NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M

The Nvidia GeForce GTS 360M is a high performance laptop graphics card based on the GT215 core. Compared to the older GTS 260M, the GTS 360 features only a higher clock speed.

The GT215 architecture supports DirectX 10.1 and OpenGL 2.1 and features 96 shader cores, similar to the 9800M GT.  The memory bus of the GTS 360M, however, is only 128 bit wide. To compensate, the GPU supports faster GDDR5 VRAM. Therefore, overall performance is significantly faster compared to models with slower DDR3 VRAM.

Similar to the GeForce 9800M GT, the GTS 360M features 96 stream processors that do the graphics work of the former dedicated pixel- and vertex-shaders. The unified shaders of Nvidia are 1-dimensional (AMD has 5-dimensional shaders which lead to the higher number of shaders). The shaders of the GT215 core are based on the GTX 200 desktop architecture and are therefore improved compared to the G92 based cards (e.g., 9800M GT).

The GeForce GPU also supports CUDADirectX ComputeOpenCL, and PhysX to use the shaders for other tasks than rendering images (for example, encoding videos or calculating physics of a game or mathematical tasks). For these special tasks, the GPU can be noticeably faster than current CPUs.

The mobile graphics card has a built in video decoder called PureVideo HD with VP4. The Video Processor 4 (VP4) supports the full decoding of H.264, VC-1, and now also MPEG-4 ASP (e.g. DivX or XviD). MPEG-1 is still not supported, but the decoding of this codec is quite trivial on a CPU.

In conjunction with an Nvidia integrated graphics (e.g. 9400M), the GTS 360M supports Hybrid-SLI in the form of HybridPower. HybridPower is a Windows Vista-only technique for switching between the integrated and dedicated graphics core for power-saving purposes. Up to now, the user had to use a tool to switch between the GPUs. Later, HybridPower was succeeded by Optimus, which can automatically switch between GPUs directly through drivers. GeForceBoost is not supported by the GTS 360M as the SLI combination with the integrated GPU would provide no significant performance boosts.

The performance of the mid- to high-class GeForce GTS 360M should be slightly above the GTS 260M because of the higher clock speed. Demanding DirectX 10 games like Crysis should run fluently in medium to high details and lower resolutions. Older or less demanding games should run in high detail settings and high resolutions fluently. More details about the gaming performance can be found in our benchmarks below.

Depending on the type of graphics memory used (GDDR5 or GDDR3), the performance of the GTS 360M may differ. The maximum clock rate can also differ according to the used graphics RAM. For models equipped with GDDR5 VRAM, the maximum supported clock rate is 2000 MHz.

The power consumption should be similar to the slightly slower clocked GTS 260M, which is rated at 38 Watt TDP. Therefore, the GTS 360M is intended for larger laptops with powerful cooling solutions.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTS 300M Series
GeForce GTS 360M 96 @ 575MHz128 Bit @ 1800MHz

GeForce GTS 350M

96 @ 500MHz128 Bit @ 1600MHz
CodenameN11E-GS1
ArchitectureGT2xx
Pipelines96 - unified
Core Speed *575 MHz
Shader Speed *1325 MHz
Memory Speed *1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
Transistors727 Million
technology40 nm
FeaturesDirectX Compute Support (Windows 7), CUDA, OpenCL, HybridPower, PhysX, SLI, Powermizer 8.0, MXM 3.0 Type-B
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement07.01.2010
Information360 GFlops
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_gef...
* The specified clock rates are only guidelines for the manufacturer and can be altered by them.

