Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Intel Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL

The Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 is an integrated graphics card in Panther Lake SoCs with 4 Xe3 cores (32 EUs / 512 ALUs), 4 raytracing cores and a clock rate of up to 2450 MHz. In contrast to the large 12-core Arc B390 variant, the GPU tile is not manufactured by TSMC but by Intel (ev Intel 4).

Despite internal improvements to the architecture, the gaming performance should be comparable to an AMD Radeon 760M and significantly below the Arc Graphics 140V in Lunar Lake. The 4-core variant in Arrow Lake called Intel Graphics should be clearly beaten.

The new media engine now supports AV1 encode and decode, VVC decode, AVC 10-bit and eDP 1.5.

The GPU chiplet is produced at Intel in the Intel 3 (3nm "class") process.

Arc Xe3 Series

Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU compare 96 @ 2.5 GHz
Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU compare 80 @ 2.4 GHz
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL 32 @ 2.5 GHz
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL compare 16
CodenamePanther Lake
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines32 - unified
Raytracing Cores4
Core Speed2500 (Boost) MHz
AI GPU40 TOPS INT8
CacheL2: 4 MB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0
Man. Technology5 nm
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1 FRL, DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20
Date of Announcement05.01.2026
CPU in Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTLGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H16 x 1600 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H16 x 1600 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H16 x 1500 MHz, 25 W? MHz2450 MHz
» show 5 more
min. - max.? MHz2300 - 2500 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3 pt (9%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.0639 -98%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M SLI
2.62 -13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
2.67 -11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
2.69 -10%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.79 -7%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
2.79 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2.88 -4%
AMD Radeon 760M
2.89 -4%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
2.9 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2.97 -1%
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
3
AMD Radeon 680M
3.02 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
3.02 1%
AMD FirePro W7170M
3.06 2%
AMD Radeon 860M
3.08 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
3.23 8%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3.23 8%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
3.23 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
3.29 10%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
3.35 12%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
22.4 647%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 1010%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 413     avg: 451.8     median: 438 (3%)     max: 514 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
622 Points (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2501 Points (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
12119 Points (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5086     avg: 6115     median: 6150 (9%)     max: 6513 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5688     avg: 6760     median: 6815 (6%)     max: 7227 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
185618 Points (21%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2672     avg: 3161     median: 3179 (8%)     max: 3395 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2391     avg: 2846     median: 2865 (6%)     max: 3003 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 23108     avg: 27720     median: 28381.5 (27%)     max: 30367 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 30345     avg: 38683     median: 39647.5 (10%)     max: 44501 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6962     avg: 7635     median: 7740 (9%)     max: 8355 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6268     avg: 6984     median: 7120 (5%)     max: 7678 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 160.4     avg: 177.6     median: 174.5 (10%)     max: 215 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 169.2     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 315 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU OpenCL
min: 23115     avg: 23483     median: 23573 (6%)     max: 23758 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU Vulkan
min: 21306     avg: 25185     median: 25360 (6%)     max: 28602 points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40     avg: 46.3     median: 46.6 (6%)     max: 51.1 Watt
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 26.3     avg: 46     median: 48.9 (14%)     max: 52.7 Watt
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.8     avg: 45.7     median: 47.5 (6%)     max: 50.6 Watt
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.3795     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.4815 fps per Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

007 First Light

007 First Light

2026
low 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Pragmata

Pragmata

2026
low 1920x1080
27.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crimson Desert

Crimson Desert

2026
low 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Resident Evil Requiem

Resident Evil Requiem

2026
low 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Call of Duty Black Ops 7

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

2025
low 1920x1080
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

2025
low 1920x1080
48.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
59.8 62 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.3 53 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.4 39 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
11
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

2025
low 1920x1080
32.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

2024
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
31
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
55.6 65.9 66.8 66.9 67.2 68 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.7 56.6 61.5 63.8 64.1 64.3 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.8 41.7 45.8 46.1 46.5 46.7 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.2 13.8 14.2 14.7 14.8 14.8 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
78.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077

2023
low 1920x1080
32.7 35.1 35.2 35.3 36.8 37.1 37.3 38.6 39.4 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26 26.9 27 27.7 28.2 28.4 28.8 29.5 29.8 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.7 21 21.1 23.8 24.4 24.4 24.5 25.5 26.1 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.7 19.1 19.9 19.9 20.2 20.5 21.1 21.5 21.8 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
59.3
58.7
65
62
66.2
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
7.6
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
18.1
17.1
18.6
16.6
20.8
18.2
20
14.9
19.6
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
27.4 28.4 28.7 31.5 31.6 32.5 33 33.3 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21 22.2 23 23.9 25.1 26.3 27 27.1 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18 19 19.6 21 21.9 23.1 23.5 23.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.7 18.7 19.5 20.3 21.4 22.8 23 23.1 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
40.6
39.7
47.1
45.3
46.5
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
107.3 172.6 184.9 190.6 192.1 197 ~ 174 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.2 64.7 68 69.7 70.5 76.2 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.9 56.9 58.9 59.1 60 62.1 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.3 48.5 50.6 51.1 52.1 53 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
33 37 37.8 40.5 41.7 41.7 43.6 44.6 45.1 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.2 29.6 29.6 30.6 30.9 31 33 33.2 33.5 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.9 24.7 26.6 27.3 28.6 30.1 30.5 31.1 32.4 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
58 64.3 64.5 66.3 67.3 68.4 69 72.3 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.5 34.5 34.6 34.9 35.4 36.3 36.6 36.7 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.5 24.8 25.1 25.1 25.4 25.9 26.1 26.2 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
101.7 102.9 103.9 104.1 105.1 109.6 123.9 128.1 139.2 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
67.5 70.2 80.3 82.1 89 89.4 91.5 99.2 109.1 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.6 73.5 73.7 77.7 79.5 81.2 81.8 82.1 85.8 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68.4 69.4 70.7 73 74.2 77.4 79.9 80.3 84.9 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
146.6 153.6 157.9 162.4 165.6 169.3 169.3 180.8 ~ 163 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
137.9 149.5 154.6 158.1 161.6 163 164.3 174.7 ~ 158 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.6 48.3 51.1 51.8 52.9 53.7 54.8 58.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18 19.8 20.4 20.8 20.9 21.6 21.8 23.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
145.8
144.8
153.6
133.4
139.2
126.6
155.3
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
156.6
151.1
160.9
133.2
144.6
131.2
161.1
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
007 First Light1714.813.612.8
Pragmata27.720.816.6
Crimson Desert16.513.91312.4
Resident Evil Requiem25.318.816.28.21
Call of Duty Black Ops 75247339
ARC Raiders48.823.517.511.4
F1 2561523910
Kingdom Come Deliverance 232.723.718.812.6
Black Myth: Wukong1814116
F1 2465614514
Counter-Strike 278.859.133.420.9
Cyberpunk 207736282420
Baldur's Gate 331242121
Strange Brigade174655550
X-Plane 11.11413128
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark663525
Dota 2 Reborn113867975
GTA V1631585221
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		5
6
5
2		9
5
3
1		11
6
1
13
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 14. 07:09:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 Jul 2026 05:31:40 +0200 +0.005s ... 0.005s

#4 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.027s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13353 +0.063s ... 0.09s

#8 got single benchmarks 13353 +0.047s ... 0.137s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.137s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.697s ... 1.833s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.834s

#12 Got 277 rows for game benchmarks. +0.064s ... 1.897s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.897s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.013s ... 1.91s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.317s ... 2.226s

#16 return log +0.226s ... 2.452s

Notebook reviews with Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU graphics card

32 GB DDR5 RAM and affordable: Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL laptop review

32 GB DDR5 RAM and affordable: Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL laptop review

A laptop north of €1,000 is hardly a budget system, but in the year 2026, it may be considered so - especially if it offers 32 GB of memory. The Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL is a laptop with a good amount of RAM that many people can still afford, a rare sight in the times of the memory crisis.
Intel Core Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 14", 1.4 kg
ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11 review: Most compelling convertible yet from Lenovo

ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11 review: Most compelling convertible yet from Lenovo

The 14-inch ThinkPad X1 is back this year powered by Panther Lake and a refreshed look. The list of minor changes add up to a noticeably better user experience especially depending on the configuration.
Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 14", 1.3 kg
MSI Prestige 13 AI+ laptop review: The perfect companion for on the go?

MSI Prestige 13 AI+ laptop review: The perfect companion for on the go?

With the Prestige 13 AI+, MSI is targeting mobile users who are often on the move and value a compact, lightweight laptop. Equipped with a brand-new Panther Lake processor, the 13-inch device is designed to win over customers looking for maximum portability.
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 13.3", 888 g
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG review: Mini PC with up to an insane 128 GB of RAM

MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG review: Mini PC with up to an insane 128 GB of RAM

The newest MSI mini PC cuts down on size and weight without cutting down on too many important features. There are nonetheless a few compromises and limitations worth mentioning.
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 552 g
A new repairability champion: Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 laptop review

A new repairability champion: Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 laptop review

Update 3 | The ThinkPad T14 is one of the topsellers of the world's biggest PC manufacturer. The newest Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 brings Intel's Panther Lake, modern LPCAMM2 memory and a huge repairability upgrade. Sadly, the pricing may make it less appealing than it could be.
Intel Core Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 14", 1.4 kg

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 review: Best XPS 14 alternative yet

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Laptop Review - Better than the new XPS 16

Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » Dell XPS 16 review: Two steps forward, one step back

Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 review: Still great, but not nearly as special

MSI Modern 16S AI+ G3M: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 16S AI+ G3M - Reviews and Specs

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G7: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G7 - Reviews and Specs

HP OmniBook Ultra AI 14-kd0000: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook Ultra AI 14-kd0000 - Reviews and Specs

HP OmniBook 5 16-bm0000: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook 5 16-bm0000 - Reviews and Specs

