Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

The 28 nm Nvidia Quadro M2000M is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a (first generation) Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM07 chip with 640 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M or 950M. The Quadro M2000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is the successor to the Kepler-based Quadro K2100M. The M2000M typically comes with 4 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective at 80 GB/s compared to 48 GB/s on the K2100M). 

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

As the exact clock speed of the M2000M is still not known, we can only speculate on the performance of the card. However, we do know that it is a mid-range model from the mobile 2015 Quadro line based on the same chip as the GeForce GTX 960M or 950M. Therefore, it should be faster than the old Quadro K2100M.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2000M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M2000M is rated for the same TGP of 55 Watt as the K2100M, including the board and memory components. Therefore, the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks and larger.

Quadro M Series

Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwell
Pipelines640 - unified
Core Speed1038 - 1197 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption55 Watt
Transistor Count1.9 Billion
technology28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.10.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.9 pt (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 107575     avg: 110819     median: 111917 (14%)     max: 112966 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 16337     avg: 17599     median: 17603.5 (19%)     max: 18273 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 26669     avg: 29145     median: 29795 (8%)     max: 30769 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3794     avg: 3875     median: 3859 (7%)     max: 4007 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4053     avg: 4157     median: 4157 (5%)     max: 4299 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 39220     avg: 113595     median: 123306 (15%)     max: 199166 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 5375     avg: 5486     median: 5456 (8%)     max: 5653 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 4997     avg: 5134     median: 5143 (4%)     max: 5280 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 20018     avg: 20537     median: 20567 (6%)     max: 21026 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 19209     avg: 19354     median: 19235 (11%)     max: 19619 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 24844     avg: 25964     median: 25604 (34%)     max: 27269 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 20.3     avg: 20.4     median: 20.4 (7%)     max: 20.6 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
min: 51.8     avg: 52.7     median: 52.7 (17%)     max: 53.4 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
min: 32.4     avg: 42     median: 42.1 (19%)     max: 51.6 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 42.14     avg: 44.4     median: 43.1 (26%)     max: 55.8 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 42.91     avg: 44.9     median: 44.2 (25%)     max: 50.3 fps
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 46.29     avg: 50.2     median: 49.7 (38%)     max: 54.2 fps
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 16.42     avg: 19.8     median: 19.6 (23%)     max: 23 fps
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 56.9     avg: 65     median: 57.7 (44%)     max: 124.2 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 48.27     avg: 55.1     median: 55 (59%)     max: 67.8 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 42.21     avg: 45.6     median: 46.2 (22%)     max: 47.08 fps
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 48.34     avg: 53.6     median: 53.5 (28%)     max: 61.6 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 32.41     avg: 33.5     median: 33.2 (5%)     max: 35.87 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 20.58     avg: 22.3     median: 21.9 (5%)     max: 24.25 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 43.32     avg: 77.7     median: 88.8 (31%)     max: 94.5 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 45.03     avg: 90.7     median: 92.7 (5%)     max: 115.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
72 72 72.6 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
44.6 45 45.3 49 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.5 25.5 25.7 28 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.6 21.6 21.8 23 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.1 9.2 16 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
154.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
95.2 106.4 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
51.8 52 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.8 38.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
70.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.4 62.7 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.9 36.2 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.7 31.5 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
131  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
83.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
69 69 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
56 57 60 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31 31 32 33 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22 23 23 23 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
67.7 68 75.7 76.2 76.8 81 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.7 45.8 46.8 47 47.1 47.3 49 53 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.5 19.9 20.2 22 23 25.5 25.9 26.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.2 13.3 13.4 13.6 13.6 13.8 15 16 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
8 9.4 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
193.9 272 ~ 233 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
100.2 136 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.7 76 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.7 33 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
121.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
110.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
60 78 89.2 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
56.1 58.8 60.7 61.9 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
49.5 50.2 51 51.7 53.2 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.3 26.4 27.1 27.3 27.8 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
209.8 232.7 ~ 221 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
156.6 174.6 174.9 ~ 169 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
130.4 134.2 143.4 145.1 ~ 138 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.7 25.5 25.5 26.2 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
100.8 118.9 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
86.1 94.8 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
53.4 55.3 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.3 29.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
187.9 193 204.9 211 219 219 ~ 206 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
128 128.7 131.8 132.3 132.8 133 139 ~ 132 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
112.7 112.9 113.7 114.7 114.8 115.8 122.8 123 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.5 42.5 42.6 43.3 44.1 45 46.5 72.2 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
348.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
162.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
107.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
149.8 155.5 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
139.9 141.8 149.8 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
120.5 126.9 128.1 134.3 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75.6 77.7 78.3 81.6 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Rise of the Tomb Raider7246262211
Rainbow Six Siege154.1101523816.4
Just Cause 370.959343012.2
Star Wars Battlefront13183.138.932.7
Batman: Arkham Knight6958322310
The Witcher 3744723149
Dirt Rally2331187233
GTA V121.1110.142.217.5
Thief76595127
Total War: Rome II22116913825
Metro: Last Light110905429
BioShock Infinite20613211647
Tomb Raider348.7162.8107.351.5
Mafia 215314412778
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


6
8

5
5
4
2
7
3
2
7
6
1



5


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 16:46:15

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Mar 2024 05:34:43 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.067s ... 0.068s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.068s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.068s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6508 +0.03s ... 0.098s

#7 got single benchmarks 6508 +0.026s ... 0.124s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.124s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.663s ... 0.787s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.787s

#11 Got 180 rows for game benchmarks. +0.014s ... 0.801s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.801s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.012s ... 0.813s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.572s ... 1.385s

#15 return log +0.039s ... 1.424s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA Quadro M2000M graphics card

Fujitsu Celsius H760 Workstation Review

Fujitsu Celsius H760 Workstation Review

Great success. The Fujitsu Celsius H760 is a successful example of a classic workstation. Performance, flexibility, quality and ergonomics are the most importan...
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | 15.60" | 3 kg
Lenovo ThinkPad P50 Workstation (Xeon, 4K) Review

Lenovo ThinkPad P50 Workstation (Xeon, 4K) Review

Better with 4K? Once again, we review the mobile workstation from Lenovo. This time, however, the ThinkPad P50 is equipped with a Xeon processor and a 4K screen...
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | 15.60" | 2.6 kg
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) Mobile Workstation Review

Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) Mobile Workstation Review

Thoughtful evolution. The long-awaited Precision revision from Dell seeks to modernize the design without compromising the functionality of the professional dev...
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | 15.60" | 2.7 kg
HP ZBook 15 G3 Workstation Review

HP ZBook 15 G3 Workstation Review

Extremely expensive, extremely good? HP’s mobile workstations are traditionally some of the most expensive devices on the market. This did not change with the n...
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | 15.60" | 2.6 kg
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11 Workstation Review

MSI WS60-6QJE316H11 Workstation Review

Too thin? The mobile workstation WS60 from MSI offers very powerful components in a slim chassis, but the mobility suffers from poor battery runtimes. Are there...
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | 15.60" | 2 kg

Lenovo ThinkPad P50: Intel Core i7-6820HQ, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P50 Workstation Review

Fujitsu Celsius H760: Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, 15.60", 3 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu Celsius H760

HP ZBook 15 G3: Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook 15 G3

MSI WS72 6QJ: Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » MSI WS72 6QJ

Lenovo ThinkPad P50-20EN0008GE: Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P50-20EN0008GE

Lenovo ThinkPad P50: Intel Core i7-6820HQ, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P50

Dell Precision 7510: Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5, 15.60", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 7510

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter