Lenovo ThinkPad E480 (i5-8250U, UHD 620, SSD) Laptop Review

The ThinkPad E-series is Lenovo’s entry-level gateway into the affordable office notebook market. The current 8th generation is represented by the E480 and E580. The European base model selling for 599 Euros (~$743) is a decent office device equipped with an Intel Core i5-8250U. US customers have to be more careful: the E480 base model for $630 + tax comes with an Intel Core i5-7200U, and the premium for the much faster Core i5-8250U is only $15. It is equipped with a meager 4 GB of RAM and a small 128 GB SSD. Our 599 Euros (~$743) review unit is sold by Campuspoint and specifically made for students; as such it requires proof of enrollment. The regular price for this model in Lenovo’s web shop is 620 Euros (~$769), and the notebook is also freely configurable when purchased directly from Lenovo. The fastest CPU available at the time of writing, the Core i7-8550U, is only available in combination with a dedicated AMD GPU. We had a similar model in review just a few days ago, equipped with an Intel Core i5-8250U CPU and the AMD GPU. You will find details for this specific unit as well as all other notebooks in our test group in the respective reviews. Our test group is composed of the following devices:
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
Details here
Lenovo ThinkPad E480 | Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | HP ProBook 440 G5 | Acer TravelMate P449 | Schenker Slim 14 | Asus VivoBook S14 | |
CPU | Intel Core i5-8250U | Intel Core i5-7200U | Intel Core i5-8250U | Intel Core i5-7200U | Intel Core i5-8250U | Intel Core i5-8250U |
GPU | AMD Radeon RX 550 | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
Display | 14-inch 1920 x 1080 (IPS) | 14-inch 1366 x 768 (TN) | 14-inch 1920 x 1080 (IPS) | 14-inch 1920 x 1080 (IPS) | 14-inch 1920 x 1080 (IPS) | 14-inch 1366 x 768 (TN) |
RAM | 8 GB DDR4 | 8 GB DDR4 | 8 GB DDR4 | 8 GB DDR4 | 16 GB DDR4 | 8 GB DDR3L |
Memory | 256 GB SSD | 256 GB SSD | 256 GB SSD | 512 GB SSD | 512 GB SSD | 256 GB SSD |
Rating | 83% | 81% | 84% | 83% | 81% | 82% |
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
Case
Given its similarity to the other recently reviewed model we would like to refer you to this Lenovo ThinkPad E480 review for details on the new case.
Connectivity
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER Slim 14 L17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Average of class Office (8 - 196.8, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
SCHENKER Slim 14 L17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Average of class Office (25.8 - 183.3, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Average of class Office (87 - 1404, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
SCHENKER Slim 14 L17 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Average of class Office (288 - 1690, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
SCHENKER Slim 14 L17 | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW |
Display
The E480 is offered with a choice of two different displays: a cheaper HD panel (1366x768) based on TN technology and an IPS FHD panel (1920x1080), which should always be your first choice. Both panels are matte, neither of which is available with touch input support. Our review unit was equipped with a panel made by Innolux, and we determined its maximum average brightness at 262 nits. Aside from the Schenker Slim 14, the ThinkPad E480 is in good company overall. Its contrast ratio of 1379:1 was exceptionally high for its price point, and despite a subpar brightness distribution of just 83% we did not notice any shadowing. Clouding, which can only be noticed in particularly dark scenes, was also negligible by and large. We found PWM flickering at a very high and thus harmless 25000 Hz. Compared to its predecessor, the ThinkPad E470, Lenovo has managed to improve upon almost every single aspect of the display.
|
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 262 cd/m²
Contrast: 1379:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
61.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.96% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.56% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW Innolux N140HCA-EAC, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Innolux N140HCA-EAC, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES LGD04B2, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad E470 NT140WHM-N41, 1366x768, 14.00 | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD N140HCA-EAB, 1920x1080, 14.00 | SCHENKER Slim 14 L17 LG Philips LGD046D, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T BOE CQ NT140WHM-N44, 1366x768, 14.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -5% | -6% | -1% | 47% | -7% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.56 | 41.88 1% | 39.56 -5% | 39.13 -6% | 41.04 -1% | 66.1 59% | 38.82 -7% |
sRGB Coverage | 62.2 | 62.8 1% | 59.3 -5% | 58.3 -6% | 61.2 -2% | 85.2 37% | 58.2 -6% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.96 | 43.29 1% | 40.88 -5% | 40.43 -6% | 42.47 -1% | 62.3 45% | 40.11 -7% |
Response Times | 1% | 10% | -14% | 8% | 3% | -12% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44.8 ? | 44 ? 2% | 40 ? 11% | 44 ? 2% | 39 ? 13% | 37.6 ? 16% | 42 ? 6% |
Response Time Black / White * | 31.2 ? | 31.2 ? -0% | 28.8 ? 8% | 14 ? 55% | 28 ? 10% | 28 ? 10% | 13 ? 58% |
PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 24880 ? 0% | 200 ? -99% | 25000 ? 0% | 20490 ? -18% | 200 ? -99% | |
Screen | 10% | -3% | -36% | -6% | 17% | -28% | |
Brightness middle | 262 | 251 -4% | 236 -10% | 209 -20% | 271 3% | 326 24% | 215 -18% |
Brightness | 245 | 231 -6% | 221 -10% | 208 -15% | 256 4% | 320 31% | 208 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 80 -4% | 88 6% | 81 -2% | 85 2% | 81 -2% | 81 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.19 -0% | 0.26 -37% | 0.58 -205% | 0.43 -126% | 0.31 -63% | 0.4 -111% |
Contrast | 1379 | 1321 -4% | 908 -34% | 360 -74% | 630 -54% | 1052 -24% | 538 -61% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7 | 5.1 27% | 5.7 19% | 8.12 -16% | 5.03 28% | 4.6 34% | 9.37 -34% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 23.6 | 10.6 55% | 22 7% | 15.18 36% | 11.9 50% | 10.3 56% | 15.84 33% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 4.5 30% | 3.8 41% | 9.86 -54% | 4.02 37% | 4.4 31% | 10.52 -64% |
Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.1 105% | 2.37 93% | 2.31 95% | 2.24 98% | 2.45 90% |
CCT | 6065 107% | 6146 106% | 7318 89% | 10218 64% | 6659 98% | 5978 109% | 11214 58% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39.5 | 39.8 1% | 37.7 -5% | 37 -6% | 39 -1% | 55.8 41% | 37 -6% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 61.9 | 62.5 1% | 59.2 -4% | 58 -6% | 61 -1% | 85.1 37% | 58 -6% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
6% | 1% /
-2% | -19% /
-26% | 0% /
-2% | 22% /
20% | -16% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
Display quality is decent by and large, and the high-contrast IPS panel with wide viewing angles featured a decent representation of color. Despite the panel’s matte surface colors were not washed-out. DeltaE values for gray scale and colors, on the other hand, are in dire need of improvement as the values determined were significantly too high. We were able to improve upon those through calibration, and as always the resulting ICC profile can be found for download in the box up top. Color space coverage of sRGB (61.9%) and AdobeRGB (39.5%) were decent enough for office workloads yet completely unsuitable for any type of photo or video editing. If you happen to fall into this category of users you will either need a different notebook or better yet, an external display.
Despite its somewhat low maximum average display brightness of just 262 nits the ThinkPad E480 was usable outdoors thanks to its matte panel. We would advise you to steer clear of direct sunlight, but it worked remarkably well in the shade.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise | |
↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (34.5 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 30 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18982 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Performance
Our entry-level E480 SKU was equipped with Intel's Core i5-8250U processor, 4 GB of RAM, and a 128 GB SSD. It is thus a solid and reliable workhorse for everyday office tasks with plenty of processing power to allow for subsequent hardware upgrades thanks to the legendary ThinkPad upgradeability. If required, the E480 can also be purchased with a dedicated AMD Radeon RX 550 GPU. Given that the GPU is not upgradeable, this decision has to be made upfront.
Processor
Intel’s Core i5-8250U is an energy-efficient quad-core processor based on the Kaby Lake architecture with a TDP of 15 W and four physical cores capable of working on up to eight threads simultaneously. Its base frequency of 1.6 GHz can boost up to 3.4 GHz dynamically. Our benchmark scores reveal that our review unit’s Core i5-8250U is about as fast as similarly equipped devices. The biggest differences can be found in the multi-thread results due to the CPU’s dependence on temperature - the better the cooling system the better overall performance. Still, compared to the Core i5-7200U-based ThinkPad E470 performance has been drastically improved.
Additional Core i5-8250U benchmark results can be found here.
We test every system for its sustained load capabilities by running Cinebench R15 multi in a loop, and the Core i5-8250U's score drops to 502 points during the second iteration already. Due to the fact that the SoC can consume up to 25 W for a short period of time this is expected behavior. After this initial drop scores remained consistent throughout the rest of the test. We can thus deduce that the E480’s cooling system is not overburdened by the CPU.
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (82.6 - 284, n=125, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
SCHENKER Slim 14 L17 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (81 - 147, n=97) | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (160.8 - 2492, n=128, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (320 - 730, n=101) | |
SCHENKER Slim 14 L17 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (0.75 - 2.97, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (0.91 - 1.79, n=35) | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (1.93 - 20.3, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (3.15 - 7.76, n=35) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Office (109.5 - 452, n=23, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (151.5 - 256, n=78) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Office (20009 - 93596, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (22772 - 35817, n=54) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (986 - 1532, n=59) | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
Average of class Office (479 - 1800, n=118, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
Without a doubt overall system performance is at a very high level, but the E480 is not quite as fast as its competitors. Just like the recently review ThinkPad E480 with AMD Radeon RX 550, our review unit stalled and lagged occasionally during everyday use. We would not classify these short incidents as disruptive, and given the brand-new hardware our best guess is that the E480 is suffering from driver issues that can possibly be fixed with future driver updates. The SSD could also be a possible culprit here - its performance is not fitting for an NVMe SSD.
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), i5-8250U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA | HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Lenovo ThinkPad E470 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G) | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | SCHENKER Slim 14 L17 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCMark 8 | 12% | 4% | 2% | -4% | 12% | 8% | -2% | -12% | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3574 | 4187 17% | 3774 6% | 3674 3% | 3519 -2% | 4006 12% | 3937 10% | 3584 ? 0% | 3824 ? 7% |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4849 | 5189 7% | 4922 2% | 4834 0% | 4605 -5% | 5106 5% | 4646 ? -4% | 3416 ? -30% | |
PCMark 10 | 42% | 33% | 16% | 18% | 33% | 26% | 80% | ||
Score | 2279 | 3954 73% | 3577 57% | 3144 38% | 3068 35% | 3612 58% | 3296 ? 45% | 5057 ? 122% | |
Essentials | 6999 | 7722 10% | 7655 9% | 6547 -6% | 7077 1% | 7468 7% | 7398 ? 6% | 9573 ? 37% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 27% /
27% | 19% /
19% | 9% /
9% | 7% /
7% | 12% /
12% | 21% /
20% | 12% /
12% | 34% /
34% |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3574 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4618 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4849 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 2279 points | |
Help |
Storage Devices
Our review unit came equipped with a 128 GB SSD made by Toshiba, but Lenovo also has devices on sale that are equipped with a 500 GB hard disk drive. We would, of course, strongly urge anyone to favor an SSD over an HDD. Our review unit’s 128 GB SSD should be the bare minimum for any office notebook. The M.2-2242 SSD requires an adapter to fit into the M.2-2280 slot and supports OPAL 2.0 self-encryption. Despite the fact that it supports the NVMe protocol its write performance was a mere 115 MB/s. Suffice it to say that it did not meet our expectations. It is possible that the self-encryption is to blame, but this should also be fixable with a future driver update. Read performance was as high as expected. In addition, the E480 supports a second 2.5-inch storage device.
