Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop is a mobile graphics card from the Blackwell family for laptops, which was unveiled at CES 2025. It is based on the GB206 chip, featuring 4,608 shader/CUDA cores clocked at 908-2520 MHz (depending on the model). The graphics memory used is 8 GB GDDR7 with a 128-bit memory bus. The RTX 5070 features 36 RT-cores and 48 ROPs. 

Performance

Our tests show that the RTX 5070 Laptop is negligibly faster than the previous RTX 4070 Laptop (1-3%) in games and up to ~5% faster in benchmarks. However, MFG (2x, 3x, and 4x) and DLSS support can help the 5070 to ensure higher and smoother frame rates. The desktop counterpart is 15-20% faster, depending on the resolution (without accounting for DLSS and MFG).

Power consumption

The GB206 chip is manufactured in the current TSMC 4N process. The total graphics power of this model ranges from 50 to 100 watts.

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop compare 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop compare 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop compare 5888 192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 4608 @ 2.24 - 2.52 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop compare 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop compare 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X6
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines4608 - unified
TMUs144
ROPs48
Raytracing Cores36
Tensor / AI Cores144
Core Speed2235 - 2520 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance23.22 TFLOPS FP16, 23.22 TFLOPS FP32
CacheL1: 4.608 KB, L2: 32.768 KB
Memory Speed32000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth512 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption100 Watt (50 - 100 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.01.2025
PredecessorNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 11868     avg: 13199     median: 13202 (35%)     max: 14369 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 11969     avg: 13264     median: 13583 (28%)     max: 14224 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 56625     avg: 64961     median: 65622.5 (62%)     max: 71379 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 119532     avg: 144560     median: 146596 (36%)     max: 166010 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 26381     avg: 30248     median: 29967.5 (45%)     max: 34042 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 31345     avg: 35024     median: 35551.5 (33%)     max: 37331 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 22444     avg: 24079     median: 24460.5 (28%)     max: 24949 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 32789     avg: 35994     median: 36219.5 (44%)     max: 39124 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 40285     avg: 43395     median: 43410 (33%)     max: 46297 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 30     avg: 31.9     median: 31.5 (5%)     max: 35 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 17     avg: 19.1     median: 19 (7%)     max: 21 Seconds
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 226     avg: 269.7     median: 272 (16%)     max: 341 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 115.1     avg: 124.2     median: 124.2 (47%)     max: 133.3 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 252.4     avg: 273.8     median: 273.8 (49%)     max: 295.1 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 637.4     avg: 689     median: 688.8 (51%)     max: 740.2 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 617.6     avg: 645     median: 645.2 (61%)     max: 672.8 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 315     avg: 1156     median: 1405.5 (34%)     max: 1535 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 122573     avg: 130910     median: 130074 (34%)     max: 146025 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 7234     avg: 76127     median: 114769 (29%)     max: 121711 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 115.3     avg: 154.1     median: 161.5 (22%)     max: 194.7 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
118 Watt (16%)
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.9 fps per Watt (73%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 123.8     avg: 190.5     median: 210 (61%)     max: 233 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 117.9     avg: 180.8     median: 185.8 (24%)     max: 225 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.428     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.761 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
176.5 186.4 274 ~ 212 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
171 177.6 239 242 ~ 207 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
161 170.4 198.4 199 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.8 27.7 31 31.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
9.2 10.6 14.1 17 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
27.1 29 33.4 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
56.9
56.1
59.8
med. 1920x1080
64.6 69.6 75.2 ~ 70 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60.5 66 68.1 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
59 64.8 66.6 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
39.5 44.8 45.4 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
54.6 59.9 66.1 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
55.6 72.8 74.2 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
47.3 62.3 65.4 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.8 30.7 32.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
19.5 20.2 20.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
30.3 32 34 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
80 81 82 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
71 74 76 77 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61 61 63 63 64 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38 40 43 43 43 45 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30 31 34 36 37 38 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18 22 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
24 29 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
37 39 45 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
46
57
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
28
37
med. 1920x1080
154.1 155.9 201 ~ 170 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
131.7 142.7 166.5 ~ 147 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
90.7 97.9 111.6 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
86.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
75.9 78.2 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.1 43.2 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21.1 24.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
30.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
101.7 111.5 123.7 ~ 112 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
86.1 91.4 102.6 ~ 93 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
63.8 67.6 75.4 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
42.6 45.5 52.1 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
58.5 61.5 71.5 ~ 64 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
138.7 153.8 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!) 54.7 56.1 60 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.3 31 42.3 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
7.6 24 32.4 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
54.7 64 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
51.7 54.1 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
45.7 47.1 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
34.2 36 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
66.9 74.1 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
155  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
95 98 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68 75 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
39  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
73  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
76.8 109.5 ~ 93 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
59.6 81.3 ~ 70 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
48.8 61.8 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
35.4 44.4 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
46.7 57.8 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
64.7 101.8 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
61.6 99.2 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
58.9 97.3 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
54.7 70.8 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
58.5 89.5 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
65.4 71.8 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
58.5 62 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
49.4 50.3 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
32.4 35.1 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
48.2 48.5 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62 66 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36 37 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26 27 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
7  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
39 41 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
42
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
288 333 ~ 311 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
275 312 ~ 294 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
199.3 223 229 247 ~ 225 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77.7 80.7 85.3 86.6 87.1 88.3 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
48.7 51.1 52.7 53.5 54.7 54.8 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15.5 19 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
18.9 22.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
76.1 81.8 84 85.8 86.7 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
64.1 71 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.3 51.4 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
31.7 36.7 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
49.4 56.2 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
84.5 100 ~ 92 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
80.4 92.1 ~ 86 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
64.9 71 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
49.1 53.8 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
66.5 74.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
91.1 108.1 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
74.9 82.6 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
73.2 77.9 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
57.9 64 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
70.3 81.3 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
60.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
102.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
101.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
97.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
81.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
352  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
84.1 86.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.8 77.8 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62.6 64.6 71.3 72.5 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
41 41.5 43.8 45.1 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18.6 23.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
37.7
med. 1920x1080
222  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
170.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
156.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
115.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
127 128.5 168.2 169.7 180.3 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
90.2 118.3 121.1 126.8 138.3 141.7 142.7 144.1 167 ~ 132 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84.5 108.3 109.7 113.8 114.7 117.7 118.6 121.3 122.8 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
82.4 90.1 90.4 97.8 98.9 101.5 101.9 102.9 106.4 106.7 107.1 108.7 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
57.2 58.3 58.4 63.4 64.5 64.6 65.4 65.9 66 66.8 66.9 67.8 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.4 28.4 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
74.3 76.6 78.4 80.1 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
177.2
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
44.9
45.8
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
6.4
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
89.7
88.1
89.2
96
76.2
98.7
96.9
94.6
97.2
96.3
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality (no FG) 3840x2160
9.7
low 1920x1080
159.5 165.1 178.7 179.1 ~ 171 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
118.5 127.2 143.6 144 146 152 154.5 155.9 ~ 143 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
106 123.8 123.9 126.1 128.2 129.3 130.7 132.8 ~ 125 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
101.3 103.5 108.8 109.4 121.3 121.9 124.9 127.3 128.4 128.8 135.8 140.8 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
71.1 75.8 81.3 82.5 84.9 84.9 88.4 88.6 89.4 90.5 91.3 96.3 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
41.1 49.6 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
65.1 83.7 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
127.4 140 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
391 424 510 511 649 ~ 497 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
287 318 331 339 341 369 ~ 331 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
243 270 280 281 293 300 ~ 278 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
203 234 244 247 258 259 259 ~ 243 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
149.7 164.2 166.6 168.6 168.9 172.7 177.9 ~ 167 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
90.3 96.1 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
102.8 104.3 114.2 125.9 128.6 146.6 156 157.5 161.3 162.3 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94.1 100.7 102 112.9 114.7 127.7 134.4 135 141.3 146.8 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.9 83.1 83.7 99.4 99.8 106.4 107.4 115.9 116.1 116.3 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
89.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
165.5 202 210 232 234 ~ 209 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
128.6 149.9 165.5 173.4 185 189.3 193.7 198.4 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96 119.5 132 138.3 140.6 141.5 145.3 150.6 150.7 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
85.8 86.5 100.5 102.3 103.7 103.9 104.5 107.4 110 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
49.1 58.8 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
158 170.3 180.8 182.6 199.1 220 223 239 246 252 ~ 207 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
129.5 151.8 152.6 165.1 170.8 189.7 193.8 204 210 213 ~ 178 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
138.8 141.6 144.9 159 161.7 181.8 185 201 201 203 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
130.9 131.9 137.6 148.7 149.3 165.8 169.6 180.9 184 184.2 ~ 158 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
148.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
104.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
185.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
179 180.4 180.8 184.6 186.7 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
158.2 167.2 176.7 179.6 185.2 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
102.5 111.8 119 121.1 127.2 142.1 148.6 153.5 156.4 160.2 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
96 105.7 108.3 109.9 114.6 122.5 124.7 126.2 129 129.1 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
125.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
55.7
62.7
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
180.4
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
182.9
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 252122071822913
Doom: The Dark Ages70656343
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered68583020
Assassin's Creed Shadows817562423420
Civilization 7170147100
Monster Hunter Wilds86.5774123
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2112936947
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle146432721
Stalker 259534635
Call of Duty Black Ops 6155144107977238
Until Dawn93705540
Space Marine 283807863
Star Wars Outlaws69605034
Black Myth: Wukong106796437277
F1 24311294225845317
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2684934
Ghost of Tsushima92866851
Horizon Forbidden West100797661
Dragon's Dogma 26660.2
Helldivers 2102.1101.297.481.3
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown356356356352
Alan Wake 28577684321
Counter-Strike 2222170.4156.5115.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty1551321121006427
Baldur's Gate 31711431251218545
Strange Brigade49733127824316793
X-Plane 11.1113612110089.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark20917313510154
Dota 2 Reborn207178172158148.8
The Witcher 3104.7
GTA V185.4182173134117125.6
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4
11

