NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M is a high-end laptop graphics card released in 2010. It is based on the GF106 core as part of the Fermi architecture. As a result, the GPU supports DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.0. In contrast to the GT 445M, which only features 144 core, the GTX 460M offers all the 192 shader cores of the GF106. The faster GTX 470M is based on the GF104 and offers even more shader cores at 288.

GF106 architecture

The GF106 core of the GTX 460M is related to the GF100 core of the GeFore GTX 480M and offers 192 shaders and a 192 Bit memory bus for GDDR5. Except for the memory controllers, the GF106 can basically be considered a halved GF104. Therefore, the architecture is not comparable to the old GT215 (e.g., GeForce GTS 350M) or GT216 (e.g., GeForce GT 330M) cores. Unlike the GF100, the smaller GF104, GF106, and GF108 cores have not only been reduced in size, but have also been considerably modified. In contrast to the GF100, which was designed for professional applications, these chips target the consumer market. They feature more shaders (3x16 instead of 2x16), more texture units (8 instead of 4) and SFUs per streaming multi-processor (SM). As there are still only 2 warp schedulers (versus 3 shader groups), Nvidia now uses superscalar execution to use the higher amount of shaders per SM more efficiently. In theory, the shaders can thereby be utilized more effectively and the performance per core can be improved. 

However, in worst case scenarios the performance can also be worse than of the GF100 and its predecessors. The ECC memory protection, which is important for professional applications, was completely omitted and the FP64 hardware shortened (only 1/3 of the shader are FP64-capable and therewith only 1/12 of the FP32’s performance). Because of these cutbacks, the size of the SM  grew only by 25% despite the higher number of shaders and larger warp schedulers with superscalar dispatch capabilities. Due to the different shader architectures and the higher clock rate of the shader domain, the core count of the GTX 460M cannot be directly compared to AMD cores of the Radeon 5000 series (e.g. HD 5850).

Detailed information on the GF104 architecture (and by extension also the GF106 and GF108) can be found in the desktop GTX 460 article by Anandtech.

Performance

Because the GeForce GTX 460M features a new architecture, the performance is not comparable to older chips with a similar core count. In contrast to the Radeon HD 5850, which could optionally use DDR3 memory, the 192 Bit memory bus of the GTX 460M is combined with GDDR5. Furthermore, the Fermi based chips offer a higher Tessellation performance than DX11 chips of the Radeon HD 5000 series.

We ran a set of benchmarks on an early pre-sample of a Toshiba Qosmio X500 with a 740QM CPU. In the synthetic benchmarks, the GTX 460M was on par with the DDR3 based Mobility Radeon HD 5850. In actual game benchmarks and tests, the performance was better than a HD 5850 with GDDR5 on average. In some cases (e.g., Unigine Heaven 2.1 and Dirt 2 Demo), the card even beat a Mobility Radeon HD 5870. On average, the GTX 480M was about 8-18% faster. The detailed benchmark and gaming results (including charts) can be found below.

Features

A novelty of the GF104/106/108 chips is the support for Bitstream HD Audio (Blu-Ray) output via HDMI. Similar to the Radeon HD 5850, the GTX 460M can transfer Dolby True HD and DTS-HD bitstream without quality loss to a HiFi receiver.

The GTX460M offers PureVideo HD technology for video decoding. The included Video Processor 4 (VP4) supports feature set C and therefore the GPU is able to fully decode MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 Part 2 (MPEG-4 ASP - e.g., DivX or Xvid), VC-1/WMV9, and H.264 (VLD, IDCT, Motion Compensation, and Deblocking). The X500 notebook tester was able to decode the VC-1 encoded Elephants Dream video with about 3-6% CPU load (according to the task manager). The H.264 coded Big Buck Bunny video was played back with 1-3% CPU load (both 1080p videos).

Furthermore, the GPU is able to decode two 1080p streams simultaneously (e.g., for Blu-Ray Picture-in-Picture).

Through CUDA, OpenCL, and DirectCompute 2.1 support, the GeForce GTX 460M can be of use in general calculations. For example, the stream processor can encode videos considerably faster than can many modern CPUs. Furthermore, physics calculations can be done by the GPU using PhysX if supported (e.g., Mafia 2 or Metro 2033). For example, the X500’s GPU ran Fluidmark more than 3x faster than its CPU (36 versus 11 fps) in our tests.

According to Nvidia,  3D Vision is supported on the GTX graphics cards. It enables the laptop to send 3D content (3D games, 3D Web Streaming, 3D photos, 3D Blu-Rays) to a built-in 3D enabled screen or an external 3D TV if supported by the laptop manufacturer. 

Unofficially, the power consumption of the GeForce GTX 460M should be about 72 Watt (TDP including the MXM board and memory), which is about the level of the Mobility Radeon HD 5850 - 5870. If not under load, the chip is clocked at 50/100 MHz (chip/shader) and 200/400 in 2D mode and 3D mode, respectively, to save power. Furthermore, the 400M series supports Optimus to automatically switch between the integrated graphics card from Intel and the Nvidia GPU. However, its implementation is dependent on the manufacturer. As current (2010) quad-cores don’t house an integrated GPU, we won’t see many Optimus designs with a GTX 460M GPU before the launch of Sandy Bridge in 2011.

The similarly named desktop GeForce GTX 460 is based on the GF104 chip and offers more shader cores at 336. Therefore, it is significantly faster than the GTX 460M and even the GTX 470M.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 400M Series

GeForce GTX 580M SLI 768@620MHz

GeForce GTX 485M SLI 768@575MHz

GeForce GTX 470M SLI 576@535MHz

GeForce GTX 480M SLI 704@425MHz

GeForce GTX 460M SLI 384@675MHz

GeForce GTX 485M 384@575MHz

GeForce GTX 470M 288@535MHz

GeForce GTX 480M 352@425MHz

GeForce GTX 460M 192@675MHz

CodenameGF106
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed *675 MHz
Shader Speed *1350 MHz
Memory Speed *1250 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory1536 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm
FeaturesOptimus Support, PureVideo HD VP4, 3D Vision, Bitstream HD Audio, CUDA, DirectCompute, OpenCL, OpenGL 4.0, DirectX 11, SLI Supported
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement03.09.2010
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product-gef...
* The specified clock rates are only guidelines for the manufacturer and can be altered by them.

