Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M is a DirectX 11 graphics card of the middle class, which has been presented in spring 2013. It is based on the Kepler architecture and manufactured by TSMC in a 28-nanometer process. The GK208 chip (384 shaders) is clocked at up to 889 MHz plus boost and has a 64 bit memory interface (DDR3). Despite the nominally higher classification, the GT 735M is therefore slower than the 128-bit version of the GT 730M.

Architecture

The GK208 is a slightly revised version of the previously Kepler chip GK107. Although both have the same number of shader units (384 ALUs), the memory interface has been cut down from 128 to 64 bits.

The GK208 supports PCIe 3.0 as well as GPU Boost 2.0. This feature can automatically overclock the card if the laptop cooling system allows it. GPU Boost 2.0 is available on any notebook with a graphics card of the 700M series.

Performance

Depending on the clock rate, the performance of the GT 735M is somewhere between the GT 640M LE and the GT 640M. In particular, the narrow memory interface limits the performance significantly. Current games (as of 2013) can thus be played fluently only in low or medium settings. In older titles, there are also reserves for higher quality levels.

Features

The feature set includes support for up to 4 active displays. Furthermore, high resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can now be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a if available. HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

The 5th generation PureVideo HD video processor (VP5) (also integrated in the GK107 core) offers hardware decoding of HD videos. Common codecs such as MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H.264 and VC1/WMV9 are fully supported up to 4K resolutions while VC1 and MPEG-4 are supported up to 1080p. Two streams can be decoded in parallel for features such as Picture-in-Picture. Another feature is the inclusion of a dedicated video encoding engine similar to Intel QuickSync that can be accessed via the NVENCI API.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the GeForce GT 735M should be similar to the old GT 640M LE (about 20 W), as Nvidia describes the card as a "low power" model. As a result, the GPU is best suited for notebooks 13-14 inches in size or greater.

GeForce GT 700M Series

GeForce GT 755M SLI compare 768 @ 0.98 GHz2x 128 Bit @ 5400 MHz
GeForce GT 750M SLI compare 768 @ 0.97 GHz2x 128 Bit @ 2000 - 5000 MHz
GeForce GT 755M compare 384 @ 0.98 GHz128 Bit @ 5400 MHz
GeForce GT 750M compare 384 @ 0.97 GHz128 Bit @ 2000 - 5000 MHz
GeForce GT 745M compare 384 @ 0.84 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce GT 740M compare 384 @ 0.81 - 0.98 GHz64/128 Bit @ 1600 - 1800 MHz
GeForce GT 735M 384 @ 0.58 - 0.89 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 - 2000 MHz
GeForce GT 730M compare 384 @ 0.73 GHz64/128 Bit @ 1800 - 2000 MHz
GeForce GT 720M compare 96 @ 0.63 - 0.94 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 - 2000 MHz
CodenameN14M-LP
ArchitectureKepler
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed575 - 889 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed1800 - 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, GPU Boost 2.0, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play
Date of Announcement01.04.2013

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.5 pt (1%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 8130     avg: 8527     median: 8527 (11%)     max: 8924 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Titanfall

Titanfall

2014
low 1024x768
52.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
25.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
73.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
29.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
53.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
48.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
75  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
44  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
93  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
75  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
64  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
high 1366x768
108.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
60.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
42.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
37.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
45.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
83.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
51.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
25.2 26.1 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.7 20 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
med. 1366x768
58.8 62.4 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
42.9 46.2 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5 13.1 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
27.2 29 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.8 21 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
61.4 63.1 64.6 65.4 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.6 33.4 35.2 35.6 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
27 27.9 29.2 29.9 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1366x768
67.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
41.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
50.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
81.8 83.4 84.8 86.3 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.5 39.5 40.7 40.7 42.9 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.4 22.5 23 23 23.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
28.9 30.4 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.8 18.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
110.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
53.2 54.2 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
42.4 43.1 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
55.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
37.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
31.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
40.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1366x768
54.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
54  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
32.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
46.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
51.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
high 1366x768
137.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2012

F1 2012

2012
med. 1366x768
77  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
37.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
29.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
149.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
107.1 119.4 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
76.3 78.2 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
42.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
66  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
31  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
39.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
57.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
40.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
104.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
71 72.3 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
62.4 63.5 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
37  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
55.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
35.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
31.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
81 107 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.8 48.4 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.4 29.4 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
38.5 46.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.7 33.7 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.3 23.1 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1366x768
83.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
42.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
42.6 46.5 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.2 32 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.3 24.8 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
101.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
41.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
med. 1024x768
81.8  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
48.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
125.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
31 34.3 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
CPU 1280x1024
19.3
16.7
Civilization 5

Civilization 5

2010
low 1024x768
57.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
med. 1024x768
56.8  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
46.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Just Cause 2

