Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

The 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 is an integrated graphics adapter that four Qualcomm Snapdragon X chips feature, as of Sep 2024. It has 1,536 unified shaders at its disposal that reportedly run at up to 1,250 MHz.

The faster 4.6 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU is reserved for the 2 most powerful Snapdragon X Elite chips, the X1E-84-100 and the X1E-00-1DE. It runs at higher clock speeds of up to 1,500 MHz while delivering the same features and having the same hardware configuration as what the 3.8 TFLOPS flavor offers.

Architecture

The underlying architecture is reportedly (Chips and Cheese) in many respects the same as what was used in the Adreno 730, rendering the iGPU DirectX 12-compatible but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-compatible. Ray tracing is only supported via Vulcan 1.3. The highest OpenGL version supported is ES 3.2. The iGPU enjoys access to fast enough RAM but has comparatively small and slow caches to work with. AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded; with VP9, only decoding is possible.

The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p rather than SUHD 4320p.

Performance

Just like it is with AMD, Intel and Nvidia products, a lot depends on the power targets of a specific system. That being said, the iGPU's real-world performance is still a little underwhelming. While faster than the aging Intel Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno doesn't even match the Radeon 780M meaning gamers will most likely not be happy with the Qualcomm iGPU at all. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is barely playable at 1080p on low with 23 fps on average. The same goes for Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty: 23 fps at 1080p on low graphics settings.

It is also worth mentioning that Qualcomm's graphics drivers aren't quite as polished as what AMD, Intel and especially Nvidia have to offer, leading to severe visual artifacts in certain games. A lot of games wont start at all.

Power consumption

X Plus 10-core as well as X Elite chips normally consume 35 W to 45 W of power, including the on-package RAM. This means the iGPU is unlikely to ever get to eat more than 30 W.

Since TSMC's N4P process is employed, it's safe to say power efficiency is going to be better than average with this iGPU, as of late 2024. Apple is still king in this area with its M-series CPUs and GPUs, of course.

Snapdragon X Series

Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS compare 1536 @ 1.5 GHz? Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 1536 @ 1.25 GHz? Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS compare 768 128 Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS compare 768 128 Bit @ 8448 MHz
Pipelines1536 - unified
Core Speed1250 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8448 MHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption30 Watt
technology4 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.)
FeaturesSUHD 2160p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/AV1 encoding and decoding
Date of Announcement26.10.2023
CPU in Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-10012 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-10012 x ? MHz, 35 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-66-10010 x 3400 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-10010 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 899     avg: 1793     median: 1893.5 (5%)     max: 1934 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 804     avg: 1616     median: 1706 (3%)     max: 1739 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 18704     avg: 22961     median: 24813 (23%)     max: 25367 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 29343     avg: 36796     median: 40436 (10%)     max: 40609 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3121     avg: 5693     median: 5966 (9%)     max: 6154 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3239     avg: 5963     median: 6288.5 (6%)     max: 6454 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 5522     avg: 6220     median: 6323 (7%)     max: 6430 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3553     avg: 6430     median: 6870 (8%)     max: 7028 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 3163     avg: 5932     median: 6352 (5%)     max: 6515 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
8454 points (6%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 22.6     avg: 24.6     median: 24.8 (1%)     max: 25.7 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 48.6     avg: 49     median: 48.8 (18%)     max: 49.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 105.7     avg: 106.3     median: 106.6 (19%)     max: 106.7 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 266.9     avg: 292.2     median: 274.5 (20%)     max: 356 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 244.1     median: 315 (8%)     max: 383 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 9.6     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 30.6 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 15316     avg: 20515     median: 20515 (5%)     max: 32096 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 19700     avg: 24179     median: 23712 (6%)     max: 34432 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 16.1     avg: 19.3     median: 19.6 (3%)     max: 21.9 Watt
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 21.4     avg: 25.1     median: 25.8 (4%)     max: 27.3 Watt
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 23.1     avg: 26.5     median: 26.5 (6%)     max: 29.9 Watt
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
0.6 fps per Watt (57%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.663     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (60%)     max: 0.771 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 24.7     avg: 37.5     median: 38.7 (11%)     max: 45.8 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22     avg: 34.9     median: 36.7 (5%)     max: 41 Watt
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.3171     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.4455 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
30.6 dB(A) (49%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
79.2 85.1 87.6 88.2 92.9 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51.9 53.7 55.2 63.8 64.9 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
125.2
low 1920x1080
16.3 21 22.1 22.7 23 23 23.1 23.9 24.1 24.1 24.4 24.6 25.1 28.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.8 17.7 18.2 18.3 18.8 18.9 19 19.5 19.5 19.5 19.6 19.7 20.3 22 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.8 15 15.3 16.1 16.3 16.4 16.4 16.6 16.9 17 17 17.3 19.1 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.2 13.2 13.9 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.4 14.5 14.7 14.9 14.9 16.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
9.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
34.6
36.3
34.1
31.3
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
12.1
11.4
10.8
12
15.3
9.8
11.2
12.8
12.7
12.9
12.5
13
14
low 1920x1080
19.4 23.1 23.2 23.6 24.2 24.2 24.2 24.3 24.7 25 25.1 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.2 19.3 19.5 19.6 19.7 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.6 20.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15 16.5 16.9 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.3 17.4 17.5 17.8 18 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.7 16.3 16.6 16.6 16.6 16.9 16.9 17 17 17.1 17.4 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
11.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
35.5
21.4
36.9
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
54.7 55.2 57 57.6 60.6 61.7 62.6 62.9 64 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.6 50.1 50.1 51 54.3 55 55.4 55.4 56.6 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.3 36.2 37 37 37.8 38 38.1 38.5 38.7 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.8 27 28.1 28.2 28.6 28.7 29.4 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
60
94.2
92.6
101
104
low 1920x1080
41.5 44.5 44.7 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.8 33.6 33.7 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.6 22.3 22.4 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8 17.9 18 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
67.6
72.9
73.9
low 1280x720
56 57 60 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25 25 25 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23 23 23 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
68 78.8 94 114.3 116 121.3 123.9 135 137 137 137 138 140 140.7 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41 43.6 47.5 49 49.3 50 50.8 50.9 51 51 51 52 52 52 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33 36.7 39.1 41 41.7 41.8 42 42 42 42.2 43 43 43 43 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30 32 33.9 33.9 34 36 36.7 37 37 37 37 37 38 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
28  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
32 35 37 37 42 44 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25 26 29 30 33 34 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23 24 28 28 31 31 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22 22 25 27 28 29 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
29.5 29.9 35.6 36.4 36.5 36.9 37.1 37.5 37.7 37.7 37.8 38 38.5 39 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
43.9 46.7 51 51 53.6 54.5 54.9 56.1 56.8 57 57.1 57.3 57.6 57.7 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.1 23 23.8 24.8 24.9 24.9 24.9 25 25 25 25.2 25.3 25.4 25.4 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.4 14.3 15.4 15.5 15.5 15.6 15.7 15.7 15.8 15.8 15.8 15.9 15.9 15.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
12.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
61.4 72.4 73.2 77.9 80 80.3 80.9 81 81.5 81.6 85.7 85.9 86.5 89.5 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46.3 55.9 56.2 60.6 60.7 60.9 63 63.3 63.5 64.2 65.7 66.6 67.9 70.9 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.1 49.2 54.5 55.1 55.9 57.4 57.8 58.6 59.2 59.6 61.7 61.9 62.5 64.9 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.9 45 49.3 50.7 50.8 51 51.1 51.6 52 53 53.2 53.8 55.1 57.7 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
79 103.7 104 104 107 107 109.2 112 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
54 63.9 68 70 70.9 71 73 74.5 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
31 39.7 39.9 40 40 40 42 43.7 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16 17.5 18.1 18.8 19 19.2 19.5 20 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
71.8 86.3 89.8 95.5 96.3 98.3 98.4 99.7 100.6 102.4 102.6 103.2 104.2 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
66.7 82.9 83.2 89.2 89.8 89.9 91.6 92.6 94.1 94.2 96.3 97.3 97.7 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.7 42.1 43.5 46.4 46.8 47.5 48.4 48.6 49.1 49.2 49.3 49.5 50 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.2 18.1 19.7 20.4 20.6 20.8 20.9 21.1 21.2 21.5 21.5 21.8 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
15.3  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
78.3
72.9
87.7
86.2
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
82.7
79.3
90.5
90.8
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Total War Pharaoh8758
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty231916149.08
Baldur's Gate 32420171711.3
F1 2260533728
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands44332218
Shadow of the Tomb Raider582523
Strange Brigade12049413528
Far Cry 538302826
X-Plane 11.1136
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark54241512.8
Dota 2 Reborn80625751
The Witcher 3103684019
GTA V9690472015.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
5
5
1
4
5
3
6
5

7
2

5





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 01. 08:00:14

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 01 Jul 2025 05:34:46 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.039s ... 0.04s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.04s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.04s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11630 +0.015s ... 0.055s

#8 got single benchmarks 11630 +0.057s ... 0.112s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.112s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.563s ... 0.674s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.675s

#12 Got 546 rows for game benchmarks. +0.078s ... 0.753s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.753s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.01s ... 0.763s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.136s ... 0.899s

#16 return log +0.003s ... 0.902s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS graphics card

Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon review - An ARM subnotebook with a brilliant 120 Hz OLED weighing only 1 kg

Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon review - An ARM subnotebook with a brilliant 120 Hz OLED weighing only 1 kg

With the MagicBook Art 14, Honor is offering a lightweight 14-inch subnotebook (1 kg) with a fast Snapdragon X Elite processor including vapor chamber cooling, ...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 14.60" | 1 kg
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Snapdragon laptop review: Finally easier to repair

Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Snapdragon laptop review: Finally easier to repair

The latest Surface Laptop 7 addresses some longstanding issues with the series in regards to sustainability and repairability. For around $1500 USD, however, th...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 15.00" | 1.7 kg
HP OmniBook X AI 14 in review

HP OmniBook X AI 14 Review: Snapdragon laptop for everyday use with long battery life but weak display

The HP OmniBook X AI 14 is a compact 14-inch laptop featuring a Snapdragon X Elite processor that enables very good battery runtimes. However, HP has cut some c...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 14.00" | 1.3 kg
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 laptop review - Near-silent companion powered by Snapdragon X Elite

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 laptop review - Near-silent companion powered by Snapdragon X Elite

The Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 boasts an ultra-slim design with a 14-inch 120 Hz OLED touchscreen and is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite processor. It deli...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 14.00" | 1.2 kg
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x 14 G9 review - Multimedia laptop with Snapdragon X Elite and great 3K OLED display

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x 14 G9 review - Multimedia laptop with Snapdragon X Elite and great 3K OLED display

With the Yoga Slim 7x, Lenovo offers a 14-inch multimedia laptop that combines the new Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite with a 90-Hz OLED touchscreen. But is the goo...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 14.50" | 1.3 kg

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  Review » Microsoft Surface Pro IPS Copilot+ review - The base model comes with an IPS display and the Snapdragon X Plus

Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite review: A stylish Snapdragon ultraportable with bags of stamina

Dell XPS 13 9345: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  Review » Dell XPS 13 9345 Snapdragon X Elite review: Undercutting the Intel Core Ultra 7

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 laptop review: Snapdragon X Elite enables epic battery life

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 review - The Copilot+ laptop's battery life of all things is disappointing

Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 13.80", 1.3 kg
  Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ review - Thanks to Snapdragon X Elite finally a serious MacBook Air competitor?

HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 laptop review: High expectations for Windows on ARM

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  Review » Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ review - A high-end 2-in-1 now with the Snapdragon X Elite

Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 15.60", 1.4 kg
  Review » Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED review - A new age of laptops with the new Snapdragon X Elite?