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 33339     avg: 34874 (57%)     max: 36409 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 33712     avg: 35177.6 (33%)     max: 36383 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 17886     avg: 20171.4 (62%)     max: 21679 Points
3DMark 06
0% 100%
min: 11521     avg: 13367.9 (52%)     max: 16957 Points
PCMark Vantage - Gaming Score 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 5437     avg: 7588.5 (34%)     max: 9940 Points
Cinebench R10 - Shading 32Bit
0% 100%
min: 3566     avg: 4942.3 (46%)     max: 5749 Points
3DMark Vantage - P Result no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 6629     avg: 7616.9 (25%)     max: 8398 Points
3DMark Vantage - P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 6537     avg: 6763.2 (20%)     max: 7164 Points
...
Radeon HD 5670 -22%
GeForce GTX 460M
Radeon HD 4850 10%
GeForce GTS 450 26%
...
GeForce GTX 590 367%
0%
100%
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
0% 100%
min: 5.7     avg: 6.9 (87%)     max: 7.1 points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
0% 100%
min: 6.9     avg: 7 (89%)     max: 7.1 points
Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit
0% 100%
min: 26.15     avg: 36.1 (47%)     max: 41.49 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 23.5     avg: 24 (18%)     max: 24.7 fps
...
Radeon HD 5670 -5%
GeForce GTX 460M
GeForce GTX 550 Ti 33%
GeForce GTS 450 38%
Radeon HD 5770 54%
...
GeForce GTX 590 466%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 11 - Catia 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 3.24     avg: 3.9 (9%)     max: 4.67 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Ensight 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 16.85     avg: 17 (43%)     max: 17.1 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Lightwave 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 5.21     avg: 7.4 (14%)     max: 9.58 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Maya 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 5.76     avg: 7 (8%)     max: 8.03 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 0.84     avg: 0.9 (7%)     max: 1.03 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - SolidWorks 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 3.75     avg: 4.7 (9%)     max: 5.69 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Tcvis 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 0.66     avg: 0.7 (2%)     max: 0.75 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Siemens NX 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 2.01     avg: 2.1 (5%)     max: 2.12 fps
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 1788     avg: 1813.6 (21%)     max: 1861 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 1598     avg: 1627.7 (18%)     max: 1692 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dirt 3
Dirt 3 (2011)
low:
189.4  fps      Compare
med.:
108  fps      Compare
high:
73.6  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings (2011): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
Crysis 2
Crysis 2 (2011)
low:
102.9 106 ~ 104 fps      Compare
med.:
70.8 71.9 ~ 71 fps      Compare
high:
51.4 53.2 ~ 52 fps      Compare
ultra:
17.8 18.1 ~ 18 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Total War: Shogun 2 (2011): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings med.. - more...
Call of Duty: Black Ops
Call of Duty: Black Ops (2010)
low:
83.7  fps      Compare
med.:
78.2  fps      Compare
high:
58.5 75.8 86.3 ~ 74 fps      Compare
ultra:
47.2 47.8 55.7 55.7 56.5 59.3 ~ 54 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 11
Fifa 11 (2010)
low:
542.8 664.4 ~ 604 fps      Compare
med.:
301.6 320.6 ~ 311 fps      Compare
high:
194 222.6 ~ 208 fps      Compare
ultra:
123.5 130 132.1 133 136.2 136.3 ~ 132 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Civilization 5 (2010): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings low. - more...
Mafia 2
Mafia 2 (2010)
low:
53.6 92.6 ~ 73 fps      Compare
med.:
50.2 67.4 ~ 59 fps      Compare
high:
46.7 51.2 56.3 62.3 ~ 54 fps      Compare
ultra:
32.9 33.7 33.9 34 34.4 34.7 34.8 39.2 ~ 35 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
StarCraft 2
StarCraft 2 (2010)
low:
172 193 216.6 ~ 194 fps      Compare
med.:
66 73 83.5 ~ 74 fps      Compare
high:
57 61 65.4 68.4 ~ 63 fps      Compare
ultra:
31.4 31.5 31.6 31.9 32 34.5 36 47.3 ~ 35 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Just Cause 2 (2010): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
Metro 2033
Metro 2033 (2010)
low:
88 115.8 ~ 102 fps      Compare
med.:
53.1 54 55.5 ~ 54 fps      Compare
high:
24.3 25.2 30 30 35.6 ~ 29 fps      Compare
ultra:
9 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.9 10.5 12.7 ~ 10 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dawn of War II - Chaos Rising (2010): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings high. - more...
Battlefield: Bad Company 2
Battlefield: Bad Company 2 (2010)
low:
80 87.3 ~ 84 fps      Compare
med.:
65 68.9 ~ 67 fps      Compare
high:
53.5 54.2 57.2 58 59.6 60.6 ~ 57 fps      Compare
ultra:
27.1 29 29.3 29.6 30.1 30.1 31 31.6 32 ~ 30 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Stalker: Call of Pripyat (2010): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
CoD Modern Warfare 2
CoD Modern Warfare 2 (2009)
low:
201.9  fps      Compare
med.:
73.2  fps      Compare
high:
58.5 62.5 68.3 ~ 63 fps      Compare
ultra:
41.3 45.2 45.4 45.9 46 47 ~ 45 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Risen
Risen (2009)
low:
97.7 102.3 ~ 100 fps      Compare
med.:
59.3 64 ~ 62 fps      Compare
high:
40.9 42.6 47.8 ~ 44 fps      Compare
ultra:
12.5 26.5 28 29.3 30.4 31 32.9 ~ 27 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Resident Evil 5
Resident Evil 5 (2009)
low:
99  fps      Compare
high:
70.2  fps      Compare
ultra:
47.2 48.3 48.6 48.8 ~ 48 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Need for Speed Shift
Need for Speed Shift (2009)
low:
126.7  fps      Compare
med.:
91.9 106.3 ~ 99 fps      Compare
high:
61 68 ~ 65 fps      Compare
ultra:
41.8 43 43.8 43.9 44 ~ 43 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2
Colin McRae: DIRT 2 (2009)
low:
63.5 113 ~ 88 fps      Compare
med.:
58.8 102.9 104.5 ~ 89 fps      Compare
high:
69.9 73.8 75.3 ~ 73 fps      Compare
ultra:
41.6 42.3 42.5 42.5 42.9 ~ 42 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1404
Anno 1404 (2009)
low:
123  fps      Compare
ultra:
44  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ArmA 2 (2009): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
Sims 3
Sims 3 (2009)
med.:
105  fps      Compare
high:
61  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F.E.A.R. 2
F.E.A.R. 2 (2009)
low:
229.4  fps      Compare
med.:
136.4  fps      Compare
high:
95.5  fps      Compare
ultra:
48.2 52 ~ 50 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto (2008): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings high. - more...
Left 4 Dead
Left 4 Dead (2008)
low:
248  fps      Compare
high:
128  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 2
Far Cry 2 (2008)
low:
121.7  fps      Compare
high:
86.4  fps      Compare
ultra:
41.5 42.1 ~ 42 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis Warhead
Crysis Warhead (2008)
low:
76  fps      Compare
ultra:
25  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Racedriver: GRID (2008): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings high. - more...
Trackmania Nations Forever
Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)
low:
317  fps      Compare
high:
86.5  fps      Compare
ultra:
31.7  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare (2007)
low:
297.9 304.3 ~ 301 fps      Compare
med.:
130.6 195.5 ~ 163 fps      Compare
high:
83 118.6 ~ 101 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Supreme Commander - FA Bench
Supreme Commander - FA Bench (2007)
low:
54.7  fps      Compare
med.:
49.2  fps      Compare
high:
48.4  fps      Compare
ultra:
37.2  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark
Crysis - GPU Benchmark (2007)
low:
92.6  fps      Compare
med.:
70.2  fps      Compare
high:
50.7 52.6 54.6 55.9 ~ 53 fps      Compare
ultra:
12.9 13 13 13.1 14.6 19.4 ~ 14 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark
Crysis - CPU Benchmark (2007)
low:
112.4  fps      Compare
med.:
70.4  fps      Compare
high:
47.4 49.6 50.5 58.4 ~ 51 fps      Compare
ultra:
12.2 12.2 12.2 12.4 14.4 16.4 ~ 13 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World in Conflict - Benchmark
World in Conflict - Benchmark (2007)
low:
165  fps      Compare
med.:
66  fps      Compare
high:
62  fps      Compare
ultra:
27  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Command and Conquer III (2007): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
Call of Juarez Benchmark
Call of Juarez Benchmark (2006)
high:
62.6 64 ~ 63 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark (2005)
high:
197  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F.E.A.R. (2005): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings high. - more...
Quake 4
Quake 4 (2005)
ultra:
62  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
World of Warcraft
World of Warcraft (2005)
high:
81  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Counter-Strike Source
Counter-Strike Source (2004)
high:
138  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Doom 3
Doom 3 (2004)
low:
216  fps      Compare
ultra:
209  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo (1999)
high:
643  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M graphics card

Alienware M17x R3 GTX 460M i7-2630 (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 17")
» Review Alienware M17x R3 (GTX 460M, i7-2630QM) Notebook - Review
» Alienware M17x R3 GTX 460M i7-2630 - External Review

Asus G53JW (Intel Core i7 720QM, 15.6")
» Review Asus G53JW 3D Gaming Notebook (GTX 460M) - Review
» Asus G53JW - External Review

Asus G53JW-3DE (Intel Core i7 740QM, 17.3")
» Asus G53JW-3DE - External Review

Asus G53JW-SX029V (Intel Core i7 720QM, 15.6")
» Asus G53JW-SX029V - External Review

Asus G53JW-SX052D (Intel Core i5 460M, 15.6")
» Asus G53JW-SX052D - External Review

Asus G53JW-SX084V (Intel Core i7 740QM, 15.6")
» Asus G53JW-SX084V - External Review

Asus G53JW-SZ098V (Intel Core i7 740QM, 15.6")
» Review Update: Asus G53JW Notebook FullHD TFT - Review
» Asus G53JW-SZ098V - External Review

Asus G53JW-SZ255V (Intel Core i5 480M, 15.6")
» Asus G53JW-SZ255V - External Review

Asus G53SW-A1 (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 15.6")
» Asus G53SW-A1 - External Review

Asus G53SW-IX089V (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 15.6")
» Asus G53SW-IX089V - External Review

Asus G53SW-IX097Z (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 15.6")
» Asus G53SW-IX097Z - External Review

Asus G73JW (Intel Core i7 720QM, 17.3")
» Review Asus G73JW Notebook (GTX 460M) - Review
» Asus G73JW - External Review

Asus G73JW-91014V (Intel Core i7 720QM, 17.4")
» Asus G73JW-91014V - External Review

Asus G73JW-91093V (Intel Core i7 740QM, 17.3")
» Asus G73JW-91093V - External Review

Asus G73JW-91121V (Intel Core i7 740QM, 17.3")
» Asus G73JW-91121V - External Review

Asus G73JW-A1 (Intel Core i7 740QM, 17.3")
» Asus G73JW-A1 - External Review

Asus G73SW-91182V (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 17.3")
» Asus G73SW-91182V - External Review

Asus G73SW-A1 (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 17.3")
» Asus G73SW-A1 - External Review

Asus G73SW-BST6 (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 17.3")
» Asus G73SW-BST6 - External Review

Asus G73SW-TZ083V (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 17.3")
» Review Asus G73SW Notebook - Review
» Asus G73SW-TZ083V - External Review

Asus VX7-SZ062V (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 15.6")
» Review Asus VX7 Lamborghini Notebook - Review
» Asus VX7-SZ062V - External Review

Asus VX7-SZ083V (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 15.6")
» Asus VX7-SZ083V - External Review

AVADirect Clevo P151HM (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 15.6")
» AVADirect Clevo P151HM - External Review

AVADirect X7200 ( , 17.3")
» AVADirect X7200 - External Review

Cyberpower Xplorer X6-9300 (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 15.6")
» Cyberpower Xplorer X6-9300 - External Review

Digital Storm x15-8690T-8 (Intel Celeron M 520, 15.6")
» Digital Storm x15-8690T-8 - External Review

Medion Erazer X6811-MD97623 (Intel Core i5 460M, 15.6")
» Medion Erazer X6811-MD97623 - External Review

Medion Erazer X6811-MD97624 (Intel Core i7 740QM, 15.6")
» Review Medion Erazer X6811 Notebook - Review
» Medion Erazer X6811-MD97624 - External Review

Medion Erazer X6811-MD97654 (Intel Core i7 740QM, 15.6")
» Medion Erazer X6811-MD97654 - External Review

Medion Erazer X6812 (Intel Core i5 460M, 15.6")
» Medion Erazer X6812 - External Review

Medion Erazer X6813 (MD97762) (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 15.6")
» Review Medion Erazer X6813 Notebook - Review
» Medion Erazer X6813 (MD97762) - External Review

MSI GT663-417CS (Intel Core i5 460M, 15.6")
» MSI GT663-417CS - External Review

MSI GT663R-i7488BLW7P (Intel Core i7 740QM, 15.6")
» Review MSI GT663R Gaming-Notebook - Review
» MSI GT663R-i7488BLW7P - External Review

MSI GT680-055AU (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 15.6")
» MSI GT680-055AU - External Review

MSI GT680R (i7-2720QM) (Intel Core i7 2720QM, 15.6")
» MSI GT680R (i7-2720QM) - External Review

MSI GT680R-008US (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 15.6")
» MSI GT680R-008US - External Review

MSI GT680R-017F (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 15.6")
» MSI GT680R-017F - External Review

MSI GT680R-i71651BLW7U (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 15.6")
» MSI GT680R-i71651BLW7U - External Review

Novatech Stingray (Intel Core i7 2720QM, 17.3")
» Novatech Stingray - External Review

Schenker XMG P500 (Intel Core i7 640M, 15.6")
» mySN XMG P500 - External Review

Schenker XMG P500 PRO (Intel Core i7 640M, 15.6")
» Review Schenker XMG P500 PRO Gaming Notebook - Review
» mySN XMG P500 PRO - External Review

Toshiba Qosmio X500-01R (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 18.4")
» Toshiba Qosmio X500-01R - External Review

Toshiba Qosmio X500-13R (Intel Core i7 740QM, 18.4")
» Toshiba Qosmio X500-13R - External Review

Toshiba Qosmio X500-167 (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 18.4")
» Toshiba Qosmio X500-167 - External Review

Toshiba Qosmio X500-Q930S (Intel Core i7 2630QM, 18.4")
» Toshiba Qosmio X500-Q930S - External Review

Toshiba Qosmio X500-TZ1V (Intel Core i7 740QM, 18.4")
» Review Toshiba Qosmio X500 Notebook (GeForce GTX 460M) - Review

Toshiba Qosmio X505-Q898 (Intel Core i7 740QM, 18.4")
» Toshiba Qosmio X505-Q898 - External Review

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailled list of all laptop GPUs with a short description. Classified and sorted by performance.

» Benchmark List
Sortable and restrainable list of all GPUs with benchmarks (e.g. 3DMarks).

» Notebook Gaming List
Which game can be played with my graphics card.

Class 1
GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 580
Radeon HD 6970
GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 480
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Radeon HD 6870
GeForce GTX 470
Radeon HD 5850
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Radeon HD 6790
Radeon HD 5770
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GeForce GTS 450
Radeon HD 4850
Radeon HD 5670
Class 2
GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 430
7590M *
Radeon HD 5570
Radeon HD 6550D *
GeForce GT 220
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Class 3
Radeon HD 4350
GeForce G 107M *
Chrome9HD *
Class 4
Class 5
Class 6
SGX543MP2 *
Mali-400 MP *
PowerVR SGX540 *
PowerVR SGX535
unknown *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > FAQ / Tips / Technics > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
Author: Klaus Hinum (Update: 2012-01-25)