NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M is a fast mid-range laptop graphics card presented in 2010. It is based on the GF108 core, which is related to the Fermi architecture. Therefore, it supports DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.0. In contrast to the GTX 415M, the card features the full 96 shader cores. The difference of the GT420M, GT425M and GT435M is only the core and memory speed.

GF108 architecture

The GF108 core of the GT 425M is related to the GF100 core of the GeFore GTX 480M and offers 96 shaders and a 128 Bit memory bus for DDR3. Except for the memory controllers the GF108 can basically be considered a halved GF106. Therefore, the architecture is not comparable to the old GT215 (e.g., GeForce GTS 350M) or GT216 (e.g., GeForce GT 330M) cores. Unlike the GF100 the smaller GF104, GF106, and GF108 core were not only shortened, but also considerably modified. In contrast to the GF100, which was designed for professional applications, these chips target the consumer market. They feature more shaders (3x16 instead of 2x16), more texture units (8 instead of 4) and SFUs per streaming multi-processor (SM). As there are still only 2 warp schedulers (versus 3 shader groups), Nvidia now uses superscalar execution to use the higher amount of shaders per SM more efficiently. In theory, the shaders can thereby be utilized more efficiently and the performance per core is improved. However, in worst case scenarios the performance can also be worse than of the GF100 (and its predecessors). The ECC memory protection, which is important for professional applications, was completely omitted and the FP64 hardware shortened (only 1/3 of the shader are FP64-capable and therewith only 1/12 of the FP32’s performance). Because of these cutbacks, the size of the SM  grew only by 25% despite the higher number of shaders and larger warp schedulers with superscalar dispatch capabilities. Due to the different shader architectures and the higher clock rate of the shader domain, the core count can not be directly compared to AMD cores of the Radeon 5000 series (e.g. HD 5650).

Detailed information on the GF104 architecture (and therewith also the GF106 and GF108) can be found in the desktop GTX 460 article by Anandtech.

Performance

Because the GeForce GT 425M features a new architecture, the performance is not comparable to older chips with a similar core count. The DDR3 graphics memory combined with the 128 Bit bus should be the bottleneck of the GT 425M. In our tests with an Acer Aspire 5745PG pre-sample, a GT 420M performed on average between a GeForce GT 330M and GT 335M. Therefore, the GT 425 should be a bit faster than the GT 335M. Nvidia positions the card against the Mobility Radeon HD 5650.

The gaming performance of the GT 425M is sufficient for medium detail settings in modern games like Battlefield Bad Company 2. Less demanding games should run in high detail settings. The best resolution to choose is about 1360x768 due to the limited performance. Benchmarks and comparison charts on the 3D performance can be found below.

Features

A novelty of the GF104/106/108 chips is the support of Bitstream HD Audio (Blu-Ray) output via HDMI. Alike the Radeon HD 5730, the GT 425M can transfer Dolby True HD and DTS-HD bitstream-wise without quality loss to a HiFi receiver.

The GT425M offers the PureVideo HD technology for video decoding. The included Video Processor 4 (VP4) supports feature set C and therefore the GPU is able to fully decode MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 Part 2 (MPEG-4 ASP - e.g., DivX or Xvid), VC-1/WMV9, and H.264 (VLD, IDCT, Motion Compensation, and Deblocking).

Furthermore, the GPU is able to decode two 1080p streams simultaneously (e.g. for Blu-Ray Picture-in-Picture).

Through CUDA, OpenCL, and DirectCompute 2.1 support the GeForce GT 425M can be of help in general calculations. For example, the stream processor can considerably faster encode videos than a fast CPU can. Furthermore, physics calculations can be done by the GPU using PhysX (e.g. supported by Mafia 2 or Metro 2033).

According to Nvidia, support for 3D Vision on the new graphics cards is also new. It enables the laptop to send 3D contents (3D games, 3D Web Streaming, 3D photos, 3D Blu-Rays) to a built-in 3D enabled screen or an external 3D TV (only if supported by the laptop manufacturer).

According to rumors, the power consumption of the GeForce GT 425M should be about 35 Watt (TDP including the MXM board and memory), and therefore suited for 15” laptops. Without load, the chip is clocked at 50/100/135 MHz (chip/shader/memory) in 2D respectively 200/400/325 in 3D mode to save power. Furthermore, the 400M series supports Optimus to automatically switch between the integrated graphics card from Intel and the Nvidia GPU. However, the laptop manufacturers need to implement it and it cannot be upgraded.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GT 400M Series

GeForce GT 445M 144@590MHz

GeForce GT 435M 96@650MHz

GeForce GT 425M 96@560MHz

GeForce GT 420M 96@500MHz

GeForce GT 415M 48@500MHz

CodenameGF108
Pipelines96 - unified
Core Speed *560 MHz
Shader Speed *1120 MHz
Memory Speed *800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm
FeaturesOptimus Support, PureVideo HD VP4, 3D Vision, Bitstream HD Audio, CUDA, DirectCompute, OpenCL, OpenGL 4.0, DirectX 11
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement15.08.2010
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product-gef...
* The specified clock rates are only guidelines for the manufacturer and can be altered by them.

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 17850     avg: 27557.8 (45%)     max: 31412 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 15802     avg: 17131.5 (16%)     max: 17833 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 11636     avg: 12975.2 (40%)     max: 13374 Points
3DMark 06
0% 100%
min: 6564     avg: 6906.9 (27%)     max: 7605 Points
PCMark Vantage - Gaming Score 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 4780     avg: 5616.7 (25%)     max: 6360 Points
Cinebench R10 - Shading 32Bit
0% 100%
min: 3442     avg: 4114.6 (38%)     max: 4696 Points
3DMark Vantage - P Result no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 3256     avg: 3386 (11%)     max: 3518 Points
3DMark Vantage - P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 2699     avg: 2803.1 (8%)     max: 2993 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
0% 100%
min: 4.6     avg: 6 (76%)     max: 6.6 points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
0% 100%
min: 6.5     avg: 6.6 (83%)     max: 6.6 points
Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit
0% 100%
min: 20.57     avg: 20.8 (27%)     max: 21.18 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 10.9     avg: 11.1 (8%)     max: 11.6 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Catia 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 2.52     avg: 3.8 (9%)     max: 5.78 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Ensight 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 7.04     avg: 7.6 (20%)     max: 8.01 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Lightwave 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 5.58     avg: 8.4 (15%)     max: 11.47 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Maya 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 1.89     avg: 7.5 (8%)     max: 18.26 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 0.8     avg: 3.2 (23%)     max: 7.6 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - SolidWorks 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 3.74     avg: 6 (11%)     max: 10.12 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Tcvis 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 0.61     avg: 0.8 (2%)     max: 1.23 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Siemens NX 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 0.88     avg: 1.4 (3%)     max: 1.63 fps
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 832     avg: 836.7 (9%)     max: 846 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 747     avg: 755.7 (8%)     max: 767 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fifa 11
Fifa 11 (2010)
low:
214.2 319.9 334 ~ 289 fps      Compare
med.:
114 141.8 148.3 161.8 ~ 141 fps      Compare
high:
94.1 95.8 98 104.1 ~ 98 fps      Compare
ultra:
51.3 57.6 ~ 54 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Civilization 5 (2010): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
Mafia 2
Mafia 2 (2010)
low:
50  fps      Compare
med.:
29.6 33.4 39.2 ~ 34 fps      Compare
high:
24.4 26.5 33.3 ~ 28 fps      Compare
ultra:
15.8 15.8 ~ 16 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
StarCraft 2
StarCraft 2 (2010)
low:
151 172.3 ~ 162 fps      Compare
med.:
31.8 37.2 37.8 38.6 ~ 36 fps      Compare
high:
25 26.3 27 28.1 ~ 27 fps      Compare
ultra:
13.7 15.5 ~ 15 fps      Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Just Cause 2 (2010): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
Metro 2033
Metro 2033 (2010)
low:
40.6 40.7 59.4 ~ 47 fps      Compare
med.:
22 22.7 30.2 30.3 ~ 26 fps      Compare
high:
11.2 11.6 ~ 11 fps      Compare
ultra:
4.2 5.7 ~ 5 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dawn of War II - Chaos Rising (2010): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings med.. - more...
Battlefield: Bad Company 2
Battlefield: Bad Company 2 (2010)
low:
44.9  fps      Compare
med.:
30.6 32.8 35.9 ~ 33 fps      Compare
high:
23.2 24 25.8 ~ 24 fps      Compare
ultra:
12.2 12.9 ~ 13 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Stalker: Call of Pripyat (2010): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
CoD Modern Warfare 2
CoD Modern Warfare 2 (2009)
low:
106.2  fps      Compare
med.:
31 39.2 46.3 ~ 39 fps      Compare
high:
26.3 33.6 38.4 ~ 33 fps      Compare
ultra:
17.9 22.2 ~ 20 fps      Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Risen
Risen (2009)
low:
63.4 65.5 75.1 77 ~ 70 fps      Compare
med.:
28.2 30.1 30.8 31.5 32 33.8 ~ 31 fps      Compare
high:
17.7 21.3 21.6 22 22.2 25 ~ 22 fps      Compare
ultra:
12.6 13.4 14 14.9 ~ 14 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Resident Evil 5
Resident Evil 5 (2009)
low:
82.5  fps      Compare
high:
38.8  fps      Compare
ultra:
21.6  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Need for Speed Shift
Need for Speed Shift (2009)
low:
59.7 86.7 ~ 73 fps      Compare
med.:
28.5 34.8 40.5 45.6 46 ~ 39 fps      Compare
high:
29.1 29.9 31.2 31.6 33 ~ 31 fps      Compare
ultra:
18.8 19.1 19.3 ~ 19 fps      Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Colin McRae: DIRT 2
Colin McRae: DIRT 2 (2009)
low:
49.5 51.9 86.9 103 ~ 73 fps      Compare
med.:
41.7 45.4 55.5 57.1 58 ~ 52 fps      Compare
high:
23.2 24.9 33.9 34.3 36.5 ~ 31 fps      Compare
ultra:
13 19.1 27.1 ~ 20 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 1404
Anno 1404 (2009)
low:
60 145.5 ~ 103 fps      Compare
ultra:
19  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
ArmA 2 (2009): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
Sims 3
Sims 3 (2009)
med.:
88.4  fps      Compare
high:
43.4  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F.E.A.R. 2 (2009): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings high. - more...
Far Cry 2
Far Cry 2 (2008)
low:
96.8  fps      Compare
high:
45.1  fps      Compare
ultra:
21.5  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis Warhead
Crysis Warhead (2008)
low:
68  fps      Compare
ultra:
12  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Racedriver: GRID (2008): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings high. - more...
Crysis - GPU Benchmark
Crysis - GPU Benchmark (2007)
low:
85.5 92.6 ~ 89 fps      Compare
med.:
43.6 44.7 ~ 44 fps      Compare
high:
24.3 25 ~ 25 fps      Compare
ultra:
5.6 5.8 ~ 6 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis - CPU Benchmark
Crysis - CPU Benchmark (2007)
low:
90.2 94.5 ~ 92 fps      Compare
med.:
41 42.2 ~ 42 fps      Compare
high:
22.3 22.8 ~ 23 fps      Compare
ultra:
5.3 5.5 ~ 5 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
World in Conflict - Benchmark
World in Conflict - Benchmark (2007)
med.:
54  fps      Compare
high:
33  fps      Compare
ultra:
12  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Command and Conquer III (2007): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
Call of Juarez Benchmark
Call of Juarez Benchmark (2006)
high:
28.4  fps      Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M graphics card

Acer Aspire 5745DG (Intel Core i3 370M, 15.6")
» Acer Aspire 5745DG - External Review

Acer Aspire 5745DG-374G32Mnks (Intel Core i3 370M, 15.6")
» Acer Aspire 5745DG-374G32Mnks - External Review

Acer Aspire 5745DG-3855 (Intel Core i5 450M, 15.6")
» Acer Aspire 5745DG-3855 - External Review

Acer Aspire 5745DG-3D (Intel Core i7 620M, 15.6")
» Acer Aspire 5745DG-3D - External Review

Acer Aspire 5745DG-464G75Bn (Intel Core i5 460M, 15.6")
» Acer Aspire 5745DG-464G75Bn - External Review

Acer Aspire 5745DG-5454G50Bnks (Intel Core i5 450M, 15.6")
» Acer Aspire 5745DG-5454G50Bnks - External Review

Acer Aspire 5745DG-7744G75Bnks (Intel Core i7 740QM, 15.6")
» Review Acer Aspire 5745DG 3D Notebook - Review
» Acer Aspire 5745DG-7744G75Bnks - External Review

Asus N43JF (Intel Core i5 520M, 14.0")
» Asus N43JF - External Review

Asus N53jf (Intel Core i5 540M, 15.6")
» Asus N53jf - External Review

Asus N53JF-XE1 (Intel Core i5 460M, 15.6")
» Asus N53JF-XE1 - External Review

Asus N53JQ (Intel Core i7 720QM, 15.6")
» Asus N53JQ - External Review

Asus N53JQ-SZ137V (Intel Core i7 740QM, 15.6")
» Asus N53JQ-SZ137V - External Review

Asus N73JF-TY004V (Intel Core i5 450M, 17.3")
» Asus N73JF-TY004V - External Review

Asus N73JF-TY096V (Intel Core i3 370M, 17.3")
» Asus N73JF-TY096V - External Review

Asus N73JQ-TZ087V (Intel Core i7 740QM, 17.3")
» Review Asus N73JQ Notebook - Review
» Asus N73JQ-TZ087V - External Review

Asus U41JF-A1 (Intel Core i3 380M, 14.1")
» Asus U41JF-A1 - External Review

Chiligreen Mobilitas NW10714 (Intel Core i3 380M, 15.6")
» Chiligreen Mobilitas NW10714 - External Review

Clevo B5130M (Intel Core i7 640M, 15.6")
» Clevo B5130M - External Review

Cyberpower Xplorer X7-7300 (Intel Core i5 560M, 17.3")
» Cyberpower Xplorer X7-7300 - External Review

Dell XPS 14-L401X (Intel Core i7 740QM, 14.0")
» Dell XPS 14-L401X - External Review

Lenovo Ideapad Y460N-4937 (Intel Core i5 460M, 14.0")
» Lenovo Ideapad Y460N-4937 - External Review

Lenovo Ideapad Y460N-ITH (Intel Core i3 380M, 14.0")
» Lenovo Ideapad Y460N-ITH - External Review

Lenovo Lenovo Y460N-IFI (Intel Core i5 560M, 14.0")
» Lenovo Lenovo Y460N-IFI - External Review

Medion Akoya P6624 (Intel Core i5 460M, 15.6")
» Medion Akoya P6624 - External Review

Medion Akoya P6624/MD98390 (Intel Core i3 370M, 15.6")
» Medion Akoya P6624/MD98390 - External Review

MSI FX700-012FR (Intel Core i5 460M, 17.3")
» MSI FX700-012FR - External Review

MSI GE603 (Intel Core i5 460M, 16.0")
» Review MSI GE603 Notebook - Review
» MSI GE603 - External Review

Schenker XMG A500 (Intel Core i5 580M, 15.6")
» Review Clevo B5130M / mySN XMG A500 Notebook - Review
» mySN XMG A500 - External Review

Sony Vaio F13M1E/H (Intel Core i5 560M, 16.4")
» Sony Vaio F13M1E/H - External Review

Sony VAIO VPC F13M0E/B (Intel Core i7 740QM, 16.4")
» Sony VAIO VPC F13M0E/B - External Review

Sony Vaio VPC-F133FX (Intel Core i7 740QM, 16.4")
» Sony Vaio VPC-F133FX - External Review

Sony VAIO VPC-F136FM/B (Intel Core i7 740QM, 16.3")
» Sony VAIO VPC-F136FM/B - External Review

Sony Vaio VPC-F13E4E (Intel Core i5 460M, 16.4")
» Sony Vaio VPC-F13E4E - External Review

Sony Vaio VPC-F13E8R/H (Intel Core i3 380M, 16.4")
» Sony Vaio VPC-F13E8R/H - External Review

Sony Vaio VPC-F13L8E/H (Intel Core i5 480M, 16.4")
» Review Sony Vaio VPC-F13L8E/H (FHD) Notebook - Review

Sony Vaio VPC-F13M1E/H (Intel Core i5 560M, 16.4")
» Sony Vaio VPC-F13M1E/H - External Review

Sony Vaio VPCF13 (Intel Core i5 460M, 16.4")
» Sony Vaio VPCF13 - External Review

Sony VAIO VPCF13AFX (Intel Core i7 740QM, 16.4")
» Sony VAIO VPCF13AFX - External Review

Sony Vaio VPCF13Z1E/B (Intel Core i7 740QM, 16.4")
» Review Sony Vaio VPC-F13Z1E/B Notebook - Review
» Sony Vaio VPCF13Z1E/B - External Review

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailled list of all laptop GPUs with a short description. Classified and sorted by performance.

» Benchmark List
Sortable and restrainable list of all GPUs with benchmarks (e.g. 3DMarks).

» Notebook Gaming List
Which game can be played with my graphics card.

Class 1
GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 580
Radeon HD 6970
GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 480
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Radeon HD 6870
GeForce GTX 470
Radeon HD 5850
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Radeon HD 6790
Radeon HD 5770
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GeForce GTS 450
Radeon HD 4850
Radeon HD 5670
Class 2
GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 430
Radeon HD 7590M *
Radeon HD 5570
Radeon HD 7650M
Radeon HD 6550D *
GeForce GT 220
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Class 3
Radeon HD 4350
GeForce G 107M *
Chrome9HD *
Class 4
Class 5
Class 6
SGX543MP2 *
Mali-400 MP *
PowerVR SGX540 *
PowerVR SGX535
unknown *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > FAQ / Tips / Technics > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA Geforce GT 425M
Author: Klaus Hinum (Update: 2012-01-25)