NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 485M is the fastest graphics card for laptops at the time of announcement (Q1 2011). It is based on the GF104 chip and offers all 384 shader cores and the full 256 Bit memory bus. Due to the high clock rate of 575 MHz, it is significantly faster than the old GeForce GTX 480M of which it replaces. It also supports DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.0.

Other than the GeForce GTX 480M, the 485M is no longer based on a trimmed down GF100 chip, but on the related GF104 instead. The GF104 is designed for the consumer sector and has a total of 384 cores. A number of cores may be disabled, for example the 470M with only 288 active cores.

The technology of the GF104 differs quite a bit from the GF100 chip (which was actually designed for professional use). The GF104 has more shaders (3x16 vs. 2x16), texture units (8 vs. 4) and SFUs (Special-Funciton-Units) per Streaming-Multiprocessors (SM). Nvidia now uses the superscalar architecture as there are still only two warp schedulers supporting three shader blocks. In theory, this helps to utilize the shaders more efficiently and increases the performance per core.

However, in the worst case, the performance can drop below the GF100 architecture (and its predecessors). The ECC memory protection, important in professional applications, was completely omitted and the FP64 was trimmed down (only 1/3 of the shaders are FP64-capable, only 1/12 of the FP32 performance). Because of these reductions in the GF104, the size of a SM increased only by 25% despite the higher number of shaders.

Note that it is not possible to directly compare the number of cores to the AMD Radeon graphics cards (e.g. HD 5870) or even to Nvidia's own predecessors (e.g., G92b), because shader architecture and clock rates are significantly different in the GF104 chip.

Performance

In our extensive test of the GeForce GTX 485M, we found that the GTX485M is significantly faster than the old GeForce GTX 480M (at the same TDP rating). The performance is on a level with two GeForce GTX 460M in SLI mode. Nearly all games are therefore playable in highest details and resolutions. Even demanding games like Mafia 2 or Battlefield Bad Company 2 can run fluently in 1080p with maximus detail settings. Detailed benchmarks can be found at the end of this page.

Features

What's new compared to the GF100 is support for Bitstream transfer of HD Audio (Blu-Ray) via HDMI in the GF104 chips. Similar to the HD 5850, the GTX 485M can transmit Dolby True HD and DTS-HD via Bitstream to compatible receivers without quality loss.

For decoding HD videos, the GTX485M supports PureVideo HD. The built-in Processor 4 (VP4) handles Feature Set C. As a result, MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 Part 2 (MPEG-4 ASP - z.B. DivX or Xvid), VC-1/WMV9 and H.264 can be fully decoded by the graphics card (VLD, IDCT, Motion Compensation, and Deblocking). Furthermore, two streams can be simultaneously decoded in realtime, e.g. Blu-Ray Picture-in-Picture (2x1080p lt DXVAChecker). In addition, PureVideo HD indicates HDCP encoding for digital interfaces.

The shader cores (also called CUDA cores) can also be used for general computations (e.g. Video Transcoding) by using the interfaces CUDA, DirectCompute 2.1 or OpenCL. Thanks to PhysX, the 485M can also perform physics calculations.

According to Nvidia, the support for 3D Vision includes support for the recent HDMI 1.4a standard as well. If enabled by the laptop manufacturer, content such as 3D games, 3D web streaming videos, 3D pictures and 3D Blu-Ray videos can be displayed on a 3D-capable TV (via discrete 3DTV Play) or on the internal notebook 3D display.

With regards to energy demand, the GTX 485M should be on par with the GeForce GTX 480M. In other words, both graphics cards should draw about 100 Watts each when including their respective memory and MXM boards. Due to the higher performance from the 485M, the performance/power efficiency here has clearly been improved.

Compared to desktop graphics cards, the performance of the 485M should be on par with a GeForce GTX 460 768MB which features less cores but operates on higher clock rates.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 400M Series

GeForce GTX 580M SLI 768@620MHz

GeForce GTX 485M SLI 768@575MHz

GeForce GTX 470M SLI 576@535MHz

GeForce GTX 480M SLI 704@425MHz

GeForce GTX 460M SLI 384@675MHz

GeForce GTX 485M 384@575MHz

GeForce GTX 470M 288@535MHz

GeForce GTX 480M 352@425MHz

GeForce GTX 460M 192@675MHz

CodenameN12E-GTX
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed *575 MHz
Shader Speed *1150 MHz
Memory Speed *1500 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Current Consumption100 Watt
technology40 nm
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement06.01.2010
* The specified clock rates are only guidelines for the manufacturer and can be altered by them.