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), i5-8250U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA | HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Lenovo ThinkPad E470 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G) | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | SCHENKER Slim 14 L17 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 24% | 155% | 56% | 152% | 440% | |
Read Seq | 909 | 1295 42% | 1181 30% | 454.2 -50% | 1086 19% | 2860 215% |
Write Seq | 128.4 | 160.6 25% | 602 369% | 438.1 241% | 581 352% | 1995 1454% |
Read 512 | 715 | 872 22% | 923 29% | 304.6 -57% | 869 22% | 815 14% |
Write 512 | 127 | 122 -4% | 600 372% | 343.7 171% | 584 360% | 1480 1065% |
Read 4k | 33.35 | 25.72 -23% | 35.48 6% | 34.15 2% | 35.89 8% | 57.7 73% |
Write 4k | 82.3 | 95.2 16% | 139.8 70% | 75.1 -9% | 122.4 49% | 196.7 139% |
Read 4k QD32 | 197.5 | 389.9 97% | 287.8 46% | 284.2 44% | 462.9 134% | 565 186% |
Write 4k QD32 | 100.2 | 118.3 18% | 417.1 316% | 208.8 108% | 370.9 270% | 475.1 374% |
GPU Performance
The graphics output warrior is Intel’s integrated UHD Graphics 620. While our review unit lacked a dedicated GPU a separate E480 SKU equipped accordingly is available, and as expected the AMD Radeon RX 550-equipped E480 wiped the floor with its rivals. All other devices in our test group offered performance on a very similar level. A second RAM module would certainly help to improve the UHD 620’s performance somewhat thanks to support for dual channel, but do not expect too much.
Further information and additional benchmarks for the Intel UHD Graphics 620 can be found here.
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Office (599 - 12195, n=123, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
SCHENKER Slim 14 L17 | |
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Average of class Office (5681 - 58068, n=109, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Office (712 - 8815, n=124, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1591 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 57070 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6738 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 829 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 370 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 343 points | |
Help |
Gaming Performance
Given its primary focus on office and productivity tasks, the ThinkPad E480’s gaming capabilities are, well, effectively non-existent. Even a second RAM module could not have improved upon them significantly. That said, the ThinkPad E480’s Intel UHD Graphics 620 should be powerful enough for simple browser games.
low | med. | high | ultra | |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 37.8 | 24.4 | 19.9 | 6.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 14.8 | 9.4 | 5.2 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 16.9 | 10.4 | 5.9 |
Emissions
System Noise
All things considered, the ThinkPad E480 was pleasantly quiet. Only the Schenker Slim 14 was even less obtrusive, but the differences were so minuscule that both devices have to share first place. The fan was completely off most of the time when the device was idle, which means that the notebook was completely silent. Under average load, our equipment measured a sound pressure level of 31.8 dB(A), and no more than 33.8 dB(A) under full load. Thus, the E480 was anything but annoying. Compared with the recently released E480 with a dedicated GPU, today’s review model did much better.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 29.1 / 29.1 / 30.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 31.8 / 33.8 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | SCHENKER Slim 14 L17 | Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -11% | -3% | -3% | -6% | 2% | -10% | |
off / environment * | 29.1 | 29.8 -2% | 29.1 -0% | 30.5 -5% | 29.9 -3% | 28.7 1% | 30.2 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.1 | 29.8 -2% | 29.1 -0% | 30.5 -5% | 30.2 -4% | 28.7 1% | 30.2 -4% |
Idle Average * | 29.1 | 31.5 -8% | 29.1 -0% | 30.5 -5% | 30.2 -4% | 29.5 -1% | 30.2 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.3 | 33.3 -10% | 30.7 -1% | 30.5 -1% | 30.2 -0% | 29.5 3% | 31.3 -3% |
Load Average * | 31.8 | 39.1 -23% | 34.5 -8% | 32.9 -3% | 36.7 -15% | 30.5 4% | 40.1 -26% |
Load Maximum * | 33.8 | 40.4 -20% | 36 -7% | 32.9 3% | 36.4 -8% | 33.4 1% | 40.4 -20% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
