Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8550U vs Intel Core i7-8565U vs Intel Core i5-8350U

Intel Core i7-8550U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8550U

The Intel Core i7-8550U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessors Core i7-7500U and i5-7260U, respectively, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8550U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.8 GHz. The Turbo Boost is not specified yet, but should be at least 3.7 - 4 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance of the i7-8550U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. This leads to big differences in our benchmark scores ranging from the 15 Watt reference by Intel up to the 23% higher score of the Inspiron 17-7773 in the Cinebench R15 Multi benchmark. Especially when taxing the CPU for longer periods, these differences can be even higher.

In our usual benchmarks, the average i7-8550U is as fast as the 35 Watt rated Core i5-7440HQ. For single thread performance, the high Turbo Boost frequency helps achieving one of the highest scores for mobile CPUs.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Core i7-8565U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-8565U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation that was announced in August 2018 (IFA). Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i7-8550U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i7-8565U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 4,6 GHz (versus 4 GHz of the i7-8550U) for a single core and 4.1 GHz (versus 3.7 GHz) of all cores (4.1 GHz for 2 cores). The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Compared to the slower Core i5-8265U and i3-8145U, the i7 supports Thermal Velocity Boost.

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same microarchitecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

The performance of the i7-8565U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. We already saw big differences for Kaby Lake-R (e.g., i7-8550U benchmarks), especially for long term (sustained) performance. Therefore, it will be interesting to see how the additional Turbo  clock speed can be made use of. It looks like Intel is promoting the i7 to be 3 - 11% faster than the previous i7-8550U, with Cinebench R15 Multi reaching 5% gains.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory, it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Core i5-8350U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8350U

The Intel Core i5-8350U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessor the Core i5-7300U, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8350U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.7 GHz. The Turbo Boost can go up to 3,6 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

According to Intel, the new quad core models are up to 40% faster than their dual core predecessors. Due to the reduced TDP and the same 14nm+ process, the long term performance and throttling behaviour will be interesting and depending on the laptop design. Therefore, the older 35 Watt quad-core models should be faster in applications that demand longer CPU loads.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

ModelIntel Core i7-8550UIntel Core i7-8565UIntel Core i5-8350U
SeriesIntel Kaby Lake RefreshIntel Core i7Intel Kaby Lake Refresh
CodenameKaby Lake RefreshWhiskey Lake-UKaby Lake Refresh
Series: Kaby Lake Refresh Kaby Lake Refresh
Intel Core i7-8650U1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U « 1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8665U1.9 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8565U « 1.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8650U1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U « 1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Clock1800 - 4000 MHz1800 - 4600 MHz1700 - 3600 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1356BGA1528BGA1356
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$409 U.S.$297 U.S.
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8550U
28.1 pt (39%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8565U
29.6 pt (41%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
2914 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1021 Points (43%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 383     avg: 388.5     median: 388.5 (43%)     max: 394 Points
min: 342     avg: 409.3     median: 411.5 (46%)     max: 472 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1118     avg: 1128     median: 1128 (3%)     max: 1138 Points
min: 954     avg: 1257     median: 1181.5 (3%)     max: 1645 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 301     avg: 576     median: 553 (3%)     max: 761 Points
min: 452     avg: 612     median: 608.5 (4%)     max: 815 Points
min: 346     avg: 548     median: 569 (4%)     max: 631 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 108     avg: 159.5     median: 163 (49%)     max: 172 Points
min: 138.3     avg: 172.5     median: 173 (52%)     max: 193 Points
min: 128     avg: 146.8     median: 150.5 (45%)     max: 153 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.38     avg: 6.3     median: 6.1 (8%)     max: 8.56 Points
min: 5.48     avg: 6.3     median: 6 (8%)     max: 7.33 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.43     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (47%)     max: 1.95 Points
min: 1.62     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (42%)     max: 1.71 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4202     avg: 6333     median: 6423 (39%)     max: 8211 Points
min: 2682     avg: 6571     median: 6644 (40%)     max: 8906 Points
min: 5152     avg: 5461     median: 5460.5 (33%)     max: 5769 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 11694     avg: 17867     median: 17321.5 (13%)     max: 24180 Points
min: 13806     avg: 17608     median: 16760 (12%)     max: 23118 Points
min: 16222     avg: 17931     median: 17931 (13%)     max: 19640 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 12279     avg: 23153     median: 22717 (16%)     max: 31667 Points
min: 14542     avg: 21376     median: 21661 (15%)     max: 26851 Points
28684 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 6737     avg: 8065     median: 8370.5 (10%)     max: 8436 Points
min: 5474     avg: 8104     median: 8809.5 (11%)     max: 9435 Points
7593 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 257.5     avg: 352     median: 366.7 (4%)     max: 435 s
min: 263.3     avg: 353.4     median: 360.2 (4%)     max: 420 s
min: 305.7     avg: 330.5     median: 330.5 (4%)     max: 355.2 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 7.047     avg: 9.8     median: 9.9 (2%)     max: 12.7 s
min: 6.812     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (2%)     max: 12.41 s
min: 7.517     avg: 9.7     median: 9.7 (2%)     max: 11.89 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
847 s (3%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
26.3 s (14%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3847     avg: 4487     median: 4374 (7%)     max: 5287 Points
min: 3537     avg: 4129     median: 4291.5 (7%)     max: 4626 Points
min: 1960     avg: 2961     median: 2961 (5%)     max: 3962 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
15613 MIPS (9%)
min: 10531     avg: 17993     median: 18860 (11%)     max: 24847 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4337 MIPS (52%)
min: 2029     avg: 4558     median: 4737 (57%)     max: 5923 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 32     avg: 35.3     median: 33.1 (12%)     max: 41 fps
min: 29.35     avg: 33.8     median: 33.7 (12%)     max: 38.8 fps
min: 34     avg: 37.3     median: 37.3 (13%)     max: 40.55 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 143.6     avg: 153.9     median: 147.9 (34%)     max: 178 fps
min: 127.5     avg: 144.4     median: 140.9 (33%)     max: 160.2 fps
min: 145     avg: 152.9     median: 152.9 (35%)     max: 160.7 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.77     avg: 4     median: 3.9 (7%)     max: 4.43 fps
min: 3.24     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (8%)     max: 5.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.357     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.469 GB/s
min: 0.347     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.516 GB/s
min: 0.363     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.456 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.583     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (13%)     max: 0.793 GB/s
min: 0.567     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.869 GB/s
min: 0.623     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.754 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.3     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (11%)     max: 4.6 GB/s
min: 3.2     avg: 4.2     median: 4 (10%)     max: 5.1 GB/s
min: 3.7     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (11%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 841     avg: 897     median: 913 (6%)     max: 937 Seconds
min: 687     avg: 821     median: 806.5 (6%)     max: 1175 Seconds
705 Seconds (5%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
min: 0.682     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.851 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 4534     avg: 5951     median: 5845 (12%)     max: 7795 Points
min: 2813     avg: 5806     median: 6158 (13%)     max: 7928 Points
min: 5852     avg: 6131     median: 5925 (13%)     max: 6617 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 9     avg: 10.5     median: 9.3 (2%)     max: 17.45 s
min: 8.286     avg: 8.5     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.889 s
min: 10     avg: 10.9     median: 10.9 (2%)     max: 11.88 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 20     avg: 23     median: 21.2 (1%)     max: 32.72 s
min: 18.9     avg: 19.3     median: 19 (1%)     max: 20.61 s
min: 23     avg: 25.3     median: 25.3 (1%)     max: 27.62 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 510     avg: 575     median: 536 (2%)     max: 740 s
min: 491.1     avg: 520     median: 508 (2%)     max: 583 s
min: 580     avg: 637     median: 637 (3%)     max: 694 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
21623 Points (19%)
min: 16249     avg: 20521     median: 20544 (18%)     max: 25525 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3961     avg: 6653     median: 6649 (18%)     max: 9527 Points
min: 3083     avg: 6977     median: 6739 (18%)     max: 9422 Points
min: 4349     avg: 5995     median: 6092 (16%)     max: 7023 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 16314     avg: 42803     median: 44682 (36%)     max: 55226 Points
min: 18314     avg: 43687     median: 46109 (37%)     max: 58024 Points
min: 39950     avg: 43226     median: 43226 (35%)     max: 46502 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 16312     avg: 37536     median: 36876 (30%)     max: 51937 Points
min: 19795     avg: 41691     median: 40823 (33%)     max: 57796 Points
min: 38261     avg: 42913     median: 42913 (35%)     max: 47565 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 27917     avg: 50269     median: 52842 (45%)     max: 58213 Points
min: 22018     avg: 45134     median: 49602 (42%)     max: 60319 Points
min: 51828     avg: 52962     median: 53024 (45%)     max: 54034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3437     avg: 5739     median: 5695 (14%)     max: 7725 Points
min: 2413     avg: 5785     median: 5756 (15%)     max: 8032 Points
min: 5408     avg: 6288     median: 6155 (16%)     max: 7190 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3961     avg: 8228     median: 8306 (15%)     max: 11110 Points
min: 3409     avg: 8376     median: 8361 (15%)     max: 11865 Points
min: 7603     avg: 8941     median: 8945.5 (16%)     max: 10362 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2463     avg: 2898     median: 2875 (12%)     max: 3865 Points
min: 1354     avg: 2953     median: 2841 (12%)     max: 3880 Points
min: 2484     avg: 2537     median: 2537 (11%)     max: 2590 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1108     avg: 1136     median: 1135.5 (48%)     max: 1163 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2839     avg: 3074     median: 3073.5 (6%)     max: 3308 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1081 Points (5%)
min: 1103     avg: 1186     median: 1197 (5%)     max: 1229 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3141 Points (10%)
min: 2643     avg: 3228     median: 3176 (10%)     max: 3803 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4555     avg: 4858     median: 4900 (49%)     max: 4997 Points
min: 2357     avg: 5053     median: 5142.5 (51%)     max: 5547 Points
min: 3646     avg: 4185     median: 4225 (42%)     max: 4685 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10869     avg: 14247     median: 15117 (17%)     max: 16294 Points
min: 8142     avg: 14179     median: 13888 (15%)     max: 16968 Points
min: 11004     avg: 13358     median: 13605 (15%)     max: 15464 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4439     avg: 4686     median: 4699 (64%)     max: 4858 Points
min: 4701     avg: 4750     median: 4759 (65%)     max: 4791 Points
min: 4160     avg: 4210     median: 4210 (57%)     max: 4260 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10747     avg: 13316     median: 13251 (32%)     max: 15294 Points
min: 11576     avg: 13367     median: 13617.5 (33%)     max: 14655 Points
min: 12679     avg: 12800     median: 12799.5 (31%)     max: 12920 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8918     avg: 12315     median: 12327.5 (22%)     max: 14144 Points
min: 10521     avg: 12071     median: 12302.5 (22%)     max: 13703 Points
12270 Points (22%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 2471     avg: 3671     median: 3770 (74%)     max: 4020 Points
min: 3340     avg: 3882     median: 3851 (75%)     max: 4820 Points
3439 Points (67%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11637     avg: 12834     median: 12833.5 (20%)     max: 14030 Points
min: 11720     avg: 12845     median: 12844.5 (20%)     max: 13969 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3784     avg: 3949     median: 3948.5 (59%)     max: 4113 Points
min: 4276     avg: 4294     median: 4294 (64%)     max: 4312 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 10320     avg: 10618     median: 10617.5 (86%)     max: 10915 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 7885     avg: 8316     median: 8315.5 (75%)     max: 8746 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 11135     avg: 11197     median: 11196.5 (22%)     max: 11258 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 10347     avg: 11305     median: 11305 (23%)     max: 12263 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 10402     avg: 10600     median: 10600 (28%)     max: 10798 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 877     avg: 1087     median: 1107 (1%)     max: 2114 ms
min: 730     avg: 1096     median: 1066 (1%)     max: 2622 ms
min: 1017     avg: 1193     median: 1216 (1%)     max: 1289 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 63.2     avg: 80.3     median: 71.3 (1%)     max: 122.7 ms
min: 80.7     avg: 153.6     median: 152.7 (2%)     max: 228.3 ms
min: 78.9     avg: 161.1     median: 156.5 (2%)     max: 252.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 17296     avg: 33448     median: 33496 (30%)     max: 42043 Points
min: 13935     avg: 34603     median: 34884.5 (31%)     max: 49795 Points
min: 28223     avg: 32497     median: 31171 (28%)     max: 38722 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
182 Points (38%)
min: 176     avg: 208.4     median: 202 (42%)     max: 239 Points
min: 164     avg: 183.5     median: 183.5 (38%)     max: 203 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
9887 Points (52%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
15717 Points (34%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
11958 Points (78%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
19602 Points (98%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.3     avg: 40.1     median: 33.7 (6%)     max: 61.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.2     avg: 38.1     median: 30.4 (6%)     max: 63.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 10.4     avg: 15.6     median: 17.3 (13%)     max: 17.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8550U → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8565U → 101% n=38

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8350U → 98% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 06. 00:02:44

#0 checking url part for id 9208 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10082 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9214 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.036s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9208 +0.017s ... 0.052s

#8 got single benchmarks 9208 +0.258s ... 0.311s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10082 +0.018s ... 0.329s

#10 got single benchmarks 10082 +0.196s ... 0.525s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9214 +0.003s ... 0.528s

#12 got single benchmarks 9214 +0.024s ... 0.552s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.552s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.543s ... 1.095s

#15 return log +0s ... 1.095s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)