Notebookcheck Logo

Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

The Intel HD Graphics (Family) is a processor graphics card which is integrated in the cheap Celeron and Pentium model of the Sandy Bridge generation. It is similar to the Intel HD Graphics 2000 and not with the processor graphics of the older Arrandale dual-core processors (which bears the same name). 

Depending on the processor, the HD graphics offers a different base and Turbo Boost clock speed. Currently there are three different models:

  • Power Saving e.g. Celeron 847: base 350MHz, Turbo 800MHz
  • Celeron e.g. Celeron B810: base 650MHz, Turbo 950MHz
  • Pentium e.g. Pentium B950: base 650MHz, Turbo 1100MHz

Furthermore, the slow CPU performance of some models may influence the games a lot. For example, although the GPU in the Celeron B710 differs not much from the Pentium B950, the gaming performance was clearly worse and many games were unplayable.

As the Intel HD Graphics 3000 and 2000, the processor graphics card is able to use part of the last level cache of the processor (2MB usually for the entry level CPUs). This could be seen as a small amount of very fast dedicated memory.

Altought 2x Antialiasing (AA) is supported, the chip is as fast as when rendering 4x AA. In the Unigine Valley benchmark a similar HD 3000 i7-2637M for example reached the same score with 2x AA and 4x AA.

The feature set compared to the HD Graphics 3000 is also reduced in these entry level CPUs. E.g. Intel Quick Sync (for de- and encoding of HD videos), In Tru 3D, Clear Video HD are usually deactivated.

HD Graphics Series

HD Graphics P530 compare 24 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5600 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 6000 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4600 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5500 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5000 compare 40 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4400 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5300 compare 24 @ 0.1 - 0.9 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4000 compare 16 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Broadwell) compare 12 @ 0.1 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4200 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Skylake) compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.8 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) compare 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Braswell) compare 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) compare 12 @ 0.32 - 0.64 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Haswell) compare 10 @ 0.2 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) compare 16 @ 0.2 - 0.6 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 3000 compare 12 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2500 compare 6 @ 0.65 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) compare 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2000 compare 6 @ 0.85 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Bay Trail) compare 4 @ 0.31 - 0.9 GHz32/64/128 Bit
CodenameSandy Bridge
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge
Pipelines6 - unified
Core Speed350 - 1100 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
technology32 nm
Date of Announcement01.05.2011
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.intel.com
CPU in HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Pentium G8602 x 3000 MHz, 65 W650 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Pentium B9802 x 2400 MHz, 35 W650 - 1100 MHz? MHz
Intel Pentium B9702 x 2300 MHz, 35 W650 MHz1150 MHz
min. - max.350 - 650 - 1100 MHz800 - 1150 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 1386     avg: 1452     median: 1451.5 (2%)     max: 1517 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 1389     avg: 1405     median: 1404.5 (0%)     max: 1420 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 13132     avg: 13747     median: 13746.5 (2%)     max: 14361 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 737     avg: 932     median: 976 (0%)     max: 1057 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 581     avg: 736     median: 767.5 (0%)     max: 831 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 2701     avg: 6189     median: 6390 (3%)     max: 7772 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 2000     avg: 4691     median: 4768 (5%)     max: 5917 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
min: 2365     avg: 2618     median: 2438 (3%)     max: 3050 points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1366x768 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 1027     avg: 2435     median: 2509 (3%)     max: 3230 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
0.3 fps (0%)
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
0.1 fps (0%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 5.4     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (72%)     max: 5.8 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 3.8     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (57%)     max: 5.1 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 1030     avg: 2571     median: 2577 (2%)     max: 3508 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 2.68     avg: 6.3     median: 6.6 (2%)     max: 7.93 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
11.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
3.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
94  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
41.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
29  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
100  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
14.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
32.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
13 14.2 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
9.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
6.9 19.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
44.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
low 1024x768
14.8 43.8 55 65.9 66.2 68.3 76.2 80.6 84 96 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.1 35 36.2 39.6 41.2 43.9 44.5 51 52 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.2 17.2 17.5 19.1 19.4 22.9 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 12.3 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2012

F1 2012

2012
low 1024x768
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
23  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
23 23.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.9 15 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6.8 12 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.9 11 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
8.8 11 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15 16.3 16.7 22 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
18 18.9 19.8 21 21.7 22 22 22 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8 8 8 9 9.4 9.5 10 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5.8 13.7 15.2 15.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4.7 7.7 7.8 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
22 44 45 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13 23 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
7 9.1 9.6 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
27 (!) 56 68.7 76.4 94 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
16 38.3 43.4 50 51 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
11.1 21.4 30 30 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18 18 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2011

F1 2011

2011
low 800x600
20 21 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
7.2 19 20.1 24.3 26 26 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
48.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
21  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
13.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
39.5 43.2 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
68.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
39.9  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
14.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
9.4  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
7.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
27 38 41 60.1 64.2 65.4 76 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
3.7 8 10 11.6 12 12.4 12.4 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
7 8 8.3 8.6 8.7 10 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
11.5 26 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.5 9.6 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
27 27 35 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
11.2 11.6 13 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
20.1 43.8 44.2 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
10.3 15.3 15.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5 7 7 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
13.8 24.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
15.5  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
12.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
72  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
23.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
75.6 135 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
22 36.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5 (!) 12.2 (!) ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
46.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
22.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
low 1024x768
15.9 22 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
15  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
12.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
23.7 33.7 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
12.1 14.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
35 58 83 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
10 17 25 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
6 9 9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
6.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
43.2 95 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
54 120 123 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
27 31 31 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
9 9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
high 1024x768
41 86 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
32 44.3 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 640x480
32 43.9 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 800x600
30.5 42.9 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
27.9 40.6 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
214  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
X-Plane 10.2511.86.93.42.5
F1 20132416
Fifa 1494522412
Dota 241.224.28.9
GRID 22916
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm10016.99.52.8
SimCity9.7
Tomb Raider14.67.9
Dead Space 332.213.39.4
Call of Duty: Black Ops 214
Medal of Honor: Warfighter9.56.5
Dishonored1315.113.3
World of Tanks v844.411.89.1
Fifa 1365422012
F1 2012241512
Guild Wars 22362
Counter-Strike: GO6030.318.89.7
The Secret World11
Dirt Showdown2713.48.65
Diablo III231398
Risen 2: Dark Waters10
Mass Effect 318
Anno 207021984
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim137
CoD: Modern Warfare 3372011
Battlefield 39
Batman: Arkham City2418
Fifa 1264402318
F1 20112112
Deus Ex Human Revolution20
Dirt 348.721.0313.2
Total War: Shogun 241
Fifa 1168.539.920
Mafia 214.79.47.44.3
StarCraft 253108
Dawn of War II - Chaos Rising198
Battlefield: Bad Company 22616
Risen3012
Resident Evil 536146
Colin McRae: DIRT 21915.512.710.7
F.E.A.R. 27221
Racedriver: GRID23.3
Trackmania Nations Forever1052910
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare46.722.5
Supreme Commander - FA Bench191512.5
Crysis - GPU Benchmark2913
World in Conflict - Benchmark591783
Call of Juarez Benchmark6.2
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark69
World of Warcraft99309
Counter-Strike Source64
Doom 338383734
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo214
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
28
12
9
30
7

26
1
2
1
16
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 15. 03:26:59

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:40:26 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.046s ... 0.047s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.047s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 2679 +0.021s ... 0.068s

#7 got single benchmarks 2679 +0.081s ... 0.149s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.149s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.534s ... 0.683s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.683s

#11 Got 263 rows for game benchmarks. +0.025s ... 0.707s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.707s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.033s ... 0.74s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.162s ... 1.902s

#15 return log +0.066s ... 1.968s

Notebook reviews with Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) graphics card

 

Review Asus F75A-TY089H Notebook

Affordable 17.3-inch laptop. With the F75A, Asus offers a simple office notebook for around $480. Its 17.3-inch screen, Pentium processor, 500 GB HDD and Window...
Intel Pentium B980 | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | 17.30" | 3 kg
 

Review Asus F55A Notebook

Cool and quiet. A Pentium processor, a 320 GB hard drive and a DOS operating system make for an inexpensive office notebook priced at around 330 Euros (~$441). ...
Intel Pentium B980 | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | 15.60" | 2.6 kg
 

Review Asus X201E Subnotebook

Ultranetbook? Thin like an Ultrabook, yet as affordable as a netbook - that must have been Asus' goal when developing this 11.6-inch subnotebook. We will need t...
Intel Celeron 847 | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | 11.60" | 1.3 kg
 

Review Acer Aspire E1-531 Notebook

An extra helping. Acer's Aspire E1-531 promises a big 15.6-inch screen for little money. With an Intel Pentium processor and 6 GB of working memory, the elegant...
Intel Pentium B960 | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | 15.60" | 2.5 kg
 

Review Acer Aspire V5-431 Notebook

Ultrabook flair. On a limited budget - but drawn to stylish and thin notebooks? Those not wanting to spend the money for an Ultrabook might be interested in Ac...
Intel Celeron 887 | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | 14.00" | 2 kg

Lenovo IdeaPad N581-MBA4YGE: Intel Pentium B970, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  Review » Review Lenovo IdeaPad N581 Notebook

Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E130 NZU5FGE: Intel Pentium 977, 11.60", 1.5 kg
  Review » Review Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E130 NZU5FGE Subnotebook

HP Compaq Presario CQ58-148SG: Intel Pentium B950, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  Review » Review HP Compaq Presario CQ58-148SG Notebook

Lenovo B570e-N2F23GE: Intel Pentium B960, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  Review » Review Lenovo B570e-N2F23GE Notebook

Samsung 550C22-H01US: Intel Celeron 867, 12.10", 1.4 kg
  Review » Review Samsung 550C22-H01US Chromebook

Lenovo IdeaPad G580-MBBG3GE: Intel Pentium B960, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  Review » Review Lenovo IdeaPad G580 Notebook

Acer Aspire V5-531: Intel Pentium 967, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  Review » Review Acer Aspire V5-531 Notebook