  Review » Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite Analysis - More efficient than AMD & Intel, but Apple stays ahead

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  Review » Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite Analysis - More efficient than AMD & Intel, but Apple stays ahead

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  Review » Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite Analysis - More efficient than AMD & Intel, but Apple stays ahead

Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 14.60", 1 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon

HP OmniBook X 14: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X 14

Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-11, X1E-78-100: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-11, X1E-78-100

Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 15.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15

Dell Latitude 7455: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 7455

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441

Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite

Dell XPS 13 9345: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 13 9345

Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 15.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16

HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14

Acer Swift Go 14 SF14-11: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, 14.50", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 SF14-11

Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-11: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, 14.50", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-11

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+

Asus Vivobook S15 OLED S5507: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 15.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S15 OLED S5507

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8X9: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.50", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8X9

HP OmniBook X AI 14-fe0000: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X AI 14-fe0000

Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 13.80", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 13.00", 0.9 kg
   » 58% faster than a MacBook Air: Microsoft's marketing makes Surface Pro look better than it is

Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 15.60", 1.4 kg
   » Asus Vivobook S15 with 120 Hz 3K OLED display drops below $850 on Amazon

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, 13.00", 0.9 kg
   » Microsoft Surface Pro 11 "Big Spring Deal" offers 32% savings to bring 120 Hz OLED tablet below $1,000

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 13.00", 0.9 kg
   » Microsoft Surface Pro 11 "Big Spring Deal" offers 32% savings to bring 120 Hz OLED tablet below $1,000

Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 13.80", 1.3 kg
   » Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 enjoys huge 44% price drop for Snapdragon X Elite SKU with 1 TB of storage

HP OmniBook X 14: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » HP OmniBook X 14 with Snapdragon X Plus discounted to under $550 at Best Buy

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, 13.00", 0.9 kg
   » Microsoft Surface Pro 11 with Snapdragon X Plus gets massive 27% discount on Amazon

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.50", 1.3 kg
   » Lenovo Slim 7i Gen 9 laptop with 14-inch touch OLED display and good battery life tumbles to new historic-low price

   » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x Gen 9 with beautiful 3K OLED display and long battery life drops to record-low price

   » Lenovo Slim 7i 14 Gen 9 (2024) OLED laptop drops to new lowest-ever price of less than $650

   » Long-lasting Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition price reaches new record low after 32% discount

Dell XPS 13 9345: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 13.40", 1.2 kg
   » Latest Dell XPS 13 9350 laptop with 20-hour battery life and 120 Hz display is now up to $500 cheaper than MSRP

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.50", 1.3 kg
   » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition is battery life beast and now cheaper than ever after 23% discount

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » Battery life champion Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G6 now available with more affordable Snapdragon X Plus, OLED & 5G

HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » HP EliteBook Ultra G1q: More affordable version with Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus 8 core & brighter screen launches

Dell XPS 13 9345: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 13.40", 1.2 kg
   » Sleek Dell XPS 14 9440 with Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and 100% sRGB InfinityEdge display records big 33.3% discount

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.50", 1.3 kg
   » Is the Snapdragon version of the Yoga Slim 7 14 getting preferential treatment from Lenovo?

   » Highly-rated Lenovo Yoga 9i Gen 9 with Core Ultra 7 155H and 120 Hz OLED display is back on sale at record low price

   » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x with 3K OLED and up to 1,000 nits drops to record-low price

Dell XPS 13 9345: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, 13.40", 1.2 kg
   » Dell XPS 13 laptop with Snapdragon X Elite is already discounted by 24%

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.50", 1.3 kg
   » Lenovo Slim 7i price drops to irresistible new level bringing 14-inch laptop to $661 less than its list price

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6: Qualcomm has the wrong focus with the Snapdragon X Elite

Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 15.60", 1.4 kg
   » Snapdragon X Elite lags behind iPhone 15 Pro in GravityMark GPU test in a shocking anomaly

SD X Elite Reference 80W: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, 0.00"
   » First Snapdragon X Elite benchmarks: Impressive gains over M2 Max, Ryzen 9 7940HS, Intel 13th gen-H, and 14th gen desktop CPUs

   » First Snapdragon X Elite benchmarks: Impressive gains over M2 Max, Ryzen 9 7940HS, Intel 13th gen-H, and 14th gen desktop CPUs

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-09-27)