Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

The NVidia GeForce GTX 260M is a high-end graphics card of the 200M series based on the G92b core. Therefore, the 55nm chip is essentially a 9800M GTX with slightly higher clock rates (550/1375/950 vs. 500/1250/800). As a result, the 260M is more similar to the desktop 9800GT than the GTX 260.

As with all native DirectX 10 cards, the GeForce GTX 260M renders 3D images using "Unified Shaders". Dedicated pixel shaders and vertex shaders have been replaced with 112 stream processors in the 260M, which now take over most of the graphics workload. The shader units themselves are also clocked higher (1375 MHz) than the core chip.

In general, the performance of the GTX 260M is somewhat higher than the 9800M GTX due to the higher clock speed. For current DirectX 10 games such as Crysis, World in Conflict, Bioshock or Age of Conan, the 260M is sufficient for gameplay under medium to high detail settings. Meanwhile, older games should be able to run fluently under high resolutions and full details. VRAM can be up to 1024 MB GDDR3 at 950MHz  in MXM 3.0 or 800MHz in MXM 2.0.

The GeForce GTX 260M integrates the PureVideo HD video decoder. The GPU is thus able to assist the CPU in the decoding of H.264-, VC-1-, MPEG2- and WMV9 videos.

HybridPower is a Windows Vista-only technology that allows users to switch between the integrated and dedicated graphics core for power-saving purposes. In the future, Nvidia intends to evolve the software for automatic switching depending on the active application (now known as Optimus). GeForceBoost is not supported with the GTX 260M as there would be no performance gain from combining with the integrated GPU.

The high current consumption of up to 75 Watts (of the entire MXM board) means that the GTX 260M can typically only be found in larger notebooks with loud and powerful cooling systems.

Compared with Desktop graphics cards, the GTX 260M is most similar to the GeForce 9800 GT.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 200M Series

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

256 @ 576 MHz256 Bit @ 1020 MHz

GeForce GTX 280M SLI

256 @ 585 MHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz

GeForce GTX 260M SLI

224 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz

GeForce GTX 285M

128 @ 576 MHz256 Bit @ 1020 MHz

GeForce GTX 280M

128 @ 585 MHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 260M 112 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
CodenameN10E-GT
ArchitectureG9x
Pipelines112 - unified
Core Speed *550 MHz
Shader Speed *1375 MHz
Memory Speed *950 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption75 Watt
Transistors754 Million
technology55 nm
FeaturesHybridPower, PureVideo HD, CUDA, PhysX ready
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.03.2009
InformationMXM 3
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_gef...
* The specified clock rates are only guidelines for the manufacturer and can be altered by them.

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage - P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 3840      avg: 4315.8 (8%)     median: 4207 (8%)     max: 5058 Points
3DMark Vantage - P Result no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 4080      avg: 4953.1 (10%)     median: 4901 (10%)     max: 5686 Points
3DMark 06
0% 100%
min: 9458      avg: 10177.2 (27%)     median: 10075 (26%)     max: 11209 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 12669      avg: 14772.6 (40%)     median: 15079 (41%)     max: 16611 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 27301      avg: 29794.3 (20%)     median: 30595.5 (20%)     max: 30685 Points
3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 32699      avg: 34053 (56%)     median: 34304 (56%)     max: 34905 Points
PCMark Vantage - Gaming Score 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 4032      avg: 4911.2 (19%)     median: 4329 (17%)     max: 6382 Points
Cinebench R10 - Shading 32Bit
0% 100%
min: 3702      avg: 3966.3 (27%)     median: 3917 (27%)     max: 4425 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
0% 100%
min: 6.8      avg: 6.8 (86%)     median: 6.8 (86%)     max: 6.8 points
Windows Vista Experience Index - GPU
0% 100%
min: 5.9      avg: 5.9 (87%)     median: 5.9 (87%)     max: 5.9 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - GPU Games
0% 100%
min: 5.8      avg: 5.8 (85%)     median: 5.8 (85%)     max: 5.8 Points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
med. 1024x768
45  fps      Compare
high 1360x768
43.8  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
StarCraft 2
low 1024x768
154  fps      Compare
high 1360x768
47  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Battlefield: Bad Company 2
low 1024x768
79.1  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
54.8  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
41.6  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.2  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
CoD Modern Warfare 2
low 800x600
137.4  fps      Compare
med. 1024x768
59.1  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
55.4  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
51.3 80.3 ~ 66 fps      Compare
med. 1024x768
41.3 50.5 ~ 46 fps      Compare
high 1366x768
31.7 36.5 ~ 34 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.9  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Need for Speed Shift
med. 1024x768
66.5  fps      Compare
high 1366x768
61  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.1  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2
low 800x600
92  fps      Compare
med. 1024x768
79.2  fps      Compare
high 1360x768
61.5  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.3  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
125.2 133 ~ 129 fps      Compare
ultra 1280x1024
36.2 39 44 49.5 ~ 42 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
313  fps      Compare
med. 1024x768
105  fps      Compare
high 1280x1024
89  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F.E.A.R. 2
low 800x600
132 151.2 ~ 142 fps      Compare
med. 1024x768
86.5 89 91.1 ~ 89 fps      Compare
high 1280x1024
63.8 65 67.4 73.4 77.4 ~ 69 fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.8  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto
low 800x600
57.9  fps      Compare
med. 1024x768
48  fps      Compare
high 1280x1024
36.7  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Left 4 Dead
low 640x480
107 135.8 ~ 121 fps      Compare
high 1024x768
69 85.8 103.3 111.7 ~ 92 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Racedriver: GRID
low 800x600
105 111.9 ~ 108 fps      Compare
med. 1024x768
61.5 72 75.1 ~ 70 fps      Compare
high 1280x1024
52.7 53 56.2 59.1 ~ 55 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare
low 800x600
211.3  fps      Compare
med. 1024x768
95.2 168.8 ~ 132 fps      Compare
high 1280x1024
52.8 67.3 77.8 88.5 ~ 72 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark
low 1024x768
92 123.7 ~ 108 fps      Compare
med. 1024x768
56 57.2 76.9 ~ 63 fps      Compare
high 1024x768
31 38 38.4 39.3 41.9 ~ 38 fps      Compare