1
14
13

4
15
10
2
7
10
6
5
10
11
2
5
3
2
2

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 13. 00:55:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:52:14 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12925 +0.015s ... 0.042s

#8 got single benchmarks 12925 +0.057s ... 0.099s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.099s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.537s ... 0.636s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.636s

#12 Got 593 rows for game benchmarks. +0.259s ... 0.895s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.895s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.024s ... 0.919s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.288s ... 1.207s

#16 return log +0.006s ... 1.213s

Notebook reviews with Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop graphics card

MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW review: Large screen without the large price

MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW review: Large screen without the large price

MSI has more 18-inch gaming laptops to choose from than most competitors, but not everyone is willing to shell out for GeForce RTX 5090 graphics or a 4K display...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.1 kg
Alienware 16X Aurora review: Balancing premium build with a midrange GPU

Alienware 16X Aurora review: Balancing premium build with a midrange GPU

Unlike the Alienware Area-51 behemoth, the Alienware 16X Aurora cuts out a lot of the RGB features and fancy Gorilla Glass for a more affordable and streamlined...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.5 kg
Zen 4 at the limit: MSI Crosshair A17 HX gaming laptop with Ryzen 9 8940HX review

Zen 4 at the limit: MSI Crosshair A17 HX gaming laptop with Ryzen 9 8940HX review

With the Crosshair A17 HX, MSI is selling an exciting gaming notebook that combines an extremely fast AMD CPU (Zen 4) and an Nvidia GPU from the Blackwell gener...
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 17.00" | 2.9 kg
Aorus Elite 16 review: Is a premium RTX 5070 gaming laptop worth it?

Aorus Elite 16 review: Is a premium RTX 5070 gaming laptop worth it?

Although the Aorus Elite 16 only features an RTX 5070, the 16-inch model is as costly as some RTX 5070 Ti laptops. We take a closer look at the gaming machine a...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.4 kg
Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 review - An 18-inch gaming laptop with the powerful AMD 9955HX & RTX 5070

Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 review - An 18-inch gaming laptop with the powerful AMD 9955HX & RTX 5070

The 18-inch Asus ROG Strix G18 gaming laptop combines a powerful AMD processor with a GeForce RTX 5070 laptop GPU to achieve a lower price. For $2,449, you get ...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 18.00" | 2.9 kg

Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H: Intel Core i7-13620H, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  Review » An affordable RTX 5070 laptop? Gigabyte Gaming A16 review

Razer Blade 14 2025: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Slimmer and with OLED, but only the RTX 5070 Laptop - Razer Blade 14 2025 Review

MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  Review » MSI Katana 17 HX laptop review: Room for improvement for the RTX 5070 gamer

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 4K OLED is replaced by 120 Hz 2.8K OLED - Asus ProArt P16 with RTX 5070 Laptop review

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2 kg
  Review » Gigabyte Aero X16 Review: Sleek AMD Zen 5 gaming machine with Nvidia RTX 5070 Laptop and upgradeable RAM

  Review » GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop vs. RTX 5070 Laptop - The successors to the RTX 4070 Laptop in review

Acer Nitro V16 AI ANV16-42: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V16 AI ANV16-42

MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XWGG: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XWGG

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CP: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CP

Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 18.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UP

HP Omen 16-ap0000: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 16-ap0000

MSI Crosshair 17 HX AI D2XWGKG: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 17.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Crosshair 17 HX AI D2XWGKG

Gigabyte Aero X16 2WHA: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero X16 2WHA

Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LP: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LP

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP10

Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10: Intel Core i9-14900HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10

Dell 16 Premium DA16250: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.30", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Dell 16 Premium DA16250

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070

MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG

Razer Blade 14 2025: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 14 2025

Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Triton 14 AI PT14-52

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP

MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.1 kg
   » MSI Crosshair 18 HX omits this one feature that could have made it even more enticing

   » MSI Crosshair 18 AX is one of the most affordable 18-inch gaming laptops with the Core Ultra 9 275HX

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2 kg
   » Compact 16-inch gamer at $450 off: Gigabyte Aero X16 with RTX 5070 drops to lowest price ever

Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » Loud Overdrive mode on the Alienware 16X Aurora is not worth the small gains in performance

   » Dell Alienware 16X Aurora is a trimmed down Area-51 gaming laptop for the masses

Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 18.00", 2.9 kg
   » The Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 with the RTX 5070 Laptop GPU is too expensive at €2300

   » What is more important for a gaming laptop - performance or features?

Razer Blade 14 2025: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Is 8 GB VRAM enough for the Blade 14? For 1080p gaming, yes

   » Razer's Blade 14 does not rival the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 for the performance crown, but is also much more affordable

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » It's a mistake that Asus only offers the ProArt P16 with the RTX 5070 Laptop

   » Asus ProArt P16 launches with OLED touchscreen, up to 64GB RAM and RTX 5070

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01- 5)