Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

The Nvidia Quadro T2000 with Max-Q Design is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer desktop GTX 1650 Ti therefore currently between a mobile GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 Ti. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. Compared to the normal Quadro T2000, the Max-Q variants are clocked lower and work in a more efficient state. Currently, we know of two variants with different clock speeds and power consumptions (35 and 40 W).

ModelShaderTGP (W)Base (MHz)Boost (MHz)
Quadro T2000 Mobile10246015751785
Quadro T2000 Max-Q10244012001620
Quadro T2000 Max-Q1024359301500
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop)102475?15301725
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile15368014551590
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile8965013951560

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

The performance in professional apps should be clearly lower than a normal (Max-P) Quadro T2000 due to the lower clock speeds, but still ahead the slower Quadro T1000 due to the higher shader count. Compared to consumer cards, the mobile GTX 1650 should be still slower.

Thanks to the relative low power consumption of the Quadro T2000 Max-Q, the GPU is suited for thin and light laptops. The used TU116 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.

Quadro Turing Series

Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
CodenameN19P-Q3 MAX-Q
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed930 / 1200 - 1500 / 1620 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption35 - 40 Watt
Transistor Count4.7 Billion
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement27.05.2019

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3604     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (40%)     max: 0.4355 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
182  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
96  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
263.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
147.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
85.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
141.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
64.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
179  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
123.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
120.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
148.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
27.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
271  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
83  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
91.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
71  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
101  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
91.9 101 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76 87 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.8 73 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
91  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.7 48.5 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.8 36.8 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.3 13.7 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
145 153 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
132 140 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
118 130 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
108 118 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
43.4 47.9 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
181  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
107.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.4 33.4 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2020182967855
Gears Tactics263.377.547.635.1
Doom Eternal147.485.558.1
Hunt Showdown141.350.344.5
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order64.253.147
GRID 201917994.777.751
Borderlands 3123.45635.827.3
Control120.240.428.3
Total War: Three Kingdoms148.460.336.324.4
Anno 180027.8612.99.8
Dirt Rally 2.027186.169.940.3
Far Cry New Dawn83585550
Metro Exodus91.541.7431.224.6
Apex Legends14486.472.764.9
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey71534525
Shadow of the Tomb Raider101564842
X-Plane 11.1196826947.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark91453325.713
Dota 2 Reborn14913612411346
The Witcher 3181107.662.533
BioShock Infinite79.5
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1

6
12
1
8
10
1
2
11
6
1
4
8
3
1


1
2

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 10:04:22

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.082s ... 0.083s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.083s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.083s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9886 +0.014s ... 0.098s

#7 got single benchmarks 9886 +0.021s ... 0.119s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.119s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +1.063s ... 1.181s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.181s

#11 Got 90 rows for game benchmarks. +0.017s ... 1.198s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.198s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.018s ... 1.217s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.975s ... 2.192s

#15 return log +0.062s ... 2.254s

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q Graphics Card
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-06-17)