With a maximum of 42.8 °C (~109 °F) under load, surface temperatures were inconspicuous overall. As such, they are on a par with last year’s model. With a maximum of 71.6 °C (~161 °F), the ThinkPad E480 with dedicated GPU single-handedly managed to break the record. Fortunately, the E480 without a dedicated RX 550 GPU did not suffer from this. Temperatures during our stress test remained inconspicuous once again: 76 °C (~169 °F) at the CPU, and no more than 60 °C (~140 °F) at the GPU. The SoC’s power target got in the way of higher CPU clock frequencies during periods of simultaneous CPU and GPU load. The CPU was never throttled due to thermal restrictions, and neither was the GPU.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.8 °C / 78.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+2 °C / 3.6 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | SCHENKER Slim 14 L17 | Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -37% | -7% | 0% | -5% | -12% | -13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 36.7 | 51.9 -41% | 39 -6% | 35.6 3% | 36.8 -0% | 41.9 -14% | 42.2 -15% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42.8 | 71.6 -67% | 45.5 -6% | 37.2 13% | 31.3 27% | 43.7 -2% | 39.4 8% |
Idle Upper Side * | 23.4 | 24.8 -6% | 24.8 -6% | 24.4 -4% | 26.7 -14% | 24.8 -6% | 28.1 -20% |
Idle Bottom * | 22.8 | 30 -32% | 25 -10% | 25.6 -12% | 30 -32% | 28.4 -25% | 28.1 -23% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy Management
Power Consumption
The ThinkPad E480 turned out to be fairly energy efficient. While idling, it consumed no more than 3.5-6.1 W, and just 30 W under average load. Maximum power consumption was measured at 42.3 W, which means that the 65 W USB-C power supply is amply dimensioned. In this category, our review unit bested every single one of its competitors.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 i5-8250U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad E470 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, TN LED, 1366x768, 14.00 | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | SCHENKER Slim 14 L17 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, TN LED, 1366x768, 14.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -38% | -33% | -25% | -20% | -42% | -8% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 4.1 -17% | 4.4 -26% | 5.2 -49% | 4.5 -29% | 6 -71% | 3.7 -6% |
Idle Average * | 5.3 | 6.3 -19% | 7.1 -34% | 7.6 -43% | 7.1 -34% | 8.46 -60% | 5.6 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.1 | 7.1 -16% | 10.2 -67% | 9.9 -62% | 10.2 -67% | 9.48 -55% | 7.6 -25% |
Load Average * | 30 | 54.8 -83% | 36.5 -22% | 31 -3% | 29.8 1% | 37.4 -25% | 37.4 -25% |
Load Maximum * | 42.3 | 66.4 -57% | 48.7 -15% | 29.7 30% | 31 27% | 41.1 3% | 33 22% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.8 |
* ... smaller is better
Battery Life
Our review unit’s battery life was surprisingly long and almost on a par with last year’s ThinkPad E470. While battery capacity has remained unchanged at 45 Wh, the E480 offers much more performance than last year’s model. In our real-world Wi-Fi test at a normalized display brightness if 150 nits (or 74% in our review unit’s case), the E480 ran for almost 8 hours, easily outlasting its Schenker, Asus, and Acer competitors. 3D performance did not suffer from any degradation on battery.
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 i5-8250U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 48 Wh | HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E470 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | SCHENKER Slim 14 L17 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 44 Wh | Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 39 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -5% | -4% | 8% | -7% | -39% | -4% | 28% | |
Reader / Idle | 1106 | 1164 5% | 821 -26% | 1112 1% | 976 -12% | 1359 ? 23% | ||
H.264 | 431 | 536 24% | 224 -48% | 546 27% | 503 17% | 680 ? 58% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 495 | 341 -31% | 416 -16% | 480 -3% | 341 -31% | 304 -39% | 476 -4% | 587 ? 19% |
Load | 105 | 88 -16% | 185 76% | 111 6% | 104 -1% | 119 ? 13% |
Verdict
Pros
Cons
The Lenovo ThinkPad E480 is an affordable office notebook with powerful hardware. Its Intel Core i5-8250U processor is a powerful yet energy-efficient CPU leading to a better than average power consumption that battery life most certainly benefits from. Equipped with just 4 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage, the ThinkPad E480 does not offer much, but more than enough for everyday office and productivity tasks.
You cannot really go wrong given the E480’s low price of around $700. Unlike the recently reviewed E480 with AMD Radeon RX 550, today’s review unit deserves our full endorsement. We were particularly impressed by the high-contrast IPS panel - a panel like this is fairly uncommon in the E480’s price bracket. Our biggest gripe was the device’s poor SSD performance, and we are also fairly annoyed by the lack of an SD card reader (which has been replaced by a MicroSD card reader). Overall, you get a solid workhorse at a decent and fair price.
The Lenovo ThinkPad E480 is well-made and features well-known input devices that we have already praised numerous times in the past.
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
-
03/13/2018 v6(old)
Sebastian Bade