Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R7 370

AMD Radeon R7 370

The AMD Radeon R7 370 is a single-GPU graphics card for mid-range desktop PCs, which was introduced in May 2015. It is based on the 28 nm "Trinidad (Pitcairn)" chip, which features 1024 shader units and a 256 bit memory interface (2 GB GDDR5, 179.2 GB/s at 1.400 MHz or 5600MHz effective).

Architecture

The basis of the 212 mm² graphic chip with 2.8 billion transistors of the AMD Radeon R7 370 is the so-called GCN architecture. The chip, which is called Trinidad now, has already been used in the AMD Radeon HD 7870 and the AMD Radeon R9 270X under the names "Pitcairn" and "Curacao”. The number of hardware units including 1024 ALUs/shader units, 64 TMUs and 32 ROPs, were reduced compared to the direct predecessor. Just like the AMD Radeon R9 270X, the AMD Radeon R7 370 does not support True Audio and supports DirectX 12 (but only FL 11_1).

Performance

Depending on resolution, AA setting and game, the performance of the AMD Radeon R7 370 is about on par with the GeForce GTX 950 from Nvidia. So, it even performs slightly better than fast mobile graphics solutions like the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M. Even extremely demanding games like Metro: Last Light can be played smoothly with maximum settings and 1920 x 1080 pixels. However, the quality settings should not be set too high in several games – otherwise, the 2 GB GDDR5 will quickly reach its limits. Due to a lower number of ALUs and TMUs, the AMD Radeon R7 370 is beaten by the AMD Radeon R9 270x. Probably this is the reason why the card is listed in the R7 series.

Features

The AMD R7 370 supports features like Eyefinity, Mantle, App Acceleration, CrossFire, PowerTune, ZeroCore, and HD3D. The cooling concept of the MSI Radeon R7 370 is convincing and even hardly audible under load. The fan stands completely still in 2D mode and the card turns silent. Since the GPU is relatively old in the meanwhile, you have to live without features like for example DirectX 12 Feature-Level 12_0, FreeSync, and TrueAudio.

Power Consumption

By means of dynamic clock speed adjustment and the familiar ZeroCore technology (since the introduction of the HD 7000 series), the AMD Radeon R7 370 can very efficiently save energy while idle. The power consumption is 110 Watt under load (according to the manufacturer).

Details to the MSI AMD R7 370

The AMD Radeon R7 370 from MSI is clocked slightly higher (GPU and RAM). GPU-Z reported a GPU clock of 1050 MHz and a memory clock of 1425MHz (effective 5700 MHz). Furthermore, MSI offers the "MSI Gaming App" tool, which allows three different modes for the graphics card (Silent mode, Gaming mode, OC mode). Depending on the selected mode, the GPU is driven with a clock frequency of 925 - 975 MHz, 980 - 1030 MHz, or 1000 - 1050 MHz. The manufacturer’s warranty covers also overclocking with the "MSI Gaming App”.

The cooling concept, also called Twin Frozr design, is decisive for the look of the MSI AMD Radeon  R7 370. The MSI 300 series shares the "Twin Frozr V" design. However, the manufacturer omitted a backplate.

Only the waste heat of the GPU is emitted to the heatsink, which extends beyond the PCB, via two heatpipes. The two big fans have a diameter of about 10 cm and provide the necessary fresh air. The fan blades’ special shape (dispersion fan blade) ensures an up to 19% higher airflow for low-noise operation.

The cooling concept proved to work quietly even under load in the benchmarks. In addition, the Zero Frozr technology ensures that the fans turn off completely during desktop use or undemanding applications.

In terms of connectivity, the graphics card delivers 2x DVI (DVI-I, DVI-D); 1x HDMI (1.4a/2.0), and 1x Display Port (1.2).

Overall, the gaming performance of the MSI AMD R7 370 is sufficient for current titles with a resolution of up to 1080p. However, depending on the game, the quality settings should not be set too high. Those who do not want to do without quality settings like AA/AF should better consider the R9 300 series.

Prospective buyers should comprehensively inform themselves about the product policy of the manufacturer. A new model does not always mean more performance! For example the AMD Radeon R9 270x is faster than the AMD Radeon R7 370.

CodenameTrinidad (Pitcairn)
ArchitectureGCN 1.0
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed975 MHz
Memory Speed5600 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12 FL 11_1
Power Consumption110 Watt
Transistor Count2.8 Billion
technology28 nm
FeaturesMantle, Eyefinity, App Acceleration, CrossFire, PowerTune, ZeroCore, HD3D
Date of Announcement05.05.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.7 pt (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 296546     avg: 323115     median: 323114 (37%)     max: 349683 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 38182     avg: 39809     median: 39808.5 (10%)     max: 41435 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5518     avg: 5525     median: 5525 (10%)     max: 5532 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5943     avg: 5961     median: 5961 (7%)     max: 5979 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 8430     avg: 8519     median: 8518.5 (7%)     max: 8607 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

med. 1920x1080
52  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
53.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
16.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
high 1920x1080
42.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
124  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
24.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
51.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
med. 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
ultra 1920x1080
160  fps    + Compare
4K 3820x2160
66  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
high 1920x1080
53.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
high 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
142  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
147  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / On (100 % Gameplay Resolution) MediumAA 1366x768
62
low 1280x720
91.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
44.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
90  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
ultra 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
53.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
45.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1366x768
82  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
3.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
32.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Mafia 3

Mafia 3

2016
low 1280x720
58  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
FIFA 17

FIFA 17

2016
ultra 1920x1080
147  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
63.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
129  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
87  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
med. 1366x768
183  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
113
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
87  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
67  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
29.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
4.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
high 1920x1080
49.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1366x768
71  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1920x1080
45.7
high 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
97  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TrilinearAF 1920x1080
56
low 1024x768
94  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
206  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
134  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1366x768
69  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
172  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
125  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
68  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
123  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
74  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
129  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
91  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
115  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
71  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
ultra 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
4K 3840 x 2160
26.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
59.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
105.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
82  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
73  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
85  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
341.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
153.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
164.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
148.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
104.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
104.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
132.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
99.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
56.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
161.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
123.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
97.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
89.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
73.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
143.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
106.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
186.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
83.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
201.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
142.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
181.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
112  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
272  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
228  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
129  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
195.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
159.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
124.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
96.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
147.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
100.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
91.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
96.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
101.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
77.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
71.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
68.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
185.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
166.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
131.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
120  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
120  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
116.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
151.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
136.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
75.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
269.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
172.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
149.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
423.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
207.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
161.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
69.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
155.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
107.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
64.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
QHD 2560x1440
80.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3820x2160
45  fps    + Compare
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Gears Tactics5228.321.8
Doom Eternal53.335.326.819.516.7
Escape from Tarkov42.331.5
F1 201912456.253.532.324.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark51.821.4
Fortnite1064130.2
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)3830.3
Team Fortress 216066
Dirt 453.727
Rocket League10937
Prey1426860.550.116
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III14737.820
Mass Effect Andromeda91.543.725.4
Dishonored 244.230.3
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare9058
Titanfall 237
Farming Simulator 1753.545.1
Battlefield 18242.640.13.3
Civilization VI32.423.118.4
Mafia 35835.216.7
FIFA 1714763.9
Mirror's Edge Catalyst129874133.49
Overwatch18310247.631.5
Doom876740.827.512.9
Ashes of the Singularity29.826.94.8
Need for Speed 201649.837.711.3
The Division7135.328.313.8
Far Cry Primal473313
XCOM 29741.327.411.9
Rise of the Tomb Raider946135.527.313.3
Rainbow Six Siege206134704923.7
Just Cause 36945.241.314.7
Star Wars Battlefront172125615219.4
Assassin's Creed Syndicate685636.54.1
Fallout 41237443.33412.3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 31299142.630.214.6
Anno 2205115713013.613.5
World of Warships8326.9
Metal Gear Solid V6059.959.739.88
Mad Max105.46052.2
Batman: Arkham Knight82733935
The Witcher 38561.335.0422.36
Dirt Rally341.8153.588.849.68
GTA V164.2148.657.130.81
Battlefield Hardline104.9104.268.242.54
Evolve132.499.656.549.07
Dragon Age: Inquisition161.9123.745.329.1
Far Cry 497.889.654.541.26
Assassin's Creed Unity73.455.628.2819.47
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare143.6106.95430.25
Civilization: Beyond Earth186.483.557.250.4
Alien: Isolation201.9142.378.159.3
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor181.511264.647.44
Fifa 15272228129
Sims 4195.1159.9124.796.8
GRID: Autosport147.1100.291.375
Watch Dogs96.3101.238.5828.41
Thief77.871.668.240.2
Battlefield 4185.6166.3131.152.9
Dota 2120120116.1
Metro: Last Light151.8136.875.337.64
BioShock Infinite269.8172.4149.556
Tomb Raider423.9207.4161.369.1
Crysis 3155.9107.464.526.3
Counter-Strike: GO80.545
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
14
25
2
12
25
13
8
30
14
5
15
32
5
3
2

1
17
4
2

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 16:47:26

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Mar 2024 05:34:43 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.036s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.037s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6493 +0.027s ... 0.063s

#7 got single benchmarks 6493 +0.01s ... 0.074s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.074s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.539s ... 0.613s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.613s

#11 Got 232 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.62s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.62s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.046s ... 0.666s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.777s ... 2.443s

#15 return log +0.044s ... 2.487s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > AMD Radeon R7 370 (MSI AMD R7 370 Gaming 2G Review)
Sebastian Bade (Update: 2016-01-26)