Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q design is the power saving variant of the mobile GeForce RTX 2070 Super with reduced clock speeds, performance and of course power consumption. It is intended for thin gaming laptops. It is based on the same TU104-725-A1 chip with 2,560 shaders, 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 256 Bit memory bus. Currently we know of three variants with a TGP of 80, 85 and 90 Watt, base clock speeds of 930, 1005, and 1080 MHz, and turbo clock speeds of 1155, 1230 and 1290 MHz. The mobile variant for comparison is rated at 115 W and 1140 - 1380 MHz.

With the refresh, Nvidia also reworked the Max-Q technologies for more efficiency. Low Voltage GDDR6 (lower clocked but more headroom for the GPU) and improved regulator efficiency should improve the performance per Watt. Two new optional features can also be implemented by the OEM. Max-Q Dynamic Boost is able to shift power from the CPU to the GPU on a per frame basis to increase overall performance. Furthermore, the laptop manufacturer can also implement Advanced Optimus with a dynamic display switch (hardware) to enable Optimus, G-SYNC and high refresh rate displays (up to 4K 120 Hz).

Features

NVIDIA manufacturers the TU104 chip on a 12 nm FinFET process and includes features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and Real-Time Ray Tracing (RTRT), which should combine to create more realistic lighting effects than older GPUs based on the company's Pascal architecture (if the games supports it). The RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is also DisplayPort 1.4 ready, while there is also support for HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) and H.265 video en/decoding (PlayReady 3.0).

Performance

Due to the lower clock rates, the Max-Q variant is clearly slower than the mobile RTX 2070 Super. The difference depends on the used variant, where the 90 W version is only slightly slower. Therefore, the performance should be sufficient for maximum detail settings at a QHD resolution. With raytracing enabled, you may have to reduce settings or resolution. Less demanding games can be easily played in 4k.

The power consumption of the card is between 80 - 90 Watt TGP and therefore clearly lower than the RTX 2070 Super Mobile (115 Watt).

GeForce RTX 2000 Series

NVIDIA Titan RTX compare 4608 @ 1.35 - 1.77 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop) compare 4352 @ 1.35 - 1.55 GHz352 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop) compare 3072 @ 1.65 - 1.82 GHz256 Bit @ 15500 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) compare 2944 @ 1.52 - 1.71 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile compare 3072 @ 1.37 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile compare 2944 @ 1.38 - 1.59 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop) compare 2560 @ 1.61 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop) compare 2304 @ 1.41 - 1.62 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile compare 2560 @ 1.14 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14002 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.98 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) compare 2176 @ 1.47 - 1.65 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile compare 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.44 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q compare 2944 @ 0.74 - 1.1 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop) compare 1920 @ 1.32 - 1.62 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 2560 @ 0.93 - 1.16 GHz256 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q compare 2304 @ 0.89 - 1.19 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile compare 1920 @ 0.96 - 1.2 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.98 - 1.19 GHz192 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile compare 2048 @ 1.48 GHz64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameN18E-G2R
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines2560 - unified
Core Speed930 - 1155 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed11000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption80 Watt
technology12 nm
FeaturesDLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor, 550 Watt system power recommended
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.04.2020

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
9.5 pt (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 7199     avg: 7605     median: 7611.5 (22%)     max: 8066 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 7084     avg: 7445     median: 7373.5 (20%)     max: 7891 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 38593     avg: 45672     median: 47119 (50%)     max: 49917 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 65295     avg: 117307     median: 126747 (33%)     max: 134954 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 16736     avg: 18097     median: 18395 (32%)     max: 18947 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 18559     avg: 20277     median: 20872.5 (24%)     max: 21446 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 20666     avg: 23000     median: 23755.5 (33%)     max: 24383 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 24244     avg: 27104     median: 27724 (24%)     max: 28900 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 129     avg: 139.5     median: 138 (8%)     max: 157 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 144     avg: 156     median: 155 (34%)     max: 176 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4324     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (48%)     max: 0.531 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 46     avg: 48.9     median: 48 (77%)     max: 53 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1320     avg: 1363     median: 1350 (53%)     max: 1440 MHz
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
117.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
67.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
56.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
135.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
102.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
101.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
86.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
163.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
93.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
86.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings + Ultra Ray Tracing 1920x1080
49
low 1280x720
118  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
160  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
95.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
100  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
96  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing (DX12) 1920x1080
32
low 1280x720
127  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
87.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
81.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
67.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
145  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
120  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
164.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
114.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
101.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
258  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
163  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
145  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
272.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
165.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
109 109.2 116 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79 82.2 90.6 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
229.6 232.3 ~ 231 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
152 157 164.1 ~ 158 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
135.1 139 141 149.4 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
130.2 135 137 146.4 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
99.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
51.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
91.6 96.8 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
56.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
116 121 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
107 119 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
79.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
132.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86.6 91.3 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.2 61.8 65.7 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.4 40.2 42.4 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32 34.3 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
20.5 22 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
108 109 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95 98.2 104 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
88.8 92.1 94.1 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
71.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88.2 94 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
80.7 82.6 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
60.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
160.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
116.2 134 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97.8 117 126 ~ 114 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84.2 99.6 104 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 1920x1080
60.1
84.4
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
med. 1920x1080
131  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
103 104 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
69.7 71.1 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
60.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
89 92 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66 69 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
49 50 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
med. 1920x1080
271  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
196 259 ~ 228 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
190 257 ~ 224 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
253  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
186  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.3 77.2 78 84.4 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.9 58.9 59.6 64.8 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
41.7 45.6 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22.2 24.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Control

Control

2019
med. 1920x1080
92.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.2 68.4 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40.6 43.9 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.1 23.8 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
39.6
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
med. 1920x1080
191  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
152 159 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
141 143 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
107  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
61  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
255.2 260.9 ~ 258 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
122.8 141.2 ~ 132 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77.6 97.5 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.8 68.7 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
med. 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97.5 99.5 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94.9 97.1 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
62.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
med. 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84.2 85.5 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.8 47.4 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
36.6 37 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.1 21.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
123  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
105 113 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77 81 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54 60 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
29 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
183  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
151 155 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
85.8 86.9 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
92 110 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
83 98 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
70 80 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
43 45 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72 75.4 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.7 60.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
46.7 49.1 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.5 29.1 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Quality DXR 16xAF 1920x1080
46.2
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
140 144 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
139 143 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
109  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
61.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
137  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
93.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
135  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
107  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
71.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
121 135 136 139 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
113 125 126 130 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
99.4 100 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
56.8 58.2 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset DXR 1920x1080
67.8
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
med. 1920x1080
89.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
83.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
76.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
99  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
133  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
112 118 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
102 106 110 110 110 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91 96 99 99 100 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68 68 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35 36 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
132
med. 1920x1080
113  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
55.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
149  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
111  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
113 119 119 121 121 122 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
97.4 104 104 106 107 109 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82.3 87.6 87.6 88.1 89.3 90 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
67.8 75.4 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
108  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
162  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
104 110 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
80 83.7 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
med. 1920x1080
133  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
132  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
108  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
86.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
43  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
144 148 153 157.8 163 163.9 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
132 137 138 146.6 147 148.3 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
127 128 132 138 139.5 140.9 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
120 120 125 129 131.4 132.3 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
103  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
312 323.7 326.3 348.3 ~ 328 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
232 235 235.4 240 254.1 ~ 239 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
131 136.2 141 141.4 142 142 152 163.1 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62.7 70.5 71.9 73.6 74 75.3 75.5 76.2 79.1 92.5 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
49.7 50.5 52.9 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
182 182 182 182 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
174 175 176 177 ~ 176 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
153 159 160 161 ~ 158 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
83.4 89.9 91.1 91.3 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
73.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
37
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
173
172
173
173
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
179
177
180
181
low 1280x720
420.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
359.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
329.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
166.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0117.867.756.748.5
Yakuza Like a Dragon135.7102.6101.686.1
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War163.793.686.277.4
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla118817060
Dirt 516095.678.265.1
Watch Dogs Legion100968459
Serious Sam 412787.781.967.7
Horizon Zero Dawn14512010793
Death Stranding164.3114.5104.3101.8
F1 2020258163145104
Gears Tactics272.4165.811184
Doom Eternal23115814113799.651.2
Hunt Showdown1099456.827.4
Escape from Tarkov12111911379.836.8
Red Dead Redemption 2132.88963413321
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order109999271.335.9
Need for Speed Heat103918260.533.4
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019160.91251149672.341
GRID 20191311047060.639.7
Ghost Recon Breakpoint10191685029
FIFA 20271228224253186
Borderlands 311279614423
Control92.6644222
F1 201919115614210761
Total War: Three Kingdoms2581328862
Rage 2119999662.830.1
Anno 180011285473721
The Division 2123109795729
Dirt Rally 2.01831538666
Far Cry New Dawn98101917544
Metro Exodus9274594828
Apex Legends14414214110961.1
Just Cause 413710193.463.634.5
Darksiders III13511810771.636.4
Battlefield V14413312410058
Hitman 289.283.279.776.141.5
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey9981624732
Shadow of the Tomb Raider133115108976836
Monster Hunter World11310284.255.727.5
Far Cry 5149118111104
X-Plane 11.111191058772
Kingdom Come: Deliverance12710875.954.427.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1621078233
Fortnite13313210886.243
Dota 2 Reborn155141134126103
The Witcher 33282391447551
GTA V1821761588973.1
BioShock Infinite420.2359.5329.8166.5
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4
19


26
22

1
35
12

5
32
7

11
17
1
10
17
5
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 08:44:05

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.084s ... 0.085s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.085s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.085s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10307 +0.035s ... 0.121s

#7 got single benchmarks 10307 +0.038s ... 0.159s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.159s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.86s ... 1.019s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.019s

#11 Got 401 rows for game benchmarks. +0.054s ... 1.073s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.073s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.038s ... 1.111s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +2.477s ... 3.588s

#15 return log +0.062s ... 3.65s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q graphics card

Lenovo ThinkPad T15g Laptop Review: A Gaming ThinkPad or a mobile workstation?

Lenovo ThinkPad T15g Laptop Review: A Gaming ThinkPad or a mobile workstation?

The ThinkPad T15g is a new product for Lenovo. You might think the designation as well as the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q GPU indicate a gaming device, but it ...
Intel Core i7-10750H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 15.60" | 2.8 kg
Medion Erazer Beast X10 (Tongfang GM7MPHP) in review: Stable, slim, compact gaming laptop with good battery life

Medion Erazer Beast X10 (Tongfang GM7MPHP) in review: Stable, slim, compact gaming laptop with good battery life

The compact Erazer Beast X10 brings all the latest computer games smoothly onto the 17.3-inch matte display (Full HD, IPS, 144 Hz). The gaming laptop scores poi...
Intel Core i7-10750H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 17.30" | 2.3 kg
Razer Blade 15 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Review: Same Laptop, But Faster

Razer Blade 15 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Review: Same Laptop, But Faster

Not much has changed over last year's Blade 15 from a design perspective, but the new 10th gen 8-core Core i7-10875H will offer noticeable raw performance gains...
Intel Core i7-10875H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 15.60" | 2.1 kg
Aorus 15G XB in review: Successful gaming machine with mechanical keyboard

Aorus 15G XB in review: Successful gaming machine with mechanical keyboard

The Aorus 15G XB brings all modern computer games smoothly onto the matte 15.6-inch screen (240 Hz, Full HD, IGZO). The rest of the equipment is also right: NVM...
Intel Core i7-10875H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 15.60" | 2.3 kg
Aorus 17G XB

Aorus 17G XB Laptop Review: The mechanical keyboard rocks

With the Aorus 17G, Gigabyte presents a complete redesign of the 17-inch gaming laptop. The mechanical keyboard is one of the most important newly introduced fe...
Intel Core i7-10875H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 17.30" | 2.7 kg

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  Review » Gigabyte Aero 15 XB laptop review: Taking the lead with OLED

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  Review » MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Laptop Review: Visually subdued, acoustically conspicuous

Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  Review » Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB Laptop Review: Super Max-Q at the Start

MSI Creator 15 A10SFS-287: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Creator 15 A10SFS-287

Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW-HN070T: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW-HN070T

HP Omen 15-dh1267ng: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 15-dh1267ng

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS-440: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS-440

Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT000TGE: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT000TGE

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Edition, i7-10875H, RTX 2070 Super: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 Advanced Edition, i7-10875H, RTX 2070 Super

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS

HP Omen 15-dh1770ng: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 15-dh1770ng

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-71K5: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-71K5

MSI Creator 17 A10SFS-269: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI Creator 17 A10SFS-269

Aorus 15G XB: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Aorus 15G XB

Alienware m17 R3-RW22J: Intel Core i7-10750H, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Alienware m17 R3-RW22J

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52

MSI GS75 10SFS-225 Stealth: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 17.30", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI GS75 10SFS-225 Stealth

Gigabyte Aorus 17G XB: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aorus 17G XB

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS-064IT: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS-064IT

Aorus 17G XB: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Aorus 17G XB

Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP

Lenovo ThinkPad T15g-20UR000GGE: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.8 kg
   » Lenovo's mobile workstation T15g appears a bit outdated

Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804: Intel Core i7-10750H, 17.30", 2.3 kg
   » The Medion Erazer Beast X10 offers plenty of gaming power, a sober look, and a good level of features

Aorus 15G XB: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
   » The Core i7 processor in the Aorus 15G XB puts the pedal to the metal

Aorus 17G XB: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
   » Aorus 17G: Mechanical keyboard meets great battery life

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
   » Podium spot thanks to OLED: Gigabyte Aero 15 XB

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.2 kg
   » MSI GS66: Quite loud for a Stealth notebook

Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
   » Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB: Versatile High-End Notebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-03-27)