Notebookcheck

HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 Laptop Review: HP Convertible impresses in almost every way

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Benjamin Herzig), 10/07/2019

Elite convertible with a matte SureView screen. Convertibles offer more flexibility than regular clamshell notebooks. Business convertibles like the HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 offer even more flexibility than consumer devices. With plenty of features & high-quality components, the HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 is a successful convertible, as there are barely any weak points to this HP laptop.

HP sorts its Intel EliteBooks in two different series: The EliteBooks of the 1000 series cover the premium segment, while the EliteBook 800 are meant for the mainstream business market. This tiering in classes exists for regular EliteBooks as well as the x360 convertibles. For example, we reviewed the HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 with a SureView display a short while ago. Now, the review of the more affordable HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 follows.

In the business segment, the fiercest competitors of the HP EliteBooks are the Lenovo ThinkPads and Dell Latitudes. Therefore, we compare the HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 with convertible laptops of these brands: The Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga and Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1.

Our review sample is a special model, as it is equipped with a "SureView" LCD. Together with the other specifications (i7, 32 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD), it is obvious that this is a high-end configuration. It costs around €2,500 (~$2745) in Germany.

HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 (EliteBook x360 Series)
Graphics adapter
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2400, 2 of 2 RAM Slots occupied, max. 64 GB
Display
13.3 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, 10 point touchscreen, native pen support, M133NVFC R5, IPS LED, HP SureView, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Storage
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00, 1024 GB 
, M.2 2280, PCIe NVMe, 908 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: combo audio, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, Intel XMM 7360, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.9 x 306.6 x 215.2 ( = 0.67 x 12.07 x 8.47 in)
Battery
53 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p with IR & Privacy shutter
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: 6 row chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, USB-C-to-USB-A adapter, HP Digitizer pen, HP Power Manager, HP Privacy Settings, HP Support Assistant, HP Sure Sense, HP Sure Store, HP System Information, HP Documentation, HP Jumpstart, Microsoft Office Trial, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
1.46 kg ( = 51.5 oz / 3.22 pounds), Power Supply: 326 g ( = 11.5 oz / 0.72 pounds)
Price
2500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Especially English native speakers welcome!

Currently wanted: 
News and Editorial Editor - Details here

HP PC with an aluminum design

HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6

From a design standpoint, the HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 fits in with the other recent EliteBook generations. The chassis is almost completely adorned in a silver color, only the LCD bezel and keyboard provide a little bit of optical contrast. Compared with the HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3, the design is not quite as sophisticated looking, as the corners are more rounded and the integration of the WWAN antenna into the lid is more crude – the EliteBook x360 1030 G3 has just a tiny piece of plastic in its lid, but on the EliteBook x360 830 G6, the entire front side of the lid is made out of plastic.

Apart from this part, the chassis is nearly completely made out of metal (with a glass screen-bezel). HP combines aluminum (lid & palmrest) with Magnesium (bottom cover). The workmanship of the laptop is perfect and the stability is on a very high level. Neither the base nor the LCD cover are susceptible to twisting and the palmrest can not be flexed down anywhere. On the other hand, even moderate pressure on the back of the LCD cover can affect the LCD panel. Still: This is the only small weakness in an overall high-quality construction.

The hinges allow opening the screen by 360 degrees. They hold the LCD cover pretty firmly, even though a slight wobble is still present. It is possible to open the screen with one hand.

The EliteBook x360 1030 G3 has the edge over the EliteBook x360 830 G6 in terms of weight and size: Today's review unit is 1 mm thicker and 200 g (~0.5 pounds) heavier as well as slightly bigger. Compared with Lenovo's offering, the ThinkPad X390 Yoga has the advantage in thickness and weight, though it is not more compact than the EliteBook 830. The chassis of the Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 is shorter, despite the bigger 14-inch screen, though it is wider and as heavy as the EliteBook x360 830 G6.

Size & weight comparison

320 mm / 12.6 inch 202 mm / 7.95 inch 15 mm / 0.591 inch 1.5 kg3.33 lbs310.4 mm / 12.2 inch 219 mm / 8.62 inch 15.95 mm / 0.628 inch 1.3 kg2.76 lbs306.6 mm / 12.1 inch 215.2 mm / 8.47 inch 16.9 mm / 0.665 inch 1.5 kg3.22 lbs305.8 mm / 12 inch 205 mm / 8.07 inch 15.8 mm / 0.622 inch 1.3 kg2.78 lbs

Connectivity: HP laptop offers many options

In contrast to many offerings in the consumer market, nearly all business laptop still retain an array of certain legacy ports. This means that modern USB C ports (with Thunderbolt 3) are combined with USB A ports and HDMI. In the convertible class, the EliteBook x360 830 G6 can easily compete with this port selection. The one thing we have to criticize is that there is no (micro)SD card reader.

It is also strange, that HP still puts in a proprietary charging port, as our review sample comes bundled with a USB C charger. That is annoying, because the USB C ports are positioned at the middle of the device. With the digitizer pen attached to the device, both USB C ports are blocked.

left: USB 3.0 type A, power button, loudness keys, Smartcard reader
left: USB 3.0 type A, power button, loudness keys, Smartcard reader
right: SIM slot, Kensington lock, combo audio, 2x Thunderbolt 3, HDMI, USB 3.0 type A, charging port
right: SIM slot, Kensington lock, combo audio, 2x Thunderbolt 3, HDMI, USB 3.0 type A, charging port

Communication

The HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 does not have Ethernet. Otherwise, it nearly has every communication-feature possible: Our sample has the newest Wi-Fi standard 6 (Intel Wireless AX200) as well as WWAN / LTE (Intel XMM 7360). The WLAN card can not fully deliver on its transfer rate potential in our benchmarks, as we still lack the necessary Wi-Fi 6 router. All in all, the AX200 performed well, though its performance did vary between 450 and 750 MBit/s.

The HD webcam takes very grainy, low quality pictures. Together with the microphones (which at least manage to record voices clearly), it is only fit for simple video telephony.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
644 MBit/s ∼98% +4%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
630 MBit/s ∼96% +2%
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
617 MBit/s ∼94%
Average of class Convertible
  (28.7 - 688, n=146)
491 MBit/s ∼75% -20%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼100% +23%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
607 MBit/s ∼89% +10%
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
553 MBit/s ∼81%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
509 MBit/s ∼75% -8%
Average of class Convertible
  (36.4 - 743, n=146)
496 MBit/s ∼73% -10%

Security

Employees of companies often come in contact with sensitive data, which gives security a much more important role for business laptops. That is why the HP laptop EliteBook x360 830 G6 has features like the Smartcard reader and the Kensington lock slot. Apart from that, there is a Fingerprint sensor as well as an IR camera for Windows Hello. Additionally, the webcam has a mechanical privacy shutter.

Accessories

Aside the 65 W USB C charger, the HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 also comes with a digitizer pen (which we describe further in the "input-devices" section) and a USB C/USB A adapter.

Maintenance

Opening the HP EliteBook x360 is comparably easy. Five TX5 screws have to be loosened (which stay stuck in the bottom cover) and afterwards, a few clips have to be opened. Once the bottom cover is removed, parts like the two RAM slots, the M.2 2280 slot or the WWAN card are accessible. It is possible to change the battery and clean the fan, too.

view of the innards
view of the innards

Warranty

As usual in the premium business segment, the EliteBook has a three-year warranty. This is an on-site warranty, which means that the technician repairs the device at the home of the owner.

HP notebook with overall good input devices

Keyboard

HP lays out the flat, square Chiclet keys in a six row arrangement. The backlight keyboard has been optimized by HP for telephony, which is why it has dedicated telephony keys. We would have preferred dedicated Home/End keys at this position. Another special thing about this layout are the extremely small vertical arrow keys.

This keyboard is definitely one of the better laptop keyboards in terms of its typing feel. The keys have a comparably long travel distance and crisp pressure point. Also, it is helpful that the chassis is absolutely stable, which prevents annoying keyboard flex. The Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga is not much better, though we still think the ThinkPad has the edge when it comes to the keyboard.

keyboard area
keyboard area

Touchpad

The 11 x 6.5 cm (~4.3 x 2.6 in) touchpad has a matte glass surface, which offers the perfect smoothness and high quality feeling. It is a clickpad, which allows HP to do without dedicated mouse buttons. The integrated mechanism has a short amount of travel and a precise pressure point. It can only be pressed down in the lower two thirds. Overall, the touchpad is fantastic, HP beats the Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga in this category – though this convertible features a TrackPoint, which the EliteBook x360 830 G6 lacks.

glass clickPad
glass clickPad

Touchscreen & pen

The matte touchscreen recognizes ten fingers at the same time and can be used without any problems.

Aside from the touchscreen and touchpad, the HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 can also be used with the bundled digitizer pen. The pen can not be stored in the chassis. Instead, it can be attached to the right side of the EliteBook with a magnet. Inside the pen, a battery is stored, which can be charged via USB C. A separate charger for the pen is not included, so the laptop charger or another USB C charger has to be used. 

The Wacom AES pen is more comfortable to use than the smaller pen of the Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga, because has a bigger diameter. The pen has three buttons, whose function can be customized. The pen works precisely at the edges of the screen and the pressure sensitivity worked flawlessly.

test of the digitizer pen
test of the digitizer pen
HP pen settings
HP pen settings
Wacom AES pen
Wacom AES pen
 

SureView display: HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 with an outdoor screen

subpixel array HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
subpixel array HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
not much backlight bleeding (shown enhanced here)
not much backlight bleeding (shown enhanced here)

As is typical for business laptops, HP gives its customers multiple different 13.3 inch screen options. All touch displays have a resolution of 1,920 x 1,080 (FHD): 

  • FHD IPS LCD (250 cd/m²), 45% NTSC, glossy
  • FHD IPS LCD (400 cd/m²), 72% NTSC, glossy or matte
  • FHD IPS LCD with SureView (1000 cd/m²), 72% NTSC, glossy or matte

The review unit contains a matte SureView LCD. The screen does not even come close to the brightness value promised by HP. Instead of 1000 cd/m², we measure 692 cd/m² on average. This means the screen is still extremely bright, but far away from HP's marketing claim. The competition in the form of Lenovo and Dell can not nearly match HP in this area. Only the HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3, which also contained a SureView screen, reached a similar brightness value.

There is barely any backlight bleeding and the brightness distribution of 69% is just barely OK – thankfully, no dark spots are visible to the naked eye. The screen does have PWM on all brightness settings. With a frequency of 952.4 Hz, most users should have no problems.

783
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
779
cd/m²
771
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
736
cd/m²
729
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
M133NVFC R5
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 783 cd/m² Average: 692.2 cd/m² Minimum: 98.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 69 %
Center on Battery: 601 cd/m²
Contrast: 2319:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
93.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
M133NVFC R5, , 1920x1080, 13.3
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3-4QZ12ES
M133NVF3 R1, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
LP133WF7-SPA1, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
SHP14A2, , 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
645%
-19%
7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44 (18.8, 25.2)
34.4 (15.6, 18.8)
22%
59.2 (30, 29.2)
-35%
56 (31.6, 24.4)
-27%
Response Time Black / White *
30 (14, 16)
23.2 (12.4, 10.8)
23%
30.8 (16.8, 14)
-3%
38 (22.8, 15.2)
-27%
PWM Frequency
952.4 (100)
18940 (99)
1889%
1667 (24)
75%
Screen
-26%
-39%
-7%
Brightness middle
603
668
11%
319
-47%
277.2
-54%
Brightness
692
685
-1%
306
-56%
263
-62%
Brightness Distribution
69
86
25%
90
30%
83
20%
Black Level *
0.26
0.52
-100%
0.15
42%
0.2
23%
Contrast
2319
1285
-45%
2127
-8%
1386
-40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.2
3.5
-59%
6.1
-177%
2.1
5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.7
8.3
-8%
9.7
-26%
5.91
23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.5
2.2
-47%
1
33%
1.03
31%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.6
4.2
-62%
8.6
-231%
3.4
-31%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.21 100%
2.62 84%
2.241 98%
CCT
6412 101%
6207 105%
6613 98%
6030 108%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60.2
60.9
1%
61.9
3%
64
6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93.6
92.5
-1%
96.8
3%
100
7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
310% / 118%
-29% / -36%
0% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

colors
colors
colors (SureView)
colors (SureView)
colors (calibrated)
colors (calibrated)
grey scale
grey scale
grey scale (SureView)
grey scale (SureView)
grey scale (calibrated)
grey scale (calibrated)
saturation
saturation
saturation (SureView)
saturation (SureView)
saturation (calibrated)
saturation (calibrated)

Ex-factory, there was a slight reddish-tint, which was more pronounced in the SureView mode. We were able to remove it with a calibration. The picture quality is good, thanks to the high contrast value of 2319:1 – the matte surface does have negative consequences on the clarity of the picture. For the best quality, the glossy model might be the better choice. The color space coverage of 93.6% of the sRGB color space is not bad, but also not perfect. Photo editing is possible, but not all colors may be displayed correctly.

sRGB: 93.6%
sRGB: 93.6%
AdobeRGB: 60.2%
AdobeRGB: 60.2%
outdoor (shadow)
outdoor (shadow)
outdoor (sun)
outdoor (sun)

The high LCD brightness and the matte screen surface enable outdoor usage. In the sun, it is still difficult to make out the screen content, also because the screen varies in brightness depending on the viewing angle.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 25.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 65 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 952.4 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 952.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 952.4 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9370 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

SureView Gen 3 allows users to restrict the viewing angles by pressing a button. Different from older SureView variations, this happens by making the screen darker – a better solution compared with older SureView screens. If SureView is not active, the viewing angles are generally good, as the colors do not change. Regrettably, this LCD panel suffers from a rather pronounced brightness-loss when it is not viewed directly from the front. This is especially apparent on white display content. There are much better IPS LCDs when it comes to viewing angles.

viewing angles
viewing angles
viewing angles (SureView)
viewing angles (SureView)
viewing angles (white picture)
viewing angles (white picture)

CPU performance of the HP EliteBook x360 is disappointing

The HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 is powered by Intel processors of the Whiskey Lake generation. The Core i5-8265U is the entry level model, the Core i5-8365U offers vPro and the Core i7-8565U has the highest clock rates. Since the memory of the EliteBook 830 G6 x360 is not soldered, it is possible to stuff up to 64 GB DDR4-2400 memory into the two RAM slots of the EliteBook – though HP sells it with 32 GB ex-factory as the maximum. As for the mass storage, there is a single M.2 2280 SSD with up to 1 TB.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon

Processor

The Intel Core i7-8565U is a Whiskey Lake processor with four cores, which has a typical power consumption of 15 W. To reach the highest level of performance of 4.8 GHz on all cores, the CPU would have to consume a lot more energy. The base clock  rate sits at 1.8 GHz. Comparisons with other CPUs are possible with our Notebookcheck CPU comparison table.

In the HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 x360, the CPU can consume 45 W for a few seconds, reaching 4.5 GHz. After the CPU temperatures reach 98 °C, the power consumption is limited to 15 W and the clock rates fall to 2.3 GHz. Temporarily, the clock rates drop to 2.1 GHz, with a power consumption of 13 W.

Compared with the other convertibles, the HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 is a poor performer. Only the HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 is worse. The competitors from the other manufacturers reach a higher CPU performance. The Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga as the closest competitor is about 12% faster in terms of the multicore performance.

The CPU performance is a little bit limited in the DC mode. The turbo boost to 45 W is not available without a charger, which is the only difference. Instead of 516 points, the HP notebook reaches 482 points in the Cinebench R15 multicore test.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710Tooltip
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø464 (448.69-516.81)
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø432 (413.4-494.22)
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø517 (498.14-623.19)
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-8665U, Intel Core i7-8665U: Ø550 (527.93-598.95)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø600 (525.84-708.92)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel Core i7-8565U
179 Points ∼100% +11%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-8665U
176 Points ∼98% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00
Intel Core i7-8565U
175 Points ∼98% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (73.1 - 193, n=48)
171 Points ∼96% +6%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
Intel Core i7-8650U
163 Points ∼91% +1%
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
Intel Core i7-8565U
161 Points ∼90%
Average of class Convertible
  (19 - 179, n=302)
105 Points ∼59% -35%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00
Intel Core i7-8565U
618 (min: 525.84, max: 708.92) Points ∼100% +35%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (361 - 815, n=49)
585 Points ∼95% +27%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-8665U
524 Points ∼85% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel Core i7-8565U
513 (min: 498.14, max: 623.19) Points ∼83% +12%
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
Intel Core i7-8565U
459 (min: 448.69, max: 516.81) Points ∼74%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
Intel Core i7-8650U
447 Points ∼72% -3%
Average of class Convertible
  (33 - 830, n=310)
300 Points ∼49% -35%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
459 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
48 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
161 Points
Help

System performance

The performance of the HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 in the PCMark benchmarks is relatively bad. This worse than average result is not something we can confirm from daily usage experience.The HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 always ran without any unnecessary idle time. 

PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3005 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2264 - 3370, n=19)
2947 Points ∼98% +12%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
2859 Points ∼95% +9%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3-4QZ12ES
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
2842 Points ∼95% +8%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
2758 Points ∼92% +5%
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
2621 Points ∼87%
Average of class Convertible
  (605 - 4342, n=100)
2492 Points ∼83% -5%
Productivity
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
7077 Points ∼100% +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
7066 Points ∼100% +16%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3-4QZ12ES
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6702 Points ∼95% +10%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6694 Points ∼95% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3381 - 7588, n=19)
6688 Points ∼95% +10%
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
6095 Points ∼86%
Average of class Convertible
  (1121 - 7179, n=102)
5266 Points ∼74% -14%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
9029 Points ∼100% +17%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
8980 Points ∼99% +16%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3-4QZ12ES
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8789 Points ∼97% +14%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8733 Points ∼97% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5450 - 9029, n=19)
8242 Points ∼91% +7%
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
7713 Points ∼85%
Average of class Convertible
  (2489 - 9678, n=102)
6963 Points ∼77% -10%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
4134 Points ∼100% +16%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
4060 Points ∼98% +14%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3-4QZ12ES
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3944 Points ∼95% +11%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2486 - 4178, n=19)
3907 Points ∼95% +10%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3901 Points ∼94% +9%
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
3567 Points ∼86%
Average of class Convertible
  (872 - 4677, n=103)
3180 Points ∼77% -11%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
5071 Points ∼100% +15%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3-4QZ12ES
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4905 Points ∼97% +11%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
4743 Points ∼94% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3596 - 5189, n=17)
4733 Points ∼93% +7%
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
4421 Points ∼87%
Average of class Convertible
  (1007 - 5281, n=230)
3744 Points ∼74% -15%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4103 Points ∼100% +28%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3-4QZ12ES
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3930 Points ∼96% +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3668 Points ∼89% +15%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
3550 Points ∼87% +11%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2577 - 4179, n=18)
3528 Points ∼86% +10%
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
3196 Points ∼78%
Average of class Convertible
  (741 - 4741, n=278)
2801 Points ∼68% -12%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3196 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4421 points
Help

Mass storage

The 1 TB M.2 2280 SSD was supplied by Western Digital. It is a PCIe NVMe SSD, which translates into very fast transfer rates. In the relative comparison with other SSDs, it is not the fastest, though users will probably never notice the difference in everyday use.

HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Average WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
12%
26%
-35%
12%
Write 4K
122.8
120
-2%
144.1
17%
35.06
-71%
130 (123 - 137, n=2)
6%
Read 4K
46.89
43.42
-7%
63.53
35%
23.64
-50%
44.1 (41.4 - 46.9, n=2)
-6%
Write Seq
1801
1814
1%
1496
-17%
1537
-15%
2151 (1801 - 2500, n=2)
19%
Read Seq
1014
2227
120%
2677
164%
1782
76%
1295 (1014 - 1576, n=2)
28%
Write 4K Q32T1
333.7
391.8
17%
357.4
7%
100.3
-70%
390 (334 - 447, n=2)
17%
Read 4K Q32T1
314.4
288.7
-8%
482.3
53%
62.73
-80%
418 (314 - 522, n=2)
33%
Write Seq Q32T1
2784
1860
-33%
1558
-44%
2698
-3%
2790 (2784 - 2796, n=2)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3261
3376
4%
3021
-7%
1073
-67%
3338 (3261 - 3415, n=2)
2%
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
Sequential Read: 1596 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1803 MB/s
512K Read: 780.9 MB/s
512K Write: 1407 MB/s
4K Read: 46.9 MB/s
4K Write: 126.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 314.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 334.2 MB/s

GPU

Since the Intel UHD Graphics 620 is an iGPU without dedicated memory, it depends on the main system memory. As the RAM of the HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 runs in dual-channel mode, the full GPU performance potential can be realized. Of course, the integrated GPU is still very limited, even with dual-channel memory. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is mostly just good for everyday multimedia tasks.

There is no GPU-throttling when the device runs on battery power.

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1278 Points ∼100% +12%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8665U
1245 Points ∼97% +9%
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1140 Points ∼89%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1401, n=136)
1125 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Convertible
  (132 - 5965, n=238)
1016 Points ∼79% -11%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
10322 Points ∼100% +6%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8665U
10165 Points ∼98% +4%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3-4QZ12ES
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
9754 Points ∼94% 0%
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
9754 Points ∼94%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11436, n=154)
9137 Points ∼89% -6%
Average of class Convertible
  (1023 - 37388, n=289)
6753 Points ∼65% -31%
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8104 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1025 points
Help

Gaming performance

Newer, more demanding PC games are not playable with the HP EliteBook x360 830 G6, at least without an eGPU.

low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 71.737.331.39.9fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 15.3fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 7144.818.917.2fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 21.9fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 25.416.414.9fps

HP PC emissions: Low temperatures & coil whine

Noise

The fan of the EliteBook laptop is mostly disabled while it is idling – though sadly not always. Sometimes, the fan does come on with 32.3 dB(A), an audible level of noise. Still, the device will not get much louder under load, as 34.4 dB(A) is the maximum noise emission.

It is too bad that we measured audible coil-whine at 29.8 dB(A). Coil whine results in a lower noise-emission score.

Noise Level

Idle
28.8 / 28.8 / 32.2 dB(A)
Load
32.2 / 34.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.128.829.527.530.42526.227.124.725.927.93132.630.730.225.329.14031.428.525.726.225.95025.626.622.921.926.36324.425.622.522.323.88023.624.322.121.924.910023.824.621.722.823.412522.123.320.42221.516022.123.521.621.422.620021.422.720.720.521.32502222.923.123.221.33152121.820.420.920.840020.320.919.519.219.95002020.419.119.520.26302020.918.318.5218002019.617.718.120.8100019.819.617.517.820.6125020.719.516.617.222.3160021.120.915.816.523.3200020.821.615.716.423.3250021.12215.615.623.9315020.320.315.315.323.3400021.519.915.515.124.9500019.718.516.715.124.4630017.716.917.315.218.3800016.416.219.91516.11000015.715.718.414.815.41250015.615.118.114.715.11600015.715.118.114.614.9SPL32.232.129.428.834.4N1.61.61.31.22median 20.3median 20.4median 18.1median 17.2median 21.3Delta1.11.81.92.82.326.630.927.624.726.328.526.628.326.326.527.12724.429.225.42222.22523.221.924.72324.923.322.520.823.123.121.522.122.62222.322.121.322.521.920.721.821.820.621.422.220.321.221.918.920.520.818.919.720.717.919.720.917.819.623.616.82124.116.1212616.12326.115.822.323.615.520.221.115.518.820.315.416.918.515.416.316.515.315.715.715.115.415.31515.23529.232.42.11.21.7median 21.9median 17.8median 211.62.62.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP EliteBook x360 830 G6Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00

Temperatures

stress test (Prime95 + FurMark)
stress test (Prime95 + FurMark)

In terms of the outer temperatures, the HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 is exemplary. The highest temperature we measured was 43.3 degrees Celsius (~110 degrees Fahrenheit), which is warm but in no way problematic. The behavior in stress tests with Prime95 and FurMark is pretty tame as well: The CPU can consume 50 W for 30 seconds, reaching clock rates of 4.1 GHz and CPU temperatures of 97 degrees Celsius (~207 degrees Fahrenheit). Soon, the power consumption is limited to 15 W and then 13 W. At the end of the stress test, the CPU clock rates sit at 800 MHz. In everyday use, this TPD throttling should be no problem.

Max. Load
 33.6 °C
92 F
35.1 °C
95 F
32.6 °C
91 F
 
 33.2 °C
92 F
34.5 °C
94 F
33 °C
91 F
 
 28 °C
82 F
27.1 °C
81 F
27.4 °C
81 F
 
Maximum: 35.1 °C = 95 F
Average: 31.6 °C = 89 F
40.1 °C
104 F
43.3 °C
110 F
39.3 °C
103 F
34.9 °C
95 F
37.3 °C
99 F
33.5 °C
92 F
29.8 °C
86 F
30.3 °C
87 F
29.6 °C
85 F
Maximum: 43.3 °C = 110 F
Average: 35.3 °C = 96 F
Power Supply (max.)  32.3 °C = 90 F | Room Temperature 21.4 °C = 71 F | Voltcraft IR-900
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
load (palmrest)
load (palmrest)
load (bottom)
load (bottom)

Speakers

As with all recent EliteBooks, HP places the speakers above the keyboard. The stereo speakers are rather good for a laptop, as they provide an adequate level of loudness and their quality is above average. Bass is missing, as usual, but the EliteBook speakers are, with no doubt, better than the speakers of the Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga. Alternatively, it is possible to use the combo audio port.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.529.82525.927.83125.329.14026.2305021.927.96322.325.78021.924.110022.826.81252233.316021.444.420020.550.525023.252.331520.953.440019.255.450019.555.263018.560.580018.166.9100017.866.5125017.265.5160016.563.6200016.461.2250015.659.9315015.362.4400015.162500015.160.2630015.264.480001565.51000014.862.41250014.756.11600014.651SPL28.875.2N1.236.3median 17.2median 60.2Delta2.8630.931.326.329.728.333.227.129.329.225.222.228.421.92624.927.420.82921.535.82242.721.345.920.749.220.654.120.353.618.953.518.960.217.966.517.86916.865.916.16016.155.215.855.615.558.515.554.315.457.715.46115.352.115.150.51550.229.274.11.230.1median 17.8median 54.12.65.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP EliteBook x360 830 G6Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energy management: HP computer with a good battery life

Power consumption

The power consumption of the HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 could be better. Both the Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga and the Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 run more efficiently while they are idling.

Under load, the highest power consumption peak is 68.2 W, which goes beyond what the 65 W charger can supply. Since this is only peak load though, it is not a problem.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.41 / 0.79 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.4 / 8 / 10.6 Watt
Load midlight 34.6 / 68.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Power Consumption
8%
6%
25%
Idle Minimum *
4.4
3.4
23%
3.46
21%
2.6
41%
Idle Average *
8
7.6
5%
5.88
26%
4.3
46%
Idle Maximum *
10.6
11.5
-8%
9.12
14%
5.5
48%
Load Average *
34.6
35.4
-2%
45.6
-32%
32
8%
Load Maximum *
68.2
51.9
24%
65.9
3%
78.8
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

charging time: 148 minutes
charging time: 148 minutes

The HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 contains an internal 53 Wh battery. This battery is smaller than the one of the HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3, but bigger than the battery of the Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga X390. The Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 has a much bigger battery, but this convertible also has a bigger 14-inch screen.

In the Wi-Fi test, the EliteBook 830 scored a battery life of roughly 10 hours, 1.5 hours longer than the comparable ThinkPad Yoga.

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
9h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 26min
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 53 Wh
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56.2 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 78 Wh
Average of class Convertible
 
Battery Runtime
1%
-20%
25%
-17%
Reader / Idle
769 (117 - 2139, n=289)
H.264
640
600
-6%
452 (206 - 1070, n=114)
-29%
WiFi v1.3
586
589
1%
492
-16%
732
25%
455 (153 - 1010, n=253)
-22%
Load
146
91
-38%
145 (49 - 677, n=284)
-1%

Pros

+ extremely bright matte SureView LCD
+ robust Aluminium chassis
+ comfortable input-devices incl. Digitizer pen
+ lots of ports, communication & security features
+ upgradeable memory
+ comparably good speakers
+ above average battery life
+ barely any heat-emission
+ three year warranty

Cons

- screen does not reach promised brightness value
- underwhelming CPU performance
- audible coil-whine
- no TrackPoint
- (micro)SD card reader is missing
- screen loses brightness fast when viewed off-angle
- digitizer pen pen blocks USB C ports when mounted to the chassis

Verdict

in review: HP EliteBook x360 830 G6, review unit supplied by HP.
in review: HP EliteBook x360 830 G6, review unit supplied by HP.

With the EliteBook x360 830 G6, HP has created a terrific convertible laptop for business users. The central feature of this model surely is the extremely bright, matte touch SureView display, which sadly does not reach the promised 1000 cd/m² – but is still extremely bright with 700 cd/m². Apart from the screen, HP barely makes any mistakes: The aluminum chassis is very robust & well made, the input devices are comfortable, the EliteBook 830 has a plethora of ports and security features and with the two RAM slots, the compact HP laptop is even fairly upgradeable. The speakers are comparably good, the HP notebook does not get hot and the battery life is great. Notable is also the long warranty.

The HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 is not problem free though. For example, the CPU performance is worse compared with the competitors. Apart from that, we have to complain about the coil whine. The HP EliteBook is missing a (micro)SD card reader as well as a TrackPoint, too. Strangely, the pen blocks the USB C ports when it is mounted to the chassis. Lastly, we think that the viewing angle stability of the screen should be better when SureView is disabled. The brightness loss is very apparent. 

Feature rich combined with premium quality: That is what the HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 delivers.

All things considered, the HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 is an excellent choice, not only for business users, but also for consumers who want a reliable workhorse. It is very well equipped to compete with the Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga.

HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 - 09/30/2019 v7
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis
89 / 98 → 91%
Keyboard
87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
69 / 75 → 91%
Weight
70 / 20-75 → 90%
Battery
88%
Display
88%
Games Performance
49 / 78 → 63%
Application Performance
79 / 85 → 93%
Temperature
93%
Noise
85%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
35 / 85 → 41%
Average
77%
88%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 Laptop Review: HP Convertible impresses in almost every way
Benjamin Herzig, 2019-10- 7 (Update: 2019-10- 7)
Benjamin Herzig
Benjamin Herzig - Editor