Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

This is a DirectX 10 graphic card from ATI and direct competitor to the NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT graphic card for laptops. This would mean that the card is able to represent all modern games in medium resolutions and without Antialiasing without motion interruptions.

Due to the Avivo HD videoengine  the Chip accelerates HD Video like HD DVD, Blu-ray (Video Decoder for H.264/AVC, VC-1, MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4/DivX Video Codecs). Furthermore PowerPlay 7.0 brings longer battery runtimes. Furthermore, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is certified for Windows Vista (for the Aero user interface).

Technically, the chip owns 40 stream processors which are able to manage vertex-, geometric or pixelshader operations. Therefore DirectX 10.0 and Shader Model 4.0 are supported. To be mentioned is also the 256 bit wide ringbus.  Further, the chip ought to be a higher clocked version of the normal Mobility Radeon HD 2400.

Compared to the Desktop 2400 XT the Mobility version has a 100 MHz slower memory and core clock and is therefore a bit slower.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 Series

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT 40 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 compare 40 @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 500 MHz
CodenameM74
ArchitectureRV6xx
Pipelines40 - unified
Core Speed600 MHz
Memory Speed700 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2, GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory256+ MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Transistor Count180 Million
technology65 nm
FeaturesAvivo HD Video, PowerPlay 7.0, Programmable Tesselation Unit (meant for Direct X 10.1), OpenGL 2.0
Date of Announcement14.05.2007
Link to Manufacturer Pageati.amd.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 1648     avg: 1689     median: 1689 (2%)     max: 1730 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
167  fps    + Compare
med. 800x600
36  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
72  fps    + Compare
med. 640x480
53.4  fps    + Compare
high 800x600
48.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
29.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
198  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F.E.A.R.1673610
Doom 37253.448.2729.71
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo198
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
1

2

1
1

1
1








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 15. 13:56:14

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:40:26 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.036s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.036s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 88 +0.012s ... 0.049s

#7 got single benchmarks 88 +0.015s ... 0.064s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.197s ... 0.261s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.261s

#11 Got 8 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.263s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.263s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.264s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.071s ... 0.335s

#15 return log +0.043s ... 0.378s

Notebook reviews with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT graphics card

 

Review Acer TravelMate 6592G-832G25N Notebook

Fully Loaded. The TravelMate 6592 is designed for businessmen who look for a powerful notebook equipped with many accessories and features. Besides brand new I...
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT | 15.40" | 3 kg

Medion P4610/MD96688: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300, 14.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Medion P4610

Gateway M-151XL: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300, 15.40", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Gateway M-151XL

Acer Extensa 5620G: Intel Core 2 Duo T5550, 15.40", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Extensa 5620G

Acer Aspire 4920: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 14.10", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 4920

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter