Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

The 1.7 TFLOPS Adreno X1-45 is an integrated graphics adapter that the Snapdragon X Plus 8-core X1P-42-100 SoC features. Compared to the faster 3.8 TFLOPS and 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPUs, this little guy does not just run at lower clock speeds but also has fewer unified shaders at its disposal, with 768 being the most likely number. The 2.1 TFLOPS X1-45 variant on the other hand only differs in clock speeds.

Architecture

The underlying architecture is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) in many respects the same as what was used in the Adreno 730, rendering the iGPU DirectX 12-compatible but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-compatible. Ray tracing is only supported via Vulcan 1.3. The highest OpenGL version supported is ES 3.2. The iGPU enjoys access to fast enough RAM but has comparatively small and slow caches to work with. AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded; with VP9, only decoding is possible.

The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p rather than SUHD 4320p.

Performance

A lot depends on the power targets of a specific system, just like it is with AMD, Intel and Nvidia products. That being said, the 1.7 TFLOPS model is on par with the GeForce GTX 950M and significantly behind the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80 EUs) in synthetic benchmarks. Games put it really close to the GeForce MX350 which is a lot better; still, this kind of performance is only just sufficient for pre-2020 games and resolutions such as HD 720p.

It is also worth mentioning that Qualcomm's graphics drivers aren't quite as polished as what AMD, Intel and especially Nvidia have to offer, leading to severe visual artefacts in certain games. A lot of games won't start at all.

Power consumption

Snapdragon X Plus 8-core chips normally consume no more than 30 W, including the on-package RAM. This makes it highly unlikely that the iGPU will ever get to eat more than 20 W.

Since TSMC's N4P process is employed, it's safe to say power efficiency is going to be better than average with this iGPU, as of late 2024. It's still far behind Apple's M-series chips of course as our in-depth analysis article shows.

Snapdragon X Series

Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS compare 1536 @ 1.5 GHz? Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS compare 1536 @ 1.25 GHz? Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS compare 768 128 Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 768 128 Bit @ 8448 MHz
Pipelines768 - unified
Memory Speed8448 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption20 Watt
technology4 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.)
FeaturesSUHD 2160p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/AV1 encoding and decoding
Date of Announcement03.09.2024
CPU in Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-1008 x ? MHz, 30 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-1008 x ? MHz, 30 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-1008 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 981     avg: 1025     median: 1025 (3%)     max: 1069 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 873     avg: 904     median: 904.5 (2%)     max: 936 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 17207     avg: 17982     median: 17699 (17%)     max: 19040 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 23800     avg: 25387     median: 24402 (6%)     max: 27960 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3602     avg: 3633     median: 3627 (5%)     max: 3691 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3690     avg: 3721     median: 3717 (3%)     max: 3792 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3164     avg: 3194     median: 3187 (4%)     max: 3225 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 4435     avg: 4489     median: 4452 (5%)     max: 4568 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 4031     avg: 4086     median: 4046 (3%)     max: 4165 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6442 points (5%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 19.7     avg: 22     median: 22.3 (1%)     max: 24.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (3%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 9415     avg: 32205     median: 9991 (3%)     max: 206281 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 11315     avg: 35333     median: 13789 (3%)     max: 207733 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.54     avg: 11     median: 10.1 (1%)     max: 15.2 Watt
0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18     avg: 18.5     median: 18.5 (3%)     max: 18.9 Watt
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.582     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (49%)     max: 0.611 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 19.1     avg: 21.6     median: 21.1 (6%)     max: 25.4 Watt
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17     avg: 21.3     median: 20.3 (3%)     max: 28.5 Watt
051015202530Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.2067     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (1%)     max: 0.4318 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
46.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
13.6 14.4 14.4 14.6 14.7 14.7 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.1 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.3 11.6 11.7 11.7 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.3 9.2 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.9 9.9 10 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.2 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.6 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
23.9
24
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
7.2
7.1
7.2
7.2
7.7
7.4
7.3
4
7
7.2
low 1920x1080
12.9 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.4 13.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.9 10.9 11 11 11 11.1 11.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.7 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.1 9.2 9.2 9.4 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
21.9
20.5
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
33.1 33.7 37.8 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.1 36.6 38.3 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.9 23 23.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.2 16.4 16.7 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
63.8
low 1920x1080
27.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
50
low 1280x720
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
0 (!) 78 83 84 85 85.5 85.5 86.7 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29 29.6 29.8 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22 22.5 23 23 23 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19 19 19 19.3 20 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
36 37 37 38 38 38 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21 21 21 21 21 21 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19 19 19 19 19 19 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17 17 18 18 18 18 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
33.3 34 34.9 34.9 36 36 36.3 36.7 39.5 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!) 28.1 28.2 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.1 25.3 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
21.4 31.4 36.8 36.9 37.1 37.1 37.2 37.2 37.6 37.8 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.9 14.9 14.9 15 15 15.1 15.1 15.2 18.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7 9.8 10 10.1 12.4 15.1 18.1 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
77 78.5 79.5 80.3 80.4 81 81.6 83.4 85 85.7 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.8 63.2 63.2 64.1 65.8 66 66.1 66.1 66.3 67.1 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37 55 55.2 55.5 55.7 55.9 56.2 56.3 56.7 56.9 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.9 47.5 47.8 47.9 48.1 48.2 48.7 48.8 49.1 49.2 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
65 68 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39 41 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22 22 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11 11 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
84.9 87.5 88 91.5 94.4 94.7 95.7 95.9 98.3 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
71.2 81.2 84.2 84.8 88 88.7 89.4 91.1 91.2 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.2 32.4 32.5 32.8 33 33 33.1 33.4 34 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 14 14 14.3 14.5 14.6 14.7 14.7 15.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
77
77.4
79.6
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
89.7
100
88.9
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Total War Pharaoh46.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty151198
Baldur's Gate 3131199
F1 2235362316
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands27.921.113.410.4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider4116
Strange Brigade73302319
Far Cry 537211918
X-Plane 11.11361925
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark351512
Dota 2 Reborn81655447
The Witcher 367402211
GTA V92863314
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
6
4
7
3
2
9
2

