Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU

NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU

The Nvidia T1200 Laptop GPU (or Quadro T1200 for laptops) is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). Compared to the consumer GTX 1650 Ti, the T1200 features more CUDA cores / shaders (1024 versus 896). The Quadro T2000 uses the same TU117 chip, but features all 1024 cores (2x to the T1000) and is therefore significantly faster. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. The T1200 was introduced as a refresh to the Quadro T1000 together with the new Ampere RTX A workstation cards like the faster Nvidia RTX A2000.

It is available in different variants from 35 - 95 Watt (TGP) with different clock speeds (and performance). The GPU supports DisplayPort 1.4 and HDMI 2.1 for external connections.

There is no more Max-Q variant (formerly used for the low power variants) but every OEM can choose to implement Max-Q 3.0 technologies (Dynamic Boost, WhisperMode).

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games.

Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards, the T1000 and T2000 do not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.

When configured as a slow 35W variant, the T1200 is also suited for thin and light laptops.

Quadro Turing Series
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed855 - 1425 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed10000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption95 Watt
technology12 nm
Features3.7 TFLOPS SP max. performance, DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, PCIe 4.0 x8, 192 GB/s memory bandwidth, Max-Q Technologies 3.0 optional
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement12.04.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/content/dam/en-zz...

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 8351     avg: 8972     median: 9255 (23%)     max: 9310 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 11917     avg: 13347     median: 13779 (28%)     max: 14344 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 12142     avg: 13714     median: 14387 (21%)     max: 14614 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 206     avg: 235.3     median: 216.8 (58%)     max: 283 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 66.3     avg: 84.6     median: 92.8 (14%)     max: 94.7 Watt
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 73.2     avg: 85.9     median: 91.9 (13%)     max: 92.5 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 98.9     avg: 100.2     median: 99.6 (22%)     max: 102 Watt
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
86  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 22

FIFA 22

2021
low 1280x720
175  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
111  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
76  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
164  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
89.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
61  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
84  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26  fps    + Compare