 versions of the card are offering almost the same performance, as the higher core clock of the DDR3 modell is compensated by the additional memory bandwidth of the GDDR5 variant. Current and demanding games of 2013/2014 like Battlefield 4 will run fluently in medium resolutions and detail settings.

The 384 shaders can be used with OpenCL 1.2 for general-purpose calculations (as 6 compute units). Compared to old TeraScale 2 chips, the GCN-based Mars architecture offers improved performance in this framework.

Features of the 8750M include video decoding via UVD3 for decoding MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, VC-1, MPEG-2, and Flash directly from the AMD GPU. Multi-View Codec (MVC) and MPEG-4 part 2 (DivX, xVid) HD videos are now compatible as well.

The 8700M series also supports automatic graphics switching between the integrated GPU and discrete GPU. Called Enduro, the technology supersedes AMD's Dynamic Switchable Graphics and is similar to Nvidia's Optimus. Furthermore, the 8750M can directly support up to 2 connected monitors using Eyefinity Technology if Enduro is disabled.

Other features of the 8700M series include ZeroCore for reducing power consumption when the display is turned off and Power Gating to power down areas of the chip that are not used. PowerTune allows automatic overclocking and underclocking of the graphics card as long as the GPU is within its TDP limit. For example, the chip may be underclocked when running FurMark and OCCT, but will overclock in certain games like Lost Planet, Crysis or Resident Evil 5.

The integrated HD audio processor is able to transmit HD Audio (TrueHD or DTS Master Audio) over HDMI and DisplayPort (e.g., for Blu-Ray videos). Additionally, it now allows audio to output simultaneously and in parallel to multiple devices with the new Discrete Digital Multipoint Audio (DDMA) feature.

The power consumption should be similar to or slightly below that of the old HD 7670M. As a result, the 8750M is best suited for 13-inch notebooks or larger.

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon HD 8700M Series

Radeon HD 8790M

384 @ 850 MHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz

Radeon HD 8770M

384 @ 775 MHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics

640 @ 720 / 825 MHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 8750M 384 @ 620 - 775 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 2000 - 4000 MHz

Radeon HD 8730M

384 @ 650 MHz128 Bit @ 2000 MHz
CodenameMars Pro
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed *620 - 775 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed *2000 - 4000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5, DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0
Transistors900 Million
technology28 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement16.11.2012
* The specified clock rates are only guidelines for the manufacturer and can be altered by them.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Ref. Match 64Bit
0% 100%
min: 98      avg: 98 (98%)     median: 98 (98%)     max: 98 Points
Cinebench R15 - OpenGL 64Bit
0% 100%
min: 30.88      avg: 38.7 (29%)     median: 40.2 (31%)     max: 43.4 Points
3DMark (2013) - Fire Strike Standard Graphics 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 1170      avg: 1277.6 (11%)     median: 1276.5 (11%)     max: 1339 Points
3DMark (2013) - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 7690      avg: 8444.6 (11%)     median: 8524.5 (11%)     max: 8882 Points
3DMark (2013) - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 41642      avg: 55700.5 (7%)     median: 54564 (7%)     max: 70678 Points
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 16.9      avg: 16.9 (12%)     median: 16.9 (12%)     max: 16.9 fps
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
0% 100%
min: 1214      avg: 1217.5 (21%)     median: 1217.5 (21%)     max: 1221 Points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room Scene, OpenCL GPUs-only
0% 100%
min: 221      avg: 224.5 (15%)     median: 224.5 (15%)     max: 228 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala Scene, OpenCL GPUs-only
0% 100%
min: 367      avg: 372.5 (15%)     median: 372.5 (15%)     max: 378 Samples/s
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 1379      avg: 1748.9 (11%)     median: 1698 (11%)     max: 2662 points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 1512      avg: 1883.5 (14%)     median: 1863.5 (14%)     max: 2515 points
3DMark Vantage - P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 5951      avg: 6450.7 (14%)     median: 6352 (14%)     max: 7610 Points
3DMark Vantage - P Result no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 6491      avg: 6901.6 (18%)     median: 6840 (18%)     max: 7297 Points
3DMark 06
0% 100%
min: 8173      avg: 9095 (30%)     median: 8901.5 (30%)     max: 10331 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 9722      avg: 13619.8 (37%)     median: 13642.5 (37%)     max: 17472 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 18964      avg: 22143.5 (15%)     median: 22143.5 (15%)     max: 25323 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 21.2      avg: 22 (12%)     median: 22.2 (12%)     max: 22.6 fps
PCMark Vantage - Gaming Score 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 3695      avg: 6034 (23%)     median: 5275.5 (20%)     max: 10889 Points
SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060
0% 100%
min: 26.41      avg: 26.4 (51%)     median: 26.4 (51%)     max: 26.41 fps
SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060
0% 100%
min: 4.87      avg: 4.9 (6%)     median: 4.9 (6%)     max: 4.87 fps
SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060
0% 100%
min: 6.3      avg: 6.3 (18%)     median: 6.3 (18%)     max: 6.3 fps
SPECviewperf 12 - Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060
0% 100%
min: 5.62      avg: 5.6 (10%)     median: 5.6 (10%)     max: 5.62 fps
SPECviewperf 12 - Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060
0% 100%
min: 13.22      avg: 13.2 (18%)     median: 13.2 (18%)     max: 13.22 fps
SPECviewperf 12 - Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060
0% 100%
min: 16.34      avg: 16.3 (30%)     median: 16.3 (30%)     max: 16.34 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Siemens NX 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 6.4      avg: 6.4 (10%)     median: 6.4 (10%)     max: 6.4 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Tcvis 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 2.89      avg: 2.9 (5%)     median: 2.9 (5%)     max: 2.89 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - SolidWorks 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 11.9      avg: 11.9 (18%)     median: 11.9 (18%)     max: 11.9 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 3.02      avg: 3 (16%)     median: 3 (16%)     max: 3.02 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Maya 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 6.33      avg: 6.3 (6%)     median: 6.3 (6%)     max: 6.33 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Lightwave 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 13.21      avg: 13.2 (16%)     median: 13.2 (16%)     max: 13.21 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Ensight 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 12.16      avg: 12.2 (15%)     median: 12.2 (15%)     max: 12.16 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Catia 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 5.49      avg: 5.5 (8%)     median: 5.5 (8%)     max: 5.49 fps
Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit
0% 100%
min: 29.12      avg: 34.9 (32%)     median: 34.8 (32%)     max: 39.75 Points
Cinebench R10 - Shading 32Bit
0% 100%
min: 4687      avg: 6448.5 (53%)     median: 6519 (54%)     max: 8055 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
0% 100%
min: 6.6      avg: 6.7 (85%)     median: 6.7 (85%)     max: 6.8 points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
0% 100%
min: 6.6      avg: 6.7 (85%)     median: 6.7 (85%)     max: 6.8 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
21  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
14.8  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
11.1  fps      Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
X-Plane 10.25
low 1024x768
59.8 63.5 ~ 62 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
30.4 33.3 ~ 32 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
13.1 14 ~ 14 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Need for Speed: Rivals
low 1024x768
30  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
28.8  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
23.7  fps      Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Call of Duty: Ghosts
low 1024x768
35.3  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
32.7  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
14.3  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Battlefield 4
low 1024x768
48.7 49.6 ~ 49 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
33 37.9 ~ 35 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
22.4 28 ~ 25 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.1  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Batman: Arkham Origins
low 1024x768
70  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
43  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
27  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
80 92 ~ 86 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
54 66 ~ 60 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
37 60 ~ 49 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23 29 ~ 26 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
229.4 253.6 316.3 ~ 266 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
146.5 147.9 182.7 ~ 159 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
122.5 142.3 157.9 ~ 141 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
78.3 97.5 99.2 ~ 92 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Total War: Rome II
low 1024x768
41 62.3 66.9 ~ 57 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
32 50 54.8 ~ 46 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
23 40.4 ~ 32 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7 7.9 ~ 7 fps      Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Saints Row IV
low 1280x720
36.8  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
29.1  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
18.6  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
The Bureau: XCOM Declassified
low 1024x768
49.9  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
33.1  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
22.4  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
71.8 96.4 99.3 ~ 89 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
52.7 53.9 70.3 ~ 59 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.5 30.7 34.8 ~ 32 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Company of Heroes 2
low 1024x768
28 30 ~ 29 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
22.1 24 ~ 23 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
12 13.9 ~ 13 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.1  fps      Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
74 86.8 ~ 80 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
52.5 57.4 ~ 55 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
41.6 50.7 ~ 46 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.5  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Metro: Last Light
low 1024x768
17 36 41 ~ 31 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
12 27.8 28.7 ~ 23 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
7 16 16.3 ~ 13 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.9  fps      Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
BioShock Infinite
low 1280x720
59.7 59.8 ~ 60 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
34.8 36.8 ~ 36 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
30.6 31 ~ 31 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6 11.2 ~ 11 fps      Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm
low 1024x768
181.2 187.2 ~ 184 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
71.7 79.1 ~ 75 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
42.8 44 ~ 43 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.3  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
42.5 66 ~ 54 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
26 26.8 ~ 26 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
19 20.1 ~ 20 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.8  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Tomb Raider
low 1024x768
71.2 92.6 94 104.4 ~ 91 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
38.7 45.5 45.9 49.4 ~ 45 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
25.3 30.8 30.8 33.6 ~ 30 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.8 15.3 ~ 14 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
32.5 36 ~ 34 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
20.8 22 ~ 21 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
14 14.5 ~ 14 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.8  fps      Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dead Space 3
low 1024x768
119.8 138 ~ 129 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
54 54.9 ~ 54 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
42 42.8 ~ 42 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.5  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
57  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
40  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
18.5  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Assassin´s Creed III
med. 1366x768
20.9  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
19.4  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.3  fps      Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Hitman: Absolution
low 1024x768
22.7  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
20.1  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
15.7  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps      Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2
low 1024x768
74.6  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
54.3  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
26  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Need for Speed: Most Wanted
low 1024x768
45  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
36.6  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
22.5  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.3  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Medal of Honor: Warfighter
low 1024x768
54.7  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
33.8  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
25.6  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dishonored
low 1024x768
71.7  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
56.4  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
49.3  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.8  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
low 1024x768
258.6  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
141 174.5 ~ 158 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
128 143.2 ~ 136 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84.5  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2012

F1 2012

2012
low 1024x768
73  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
57  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
39  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Borderlands 2
low 1024x768
53  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
41  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
31.3  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.1  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Guild Wars 2
low 1024x768
59.7  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
26.4  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Counter-Strike: GO
low 1024x768
135  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
100.6  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
82.3  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.5  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Darksiders II
med. 1366x768
51.2  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.5  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Sleeping Dogs
low 1024x768
31.3  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
30.2  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
23.6  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps      Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Max Payne 3
low 1024x768
42.7  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
26.8  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
25.6  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.5  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt Showdown
low 1024x768
71.3  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
44.3  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
35.1  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.9  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Diablo III
low 1024x768
80.5 81.2 85.2 93 ~ 85 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
57.4 57.7 57.7 68 ~ 60 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
49.2 49.3 49.5 56 ~ 51 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.3 30.8 31.7 ~ 31 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Risen 2: Dark Waters
low 1024x768
44.8  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
30.3  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
23  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.2  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mass Effect 3
low 1280x720
57 57.6 ~ 57 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
44.3 45 ~ 45 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.3  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
43.7  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
26  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.2  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
97 103.6 109.8 126.5 129.5 ~ 113 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
48.1 50.4 52.5 54.1 58.5 ~ 53 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
29.4 29.7 31.4 32.1 34.6 ~ 31 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.1 14.4 15 15 ~ 15 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
low 1280x720
55 70.7 ~ 63 fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
38.8 46.5 ~ 43 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
28.4 32.4 ~ 30 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.1  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
CoD: Modern Warfare 3
low 1024x768
130.3  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
79.8  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
46.6  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.4  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Battlefield 3
low 1024x768
43.4  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
32.2  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
25.5  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.3  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Batman: Arkham City
low 1024x768
86  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
69  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
30  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Deus Ex Human Revolution
low 1024x768
99.7  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
52.4  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.9  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Total War: Shogun 2
low 1024x768
125.3  fps      Compare
med. 1280x720
31.6  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.5  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Civilization 5
low 1024x768
45.7  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.1  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
57.1  fps      Compare
med. 1024x768
53.6  fps      Compare
high 1360x768
48.2  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
StarCraft 2
low 1024x768
126  fps      Compare
med. 1360x768
47  fps      Compare
high 1360x768
35  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Just Cause 2
ultra 1920x1080
24.9  fps      Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Metro 2033
low 800x600
72  fps      Compare
med. 1360x768
40  fps      Compare
high 1600x900
23  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Battlefield: Bad Company 2
low 1024x768
78.6  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
60.2  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
44.1  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Resident Evil 5
low 800x600
96  fps      Compare
high 1360x768
55.1  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.5  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Need for Speed Shift
low 800x600
84.8  fps      Compare
med. 1024x768
64  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
37.1  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Trackmania Nations Forever
low 640x480
154  fps      Compare
high 1024x768
48.4  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.1  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World of Warcraft
low 800x600
64  fps      Compare
med. 1024x768
64  fps      Compare
high 1280x1024
31  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

#0 Did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old +0.002s ... 0.002s

#1 min, max, avg, median took 0.00037670135498047s +0.358s ... 0.36s

#2 Before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 0.361s

#3 return log +1.3s ... 1.661s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon HD 8750M graphics card

Acer Aspire E1-572G-54204G75Mnkk: Intel Core i5 4200U, 15.6", 2.4 kg
  Review » Review Acer Aspire E1-572G-54204G75Mnkk Notebook

Acer Aspire V5-552PG-X809: AMD A-Series A10-5757M, 15.6", 2.3 kg
  Review » Review Acer Aspire V5-552PG-X809 Notebook

Acer TravelMate P645-MG-74508G75tkk: Intel Core i7 4500U, 14", 1.5 kg
  Review » Acer TravelMate P645-MG-74508G75tkk Notebook Review

Acer TravelMate P645-MG-9419: Intel Core i7 4500U, 14.0", 1.6 kg
  Review » Review Acer TravelMate P645-MG-9419 Ultrabook

Dell Inspiron 15-3521-0620: Intel Core i5 3337U, 15.6", 2.4 kg
  Review » Review Dell Inspiron 15-3521-0620 Notebook

HP EliteBook 850 G1-H5G44ET: Intel Core i7 4600U, 15.6", 2 kg
  Review » Review Update HP EliteBook 850 G1-H5G44ET Notebook

HP ProBook 470 G0-H6P56EA: Intel Core i7 3632QM, 17.3", 2.9 kg
  Review » Review HP ProBook 470 G0 (H6P56EA) Notebook

HP ProBook 470 G1 E9Y75EA: Intel Core i5 4200M, 17.3", 2.9 kg
  Review » Review Update HP ProBook 470 G1 E9Y75EA Notebook

Samsung 510R5E-S01DE: Intel Core i5 3210M, 15.6", 2 kg
  Review » Review Samsung Series 5 510R5E Notebook

Samsung 530U4E-S02DE: Intel Core i5 3337U, 14", 1.8 kg
  Review » Review Samsung Series 5 530U4E-S02DE Ultrabook

Acer Aspire E1-572G-54204G75Mnkk: Intel Core i5 4200U, 15.6", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire E1-572G-54204G75Mnkk

Acer Aspire V5-552G-8632: AMD A-Series A8-5557M, 15.6", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V5-552G-8632

Acer Aspire V5-552G-X414: AMD A-Series A10-5757M, 15.6", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V5-552G-X414

Acer TravelMate P255-MG-54204G50Mnkk: Intel Core i5 4200U, 15.6", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P255-MG-54208G50Mnkk

Acer TravelMate P455-MG: Intel Core i5 4200H, 15.6", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P455-MG

Acer TravelMate P645-MG-9419: Intel Core i7 4500U, 14.0", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P645-MG-9419

Acer Travelmate Pro TMP645-MG: Intel Core i5 4200U, 14.0", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Travelmate Pro TMP645-MG

Asus N56DY: AMD A-Series A8-5550M, 15.6", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N56DY

HP EliteBook 840 G1: Intel Core i7 4600U, 14.0", 1.6 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 840 G1

HP EliteBook 850 G1-H5G44ET: Intel Core i7 4600U, 15.6", 2 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 850 G1-H5G44ET

HP ProBook 450-H0U97EA: Intel Core i5 3230M, 15.6", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP ProBook 450-H0U97EA

HP ProBook 455 H0W29EA: AMD A-Series A8-4500M, 15.6", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP ProBook 455 H0W29EA

HP ProBook 470 G1 E9Y75EA: Intel Core i5 4200M, 17.3", 2.9 kg
  External Review » HP ProBook 470 G1 E9Y75EA

HP ProBook 650 G1: Intel Core i5 4200M, 15.6", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP ProBook 650 G1

Lenovo G510-59406666: Intel Core i7 4700MQ, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo G510-59406666

Lenovo IdeaPad G500s-59381252: Intel Core i7 3612QM, 15.6", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad G500s-59381252

Lenovo IdeaPad G510: Intel Core i5 4200M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad G510

Samsung 300E5E-S01PL: Intel Core i3 3120M, 15.6", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung 300E5E-S01PL

Samsung 370R5E-S06PL: Intel Pentium 997, 15.6", 2 kg
  External Review » Samsung 370R5E-S06PL

Samsung 510R5E-S01DE: Intel Core i5 3210M, 15.6", 2 kg
  External Review » Samsung 510R5E-S01DE

Samsung 530U4E-S02DE: Intel Core i5 3337U, 14", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Samsung 530U4E-S02DE

Samsung NP370R5V: Intel Core i3 3110M, 15.6", 2 kg
  External Review » Samsung NP370R5V

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailled list of all laptop GPUs with a short description. Classified and sorted by performance.

» Benchmark List
Sortable and restrainable list of all GPUs with benchmarks (e.g. 3DMarks).

» Notebook Gaming List
Which game can be played with my graphics card.

Class 1
GeForce GTX 980
GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 580
Radeon HD 6970
GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Radeon HD 5850
Radeon HD 7770
Radeon HD 7770
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Radeon HD 6790
Radeon HD 5770
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Class 2
GeForce GTS 450
Radeon HD 4850
Class 3
Radeon HD 5670
GeForce GT 240
Radeon R6 M255DX
GeForce GT 430
Radeon HD 5570
GeForce GT 220
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Class 4
Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Mali-T760 MP6
Class 5
PowerVR GX6450
Radeon HD 4350
GeForce G 107M *
Chrome9HD *
Class 6
unknown *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > FAQ / Tips / Technics > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Author: Klaus Hinum (Update: 2013-01-17)