8
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 22. 00:43:03

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 21 Jul 2025 11:15:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.045s ... 0.046s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.046s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.046s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12765 +0.014s ... 0.06s

#8 got single benchmarks 12765 +0.034s ... 0.094s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.094s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.484s ... 0.578s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.578s

#12 Got 314 rows for game benchmarks. +0.037s ... 0.615s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.616s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.009s ... 0.625s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.13s ... 0.755s

#16 return log +0.003s ... 0.758s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS graphics card

Finally a silent Snapdragon 2-in-1 - Microsoft Surface Pro 12 review

Finally a silent Snapdragon 2-in-1 - Microsoft Surface Pro 12 review

Microsoft is launching its new compact Surface Pro that comes with a 12-inch display and a Snapdragon ARM processor from Qualcomm. One special feature is the pa...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 12.00" | 1 kg
Superfluous and too expensive? - Microsoft Surface Laptop 13 with the Snapdragon X Plus review

Superfluous and too expensive? - Microsoft Surface Laptop 13 with the Snapdragon X Plus review

Microsoft has brought out a new Surface Laptop with a 13-inch display. The problem, however, is that it is worse in almost every respect—and it costs more than ...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 13.00" | 1.2 kg
Asus Vivobook S16 with Snapdragon X1 in review

Asus Vivobook S16 Laptop Review: Good everyday computer with almost 20 hours of battery life for €899

With its Snapdragon X processor, the Asus Vivobook S16 offers sufficient performance for everyday use, and the matte IPS display impresses with its high 2.5K re...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
More than 24 hrs battery life for less than $1,000: Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY laptop review

More than 24 hrs battery life for less than $1,000: Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY laptop review

Qualcomm and Microsoft want to bring the advantages of the efficient ARM architecture to the Windows segment. The Lenovo ThinkBook 16 Gen 7 QOY demonstrates how...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
Asus Zenbook A14 laptop review - The 14-inch OLED subnotebook with a Snapdragon X only weighs 978 grams

Asus Zenbook A14 laptop review - The 14-inch OLED subnotebook with a Snapdragon X only weighs 978 grams

Asus' new Zenbook A14 is a particularly lightweight 14-inch laptop that weighs less than 1 kilogram. Its case is made entirely out of Ceraluminum and on the ins...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 14.00" | 978 g

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14Q8X9: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14Q8X9 review: Affordable Qualcomm ARM convertible

Acer Swift Go 14 AI: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.50", 1.3 kg
  Review » Acer Swift Go 14 AI laptop review: 24-hour runtime for the MacBook Air competitor with Snapdragon

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  Review » Asus ProArt PZ13 review - The durable OLED convertible with a Snapdragon X Plus

Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 15.60", 1.4 kg
  Review » Asus VivoBook S 15 OLED Snapdragon 8-core laptop review - An almost silent everyday companion with the Snapdragon X Plus

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  Review » Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus 8-core analysis - The X1P-42-100 is smaller and cheaper, but not very efficient

Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 15.60", 1.4 kg
  Review » Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus 8-core analysis - The X1P-42-100 is smaller and cheaper, but not very efficient

  Review » Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus 8-core analysis - The X1P-42-100 is smaller and cheaper, but not very efficient

Microsoft Surface Pro 12: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 12.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro 12

Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA

Dell Latitude 5455: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 5455

Asus Vivobook 16 X1607QA: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 16 X1607QA

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3x Snapdragon: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 15.30", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3x Snapdragon

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15

Acer Swift Go 14 AI: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.50", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 AI

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14Q8X9: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14Q8X9

Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA: Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14Q8X9: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14Q8X9

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14Q8X9: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in1 14Q8X9

Dell Inspiron 14 5441: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 5441

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306

Microsoft Surface Pro 12: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 12.00", 1 kg
   » Microsoft's Surface Pro 12-inch is compact, manages long battery runtimes and is silent

Microsoft Surface Laptop 13: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.00", 1.2 kg
   » Who is supposed to buy this? Microsoft's Surface Laptop 13 is worse and just as expensive as the Surface Laptop 13.8

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.30", 0.9 kg
   » Asus ProArt PZ13 with detachable 3K OLED display drops back to record-low price of $850

Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 15.60", 1.4 kg
   » Asus Vivobook S 16 (M506KA) and Vivobook S 14 (M5406WA) debut with new AMD Krackan Point APUs and OLED displays

   » Asus Vivobook S 16 (S5606CA) launched with latest Intel Core Ultra 200H Arrow Lake mobile CPUs and Lumina OLED display

   » Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED laptop with newest Lunar Lake CPU and long battery life is back on sale at lowest price to date

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.30", 0.9 kg
   » Asus ProArt P16 4K OLED laptop with Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and RTX 4060 now on sale at lowest ever price

Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 15.60", 1.4 kg
   » Portable Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED laptop with latest Intel Lunar Lake SoC and 16 GB RAM is on sale at 32% discount

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.30", 0.9 kg
   » Latest Asus ProArt PX13 OLED creator laptop with Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 drops to lowest price ever

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-09-27)