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage - P Result no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 5333      avg: 5544 (15%)     median: 5522 (15%)     max: 5777 Points
3DMark Vantage - P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 4386      avg: 4516.3 (10%)     median: 4569 (10%)     max: 4594 Points
3DMark 06
0% 100%
min: 9819      avg: 10329.5 (35%)     median: 10243.5 (35%)     max: 11012 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 16582      avg: 16711.7 (45%)     median: 16674 (45%)     max: 16879 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 25762      avg: 26151.7 (17%)     median: 26327 (17%)     max: 26366 Points
PCMark Vantage - Gaming Score 1024x768
0% 100%
min: 5127      avg: 5127 (20%)     median: 5127 (20%)     max: 5127 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit
0% 100%
min: 27.75      avg: 27.8 (25%)     median: 27.8 (25%)     max: 27.75 Points
Cinebench R10 - Shading 32Bit
0% 100%
min: 3368      avg: 3664.5 (31%)     median: 3664.5 (31%)     max: 3961 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
0% 100%
min: 6.8      avg: 6.8 (86%)     median: 6.8 (86%)     max: 6.8 points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
0% 100%
min: 6.8      avg: 6.8 (86%)     median: 6.8 (86%)     max: 6.8 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Metro 2033
Metro 2033 (2010)
low:
42.2  fps      Compare
med.:
32.1  fps      Compare
high:
17.9  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Battlefield: Bad Company 2
med.:
52  fps      Compare
high:
40.2  fps      Compare
ultra:
21.6  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
CoD Modern Warfare 2
med.:
61.3  fps      Compare
high:
53.1  fps      Compare
ultra:
34  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Risen
Risen (2009)
med.:
45.7  fps      Compare
high:
33.4  fps      Compare
ultra:
23.2  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Need for Speed Shift
Need for Speed Shift (2009)
med.:
63.2  fps      Compare
high:
53.1  fps      Compare
ultra:
32  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2
Colin McRae: DIRT 2 (2009)
med.:
80.9  fps      Compare
high:
50.2  fps      Compare
ultra:
27.8  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anno 1404
Anno 1404 (2009)
low:
122.6  fps      Compare
ultra:
39.1  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark
Crysis - GPU Benchmark (2007)
med.:
62.4  fps      Compare
high:
38.5  fps      Compare
ultra:
9.9  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark
Crysis - CPU Benchmark (2007)
med.:
60.5  fps      Compare
high:
34.5  fps      Compare
ultra:
9.4  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M graphics card

Toshiba Qosmio X500-121: Intel Core i7 720QM, 18.4", 4.6 kg
  Review » Review Toshiba Qosmio X500-121 Notebook

Asus G51Jx-X1: Intel Core i7 720QM, 15.6", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Asus G51Jx-X1

Asus G51JX-X3: Intel Core i5 430M, 15.6", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Asus G51JX-X3

Asus G60JX: Intel Core i5 430M, 16.0", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Asus G60JX

Asus G60JX-JX154V: Intel Core i5 520M, 16.0", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Asus G60JX-JX154V

Toshiba Qosmio X500-116: Intel Core i7 720QM, 18.4", 4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-116

Toshiba Qosmio X500-11D: Intel Core i7 720QM, 18.4", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-11D

Toshiba Qosmio X500-11g : Intel Core i7 720QM, 18.4", 4.9 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-11g

Toshiba Qosmio X500-11X: Intel Core i7 720QM, 18.4", 4.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-11X

Toshiba Qosmio X500-121: Intel Core i7 720QM, 18.4", 4.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-121

Toshiba Qosmio X500-128: Intel Core i7 720QM, 18.4", 4.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-128

Toshiba Qosmio X500-12N: Intel Core i7 740QM, 18.4", 4.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-12N

Toshiba Qosmio X500-14W: Intel Core i7 740QM, 18.4", 4.8 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-14W

Toshiba Qosmio X505-Q890: Intel Core i7 740QM, 18.4", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X505-Q890

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailled list of all laptop GPUs with a short description. Classified and sorted by performance.

» Benchmark List
Sortable and restrainable list of all GPUs with benchmarks (e.g. 3DMarks).

» Notebook Gaming List
Which game can be played with my graphics card.

Class 1
GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 580
Radeon HD 6970
GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Radeon HD 6870
Radeon HD 5850
Radeon HD 7770
Radeon HD 7770
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Radeon HD 6790
Radeon HD 5770
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Class 2
GeForce GTS 450
Radeon HD 4850
Class 3
Radeon HD 5670
GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 430
Radeon HD 5570
GeForce GT 220
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Class 4
Class 5
Radeon HD 4350
GeForce G 107M *
Chrome9HD *
PowerVR SGX554MP4 *
Mali-T604 *
Class 6
PowerVR SGX543MP4 *
Mali-T624 *
Mali-450 MP4 *
PowerVR SGX543MP3 *
PowerVR SGX543MP2 *
PowerVR SGX544 *
Adreno 225 *
Vivante GC4000 *
VideoCore-IV *
Adreno 220 *
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Mali-400 MP2 *
PowerVR SGX540 *
Adreno 205 *
GC800 *
PowerVR SGX535
PowerVR SGX531
PowerVR SGX530
Mali-200 *
unknown *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > FAQ / Tips / Technics > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
Author: Klaus Hinum (Update: 2013-01-16)