Sony Vaio VPC-EH3C0E/W: Intel Pentium B960, 15.50", 2.4 kg
  Review » Review Sony Vaio VPC-EH3C0E/W Notebook

HP ProBook 4330s LW759ES: Intel Celeron B810, 13.30", 2 kg
  Review » Review HP ProBook 4330s LW759ES Notebook

Asus X502CA: Intel Pentium 987, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus X502CA

HP Pavilion 14-c002sa: Intel Celeron 847, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 14-c002sa

Lenovo IdeaPad Z500-59367598: Intel Pentium 2020M, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Z500-59367598

HP Pavilion 14-c002ea: Intel Celeron 847, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 14-c002ea

Acer C710-2457: Intel Celeron 847, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer C710-2457

HP 650-B6N63EA: Intel Pentium B970, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP 650-B6N63EA

Asus X501A-XX243H: Intel Pentium B980, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus X501A-XX243H

Asus X501A-XX145H: Intel Celeron B820, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus X501A-XX145H

Gigabyte Slate S1082: Intel Celeron 847, 10.10", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Slate S1082

HP Pavilion SleekBook 15-b025ec: Intel Pentium 987, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion SleekBook 15-b025ec

Asus VivoBook X202E-CT103H: Intel Celeron 847, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook X202E-CT103H

Samsung 350E7C-S02CZ: Intel Pentium B970, 17.10", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung 350E7C-S02CZ

Asus VivoBook X202E-CT129H: Intel Pentium 987, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook X202E-CT129H

Lenovo IdeaPad S400-MAY8PUK: Intel Pentium 997, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad S400-MAY8PUK

HP 650-H5K82EA: Intel Celeron 1000M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP 650-H5K82EA

Asus F75A-TY089H: Intel Pentium B980, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus F75A-TY089H

Lenovo IdeaPad N581-MBA4YGE: Intel Pentium B970, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad N581-MBA4YGE

HP Compaq Presario CQ58-148SG: Intel Pentium B950, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Compaq Presario CQ58-148SG

Acer Aspire E1-531-B9606G50Mnks: Intel Pentium B960, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Apire E1-531-B9606G50Mnks

Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E130 NZU5FGE: Intel Pentium 977, 11.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E130 NZU5FGE

Lenovo IdeaPad G580-MBBG3GE: Intel Pentium B960, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad G580-MBBG3GE

Samsung 550C22-H01US: Intel Celeron 867, 12.10", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Samsung 550C22-H01US

Samsung 400B2B-A04UK: Intel Core i5-2450M, 12.50", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Samsung 400B2B-A04UK

Samsung 400B5B-A06UK: Intel Core i5-2450M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung 400B5B-A06UK

HP Pavilion dm1-4015tu: Intel Core i3-2367M, 11.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dm1-4015tu

Packard Bell EasyNote TS11-HR-695UK: Intel Core i3-2310M, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Packard Bell EasyNote TS11-HR-695UK

HP ProBook 4330s LW759ES: Intel Celeron B810, 13.30", 2 kg
  External Review » HP ProBook 4330s LW759ES

Asus Zenbook UX31-RSL8: Intel Core i5-2467M, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook UX31-RSL8

Toshiba Portégé Z830-S8302: Intel Core i7-2677M, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Portégé Z830-S8302

Asus Zenbook UX31E-DH53: Intel Core i5-2557M, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook UX31E-DH53

Medion Akoya E7219-MD97874: Intel Pentium B950, 17.30", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya E7219-MD97874

Toshiba Satellite L755-S5258: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite L755-S5258

Panasonic Toughbook CF-S10: Intel Core i5-2520M, 12.10", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Panasonic Toughbook CF-S10

Zoostorm 3390-2012/A: Intel Core i3-2310M, 0.00"
  External Review » Zoostorm 3390-2012/A

Samsung Series 7 700Z3A: Intel Core i5-2430M, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Samsung Series 7-700Z3A

Acer Aspire S3-3951: Intel Core i7-2637M, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire S3-3951

Toshiba Satellite P755-S5272: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P755-S5272

Medion Akoya E6226: Intel Core i3-2310M, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya E6226

Medion Akoya E7218: Intel Core i3-2310M, 17.30", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya E7218

Panasonic Toughbook CF-C1, Sandy Bridge: Intel Core i5-2520M, 12.10", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Panasonic Toughbook CF-C1, Sandy Bridge

Acer Aspire 3830T-6417: Intel Core i3-2310M, 13.30", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3830T-6417

Asus A53E-XA1: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus A53E-XA1

Asus A53E-XA2: Intel Core i3-2310M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus A53E-XA2

Toshiba Satellite L755-S5271: Intel Core i3-2310M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite L755-S5271

Toshiba Satellite P755-S5274: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.60", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P755-S5274

Acer Aspire 5750-9851: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5750-9851

Fujitsu Lifebook S761: Intel Core i7-2620M, 13.30", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu Lifebook S761

Asus U56E-BBL5: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus U56E-BBL5

Toshiba Satellite P775-S7215: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P775-S7215

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter