NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

► remove

The Nvidia Quadro T2000 with Max-Q Design is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer desktop GTX 1650 Ti therefore currently between a mobile GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 Ti. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. Compared to the normal Quadro T2000, the Max-Q variants are clocked lower and work in a more efficient state. Currently, we know of two variants with different clock speeds and power consumptions (35 and 40 W).

ModelShaderTGP (W)Base (MHz)Boost (MHz)
Quadro T2000 Mobile10246015751785
Quadro T2000 Max-Q10244012001620
Quadro T2000 Max-Q1024359301500
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop)102475?15301725
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile15368014551590
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile8965013951560

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

The performance in professional apps should be clearly lower than a normal (Max-P) Quadro T2000 due to the lower clock speeds, but still ahead the slower Quadro T1000 due to the higher shader count. Compared to consumer cards, the mobile GTX 1650 should be still slower.

Thanks to the relative low power consumption of the Quadro T2000 Max-Q, the GPU is suited for thin and light laptops. The used TU116 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)

► remove

The Nvidia Quadro T2000 for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer desktop GTX 1650 Ti with comparable clock speeds and therefore currently between a mobile GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 Ti. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. 

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards (e.g. Quadro RTX 3000), the T1000 and T2000 don not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-QNVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro Turing Series
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) (compare) 4608 384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) (compare) 3072 @ 1035 / 1350 - 1545 / 1770 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (compare) 3072 @ 600 - 930 - 1350 - 1455 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) (compare) 2560 @ 1110 - 1560 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q (compare) 2560 @ 780 - 960 - 1380 - 1485 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) (compare) 1920 @ 945 - 1380 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (compare) 1920 @ 600 - 870 - 1215 - 1380 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1575 - 1785 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 @ 930 / 1200 - 1500 / 1620 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) (compare) 768 @ 1395 - 1455 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q (compare) 768 @ 795 / 1230 - 1455 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) (compare) 4608 384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) (compare) 3072 @ 1035 / 1350 - 1545 / 1770 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (compare) 3072 @ 600 - 930 - 1350 - 1455 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) (compare) 2560 @ 1110 - 1560 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q (compare) 2560 @ 780 - 960 - 1380 - 1485 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) (compare) 1920 @ 945 - 1380 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (compare) 1920 @ 600 - 870 - 1215 - 1380 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1575 - 1785 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 @ 930 / 1200 - 1500 / 1620 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) (compare) 768 @ 1395 - 1455 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q (compare) 768 @ 795 / 1230 - 1455 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN19P-Q3 MAX-QN19P-Q3
ArchitectureTuringTuring
1024 - 1024 -
Core930 / 1200 - 1500 / 1620 (Boost) MHz1575 - 1785 (Boost) MHz
Memory8000 MHz8000 MHz
Bus128 Bit128 Bit
MemoryGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Memory4096 MB4096 MB
nono
DirectXDirectX 12_1DirectX 12_1
Transistors4700 Million4700 Million
Technology12 nm12 nm
Size
Introduced27.05.2019 27.05.2019

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
3356 Points (25%)
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
3066 Points (21%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
75193 Points (14%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
28401 Points (46%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
42409 Points (23%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
7320 Points (27%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
8107 Points (20%)
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
11695 points (33%)
13392 points (38%)
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
11468 points (22%)
13677 points (27%)
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Solidworks (sw-04) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Siemens NX (snx-03) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Siemens NX (snx-03) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Showcase (showcase-02) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Showcase (showcase-02) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Medical (medical-02) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Maya (maya-05) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Maya (maya-05) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Energy (energy-02) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Creo (creo-02) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Creo (creo-02) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Catia (catia-05) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Catia (catia-05) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Ref. Match 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
255.2 fps (46%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
59.9 fps (16%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
28.3 fps (18%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 2560x1440
64.8 fps (47%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
43.1 fps (22%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen 1920x1080
133.4 fps (39%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
150.8 fps (38%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
34.8 fps (21%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
1640 Samples/s (31%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
3050 Samples/s (28%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
6331 Points (23%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
89.9 Watt (20%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) → 114%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
27.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
12.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
9.8  fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
101  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
87  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
73  fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
»
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
41.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
28.8  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
12.3  fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
145 fps  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
132 fps  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
118 fps  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
108 fps  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
43.4 fps  fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
»
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
32.4 fps  fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
»
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
79.5  fps
Quadro T2000 Max-Q:
»

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q → 100%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)