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 2891     avg: 2942 (33%)     max: 2993 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 2668     avg: 2709 (29%)     max: 2750 points
...
GeForce GTS 450 -30%
GeForce GTX 550 Ti -16%
Radeon HD 5770 -11%
GeForce GTX 485M
GeForce GTX 460 768MB 4%
Radeon HD 6790 7%
Radeon HD 5850 26%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 48%
...
GeForce GTX 590 238%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage - P Result no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 13172     avg: 13449.5 (44%)     max: 13554 Points
3DMark Vantage - P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 12142     avg: 12198.8 (36%)     max: 12270 Points
3DMark 06
0% 100%
min: 17852     avg: 19464.5 (75%)     max: 20251 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 23218     avg: 24983.5 (77%)     max: 26749 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 40.9     avg: 40.9 (30%)     max: 40.9 fps
PCMark Vantage - Gaming Score 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 8018     avg: 8498 (38%)     max: 8978 Points
SPECviewperf 11 - Ensight 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 22.87     avg: 22.9 (58%)     max: 22.87 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Lightwave 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 8.85     avg: 8.9 (16%)     max: 8.85 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Maya 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 6.99     avg: 7 (8%)     max: 6.99 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 1.04     avg: 1 (8%)     max: 1.04 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - SolidWorks 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 6.24     avg: 6.2 (12%)     max: 6.24 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Tcvis 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 0.7     avg: 0.7 (2%)     max: 0.7 fps
SPECviewperf 11 - Siemens NX 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 2.14     avg: 2.1 (5%)     max: 2.14 fps
Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit
0% 100%
min: 40.88     avg: 46.7 (61%)     max: 49.58 Points
Cinebench R10 - Shading 32Bit
0% 100%
min: 5454     avg: 5780 (53%)     max: 5947 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
0% 100%
min: 5.7     avg: 5.7 (72%)     max: 5.7 points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
0% 100%
min: 6.6     avg: 6.6 (84%)     max: 6.6 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis 2
Crysis 2 (2011)
low:
166.6  fps      Compare
med.:
117.5  fps      Compare
high:
87.8  fps      Compare
ultra:
30.3  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Total War: Shogun 2 (2011): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings med.. - more...
Call of Duty: Black Ops
Call of Duty: Black Ops (2010)
low:
74.3  fps      Compare
med.:
84.2  fps      Compare
high:
72.7 77.5 ~ 75 fps      Compare
ultra:
71.4 74.2 ~ 73 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 11
Fifa 11 (2010)
low:
455  fps      Compare
med.:
327  fps      Compare
high:
271  fps      Compare
ultra:
196.9  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Civilization 5 (2010): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings low. - more...
Mafia 2
Mafia 2 (2010)
low:
97.9  fps      Compare
med.:
90.8  fps      Compare
high:
85.1 87.3 ~ 86 fps      Compare
ultra:
58.3 59.2 ~ 59 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
StarCraft 2
StarCraft 2 (2010)
low:
220.9  fps      Compare
med.:
85.9  fps      Compare
high:
85.2  fps      Compare
ultra:
56.5  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Just Cause 2 (2010): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
Metro 2033
Metro 2033 (2010)
low:
116.2  fps      Compare
med.:
80.8  fps      Compare
high:
48.1  fps      Compare
ultra:
16.1  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dawn of War II - Chaos Rising (2010): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings ultra. - more...
Battlefield: Bad Company 2
Battlefield: Bad Company 2 (2010)
med.:
134.5  fps      Compare
high:
100.5 101.5 ~ 101 fps      Compare
ultra:
49.5 53.6 ~ 52 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Stalker: Call of Pripyat (2010): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
CoD Modern Warfare 2
CoD Modern Warfare 2 (2009)
low:
223.7  fps      Compare
med.:
130.9  fps      Compare
high:
118.4  fps      Compare
ultra:
76.3  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Risen
Risen (2009)
low:
160.3  fps      Compare
med.:
99.9  fps      Compare
high:
72.6  fps      Compare
ultra:
52.7  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Resident Evil 5
Resident Evil 5 (2009)
low:
140  fps      Compare
high:
96.9  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Need for Speed Shift
Need for Speed Shift (2009)
low:
141.9  fps      Compare
med.:
106.9  fps      Compare
high:
100.1  fps      Compare
ultra:
70.7  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2
Colin McRae: DIRT 2 (2009)
low:
159.9  fps      Compare
med.:
138.8  fps      Compare
high:
124.1 124.8 ~ 124 fps      Compare
ultra:
69.7 70.3 ~ 70 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1404
Anno 1404 (2009)
low:
214.2  fps      Compare
ultra:
83.3  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ArmA 2 (2009): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
F.E.A.R. 2
F.E.A.R. 2 (2009)
low:
271.6  fps      Compare
med.:
182.7  fps      Compare
high:
153.5  fps      Compare
ultra:
88.5  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto (2008)
low:
65.5  fps      Compare
med.:
63.9  fps      Compare
high:
62  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Left 4 Dead
Left 4 Dead (2008)
low:
184.3  fps      Compare
high:
121.6  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 2
Far Cry 2 (2008)
low:
192.8  fps      Compare
high:
141.4  fps      Compare
ultra:
68.3  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis Warhead (2008): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings ultra. - more...
Supreme Commander - FA Bench
Supreme Commander - FA Bench (2007)
med.:
81.7  fps      Compare
high:
78.9  fps      Compare
ultra:
59.9  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark (2007): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings high. - more...
Crysis - GPU Benchmark
Crysis - GPU Benchmark (2007)
low:
135.6  fps      Compare
med.:
88.1  fps      Compare
high:
74.2  fps      Compare
ultra:
22.6  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World in Conflict - Benchmark (2007): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings ultra. - more...

