Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU

NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU

The Nvidia T1200 Laptop GPU (or Quadro T1200 for laptops) is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). Compared to the consumer GTX 1650 Ti, the T1200 features more CUDA cores / shaders (1024 versus 896). The Quadro T2000 uses the same TU117 chip, but features all 1024 cores (2x to the T1000) and is therefore significantly faster. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. The T1200 was introduced as a refresh to the Quadro T1000 together with the new Ampere RTX A workstation cards like the faster Nvidia RTX A2000.

It is available in different variants from 35 - 95 Watt (TGP) with different clock speeds (and performance). The GPU supports DisplayPort 1.4 and HDMI 2.1 for external connections.

There is no more Max-Q variant (formerly used for the low power variants) but every OEM can choose to implement Max-Q 3.0 technologies (Dynamic Boost, WhisperMode).

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games.

Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards, the T1000 and T2000 do not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.

When configured as a slow 35W variant, the T1200 is also suited for thin and light laptops.

Quadro Turing Series

Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified
TMUs64
ROPs32
Tensor / AI Cores64
Core Speed855 - 1425 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed10000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth192 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
technology12 nm
PCIe4.0
DisplaysHDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4
Features3.7 TFLOPS SP max. performance, DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, PCIe 4.0 x8, 192 GB/s memory bandwidth, Max-Q Technologies 3.0 optional
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement12.04.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3497     avg: 3775     median: 3891 (11%)     max: 3937 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 3229     avg: 3492     median: 3595 (10%)     max: 3651 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 27580     avg: 29050     median: 29050 (31%)     max: 30520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 46125     avg: 50827     median: 50827 (13%)     max: 55529 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 8351     avg: 8972     median: 9255 (16%)     max: 9310 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 9030     avg: 9810     median: 10134 (11%)     max: 10266 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 11917     avg: 13347     median: 13779 (19%)     max: 14344 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 12142     avg: 13714     median: 14387 (12%)     max: 14614 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 150     avg: 160.8     median: 161.3 (18%)     max: 171.1 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 149     avg: 163.3     median: 169.4 (19%)     max: 171.6 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 94     avg: 102.3     median: 105.4 (18%)     max: 107.5 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 82.8     avg: 88.8     median: 91.2 (18%)     max: 92.3 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 151     avg: 161.4     median: 164.1 (30%)     max: 169.1 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 22.7     avg: 24.2     median: 24.9 (27%)     max: 24.99 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 133     avg: 143.1     median: 144.9 (21%)     max: 151.4 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 18     avg: 18.9     median: 19.3 (18%)     max: 19.45 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 38.2     avg: 40.4     median: 41.4 (32%)     max: 41.6 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 43     avg: 47.8     median: 50.1 (23%)     max: 50.2 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 66.3     avg: 84.6     median: 92.8 (13%)     max: 94.7 Watt
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 73.2     avg: 85.9     median: 91.9 (13%)     max: 92.5 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 98.9     avg: 100.2     median: 99.6 (22%)     max: 102 Watt
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3255     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (37%)     max: 0.3815 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.3968     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (34%)     max: 0.4536 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
121.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
72.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
69.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
69.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
50.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
44.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
low 1920x1080
43.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
52.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
36.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
36.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
171.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
96.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
70.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
61.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
93  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
86  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 22

FIFA 22

2021
low 1280x720
175  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
111  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
76  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
164  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
89.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
114.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
64.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
57.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
49.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
61  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
84  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
77  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
125  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
66  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
84  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
88  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
86  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
222  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
45  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
268  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
99  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
96  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
208 218 ~ 213 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84 94 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.5 77 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.3 67 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
107 110 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60 69 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53 64 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51 60 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
41  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
96.2 105 109 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77.5 85.3 94 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.8 66.8 75.6 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
88 102 103 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.5 56.5 56.5 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35 37 39 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26 26.6 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
133.3 155 157 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
116.5 131 138 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107.8 114 128 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
100.4 107 116 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
109  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
195 198 ~ 197 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
125 127 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59 71 72 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.2 36.7 38 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
166 169.9 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
152 158.5 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
89.7 94.9 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.5 52.3 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
37.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
352.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
235.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
207.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
88.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Vampire Bloodhunt121.872.969.969.5
Ghostwire Tokyo50.747.344.641.2
Elex 243.139.334.229.6
GRID Legends1037361.745.7
Elden Ring52.94739.536.8
Dying Light 236.125.721.2
Farming Simulator 22171.996.670.161.2
Riders Republic93504140
Far Cry 68658544726
FIFA 2217512111911176
F1 202116410689.553.639
Resident Evil Village114.364.357.949.8
Cyberpunk 2077 1.06133272214
Immortals Fenyx Rising8455444026
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla7747282118
Dirt 5125564512
Watch Dogs Legion6654471912
Mafia Definitive Edition8443.439.2
Horizon Zero Dawn8860504332
Death Stranding8668615940
F1 2020222109906345
Gears Tactics268101664632
Borderlands 39962433323
Shadow of the Tomb Raider96594839
Strange Brigade21389736347
Far Cry 510965595641
X-Plane 11.11103866952.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark98543726
Dota 2 Reborn148129117108109
The Witcher 31971266736
GTA V168155925037.4
BioShock Infinite352.2235.8207.988.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4
16
12
1
13
13
5
3
15
13
1
5
16
7
7
8
1

1
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 21:14:15

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.048s ... 0.049s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.049s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.049s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10683 +0.014s ... 0.063s

#7 got single benchmarks 10683 +0.016s ... 0.079s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.079s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.593s ... 0.672s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.672s

#11 Got 181 rows for game benchmarks. +0.023s ... 0.695s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.695s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.023s ... 0.718s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.379s ... 2.098s

#15 return log +0.044s ... 2.142s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU graphics card

Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2: Affordable and robust 15-inch business workstation with Core i7-11800H and Nvidia T1200

Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 laptop review: Affordable business workstation

Lenovo's ThinkPad P15v G2 is an inexpensive 15-inch workstation with a 4K display option in a fairly slim format. It is not only quick, quiet and robust, but al...
Intel Core i7-11800H | NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU | 15.60" | 2.3 kg
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4 Laptop Review: BIOS update provides more CPU performance

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4 Laptop Review: BIOS update provides more CPU performance

In our first review of the ThinkPad P1 G4, there were problems with the performance of the Tiger Lake CPU. However, we now observe a significant performance imp...
Intel Core i7-11800H | NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4 Laptop - Workstation Version of the X1 Extreme G4 in Review

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4 Laptop - Workstation Version of the X1 Extreme G4 in Review

Lenovo introduces a completely new device with the fourth generation of the ThinkPad P1, including a 16-inch display with 16:10 aspect ratio and updated hardwar...
Intel Core i7-11800H | NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 1.8 kg

Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3, i7-12700H T1200: Intel Core i7-12700H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3, i7-12700H T1200

Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel Pro CC315-73P-73QS: Intel Core i7-11800H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel Pro CC315-73P-73QS

HP ZBook Power G8, i9-11950H T1200: Intel Core i9-11950H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Power G8, i9-11950H T1200

Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE: Intel Core i7-11800H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 review: Affordable 15-inch workstation made better with Intel Core i9 and 4K display?

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE: Intel Core i7-11800H, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » Customers are left in the dark: Only vapor-chamber models of the Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4/X1 Extreme G4 offer full CPU performance

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-09-18)