NVIDIA Quadro P5200
The Nvidia Quadro P5200 is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for laptops. Similar to the consumer GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), it is based on a GP104 chip with 2560 shaders but uses a bit slower GDDR5 instead of GDDR5X of the GTX1080. The Quadro P5200 ist the successor to the Quadro P5000 . There will be a normal (Max-P) and a slower but more efficient (Max-Q) variant of the card. For the Max-P variant, the clock speeds are specified from 1556 (base) to 1746 MHz (Boost), the power efficient Max-Q clocks from 1316 MHz (base) to 1569 (Boost) according to a GPU-Z screenshot from a reader (-15% / -10%). The 16 GB GDDR5 are clocked at 3,6 GHz leading to a memory bandwidth of 230 GB/s.
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
Performance
The theoretical performance should be a bit above the older Quadro P5000. Altough the clock speed increase is not yet known, the power consumption is rumored to be a lot higher, which should lead to a noticable improved performance. Nvidia specifies a theoretical peak performance of 8,9 GFLOPS (Single Precision).
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro P5200 is specified by Nvidia as 150 Watt (Max-P) and rumored to be 100 - 110 Watt for the Max-Q variant. Therefore, it is a lot higher than the Quadro P5000 versions (100 Watt and 80 Watt).
Quadro P Series Architecture Pascal Pipelines 2560 - unified Core Speed 1316 - 1569 (Boost) MHz Memory Speed 7216 MHz Memory Bus Width 256 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 16 GB Shared Memory no API DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 Power Consumption 150 Watt technology 16 nm Features Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Notebook Size large Date of Announcement 11.01.2017
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
8.4 pt (25%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 6580 avg: 6647 median: 6646.5 (19%) max: 6713 Points
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 6390 avg: 6422 median: 6422 (17%) max: 6454 Points
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 39077 avg: 43444 median: 43443.5 (46%) max: 47810 Points
...
...
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 105184 avg: 106328 median: 106328 (28%) max: 107472 Points
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 16528 avg: 16626 median: 16625.5 (29%) max: 16723 Points
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 18390 avg: 18467 median: 18467 (21%) max: 18544 Points
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
387870 Points (47%)
...
...
max:
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 21204 avg: 21715 median: 21715 (30%) max: 22226 Points
...
...
max:
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 24934 avg: 25100 median: 25100 (22%) max: 25266 Points
...
...
max:
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
65844 Points (19%)
...
...
max:
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
68614 Points (39%)
...
...
max:
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
44390 Points (59%)
...
...
max:
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 199.8 avg: 205.9 median: 205.9 (51%) max: 212 fps
...
max:
specvp12 snx-02 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 213.7 avg: 215.8 median: 215.8 (32%) max: 217.9 fps
...
max:
specvp12 showcase-01 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 75 avg: 75.3 median: 75.3 (16%) max: 75.6 fps
...
...
max:
specvp12 mediacal-01 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 79.1 avg: 79.3 median: 79.3 (20%) max: 79.4 fps
...
max:
specvp12 maya-04 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 143.4 avg: 145.7 median: 145.7 (40%) max: 147.9 fps
...
...
max:
specvp12 energy-01 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
16.9 fps (15%)
...
...
max:
specvp12 creo-01 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 152 avg: 156 median: 156 (62%) max: 160 fps
...
max:
specvp12 catia-04 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 188.6 avg: 192.6 median: 192.6 (32%) max: 196.6 fps
...
max:
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 178.3 avg: 183.8 median: 183.8 (49%) max: 189.2 fps
...
...
max:
specvp13 snx-03 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 386.7 avg: 391.5 median: 391.5 (43%) max: 396.3 fps
...
max:
specvp13 showcase-02 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 74.7 avg: 75.1 median: 75.1 (16%) max: 75.5 fps
...
...
max:
specvp13 medical-02 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 61.5 avg: 61.6 median: 61.6 (13%) max: 61.7 fps
...
...
max:
specvp13 maya-05 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 251.9 avg: 253.5 median: 253.5 (29%) max: 255 fps
...
...
max:
specvp13 energy-02 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 17.14 avg: 17.2 median: 17.2 (6%) max: 17.28 fps
...
...
specvp13 creo-02 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 241.6 avg: 244.7 median: 244.7 (36%) max: 247.7 fps
...
max:
specvp13 catia-05 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 291.7 avg: 297.1 median: 297.1 (33%) max: 302.4 fps
...
max:
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
149.6 fps (26%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6830 avg: 6833 median: 6833 (5%) max: 6836 points
...
...
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 145.4 avg: 158 median: 158 (55%) max: 170.5 fps
...
...
max:
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 219 avg: 234.3 median: 234.3 (14%) max: 249.6 fps
...
...
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
...
...
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
2539 Samples/s (11%)
...
...
max:
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
5183 Samples/s (9%)
...
...
max:
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
15892 points (17%)
...
...
max:
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 218.9 avg: 227.6 median: 227.6 (50%) max: 236.3 Watt
...
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.2823 avg: 0.3 median: 0.3 (28%) max: 0.2896 fps per Watt
...
...
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 51.4 avg: 51.8 median: 51.8 (83%) max: 52.2 dB(A)
...
...
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
...
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1366x768
...
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
...
...
...
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF FXAA 1366x768
...
...
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
Epic (Render Scale 100 %) 16xAF SMAA 3820x2160
...
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
extreme 3840x2160
...
max:
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
0 Tooltip Tornado F7W: Ø63 (59-67)
WT75 8SM: Ø62.8 (59-68)
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low med. high ultra QHD 4K Shadow of the Tomb Raider 147 91 84 72 26 F1 2018 212 152 125 83 46 Monster Hunter World 183.5 110.1 100.4 77.4 24.1 Destiny 2 13 12.7 12.6 12.2 12.3 Middle-earth: Shadow of War 219 137 106 84 33 Dirt 4 354.1 221.2 126 84.4 56.8 Rocket League 248.5 247 185.8 92.5 Prey 145 144.6 145 144.1 60.9 Overwatch 300 300 252.2 174.1 88.7 Ashes of the Singularity 113 99.1 97.8 43.5 Rise of the Tomb Raider 291 215 124 103 46 Fallout 4 241.9 236.3 46.8 Metal Gear Solid V 60 60 60 60 60 Batman: Arkham Knight 186 176 131 90 50 The Witcher 3 315 220 118 65 46 Thief 149.4 145.1 145.7 114.2 Metro: Last Light 177.5 175.2 171.6 119.2 BioShock Infinite 415 359 331 StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm 753 346.2 296.6 218.9 Guild Wars 2 145.1 83.5 85.4 Sleeping Dogs 344.2 288.1 267.3 118.8 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 2 18 1 4 15 1 7 12 1 13 3 3 8 4
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 16. 15:14:30
#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s
#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#3 composed specs +0.042s ... 0.043s
#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s
#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.043s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8094 +0.028s ... 0.071s
#7 got single benchmarks 8094 +0.014s ... 0.085s
#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.085s
#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.591s ... 0.676s
#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.676s
#11 Got 106 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.684s
#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.684s
#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.014s ... 0.698s
#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.723s ... 1.42s
#15 return log +0.037s ... 1.457s
Model (Max-P)
Cores
TFLOPS
Quadro P5200
2560
8.9
Quadro P4200
2304
7.6
Quadro P3200
1792
5.3
Quadro P2000
768
2.5
Quadro P1000
512
1.6
Quadro P600
384
1.2
Quadro P500
256
0.5
Notebook reviews with NVIDIA Quadro P5200 graphics card
MSI WT75 8SM (Xeon E-2176G, Quadro P5200) Workstation Review The WT75 takes the best aspects of the GT75 and turns it into a formidable mobile workstation. If you're not overly concerned about weight, thickness, or batter...
Intel Xeon E-2176G | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | 17.30" | 4.1 kg
Eurocom Tornado F7W (i9-9900K, Quadro P5200) Workstation Review For about $5000+ USD, professional users can get what is essentially a high-end desktop wrapped in a 17.3-inch chassis. Performance is indubitably fast, but not...
Intel Core i9-9900K | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | 17.30" | 4.2 kg
HP ZBook 17 G5-4RA65UT-ABA : Intel Xeon E-2186M, 17.30", 3.2 kg
External Review » HP ZBook 17 G5-4RA65UT-ABA
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB0000PB : Intel Xeon E-2186M, 17.30", 3.4 kg
External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB0000PB
Fujitsu Celsius H980 : Intel Core i7-8850H, 17.30", 3.5 kg
External Review » Fujitsu Celsius H980
Dell Precision 7730, i9-8950HK, Nvidia Quadro P5200 : Intel Core i9-8950HK, 17.30", 3.2 kg
External Review » Dell Precision 7730, i9-8950HK, Nvidia Quadro P5200
Please share our article, every link counts!
» Comparison of GPUs Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.
» Benchmark List Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.
» Notebook Gaming List Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.
Class 0 Arc A380
Class 1
Class 2 Radeon PRO W6600M *
Class 3 UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Class 4
Class 5 * Approximate position of the graphics adapter
Working For Notebookcheck
Are you a techie who knows how to translate? Then join our Team!
Details here
Top 10 Laptops Multimedia , Budget Multimedia , Gaming , Budget Gaming , Lightweight Gaming , Business , Budget Office , Workstation , Subnotebooks , Ultrabooks , Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros , under 500 USD/Euros , 1,000 USD/Euros , for University Students , Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones Smartphones , Phablets , ≤6-inch , Camera Smartphones
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2018-05- 8)