Benchmarkcheck: The Elder Scrolls Online
Benchmarkcheck: The Elder Scrolls Online
Lenovo ThinkPad T440 Review
Lenovo ThinkPad T440 Review
Acer Iconia W4 Review
Acer Iconia W4 Review
Nvidia Tegra Note 7 Review
Nvidia Tegra Note 7 Review
Benchmarkcheck: The Elder Scrolls Online
Lenovo ThinkPad T440 Review
Acer Iconia W4 Review
Nvidia Tegra Note 7 Review

AMD Radeon HD 6755G2

AMD Radeon HD 6755G2

The AMD Radeon HD 6755G2 is the combination of an integrated AMD Radeon HD 6620G or 6520G APU processor graphics card and a dedicated entry level AMD Radeon HD 6750M graphics card in CrossFire combination. This setup,  called AMD Dual Graphics or asymmetric CrossFire, uses AFR (Alternate Frame Rendering) to render alternating frames between the two graphics cores. As a result, the combination also suffers from the phenomenon known as micro stuttering.

The performance of the Radeon HD 6755G2 depends greatly on the driver support in games. In some games, the performance may even degrade by 10-15% compared to using only the APU graphics card. As of June 2011, only DirectX 10 and 11 graphics modes are supported and therefore lower settings and older games are not accelerated. Due to the micro stuttering and performance issues, AMD Dual Graphics may impose more problems than performance gains.

Supported Features like PureVideo HD (UVD3) and OpenCL have similar performance to a discrete Radeon HD 6750M.

As both graphics cards are rendering frames, the power consumption is clearly greater than if only one GPU was active.

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon HD 6000G2 Series

Radeon HD 6775G2

 880 ? Bit
Radeon HD 6755G2 880 ? Bit

Radeon HD 6760G2

 880 ? Bit

Radeon HD 6740G2

 880 ? Bit

Radeon HD 6720G2

 880 ? Bit

Radeon HD 6690G2

 880 ? Bit

Radeon HD 6680G2

 800 ? Bit

Radeon HD 6645G2

 560 ? Bit

Radeon HD 6640G2

 560 ? Bit

Radeon HD 6545G2

 480 ? Bit

Radeon HD 6540G2

 480 ? Bit

Radeon HD 6515G2

 400 ? Bit

Radeon HD 6510G2

 400 ? Bit
ArchitectureTerascale 2
Pipelines880 - unified
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement14.06.2011
* The specified clock rates are only guidelines for the manufacturer and can be altered by them.

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 1511      avg: 1513 (12%)     median: 1513 (12%)     max: 1515 points
2 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 1528      avg: 1529 (10%)     median: 1529 (10%)     max: 1530 points
2 benchmarks and specifications    Hide comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - P Result no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 1065      avg: 2855 (8%)     median: 2855 (8%)     max: 4645 Points
2 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 837      avg: 2592.5 (6%)     median: 2592.5 (6%)     max: 4348 Points
2 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
3DMark 06
0% 100%
min: 7374      avg: 7377 (25%)     median: 7377 (25%)     max: 7380 Points
2 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 8810      avg: 8810 (24%)     median: 8810 (24%)     max: 8810 Points
1 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 12732      avg: 12732 (8%)     median: 12732 (8%)     max: 12732 Points
1 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 18.8      avg: 18.8 (11%)     median: 18.8 (11%)     max: 18.8 fps
1 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
PCMark Vantage - Gaming Score 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 4560      avg: 4560 (17%)     median: 4560 (17%)     max: 4560 Points
1 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 11 - Catia 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 3.15      avg: 3.2 (5%)     median: 3.2 (5%)     max: 3.15 fps
1 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 11 - Ensight 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 8.7      avg: 8.7 (14%)     median: 8.7 (14%)     max: 8.7 fps
1 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 11 - Lightwave 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 12.66      avg: 12.7 (16%)     median: 12.7 (16%)     max: 12.66 fps
1 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 11 - Maya 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 5.22      avg: 5.2 (5%)     median: 5.2 (5%)     max: 5.22 fps
1 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 11 - Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 1.03      avg: 1 (5%)     median: 1 (5%)     max: 1.03 fps
1 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 11 - SolidWorks 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 10.47      avg: 10.5 (16%)     median: 10.5 (16%)     max: 10.47 fps
1 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 11 - Tcvis 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 2.82      avg: 2.8 (5%)     median: 2.8 (5%)     max: 2.82 fps
1 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 11 - Siemens NX 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 4.33      avg: 4.3 (7%)     median: 4.3 (7%)     max: 4.33 fps
1 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit
0% 100%
min: 20.21      avg: 20.3 (19%)     median: 20.3 (19%)     max: 20.46 Points
2 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Shading 32Bit
0% 100%
min: 3503      avg: 3661.5 (31%)     median: 3661.5 (31%)     max: 3820 Points
2 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
0% 100%
min: 6.4      avg: 6.4 (81%)     median: 6.4 (81%)     max: 6.4 points
1 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
0% 100%
min: 6.4      avg: 6.4 (81%)     median: 6.4 (81%)     max: 6.4 points
1 benchmarks and specifications    Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 2070
Anno 2070 (2011)
low:
67.7  fps      Compare
med.:
18.1  fps      Compare
high:
16.2  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 12
Fifa 12 (2011)
low:
124.7  fps      Compare
med.:
67.9  fps      Compare
high:
47.3  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dirt 3
Dirt 3 (2011)
low:
51.8  fps      Compare
med.:
35.2  fps      Compare
high:
31.8  fps      Compare
ultra:
13.7  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis 2
Crysis 2 (2011)
low:
46.8  fps      Compare
med.:
31.8  fps      Compare
high:
24  fps      Compare
ultra:
8.9  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Call of Duty: Black Ops
med.:
29.1  fps      Compare
high:
25.2  fps      Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Mafia 2
Mafia 2 (2010)
low:
45  fps      Compare
med.:
37.6  fps      Compare
high:
30.7  fps      Compare
ultra:
13.4  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
StarCraft 2
StarCraft 2 (2010)
low:
74.1  fps      Compare
med.:
28.6  fps      Compare
high:
20.1  fps      Compare
ultra:
15.2  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Metro 2033
Metro 2033 (2010)
low:
49.1 78.1 ~ 64 fps      Compare
med.:
29.9 45.8 ~ 38 fps      Compare
high:
19.6  fps      Compare
ultra:
7.1  fps      Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Battlefield: Bad Company 2
low:
63.6  fps      Compare
med.:
48.2  fps      Compare
high:
35.4  fps      Compare
ultra:
18.8  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Risen
Risen (2009)
low:
58.4  fps      Compare
med.:
23.4 32.7 ~ 28 fps      Compare
high:
16.6 23.5 ~ 20 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Resident Evil 5
Resident Evil 5 (2009)
low:
50.6  fps      Compare
high:
39.9  fps      Compare
ultra:
31.4  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Need for Speed Shift
Need for Speed Shift (2009)
med.:
26.3  fps      Compare
high:
22.4  fps      Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2
Colin McRae: DIRT 2 (2009)
low:
69.5  fps      Compare