Caution: Hot – ThinkPad E490 & E590 have arrived

Lenovo sent us the two new laptops ThinkPad E490 and ThinkPad E590. After temperature problems with the Radeon GPU in last year's ThinkPad E480, we were eager to find out whether Lenovo fixed the issues or not for the new E490, but our initial measurements are not promising.

Andreas Osthoff 👁, Published 03/04/2019

We just got two new ThinkPads: the 14-inch ThinkPad E490 and its larger sibling, the ThinkPad E590 with a 15.6-inch screen. Lenovo's ThinkPad E-series represents inexpensive business laptops, but they are also popular among private users thanks to their solid specs and the good keyboard.

The 2019 ThinkPad E laptops are basically hardware updates with Intel's new Whiskey Lake chips and updated wireless modules, but the cases are identical to last year's models. This means there should not be any surprises, but we are still interested in the SKU with the dedicated GPU. The old E480 with the Radeon RX 550 had temperature problems, and Lenovo had to roll out a BIOS update that reduced the GPU performance to fix it.

Our test models
	ThinkPad E490	ThinkPad E590
CPU	Intel Core i7-8565U	Intel Core i7-8565U
GPU	AMD Radeon RX 550X 2 GB GDDR5-VRAM	Intel UHD Graphics 620
RAM	16 GB DDR4	16 GB DDR4
Storage	512 GB NVMe-SSD + 1 TB HDD	512 GB NVMe-SSD
Display	14-inch IPS (1920x1080 pixels)	15-inch IPS (1920x1080)

Before the full reviews of the two 2019 SKUs will be published, we took a first look at the temperatures and the performance of the dedicated Radeon GPU in the ThinkPad E490. We also recommend our previous reviews of the two old models E480/E580 for more information on the cases and the input devices:

ThinkPad E480 (i5, UHD Graphics 620)
ThinkPad E480 (i5, Radeon RX 550)
ThinkPad E580 (i5, UHD Graphics 620)
ThinkPad E580 (i7, Radeon RX 550)

GPU Performance

After Lenovo reduced the GPU performance of the E480 significantly via BIOS update, there does not seem to be an issue here. According to the initial benchmarks, the performance of the Radeon RX 550X is on the expected level and about 12-15% ahead of the previous Radeon RX 550. The advantage is a result of the higher core clock, because it is basically the same GPU.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE Intel Core i7-8565U, Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)	5357 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Intel Core i5-8250U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)	4559 Points ∼85% -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Intel Core i5-8250U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop) (BIOS 1.14)	1619 Points ∼30% -70%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Core i7-8550U, GeForce MX150	4506 Points ∼84% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE Intel Core i7-8550U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)	4444 Points ∼83% -17%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A Intel Core i5-8250U, GeForce MX130	2882 Points ∼54% -46%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW Intel Core i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620	1629 Points ∼30% -70%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW Intel Core i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620	1518 Points ∼28% -72%

Stress Test / Temperature

We performed our stress test with the two synthetic tools Prime95 and FurMark to simulate a maximum load scenario and reach the highest temperatures. This is certainly not a standard scenario for an office device, but you will probably do some gaming if you go for the SKU with the dedicated GPU. This means the load results are definitely interesting, especially when the ambient temperature will get higher (summer). Both the GPU driver as well as the BIOS version (1.10) are up to date.

We start with the good news: The GPU performance is very good, even in a combined workload scenario. The GPU clock fluctuates between 1000-1040 MHz and is not far off its maximum value (1176 MHz). The processor operates at a consumption of 25W for a short while and then levels off at the usual 15W, which is sufficient for 4x 1.8-1.9 GHz. However, this value cannot be maintained over the course of the test, and the laptop will eventually limit the consumption of the mobile quad-core processor to just 5W, which results in 4x 400 MHz.

Both the CPU as well as the GPU hover at ~75 °C on average during the stress test, which is not a bad result. However, the high surface temperatures show that the cooling solution is juts not powerful enough. We record more than 50 °C at the top and almost 64 °C at the bottom of the base unit. Compared to the E480, where we recorded more than 70 °C at the bottom, this is a small improvement (since the core temperatures are also lower), but these temperatures are still way too high for an office laptop in this performance class.

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


45.8 °C 114 F	55.6 °C 132 F	46.5 °C 116 F
40 °C 104 F	42.3 °C 108 F	42.1 °C 108 F
28.1 °C 83 F	28.9 °C 84 F	29.4 °C 85 F

Maximum: 53.1 °C = 128 F
Average: 39.3 °C = 103 F


52.9 °C 127 F	65.3 °C 150 F	46.3 °C 115 F
42.2 °C 108 F	43.7 °C 111 F	40.5 °C 105 F
26.5 °C 80 F	27.4 °C 81 F	26.3 °C 79 F

Maximum: 63.8 °C = 147 F
Average: 41.1 °C = 106 F

Power Supply (max.) 40.3 °C = 105 F | Room Temperature 19.9 °C = 68 F | Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


25.2 °C 77 F	25.4 °C 78 F	25.3 °C 78 F
24.6 °C 76 F	24.8 °C 77 F	25 °C 77 F
23.2 °C 74 F	23.3 °C 74 F	23.4 °C 74 F

Maximum: 25.4 °C = 78 F
Average: 24.5 °C = 76 F


26.9 °C 80 F	27.3 °C 81 F	28.1 °C 83 F
26.2 °C 79 F	27.6 °C 82 F	27.1 °C 81 F
23.3 °C 74 F	23.6 °C 74 F	23.5 °C 74 F

Maximum: 28.1 °C = 83 F
Average: 26 °C = 79 F

Power Supply (max.) 24.6 °C = 76 F | Room Temperature 20.1 °C = 68 F | Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


42.8 °C 109 F	50.8 °C 123 F	45.1 °C 113 F
38.3 °C 101 F	40.9 °C 106 F	41.6 °C 107 F
26.2 °C 79 F	26.7 °C 80 F	27.1 °C 81 F

Maximum: 50.8 °C = 123 F
Average: 37.7 °C = 100 F


48.8 °C 120 F	59.9 °C 140 F	43.5 °C 110 F
43.9 °C 111 F	44.9 °C 113 F	40.1 °C 104 F
25.6 °C 78 F	25.4 °C 78 F	25.2 °C 77 F

Maximum: 59.9 °C = 140 F
Average: 39.7 °C = 103 F

Power Supply (max.) 39.1 °C = 102 F | Room Temperature 20.3 °C = 69 F | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53.1 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63.8 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-1.6 °C / -2.9 F).

Temperature distribution top (stress test)

Temperature distribution bottom (stress test)

First Impressions

It looks like Lenovo did not change the cooling solution of the E480 for the new 2019 ThinkPad E490 after our initial tests. The temperature limits for the two processors are a couple of degrees lower in a direct comparison, which results in lower surface temperatures. However, we still think more than 60 °C at the bottom and more than 50 °C at the top of the base unit are too hot, especially for the performance class. The processor clock, which drops to just 400 MHZ in our stress test, is another indicator for an insufficient cooling performance. The current BIOS version is at least not limiting the graphics performance for now.