Just Cause 2

2010
ultra 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1360x768
33.9  fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
16.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1366x768
58.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
42.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
49.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
31.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
high 1360x768
54.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
36.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
med. 1024x768
77.6  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
34.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
high 1024x768
61.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
69.6  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
33.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
57.4  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
28.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
high 1280x1024
31.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Titanfall52.625.120.7
Thief25.114.711.9
X-Plane 10.2573.433.912.9
Need for Speed: Rivals29.727.621
Call of Duty: Ghosts53.729.918.7
Battlefield 448.43323.2
Batman: Arkham Origins754421
F1 201393756427
Fifa 14108.757.4
Total War: Rome II60.141.533.610.1
Saints Row IV42.635.614.4
The Bureau: XCOM Declassified37.933.321.1
Splinter Cell: Blacklist45.132.715.6
Dota 283.751.126.1
Company of Heroes 22619
GRID 2614513
Metro: Last Light282012.8
BioShock Infinite6434298.28
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm67.541.214.1
SimCity50.820.916.1
Tomb Raider84412310.2
Crysis 3301813.2
Dead Space 3110.7544324.9
Far Cry 355.535.816.6
Assassin´s Creed III37.931.28
Hitman: Absolution40.827.712.2
Call of Duty: Black Ops 254.730.5
Need for Speed: Most Wanted5432.922.6
Medal of Honor: Warfighter46.430.224.8
Dishonored51.12421.1212.05
Fifa 13137.981.4
F1 2012776030
Borderlands 237.729.518.6
Counter-Strike: GO149.71137732
Darksiders II42.624.7
Sleeping Dogs6649.419.5
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier3120.6
Max Payne 339.235.415.5
Dirt Showdown57.540.914.8
Diablo III104.5726338.2
Risen 2: Dark Waters372418.7
Mass Effect 355.635.621.8
Alan Wake31.116.8
Anno 2070944226
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim42322112.22
CoD: Modern Warfare 383.442.524
Battlefield 3453224
Deus Ex Human Revolution101.341.618
Dirt 381.848.316.2
Total War: Shogun 2125.73311.74
Civilization 557.312.9
Mafia 256.846.926.7
Just Cause 223.6
Metro 203333.916.8
Battlefield: Bad Company 258.642.919.1
Risen49.231.620.3
Resident Evil 554.528.2
Need for Speed Shift36.125.6
Colin McRae: DIRT 277.634.116
Trackmania Nations Forever61.521
Crysis - GPU Benchmark69.633.98.76
Crysis - CPU Benchmark57.428.227.77
World of Warcraft31.116
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4
20
12
2
13
31
10
29
19
6
1
31
4
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 19:46:59

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Mar 2024 05:34:43 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.062s ... 0.063s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.063s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.063s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4175 +0.031s ... 0.094s

#7 got single benchmarks 4175 +0.018s ... 0.112s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.112s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.426s ... 0.537s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.537s

#11 Got 228 rows for game benchmarks. +0.016s ... 0.554s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.554s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.041s ... 0.594s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.615s ... 2.209s

#15 return log +0.04s ... 2.249s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M graphics card

Review Acer Aspire S3-392G Ultrabook

Review Acer Aspire S3-392G Ultrabook

Slim, fast and gaming-ready. In 2011, Acer introduced the Aspire S3-951, the first ever Ultrabook. After three years, we are delighted to meet the successor, t...
Intel Core i5-4200U | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | 13.30" | 1.7 kg
Review Sony Vaio Fit multi-flip SV-F15N1Z2E/B Convertible

Review Sony Vaio Fit multi-flip SV-F15N1Z2E/B Convertible

Quick convertible. Sony has come up with an innovative construction that allows converting a laptop into a tablet quickly. Besides the review sample's unusually...
Intel Core i7-4500U | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | 15.50" | 2.3 kg
 

Review Sony Vaio Fit SV-F14A1M2E/S Notebook

Versatile all-rounder. A thin 14-inch case is the base for Sony's latest multimedia device that wants to attract customers with highlights like a touchscreen di...
Intel Core i5-3337U | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | 14.00" | 2.2 kg
 

Review Sony Vaio SV-F15A1S2ES Notebook

Slim all-rounder. Sony's latest coup follows current laptop trends in the way of a slim casing and Full HD touchscreen. That is accompanied by a gaming-suitable...
Intel Core i7-3537U | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | 15.50" | 2.3 kg

Sony Vaio Fit Multi-flip SV-F15N1Z2RB: Intel Core i7-4500U, 15.50", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio Fit Multi-flip SV-F15N1Z2RB

Acer Aspire S3-392G: Intel Core i5-4200U, 13.30", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire S3-392G

Acer Aspire S3-392G-54204G1.02Ttws: Intel Core i5-4200U, 13.30", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire S3-392G-54204G1.02Ttws

Sony Vaio Flip 15 SV-F15N1Z2E/B: Intel Core i7-4500U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio Flip 15 SV-F15N1Z2E/B

Sony Vaio SV-F15A1M2ES: Intel Core i5-3337U, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio SV-F15A1M2ES

Sony Vaio SV-F15A1S9R: Intel Core i5-3337U, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio SV-F15A1S9R

Sony Vaio SV-F15A1M2E: Intel Core i5-3337U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio SV-F15A1M2E

Sony Vaio SV-F15A1Z2EB: Intel Core i7-3537U, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio SV-F15A1Z2EB

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter