Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8550U vs Intel Core i9-9980HK vs Intel Core i5-8250U

Intel Core i7-8550U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8550U

The Intel Core i7-8550U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessors Core i7-7500U and i5-7260U, respectively, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8550U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.8 GHz. The Turbo Boost is not specified yet, but should be at least 3.7 - 4 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance of the i7-8550U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. This leads to big differences in our benchmark scores ranging from the 15 Watt reference by Intel up to the 23% higher score of the Inspiron 17-7773 in the Cinebench R15 Multi benchmark. Especially when taxing the CPU for longer periods, these differences can be even higher.

In our usual benchmarks, the average i7-8550U is as fast as the 35 Watt rated Core i5-7440HQ. For single thread performance, the high Turbo Boost frequency helps achieving one of the highest scores for mobile CPUs.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Core i9-9980HK

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9980HK

The Intel Core i9-9980HK is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.4 - 5 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5 GHz can only be reached using the "Thermal Velocity Boost" which allows one core to boost to 5 GHz (+100 MHz) as long as the CPU temperature is below 50°C. Multiple cores can be boosted +100 MHz? below 50°C (not verified). Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-8950HK, the 9980H is based on the same architecture but offers 2 more cores and higher clock speeds (boost).

According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i9-9980HK is the fastest model of the Coffee-Lake-H (refresh) series at the time of announcement and offers an unlocked multiplier for overclocking of the CPU.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now max. eight cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 33% compared to a similar clocked 6-core processor. According to first benchmarks, the mobile variant can reach the performance of the Core i9-9900K if the cooling is sufficient.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

Intel Core i5-8250U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8250U

The Intel Core i5-8250U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessor the Core i5-7200U, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8250U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.6 GHz. The Turbo Boost can go up to 3,4 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

According to Intel, the new quad core models are up to 40% faster than their dual core predecessors. Due to the reduced TDP and the same 14nm+ process, the long term performance and throttling behavior will be interesting and depending on the laptop design. Therefore, the older 35 Watt quad-core models should be faster in applications that demand longer CPU loads.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

ModelIntel Core i7-8550UIntel Core i9-9980HKIntel Core i5-8250U
SeriesIntel Kaby Lake RefreshIntel Coffee LakeIntel Kaby Lake Refresh
CodenameKaby Lake RefreshCoffee Lake-HKaby Lake Refresh
Series: Kaby Lake Refresh Kaby Lake Refresh
Intel Core i7-8650U1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U « 1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK « 2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8650U1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U « 1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Clock1800 - 4000 MHz2400 - 5000 MHz1600 - 3400 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB512 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 164 / 8
TDP15 Watt45 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1356FCBGA1440BGA1356
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1250 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$409 U.S.$297 U.S.
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8550U
28.1 pt (39%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9980HK
35.4 pt (49%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8250U
26.2 pt (36%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
2914 Points (3%)
min: 3022     avg: 3108     median: 3108 (3%)     max: 3194 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1021 Points (43%)
min: 840     avg: 874     median: 873.5 (37%)     max: 907 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 383     avg: 388.5     median: 388.5 (43%)     max: 394 Points
min: 431     avg: 471.3     median: 478.5 (53%)     max: 505 Points
min: 332     avg: 349.2     median: 353 (39%)     max: 355 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1118     avg: 1128     median: 1128 (3%)     max: 1138 Points
min: 2974     avg: 3530     median: 3475 (8%)     max: 4150 Points
min: 846     avg: 1148     median: 1171 (3%)     max: 1325 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 301     avg: 576     median: 553 (3%)     max: 761 Points
min: 1327     avg: 1656     median: 1624 (10%)     max: 1930 Points
min: 320     avg: 570     median: 562 (4%)     max: 730 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 108     avg: 159.5     median: 163 (49%)     max: 172 Points
min: 181     avg: 198.8     median: 201 (61%)     max: 215 Points
min: 81     avg: 141.1     median: 143 (43%)     max: 147 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.38     avg: 6.3     median: 6.1 (8%)     max: 8.56 Points
min: 14.81     avg: 16.7     median: 17.2 (22%)     max: 18.04 Points
min: 3.15     avg: 6     median: 5.9 (8%)     max: 7.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.43     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (47%)     max: 1.95 Points
min: 2.25     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (57%)     max: 2.4 Points
min: 0.91     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (41%)     max: 1.79 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4202     avg: 6333     median: 6423 (39%)     max: 8211 Points
min: 7709     avg: 8346     median: 7969.5 (48%)     max: 9734 Points
min: 5349     avg: 5631     median: 5533 (33%)     max: 8356 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 11694     avg: 17867     median: 17321.5 (13%)     max: 24180 Points
min: 39440     avg: 44697     median: 44455 (32%)     max: 50439 Points
min: 14148     avg: 18261     median: 17987 (13%)     max: 22097 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 12279     avg: 23153     median: 22717 (16%)     max: 31667 Points
55742 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 6737     avg: 8065     median: 8370.5 (10%)     max: 8436 Points
10359 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 257.5     avg: 352     median: 366.7 (4%)     max: 435 s
min: 110.4     avg: 115.3     median: 115.3 (1%)     max: 120.2 s
min: 243.3     avg: 308.6     median: 306.2 (4%)     max: 402.1 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 7.047     avg: 9.8     median: 9.9 (2%)     max: 12.7 s
min: 3.788     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (1%)     max: 4.941 s
min: 7.394     avg: 8.9     median: 8.1 (2%)     max: 13.75 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
847 s (3%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
26.3 s (14%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3847     avg: 4487     median: 4374 (7%)     max: 5287 Points
min: 7266     avg: 7351     median: 7351 (12%)     max: 7436 Points
min: 3632     avg: 3991     median: 3991 (6%)     max: 4350 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
15613 MIPS (9%)
min: 39566     avg: 41756     median: 41688 (24%)     max: 44081 MIPS
min: 11546     avg: 15262     median: 15365.5 (9%)     max: 17405 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4337 MIPS (52%)
min: 5283     avg: 5426     median: 5389.5 (64%)     max: 5642 MIPS
min: 3641     avg: 3726     median: 3706 (44%)     max: 3925 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 32     avg: 35.3     median: 33.1 (12%)     max: 41 fps
min: 92.8     avg: 93.8     median: 93.8 (33%)     max: 94.8 fps
min: 29.5     avg: 32.8     median: 32 (11%)     max: 37.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 143.6     avg: 153.9     median: 147.9 (34%)     max: 178 fps
min: 237.5     avg: 238.1     median: 238.1 (55%)     max: 238.7 fps
min: 124.6     avg: 139.3     median: 137.5 (32%)     max: 157.6 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.77     avg: 4     median: 3.9 (7%)     max: 4.43 fps
min: 10.8     avg: 11.5     median: 11.4 (20%)     max: 12.35 fps
min: 3.02     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (8%)     max: 4.78 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.357     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.469 GB/s
1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.336     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.415 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.583     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (13%)     max: 0.793 GB/s
1.7 GB/s (29%)
min: 0.58     avg: 0.6     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.714 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.3     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (11%)     max: 4.6 GB/s
min: 10.1     avg: 10.2     median: 10.2 (27%)     max: 10.3 GB/s
min: 2.9     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (9%)     max: 4 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 841     avg: 897     median: 913 (6%)     max: 937 Seconds
min: 317.4     avg: 397.6     median: 348.4 (2%)     max: 527 Seconds
min: 813     avg: 948     median: 899.5 (6%)     max: 1209 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
0.5 sec (12%)
min: 0.818     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 0.843 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 4534     avg: 5951     median: 5845 (12%)     max: 7795 Points
min: 11256     avg: 12585     median: 13208 (28%)     max: 13290 Points
min: 4775     avg: 6370     median: 6348 (14%)     max: 7575 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 9     avg: 10.5     median: 9.3 (2%)     max: 17.45 s
min: 7.639     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 7.856 s
min: 10.9     avg: 11.7     median: 11.1 (2%)     max: 15.77 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 20     avg: 23     median: 21.2 (1%)     max: 32.72 s
min: 16.84     avg: 17.1     median: 17.1 (1%)     max: 17.26 s
min: 24.9     avg: 26.3     median: 25.2 (1%)     max: 34.28 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 510     avg: 575     median: 536 (2%)     max: 740 s
min: 424.4     avg: 432.3     median: 432.3 (2%)     max: 440.1 s
min: 601     avg: 631     median: 613 (3%)     max: 783 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
21623 Points (19%)
49107 Points (43%)
min: 15198     avg: 20933     median: 21899 (19%)     max: 24736 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3961     avg: 6653     median: 6649 (18%)     max: 9527 Points
min: 9056     avg: 15688     median: 16079.5 (43%)     max: 18260 Points
min: 3233     avg: 6318     median: 6276 (17%)     max: 8014 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 16314     avg: 42803     median: 44682 (36%)     max: 55226 Points
min: 64033     avg: 64733     median: 65047 (53%)     max: 65119 Points
min: 24077     avg: 44593     median: 45968.5 (37%)     max: 50962 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 16312     avg: 37536     median: 36876 (30%)     max: 51937 Points
min: 64156     avg: 64682     median: 64841 (53%)     max: 65049 Points
min: 24155     avg: 44127     median: 45251 (37%)     max: 50910 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 27917     avg: 50269     median: 52842 (45%)     max: 58213 Points
min: 60812     avg: 63911     median: 64615.5 (54%)     max: 65599 Points
min: 34294     avg: 49389     median: 50347.5 (42%)     max: 52066 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3437     avg: 5739     median: 5695 (14%)     max: 7725 Points
min: 13173     avg: 15303     median: 15694.5 (40%)     max: 16935 Points
min: 3002     avg: 5863     median: 5774 (15%)     max: 7695 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3961     avg: 8228     median: 8306 (15%)     max: 11110 Points
min: 11758     avg: 19893     median: 20357 (36%)     max: 22463 Points
min: 4495     avg: 8511     median: 8453 (15%)     max: 10727 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2463     avg: 2898     median: 2875 (12%)     max: 3865 Points
min: 5540     avg: 8487     median: 8884.5 (37%)     max: 10162 Points
min: 1956     avg: 2709     median: 2663 (11%)     max: 3723 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
7968 Points (94%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1314     avg: 1346     median: 1346 (57%)     max: 1378 Points
min: 882     avg: 914     median: 925 (39%)     max: 936 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6945     avg: 7405     median: 7568 (14%)     max: 7703 Points
min: 2265     avg: 3162     median: 3427 (6%)     max: 3516 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1081 Points (5%)
min: 1171     avg: 1273     median: 1282 (6%)     max: 1355 Points
min: 923     avg: 927     median: 927 (4%)     max: 931 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3141 Points (10%)
min: 7072     avg: 7421     median: 7403.5 (23%)     max: 7805 Points
min: 3105     avg: 3298     median: 3298 (10%)     max: 3491 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4555     avg: 4858     median: 4900 (49%)     max: 4997 Points
min: 5617     avg: 5853     median: 5969 (60%)     max: 5972 Points
min: 3453     avg: 4116     median: 4095 (41%)     max: 4330 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10869     avg: 14247     median: 15117 (17%)     max: 16294 Points
min: 28625     avg: 29620     median: 29385 (32%)     max: 30849 Points
min: 11269     avg: 12833     median: 12751 (14%)     max: 14228 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4439     avg: 4686     median: 4699 (64%)     max: 4858 Points
6002 Points (82%)
min: 3924     avg: 4076     median: 4029 (55%)     max: 4243 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10747     avg: 13316     median: 13251 (32%)     max: 15294 Points
30099 Points (73%)
min: 10751     avg: 12210     median: 12131 (30%)     max: 13486 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8918     avg: 12315     median: 12327.5 (22%)     max: 14144 Points
31724 Points (56%)
min: 10893     avg: 12606     median: 12742 (23%)     max: 13553 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 2471     avg: 3671     median: 3770 (74%)     max: 4020 Points
4871 Points (95%)
min: 3148     avg: 3302     median: 3242 (63%)     max: 3503 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11637     avg: 12834     median: 12833.5 (20%)     max: 14030 Points
min: 14363     avg: 14408     median: 14407.5 (23%)     max: 14452 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3784     avg: 3949     median: 3948.5 (59%)     max: 4113 Points
min: 3759     avg: 3829     median: 3828.5 (57%)     max: 3898 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 877     avg: 1087     median: 1107 (1%)     max: 2114 ms
min: 705     avg: 878     median: 941 (1%)     max: 999 ms
min: 986     avg: 1221     median: 1259 (1%)     max: 1532 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 63.2     avg: 80.3     median: 71.3 (1%)     max: 122.7 ms
min: 74.8     avg: 107.9     median: 91 (1%)     max: 265.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 17296     avg: 33448     median: 33496 (30%)     max: 42043 Points
min: 40364     avg: 42641     median: 42219.5 (38%)     max: 46473 Points
min: 22772     avg: 30123     median: 29871 (27%)     max: 35817 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
182 Points (38%)
233 Points (49%)
min: 163     avg: 169.5     median: 167.5 (35%)     max: 180 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
768 Points (29%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.3     avg: 40.1     median: 33.7 (6%)     max: 61.4 Watt
min: 97.2     avg: 103.3     median: 103.3 (18%)     max: 109.4 Watt
min: 25.9     avg: 27.9     median: 28.3 (5%)     max: 29.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.2     avg: 38.1     median: 30.4 (6%)     max: 63.2 Watt
min: 127.1     avg: 132.7     median: 132.7 (24%)     max: 138.2 Watt
min: 27.7     avg: 29.5     median: 29.8 (5%)     max: 30.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 10.4     avg: 15.6     median: 17.3 (13%)     max: 17.5 Points per Watt
13.2 Points per Watt (10%)
min: 16.8     avg: 18.1     median: 18.4 (14%)     max: 18.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8550U → 100% n=46

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9980HK → 184% n=46

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8250U → 96% n=46

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 17. 06:32:02

#0 checking url part for id 9208 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11341 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9206 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.061s ... 0.062s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.063s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9208 +0.024s ... 0.086s

#8 got single benchmarks 9208 +0.317s ... 0.403s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11341 +0.022s ... 0.425s

#10 got single benchmarks 11341 +0.048s ... 0.473s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9206 +0.02s ... 0.493s

#12 got single benchmarks 9206 +0.396s ... 0.89s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.89s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.849s ... 1.738s

#15 return log +0s ... 1.739s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)