Asus Taichi 31 Review
AMD A6-1450 APU "Temash" Review
Lenovo ThinkPad X230t Review
Sony Xperia Tablet Z Review

NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

The Nvidia GeForce GT 325M is a DirectX 10.1 capable middle class notebook graphics card. Technically it is a slower clocked GT 330M and similar to the GT 230M. The core clock of the chip is a bit below the GT 230M, but faster memory is supported. The power consumption should be a bit below the average GT 230M.

 

The performance of the GT 325M should be similar to the GeForce GT 230M and therefore located in the middle class. The card should support DirectX 10.1 and all the features of the GT 230M (as it is based on the same GT216 core). Therefore, PureVideo HD (with VP4?) and CUDA support should be in the chip.

As with the GT 230M, the performance depends on the used graphics memory. With slow DDR2, the card can be up to 20% slower than with faster memory.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GT 300M Series

GeForce GT 335M 72@450MHz

GeForce GT 330M 48@575MHz

GeForce GT 325M 48@450MHz

GeForce GT 320M 24@500MHz

CodenameN11P-GV1
ArchitectureGT2xx
Pipelines48 - unified
Core Speed *450 MHz
Shader Speed *990 MHz
Memory Speed *1066 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
technology40 nm
FeaturesDirectX Compute Support (Windows 7), CUDA, OpenCL, HybridPower, PhysX
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement10.01.2010
Information142 Gigaflops
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_gef...
* The specified clock rates are only guidelines for the manufacturer and can be altered by them.

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage - P Result no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 2157     avg: 2165.3 (6%)     max: 2178 Points
3DMark Vantage - P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 1742     avg: 1753 (5%)     max: 1768 Points
3DMark 06
0% 100%
min: 5333     avg: 5723.6 (19%)     max: 6033 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 9933     avg: 10461.2 (28%)     max: 10617 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 13916     avg: 14930.3 (10%)     max: 15340 Points
PCMark Vantage - Gaming Score 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 4544     avg: 4665.7 (18%)     max: 4803 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit
0% 100%
min: 13.7     avg: 13.9 (16%)     max: 14.35 Points
Cinebench R10 - Shading 32Bit
0% 100%
min: 1903     avg: 3597 (33%)     max: 4665 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
0% 100%
min: 4.3     avg: 4.6 (58%)     max: 4.8 points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
0% 100%
min: 5     avg: 5.5 (70%)     max: 6.3 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Metro 2033
Metro 2033 (2010)
low:
35.5  fps      Compare
med.:
24.4  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dawn of War II - Chaos Rising (2010): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings low. - more...
Battlefield: Bad Company 2
low:
45.9  fps      Compare
med.:
25.4  fps      Compare
high:
17.2  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Stalker: Call of Pripyat (2010): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
CoD Modern Warfare 2
low:
58.7  fps      Compare
med.:
31.8  fps      Compare
high:
26.8  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Risen
Risen (2009)
low:
51.5  fps      Compare
med.:
35  fps      Compare
high:
25.7  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Resident Evil 5 (2009): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings low. - more...
Anno 1404
Anno 1404 (2009)
low:
89.6  fps      Compare
ultra:
18.4  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
ArmA 2 (2009): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
Left 4 Dead
Left 4 Dead (2008)
high:
59.2 70.6 ~ 65 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 2
Far Cry 2 (2008)
low:
71.6  fps      Compare
high:
20  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Crysis Warhead (2008): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings low. - more...
Crysis - GPU Benchmark
Crysis - GPU Benchmark (2007)
med.:
26.4  fps      Compare
high:
17.8  fps      Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark
Crysis - CPU Benchmark (2007)
med.:
25.9  fps      Compare
high:
16.3  fps      Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World in Conflict - Benchmark
World in Conflict - Benchmark (2007)
low:
83  fps      Compare
med.:
40 50 ~ 45 fps      Compare
high:
25 26 ~ 26 fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Command and Conquer III (2007): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...
Call of Juarez Benchmark
Call of Juarez Benchmark (2006)
high:
13.8  fps      Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M graphics card

Asus N61JV-JX007V: Intel Core i5 430M, 16.0", 2.7 kg
  Review » Review Asus N61JV-JX007V Notebook

Asus N71J: Intel Core i5 430M, 17.3", 3.2 kg
  Review » Review Asus N71JV Notebook

MSI FX600-i5447W7P: Intel Core i5 450M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  Review » Review MSI FX600 Notebook

Asus N61J-X2: Intel Core i5 430M, 16.0", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Asus N61J-X2

Asus N61JV-JX007V: Intel Core i5 430M, 16.0", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N61JV-JX007

Asus N61JV-JX361V: Intel Core i3 370M, 16.0", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus N61JV-JX361V

Asus N73JN-TY035V: Intel Core i5 520M, 17.3", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N73JN-TY035V

MSI FX600-007UK: Intel Core i3 330M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI FX600-007UK

MSI FX600-062FR: Intel Core i5 450M, 15.6", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI FX600-062FR

MSI FX600-211PL: Intel Core i5 460M, 15.6", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI FX600-211PL

MSI FX600-i3343W7P: Intel Core i3 330M, 15.6", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI FX600-i3343W7P

MSI FX600-i5447W7P: Intel Core i5 450M, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI FX600-i5447W7P

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailled list of all laptop GPUs with a short description. Classified and sorted by performance.

» Benchmark List
Sortable and restrainable list of all GPUs with benchmarks (e.g. 3DMarks).

» Notebook Gaming List
Which game can be played with my graphics card.

Class 1
GeForce GTX 590
Radeon HD 7970
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Radeon HD 7870
GeForce GTX 580
Radeon HD 6970
GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 480
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Radeon HD 6870
Radeon HD 5850
Radeon HD 7770
Radeon HD 7770
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Radeon HD 6790
Radeon HD 5770
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Class 2
GeForce GTS 450
Radeon HD 4850
Class 3
Radeon HD 5670
GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 430
Radeon HD 5570
GeForce GT 220
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Class 4
Class 5
Radeon HD 4350
GeForce G 107M *
Chrome9HD *
PowerVR SGX554MP4 *
Mali-T604 *
Class 6
PowerVR SGX543MP4 *
Adreno 320 *
PowerVR SGX543MP3 *
PowerVR SGX543MP2 *
PowerVR SGX545
PowerVR SGX544 *
Adreno 305 *
Adreno 225 *
Vivante GC4000 *
Mali-400 MP4 *
VideoCore-IV *
Adreno 220 *
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Mali-400 MP2 *
PowerVR SGX540 *
Adreno 205 *
Adreno 203 *
GC800 *
PowerVR SGX535
PowerVR SGX531
PowerVR SGX530
Adreno 200 *
Mali-200 *
unknown *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > FAQ / Tips / Technics > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
Author: Klaus Hinum (Update: 2013-01-16)