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M graphics card

Schenker XMG P501: Intel Core i7 2630QM, 15.6", 3.2 kg
  Review » Review Schenker XMG P501 Gaming-Notebook (Clevo P150HM)

  Review » Review Nvidia Geforce GTX 485M graphics card

AVADirect Clevo P150HM: Intel Core i7 2720QM, 15.6", 2.7 kg
  External Review » AVADirect Clevo P150HM

AVADirect Clevo P170HM: Intel Core i7 2720QM, 17.3", 3.9 kg
  External Review » AVADirect Clevo P170HM

Kobalt G150: Intel Core i7 2630QM, 15.6", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Kobalt G150

Maingear eX-L 15: Intel Core i7 2720QM, 15.6", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Maingear eX-L 15

Maingear Titan 17: Intel Core i7 (Desktop) 990X EE, 17.3", 5.5 kg
  External Review » Maingear Titan 17

MALIBAL Lotus P150HM: Intel Core i7 2920XM, 15.6", 3.2 kg
  External Review » MALIBAL Lotus P150HM

Rock Xtreme 786-I7-2630: Intel Core i7 2630QM, 17.3", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Rock Xtreme 786-I7-2630

Schenker XMG P501: Intel Core i7 2630QM, 15.6", 3.2 kg
  External Review » mySN XMG P501

  External Review » mySN XMG P501

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailled list of all laptop GPUs with a short description. Classified and sorted by performance.

» Benchmark List
Sortable and restrainable list of all GPUs with benchmarks (e.g. 3DMarks).

» Notebook Gaming List
Which game can be played with my graphics card.

Class 1
GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 580
Radeon HD 6970
GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 480
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Radeon HD 6870
GeForce GTX 470
Radeon HD 5850
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Radeon HD 6790
Radeon HD 5770
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GeForce GTS 450
Radeon HD 4850
Radeon HD 5670
Class 2
GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 430
Radeon HD 5570
Radeon HD 7650M
Radeon HD 7570M *
Radeon HD 7630M
Radeon HD 6550D *
Radeon HD 7550M *
GeForce GT 220
Radeon HD 7530M *
Radeon HD 7490M *
Radeon HD 7510M *
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Class 3
Radeon HD 4350
GeForce G 107M *
Chrome9HD *
Radeon HD 7340 *
Radeon HD 7310 *
Class 4
Class 5
Class 6
SGX543MP2 *
Mali-400 MP *
PowerVR SGX540 *
PowerVR SGX535
unknown *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > FAQ / Tips / Technics > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
Author: Klaus Hinum (Update: 2012-01-25)