Honor MagicBook 16 2026: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook 16 2026 - Reviews and Specs

Asus Vivobook 14 X1407AA: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 14 X1407AA - Reviews and Specs

HP OmniBook X 14-ka0000ng: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X 14-ka0000ng - Reviews and Specs

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL - Reviews and Specs

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G14: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G14 - Reviews and Specs

Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8: Intel Core Ultra 5 335, 13.80", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8

HP OmniBook X 14-ka: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X 14-ka

Asus Vivobook 16 X1607AA: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 16 X1607AA

Microsoft Surface Pro 13 (2026): Intel Core Ultra 5 335, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro 13 (2026)

Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IPH11

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ D3M: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 AI+ D3M

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Book6 NP760VJG-KG5DE: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book6 NP760VJG-KG5DE

MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ D3MTG: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ D3MTG

Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-I71M: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-I71M

MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG

MSI Prestige 16 AI+ C3MG: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 AI+ C3MG

MSI Prestige 16 Flip AI+ C3MTG (2026): Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 Flip AI+ C3MTG (2026)

Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA

Dell XPS 14 (2026) DA14260: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 14 (2026) DA14260

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i 14IPH11

Dell XPS 16 (2026) DA16260: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 16 (2026) DA16260

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL 21UX005PGE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » This Lenovo laptop with 32 GB RAM offers a huge potential for future upgrades

   » Why 2026 laptops like this Lenovo ThinkBook face an uphill battle

   » This 14-inch Lenovo laptop shows how expensive PCs with 32 GB RAM are becoming

   » New era for storage: Chinese made laptop SSD tested in Lenovo laptop for the first time

   » ThinkBook or ThinkPad? We compare two popular 14-inch Lenovo laptops

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11 pen charging is neat, but the drawbacks are evident

   » Only one ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11 configuration offers significant improvements to graphics performance

MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 0.6 kg
   » MSI Cubi AI+ 3MG is over 60 percent faster than before, but it could have been even better

   » MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG tiny PC supports a massive 128 GB of removable RAM

   » MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG vs. Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG: Improvements almost everywhere

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 21WN00A0GE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Consequence of the RAM crisis: Lenovo's screen downgrade on the ThinkPad T14 Gen 7

   » Lunar Lake is still the Intel battery life king: ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 vs. T14 Gen 6

   » This keyboard issue is finally fixed with the new ThinkPad T14 Gen 7

   » One controversial design change: Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 vs T14 Gen 6 photo comparison

   » ThinkPad T14 Gen 7: These features work with Linux - and these do not

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
   » Lenovo keeps shipping laptops with high refresh rate displays set to 60 Hz. Here's the easy fix

   » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14 Aura is one of the lightest laptops with Core Ultra X7, but there's a catch

   » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Ultra Aura undercuts Dell XPS 14 by over $300 and with twice the RAM

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
   » Samsung's Galaxy Book6 Pro is a good multimedia laptop, but $2100 is too expensive

Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 16.00", 1.7 kg
   » 2026 Dell XPS 16 runs noticeably warmer than last generation model

   » Panther Lake XPS 16 is so efficient, it draws just 1.5 W when idling for insanely long battery life

   » Our first Core Ultra 5 325 benchmarks are in and results are nearly identical to the Core Ultra 7 355

Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » Intel 4 Xe3 GPU is over 50 percent slower than the flagship Arc B390 according to first benchmarks

   » First Core Ultra 7 355 benchmarks are in and they're nowhere near as good as the Core Ultra X7

Samsung Galaxy Book6 NP760VJG-KG5DE: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Book6 Series Hands-On: All models, prices, and launch date

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
Radeon RX 6850M XT
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6800M
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Radeon 8065S
Radeon 8060S
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU *
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 7700S
M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M2 Max 38-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop
Radeon RX 6700M
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M4 Max 32-Core GPU *
M3 Max 30-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M2 Max 30-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 7600M *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 7600S
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
A770M
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6700S
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU
Radeon RX 6600S
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
A730M
Radeon 8040S *
Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
A570M *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
A550M *
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
A530M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6550S
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop
Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU
A370M
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon 890M
Arc 140T
Radeon RX 6450M *
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Arc 8-Core
X2-90 *
X2-85 *
Arc 140V
M4 9-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6300M *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Radeon 880M
GeForce MX570
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
T1200 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Adreno 840 *
M4 8-Core GPU *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
T600 Laptop GPU
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Adreno 830 *
Adreno 829 *
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS *
A310
Radeon 780M
GeForce MX550
Arc 7-Core
A350M
Arc 130V
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 860M
Radeon 680M
T550 Laptop GPU
T500 Laptop GPU
GeForce MX450
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL
Radeon 760M
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS *
Adreno X2-45 *
Radeon 840M
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon 740M
Radeon 660M
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon 540X *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Vega 10
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS *
Vega 9
Vega 8 *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
GeForce MX230
Radeon 820M
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
GeForce MX130
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 6 *
GeForce MX110
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs *
Intel Graphics 1 Xe3 WCL *
Vega 3
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)