Notebookcheck

Lenovo ThinkPad E590 (i7-8565U, UHD 620, FHD) Laptop Review

Benjamin Herzig (translated by Benjamin Herzig), 03/22/2019

Same procedure as last year. Something that worked in 2018 does not have to be wrong in 2019 – this is something that Lenovo might have thought when planning the announcement of the ThinkPad E590. The new Lenovo ThinkPad is pretty much the same machine as the older E580 with a new CPU. Is the ThinkPad E590 still a sensible choice for an office laptop?

Everything new in 2019? Maybe in some cases, but sometimes everything stays the same as before. Lenovo's ThinkPad laptops are a good example: While the more-expensive models of the T series were redesigned this year for example, the ThinkPad L390 uses the same design as its predecessor. The same is true for the affordable ThinkPad E series, which is one of the most affordable ThinkPad lines that Lenovo offers. Our review device today is the biggest model of this series, the Lenovo ThinkPad E590, which is the direct successor of the ThinkPad E580.

The ThinkPad E series is made for small businesses and self-employed people, with the ThinkPad E590 as the bigger 15.6-inch model having a stronger focus on stationary usage compared with the smaller ThinkPad E490. Its main competitors are the HP ProBook 450 G6, the Acer TravelMate P2510 as well as the Toshiba Tecra A50. Our review unit contains the Core i7-8565U, a 512 GB SSD, 16 GB RAM and an FHD screen. A version with similar specifications costs roughly $1,200 when bought directly via Lenovo's US website.  

Since Lenovo practically did not make any changes to the outer design compared with the ThinkPad E580, we saved on describing the casing, the connectivity and the input devices. A description of those can be found in our comprehensive review of the ThinkPad E580.

Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE (ThinkPad E590 Series)
Graphics adapter
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, 1 of 2 slots free, max 64GB
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LP156WFC-SPDB, IPS LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Storage
Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, 512 GB 
, M.2 2280, PCIe NVMe, 440 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Combo audio, Card Reader: MicroSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 369 x 252.5 ( = 0.78 x 14.53 x 9.94 in)
Battery
45 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Additional features
Speakers: 2 W stereo, Keyboard: 6 row chiclet with numpad, Keyboard Light: yes, Lenovo Vantage, McAfee LiveSafe, Microsoft Office Trial, Dolby Audio Premium, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.923 kg ( = 67.83 oz / 4.24 pounds), Power Supply: 337 g ( = 11.89 oz / 0.74 pounds)
Price
950 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size & weight comparison

379 mm / 14.9 inch 258 mm / 10.2 inch 23 mm / 0.906 inch 2 kg4.41 lbs379.5 mm / 14.9 inch 254 mm / 10 inch 22.1 mm / 0.87 inch 2.1 kg4.63 lbs369 mm / 14.5 inch 252.5 mm / 9.94 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 1.9 kg4.24 lbs365 mm / 14.4 inch 257 mm / 10.1 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2 kg4.39 lbs
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
77.6 MB/s ∼100%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76.1 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Average of class Office
  (10.2 - 191, n=256)
60.8 MB/s ∼78% -22%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32.6 MB/s ∼42% -58%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.9 MB/s ∼31% -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
85.2 MB/s ∼100%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.1 MB/s ∼96% -4%
Average of class Office
  (9.5 - 255, n=231)
77.4 MB/s ∼91% -9%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼31% -69%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.2 MB/s ∼28% -72%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
634 (min: 437, max: 666) MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
592 (min: 552, max: 637) MBit/s ∼93%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
513 MBit/s ∼81% -13%
Average of class Office
  (5 - 688, n=198)
465 MBit/s ∼73% -21%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
295 (min: 186, max: 388) MBit/s ∼47% -50%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
683 (min: 667, max: 691) MBit/s ∼100%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
682 (min: 650, max: 687) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
620 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
568 (min: 553, max: 591) MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Average of class Office
  (34 - 688, n=198)
437 MBit/s ∼64% -36%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø592 (552-637)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø682 (667-691)

Display

Subpixel array LP156WFC-SPDB
Subpixel array LP156WFC-SPDB
Backlight-bleeding (shown enhanced here)
Backlight-bleeding (shown enhanced here)

There are exactly two screen options for the Lenovo ThinkPad E590, which is typical for this price range: An HD TN display (1366x768) as well as an FHD IPS LCD (1920x1080). The affordable HD TN option should be of terrible quality and is to be avoided at any cost. Our review unit contains the FHD option, which has a matte screen surface. There is no touch option.

Despite being the best screen option for the E590, the FHD screen is definitely not a high-end panel. Lenovo says that it should reach an average brightness value of 250 cd/m², which we can confirm with our measurements (251 cd/m² on average). This is not an outright bad value, but it is not really good either. Still, it is a little bit brighter than the panels of the direct competitors by HP, Toshiba and Acer. The ThinkPad E580 meanwhile had a brighter screen.

The brightness distribution is pretty even with roughly 90%. We did not measure PWM, but sadly the screen did show a moderate amount of backlight-bleeding.

253
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
258
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
250
cd/m²
233
cd/m²
250
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 258 cd/m² Average: 251.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 251 cd/m²
Contrast: 1270:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 4.9
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
57.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 36.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
LP156WFC-SPDB, , 1920x1080, 15.6
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
Chi Mei CMN15FE, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
Chi Mei CMN15D3, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
BOE NV156FHM-N49, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
13%
-8%
-10%
-29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 (21.2, 18.8)
34.4 (17.2, 17.2)
14%
40 (23, 17)
-0%
44 (23, 21)
-10%
48.4 (25.6, 22.8)
-21%
Response Time Black / White *
27.6 (16.8, 10.8)
24.4 (14.4, 10)
12%
32 (13, 10)
-16%
30 (19, 11)
-9%
37.6 (21.2, 16.4)
-36%
PWM Frequency
26040 (40)
25000 (10)
20000 (90)
22030 (99)
Screen
2%
18%
3%
-7%
Brightness middle
254
242
-5%
259
2%
290
14%
292
15%
Brightness
251
226
-10%
230
-8%
249
-1%
272
8%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
82
-9%
78
-13%
84
-7%
Black Level *
0.2
0.21
-5%
0.19
5%
0.38
-90%
0.3
-50%
Contrast
1270
1152
-9%
1363
7%
763
-40%
973
-23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.6
4.7
16%
3.13
44%
4.35
22%
5.8
-4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
15.4
18.5
-20%
7.81
49%
11.06
28%
22.4
-45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.9
4
18%
3.09
37%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.1
2.7
13%
1.42
54%
3.01
3%
2.3
26%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.26 97%
2.36 93%
2.44 90%
2.12 104%
CCT
6450 101%
6442 101%
6391 102%
7198 90%
6223 104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.3
40.8
12%
40
10%
56
54%
37.6
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57.1
64
12%
63
10%
86
51%
58
2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
8% / 4%
5% / 14%
-4% / 1%
-18% / -11%

* ... smaller is better

Colors
Colors
Saturation
Saturation
Grayscale
Grayscale
Colors (calibrated)
Colors (calibrated)
Saturation (calibrated)
Saturation (calibrated)
Grayscale (calibrated)
Grayscale (calibrated)

The contrast value (1270:1) is good, and the same is true for the black value of 0.2 cd/m². Because of these values alone, the subjective image quality of the screen is more than passable, as colors are displayed vividly. There was no strong color tint ex factory, which means the image quality after calibration is not much different from its state ex factory.

The difference between a cheap and an expensive LCD screen often becomes apparent when you are looking at the color-gamut coverage. The screen inside the ThinkPad E590 is an IPS LCD of the cheaper kind, as its sRGB coverage sits at abysmal 57.1%. The display is not suited for serious photo-editing.

sRGB: 57.1%
sRGB: 57.1%
AdobeRGB: 36.3%
AdobeRGB: 36.3%
Outdoors (cloudy)
Outdoors (cloudy)

Thanks to the matte screen surface, the E590 is usable outdoors, even though this is only true when the weather is cloudy or if used in the shadows. The screen is not bright enough to make it usable in direct sunlight.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.8 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (40.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9654 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Since this is an IPS screen, the viewing-angle stability is mostly good. The IPS glow effect is present, but it's not very pronounced.

Viewing angles Lenovo ThinkPad E590
Viewing angles Lenovo ThinkPad E590

Performance

There are five different models of the Lenovo laptop ThinkPad E590 on sale in Germany. The Lenovo notebook is also configurable in the Lenovo shop. As processor choices, there are the Intel Core i5-8265U, the Core i7-8565U as well as the Core i3-8145U. The more-expensive models include the AMD Radeon RX 550X; otherwise the Intel UHD Graphics 620 is responsible for the GPU performance. When it comes to the memory, Lenovo sells the ThinkPad E590 with 8, 16 or 32 GB DDR4-2400 RAM ex factory. It should be possible to upgrade the ThinkPad to 64 GB (two RAM slots with 32 GB modules). The E590 is also pretty upgradeable in terms of mass storage, as it can take in 128, 256 or 512 GB of SSD storage in addition to an HDD with 500 GB or 1 TB.

HWiNFO
HWiNFO
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
 
 

Processor

The Intel Core i7-8565U is the fastest current 15 W processor of the Whiskey Lake series. The four cores of this 14 nm++ chip have a clock rate of 1.8 to 4.6 GHz. Comparisons with other processors are possible with our CPU comparison list.

In the Cinebench R15 test, the E590 shows typical behavior: Its CPU can consume 25 W for a few seconds, and then afterwards the power consumption is limited to 15 W. In the Cinebench loop, the E590 can hold its performance level without any drops after the first iteration. All in all, the ThinkPad E590 beats its predecessor ThinkPad E580 when it comes to the boost performance as well as the continuous load performance. Compared with the direct competitor HP ProBook 450 G6, the Lenovo ThinkPad E590 is roughly as fast.

The CPU is not throttled while using the laptop on battery power.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø503 (498-544)
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø511 (506.9-545.23)
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø500 (432.57-532.94)
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø480 (477.83-508.65)
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø477 (469-510)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
Intel Core i7-8565U
178 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (73.1 - 191, n=27)
168 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE
Intel Core i7-8550U
156 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼80% -20%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
Intel Core i5-8250U
142 Points ∼80% -20%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U
139 Points ∼78% -22%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
Intel Core i7-8565U
138.25 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Office
  (20 - 181, n=506)
110 Points ∼62% -38%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (361 - 815, n=28)
596 Points ∼100% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
Intel Core i5-8250U
553 Points ∼93% 0%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
Intel Core i7-8565U
553 (min: 490.31, max: 513.51) Points ∼93% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
Intel Core i7-8565U
553 Points ∼93%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE
Intel Core i7-8550U
521 Points ∼87% -6%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U
508 Points ∼85% -8%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
Intel Core i5-8250U
504.475 (min: 432.57, max: 532.94) Points ∼85% -9%
Average of class Office
  (36 - 1050, n=511)
330 Points ∼55% -40%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
47.13 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
553 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
178 Points
Help

System performance

In the PCMark benchmarks, no matter if it's PCMark 10 or PCMark 8, the ThinkPad E590 performs pretty badly, despite its theoretically powerful components. In nearly every individual test of PCMark, the E590 takes the last position in the comparison. As far as everyday use goes, the ThinkPad E590 cannot completely convince us either. Especially copying large amounts of data happens very slowly.

PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 8550U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3124 Points ∼100% +38%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
GeForce MX130, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
2958 Points ∼95% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2264 - 3370, n=11)
2948 Points ∼94% +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
2799 Points ∼90% +24%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
2778 Points ∼89% +23%
Average of class Office
  (320 - 3884, n=124)
2577 Points ∼82% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
2264 Points ∼72%
Productivity
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3381 - 7588, n=11)
6559 Points ∼100% +94%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
5999 Points ∼91% +77%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 8550U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
5930 Points ∼90% +75%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
GeForce MX130, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5930 Points ∼90% +75%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
5505 Points ∼84% +63%
Average of class Office
  (1266 - 7964, n=124)
5400 Points ∼82% +60%
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
3381 Points ∼52%
Essentials
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5450 - 8787, n=11)
7985 Points ∼100% +47%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 8550U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
7775 Points ∼97% +43%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
GeForce MX130, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7638 Points ∼96% +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
7268 Points ∼91% +33%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
7021 Points ∼88% +29%
Average of class Office
  (2683 - 8992, n=124)
6838 Points ∼86% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
5450 Points ∼68%
Score
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2486 - 4172, n=11)
3840 Points ∼100% +54%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 8550U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3757 Points ∼98% +51%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
GeForce MX130, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3668 Points ∼96% +48%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3407 Points ∼89% +37%
Average of class Office
  (803 - 4597, n=125)
3188 Points ∼83% +28%
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
2486 Points ∼65%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
2449 Points ∼64% -1%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 8550U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
5140 Points ∼100% +43%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
GeForce MX130, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5033 Points ∼98% +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4901 Points ∼95% +36%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
GeForce MX130, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4769 Points ∼93% +33%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3596 - 5181, n=9)
4733 Points ∼92% +32%
Average of class Office
  (1226 - 5428, n=326)
3990 Points ∼78% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
3596 Points ∼70%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 8550U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
4273 Points ∼100% +66%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
3729 Points ∼87% +45%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2577 - 4179, n=10)
3551 Points ∼83% +38%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
GeForce MX130, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3461 Points ∼81% +34%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
GeForce MX130, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3457 Points ∼81% +34%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3113 Points ∼73% +21%
Average of class Office
  (1169 - 4770, n=382)
3038 Points ∼71% +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
2577 Points ∼60%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2577 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3596 points
Help

Mass storage

We quickly found the culprit responsible for the bad system performance of the Lenovo ThinkPad E590: Its SSD, which has a capacity of 512 GB and is made by Toshiba. It is a PCIe NVMe SSD in the M.2 format, but despite this, it is still very slow, especially when it comes to the important 4K values. Too bad that Lenovo uses such a slow SSD – that is something that HP did better with its ProBook 450 G6, which has a blazingly fast Samsung PM981.

Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
Average Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
160%
1%
12%
-7%
24%
Write 4K
53.43
126.1
136%
71.76
34%
80.14
50%
81.76
53%
72.7 (53.4 - 91.9, n=2)
36%
Read 4K
33.03
43.92
33%
21.23
-36%
32.05
-3%
33.33
1%
40.5 (33 - 47.9, n=2)
23%
Write Seq
624.3
1669
167%
257.1
-59%
505.4
-19%
131.1
-79%
624 (624 - 624, n=2)
0%
Read Seq
835.3
2224
166%
476.3
-43%
527.9
-37%
909.9
9%
837 (835 - 840, n=2)
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
87.41
410.4
370%
202.6
132%
204.9
134%
122.1
40%
125 (87.4 - 163, n=2)
43%
Read 4K Q32T1
135.9
338.1
149%
282
108%
226.6
67%
199.3
47%
259 (136 - 382, n=2)
91%
Write Seq Q32T1
783.5
1979
153%
265.6
-66%
532.7
-32%
133
-83%
801 (784 - 818, n=2)
2%
Read Seq Q32T1
1623
3368
108%
559.4
-66%
550.7
-66%
934.5
-42%
1618 (1614 - 1623, n=2)
0%
Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
Sequential Read: 947.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 778.8 MB/s
512K Read: 757.6 MB/s
512K Write: 585.1 MB/s
4K Read: 43.61 MB/s
4K Write: 96.12 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 231.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 155.8 MB/s

GPU

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is an integrated GPU of the current Intel processor lineup. The performance of the 24 executive units is largely determined by the system memory, as the iGPU does not have its own dedicated memory. Since the E590 has single-channel memory, the performance could be better. No matter if the system has dual- or single-channel RAM, the Intel UHD Graphics 620 is a pretty slow GPU in any case and just fast enough for everyday multimedia tasks. For more GPU performance, the ThinkPad E590 with the AMD Radeon RX 550X might be a better option.

The GPU performance is not negatively affected when the device runs on battery power.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE
AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8550U
4444 Points ∼100% +141%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i7-8565U
2908 Points ∼65% +58%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U
2786 Points ∼63% +51%
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1844 Points ∼41%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 1979, n=139)
1700 Points ∼38% -8%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1672 Points ∼38% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1629 Points ∼37% -12%
Average of class Office
  (185 - 5332, n=628)
1266 Points ∼28% -31%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Office
  (76 - 1158, n=38)
459 Points ∼100%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (299 - 402, n=22)
349 Points ∼76%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
312 Points ∼68%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE
AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8550U
2874 Points ∼100% +143%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i7-8565U
2383 Points ∼83% +101%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U
2311 Points ∼80% +95%
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1183 Points ∼41%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1399, n=109)
1109 Points ∼39% -6%
Average of class Office
  (138 - 4109, n=451)
977 Points ∼34% -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
938 Points ∼33% -21%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE
AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8550U
17423 Points ∼100% +84%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i7-8565U
13776 Points ∼79% +46%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U
13246 Points ∼76% +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
9446 Points ∼54%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11294, n=125)
9069 Points ∼52% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
7532 Points ∼43% -20%
Average of class Office
  (1208 - 27117, n=497)
6779 Points ∼39% -28%
3DMark 11 Performance
1989 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6847 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1068 points
Help

Gaming performance

With the lack of a dGPU, this configuration of the Lenovo ThinkPad E590 is not really gaming-ready. Only older games run on reduced resolutions and details. If you want to play with the E590, you should choose the model with the AMD Radeon RX 550X. There is no Thunderbolt 3 port, so it is impossible to connect an eGPU to the E590.

While testing the gaming performance, the long load times of the games were notable – another hint that the SSD was pretty slow.

low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 62.532.426.38.4fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 16.6fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 21.5fps

Emissions

Noise

Lenovo has optimized the active cooling system of the ThinkPad laptop E590 very well, as the fan is generally turned off in idle. Of course, this changes under load, but even then, the fan remains pretty silent – this is how it should be with a 15.6-inch laptop with an Ultra Low Voltage processor. In comparison, the fan of the HP ProBook 450 G6 is much louder and more high-frequent.

We did hear some coil whine, but it was only audible when pressing an ear to the keyboard.

Noise Level

Idle
29.3 / 29.3 / 29.3 dB(A)
Load
30.6 / 30.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.133.433.42525.824.926.73128.427.933.84028.227.329.95023.723.925.66323.523.624.18022.923.523.810023.32322.912521.922.12216021.821.722.220023.622.522.82502222.122.931522.221.221.540021.320.421.250021.119.920.263021.419.620.580020.919.119.2100019.717.919.1125019.317.618.8160018.81718200018.516.517.5250017.616.217.7315017.115.716.740001715.516.6500016.515.416.1630016.215.415.8800015.615.415.41000015.515.315.41250015.215.115.31600014.914.915SPL30.629.330.1N1.41.21.4median 19.3median 17.6median 18.8Delta2.52.62.53027.830.929.128.423.726.525.824.22524.926.527.325.930.226.824.726.124.629.826.324.624.625.726.622.723.222.923.323.122.522.324.123.424.32323.9242222.823.122.722.222.222.322.322.821.821.722.422.823.322.122.22322.622.221.521.522.721.922.12121.322.521.420.820.220.42221.120.919.919.822.621.921.318.91923.922.321.619.418.324.62221.618.517.825.322.922.317.917.126.922.622.117.216.326.423.522.116.716.327.724.122.415.915.929.126.224.116.515.731.219.518.216.115.326.318.116.915.515.323.516.315.915.515.419.515.915.715.515.418.315.815.815.315.317.715.515.615.215.116.61515.215.114.916.434.23329.42938.41.91.81.31.22.7median 22median 21.6median 17.9median 17.1median 22.81.92.42.52.62.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GEHP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA

Temperatures

Stress test (Prime95 + FurMark)
Stress test (Prime95 + FurMark)

The low voltage CPU and the integrated GPU are no huge challenge for the cooling system of the Lenovo ThinkPad E590. The temperatures do not exceed 45 °C; we measured 43.9 °C at maximum.

Let's look at the stress test with Prime95 and FurMark: The inner temperatures stay at a very low level; they peaked at 66 °C. The system shows a behavior that mirrors the Cinebench loop, as the CPU and GPU can consume 25 W for a few seconds before the TDP limit drops to 15 W. This power limit does not change for the remainder of the stress test. As a result, the CPU clock rates are lower than in the Cinebench loop, as both the CPU and GPU have to share the 15 W. This means that the E590 exhibits TDP throttling, which should not affect everyday usage much.

Max. Load
 43.8 °C
111 F
40.7 °C
105 F
39.2 °C
103 F
 
 36.4 °C
98 F
36 °C
97 F
35.3 °C
96 F
 
 23.4 °C
74 F
23.5 °C
74 F
21.9 °C
71 F
 
Maximum: 43.8 °C = 111 F
Average: 33.4 °C = 92 F
38.5 °C
101 F
38.9 °C
102 F
40.4 °C
105 F
35.8 °C
96 F
43.9 °C
111 F
41.7 °C
107 F
21.7 °C
71 F
24.2 °C
76 F
24.1 °C
75 F
Maximum: 43.9 °C = 111 F
Average: 34.4 °C = 94 F
Power Supply (max.)  33.8 °C = 93 F | Room Temperature 20.7 °C = 69 F | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.5 °C / 74.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+4.7 °C / 8.5 F).
Load (keyboard area)
Load (keyboard area)
Load (bottom)
Load (bottom)

Speakers

The stereo speakers are placed at the bottom of the system, near the front rubber feet. Their quality is average at best, as their sound is neither pretty loud nor of high quality. Instead of the integrated speakers, users should rely on external speakers or a headset that can be connected via the flawlessly working combo audio port.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.435.22524.927.73127.928.84027.327.55023.924.26323.623.18023.522.71002322.412522.122.816021.727.520022.53725022.145.231521.251.940020.455.450019.952.563019.651.980019.158.8100017.960125017.661.216001759.3200016.559.6250016.251.9315015.757.9400015.555.8500015.449.5630015.454.2800015.461.51000015.358.71250015.157.91600014.952.3SPL29.370N1.225.8median 17.6median 54.2Delta2.66.930.329.52627.326.926.528.524.825.724.826.523.823.623.623.923.722.923.222.628.821.7402244.72147.120.85120.251.519.452.819.159.318.561.117.566.617.564.116.862.215.962.515.663.415.462.515.464.715.462.315.458.615.256.315.153.614.950.329.474.41.232median 17.5median 56.32.69.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GEHP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energy management

Power consumption

The power consumption of the ThinkPad E590 is not extremely high, but the direct competitor made by HP is better in this regard. Especially when idle, the HP ProBook 450 G6 consumes much less energy. The situation reverses under load, because the ProBook contains the dedicated Nvidia GeForce MX130.

The 65 W charger is more than powerful enough for the maximum power consumption of 44 W. Theoretically, even the smaller 45 W charger would suffice for the E590 without dGPU, though this might result in prolonged charging times.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.63 / 0.78 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.72 / 7.8 / 10.32 Watt
Load midlight 30.24 / 44 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
8565U, GeForce MX130, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
8250U, GeForce MX130, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
9%
-21%
-12%
5%
0%
-43%
Idle Minimum *
3.72
3.4
9%
3.12
16%
3.3
11%
3.8
-2%
3.89 (1 - 12.4, n=150)
-5%
7.68 (0.77 - 32, n=940)
-106%
Idle Average *
7.8
6.7
14%
6.3
19%
5.6
28%
7.7
1%
7.15 (4.3 - 15.5, n=150)
8%
11.5 (4.2 - 42, n=940)
-47%
Idle Maximum *
10.32
7.7
25%
9.78
5%
7.8
24%
9.3
10%
9 (5.2 - 16.6, n=150)
13%
13.9 (5 - 67, n=940)
-35%
Load Average *
30.24
31.1
-3%
57.6
-90%
54
-79%
31
-3%
35.2 (12.9 - 51.6, n=150)
-16%
37.3 (7.43 - 99.3, n=925)
-23%
Load Maximum *
44
42.9
2%
67.3
-53%
63
-43%
34.6
21%
42.9 (22 - 79, n=150)
2%
45.9 (12.2 - 129, n=927)
-4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

Charging time: 107 minutes
Charging time: 107 minutes

The integrated lithium-ion battery has a capacity of 45 Wh. Not exactly generous for a 15.6-inch laptop, though it is a normal capacity for a system of this price point – the HP ProBook 450 G6 has a 45 WH battery as well. Despite having the same battery capacity, the HP laptop performs much better in the realistic Wi-Fi test. While the E590 only achieved a little bit more than six hours of battery life, the ProBook almost achieved 10 hours in the same test – probably because of the much lower power consumption of the ProBook.

The charging times deserve some praise, as the battery is fully charged after less than two hours.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
18h 18min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
6h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 26min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 45min
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
8565U, GeForce MX130, 45 Wh
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
8250U, GeForce MX130, 48 Wh
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
-9%
12%
15%
-24%
-16%
Reader / Idle
1098
864
-21%
876
-20%
566 (101 - 1857, n=786)
-48%
H.264
506
435
-14%
462
-9%
516
2%
422 (139 - 834, n=165)
-17%
WiFi v1.3
383
421
10%
583
52%
505
32%
291
-24%
408 (105 - 964, n=322)
7%
Load
105
96
-9%
131
25%
118
12%
101 (37 - 259, n=733)
-4%

Pros

+ solid chassis
+ comfortable keyboard
+ excellent mouse input device
+ very cool & quiet
+ expandability (2x RAM, HDD + SSD)
+ better CPU performance than predecessor

Cons

- only microSD card-reader
- rather bad battery life
- LCD: Poor color-gamut coverage & backlight-bleeding
- extremely slow PCIe NVMe SSD
- only one-year warranty
- USB port on the right only supports USB 2.0

Verdict

Lenovo ThinkPad E590 review. Test device courtesy of Lenovo.
Lenovo ThinkPad E590 review. Test device courtesy of Lenovo.

The Lenovo ThinkPad E590 is one of the more affordable Lenovo business laptops. Compared with the ThinkPad E580, Lenovo did not change many things and like its predecessor, the ThinkPad E590 is a solid office laptop. The strong points of this laptop include the very good keyboard as well as the typical ThinkPad TrackPoint, the excellent expandability and the extremely quiet cooling system, even under load. The E590 also stays cool under load and the CPU performance has improved compared with the predecessor. The chassis is still well-made and of high quality for a cheaper laptop.

It is not very surprising that the E590 not only shares many of its positive aspects with the E580, as it also shares the negative aspects with its predecessor. For example, the E590 still only has a microSD card-slot, despite having a roomy chassis. The battery life is underwhelming and the screen has a bad color-gamut coverage as well as backlight-bleeding. Another problem of our review unit was the extremely slow SSD, which even impacted everyday use. Also, we think the warranty of 12 months is rather short and the USB port on the right side should not be limited to USB 2.0 – USB 3.0 should be standard in 2019.

Solid home-office ThinkPad laptop for less than 1,000 Euros (~$1,137): The Lenovo ThinkPad E590.

On the whole, the ThinkPad E590 iGPU model is recommended as a comparably affordable office laptop – though its size and weight as well as bad battery life qualify the E590 more for the home-office than a more mobile usage. Also, buyers should be on the lookout when it comes to the SSD, as we would not recommend the Toshiba SSD Lenovo used in our review device. Unfortunately, in this case the user has to play the lottery in regard to the parts that are installed.

Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE - 03/19/2019 v6
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
67 / 80 → 83%
Weight
64 / 20-67 → 93%
Battery
89%
Display
85%
Games Performance
58 / 68 → 85%
Application Performance
75 / 92 → 82%
Temperature
92%
Noise
96%
Audio
60%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Average
76%
87%
Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 7 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Lenovo ThinkPad E590 (i7-8565U, UHD 620, FHD) Laptop Review
Benjamin Herzig, 2019-03-22 (Update: 2019-04-30)
Benjamin Herzig
Benjamin Herzig - Editor