Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H vs Intel Core i7-8750H vs Intel Core i7-8850H

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3750H

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3750H offers a 20 Watt higher TDP and therefore a better performance under long periods of load. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements.

Performance

The average 3750H in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-10610U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly good result, as of early 2022.

The ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU is among the fastest laptops built around the 3750H that we know of. It can be about 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP of 35 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop manufacturers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly. These values are comparatively high, making an active cooling solution pretty much a necessity.

Last but not the least, this AMD APU is built with a rather old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-8750H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8750H

The Intel Core i7-8750H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and will be announced early 2018. The processor clocks at between 2.2 and 4.1 GHz (4 GHz with 4 cores, 3.9 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor like the Core i7-7820HQ (2.9 - 3.9 GHz). Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end model, the i7-8850H is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i7-8850H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8850H

The Intel Core i7-8850H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and will be announced early 2018. The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.3 GHz (4.1 with 4 cores, 4 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor like the Core i7-7920HQ (3.1 - 4.1 GHz). Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end model, the i7-8850H is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 3750HIntel Core i7-8750HIntel Core i7-8850H
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenamePicasso (Zen+)Coffee Lake-HCoffee Lake-H
Clock2300 - 4000 MHz2200 - 4100 MHz2600 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB9 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 126 / 12
TDP35 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP5FCBGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H « 2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H « 2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
$395 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3750H
27 pt (37%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8750H
31.2 pt (43%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8850H
31.9 pt (44%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3897 Points (4%)
5742 Points (5%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
971 Points (41%)
1096 Points (47%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 340     avg: 363.8     median: 364.5 (41%)     max: 386 Points
min: 403     avg: 411.8     median: 412.5 (46%)     max: 418 Points
min: 422     avg: 435.3     median: 441 (49%)     max: 443 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1514     avg: 1691     median: 1713 (4%)     max: 1825 Points
min: 2142     avg: 2377     median: 2336.5 (6%)     max: 2707 Points
min: 2302     avg: 2516     median: 2522 (6%)     max: 2724 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 672     avg: 743     median: 734 (5%)     max: 805 Points
min: 863     avg: 1113     median: 1116 (7%)     max: 1251 Points
min: 929     avg: 1122     median: 1090 (7%)     max: 1276 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 135     avg: 143.9     median: 144 (43%)     max: 157 Points
min: 163     avg: 172     median: 173 (52%)     max: 177 Points
min: 176     avg: 180.4     median: 181.5 (55%)     max: 185 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.2 Points (12%)
min: 9.54     avg: 12.2     median: 12.3 (16%)     max: 13.54 Points
min: 10.95     avg: 12.9     median: 13.9 (18%)     max: 14.02 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.6 Points (41%)
min: 1.89     avg: 2     median: 2 (49%)     max: 2 Points
min: 2     avg: 2     median: 2 (51%)     max: 2.08 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4527     avg: 4732     median: 4770 (29%)     max: 4898 Points
min: 6236     avg: 6479     median: 6471 (39%)     max: 6645 Points
min: 6658     avg: 6758     median: 6766 (41%)     max: 6841 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 19290     avg: 20242     median: 20687 (15%)     max: 20750 Points
min: 29664     avg: 33163     median: 33595 (24%)     max: 35307 Points
min: 31284     avg: 34134     median: 34216.5 (25%)     max: 36819 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 33944     avg: 42290     median: 43494 (30%)     max: 46384 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 8472     avg: 8542     median: 8498 (10%)     max: 8665 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
197.1 s (2%)
min: 125.5     avg: 157.5     median: 156.8 (2%)     max: 180.5 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.4 s (1%)
min: 4.35     avg: 7.1     median: 5.5 (1%)     max: 16.26 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2866 Points (5%)
5310 Points (8%)
5922 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 17077     avg: 18318     median: 18689 (11%)     max: 19187 MIPS
min: 28826     avg: 30674     median: 31144 (18%)     max: 33257 MIPS
min: 30761     avg: 31802     median: 30851 (18%)     max: 33794 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3511     avg: 3641     median: 3659 (44%)     max: 3752 MIPS
min: 4599     avg: 4621     median: 4629 (55%)     max: 4630 MIPS
min: 4558     avg: 4684     median: 4689 (56%)     max: 4804 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
48.6 fps (17%)
min: 64.2     avg: 67.2     median: 67.2 (23%)     max: 70.2 fps
min: 64.9     avg: 71.4     median: 71.4 (25%)     max: 77.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
139.4 fps (32%)
min: 193.5     avg: 200.3     median: 200.3 (46%)     max: 207.1 fps
min: 214.2     avg: 216.1     median: 216.1 (50%)     max: 218 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.14     avg: 4.3     median: 4.4 (8%)     max: 4.4 fps
min: 7.56     avg: 8.2     median: 7.8 (14%)     max: 9.55 fps
min: 7.35     avg: 8.1     median: 7.6 (13%)     max: 9.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.7 GB/s (0%)
0.7 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (12%)
1.2 GB/s (21%)
1.2 GB/s (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (13%)
7 GB/s (18%)
7.4 GB/s (19%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 584     avg: 630     median: 633 (4%)     max: 672 Seconds
min: 395.5     avg: 456.2     median: 469.3 (3%)     max: 485.9 Seconds
min: 401     avg: 461.7     median: 490.1 (3%)     max: 494.1 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.6902     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.723 sec
min: 0.679     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.702 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7187     avg: 7715     median: 7431 (16%)     max: 8812 Points
min: 7531     avg: 10078     median: 10294.5 (22%)     max: 10832 Points
min: 7821     avg: 9758     median: 10516 (22%)     max: 10938 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11 s (2%)
min: 8.98     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (2%)     max: 9.45 s
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
25.7 s (1%)
min: 20.26     avg: 21     median: 21.1 (1%)     max: 21.39 s
19.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
650 s (3%)
min: 509     avg: 524     median: 524 (2%)     max: 537 s
483 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25143 Points (22%)
min: 27882     avg: 36281     median: 37117 (32%)     max: 41516 Points
43508 Points (38%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6360     avg: 7609     median: 7878 (21%)     max: 8648 Points
min: 7869     avg: 11044     median: 11474.5 (31%)     max: 13112 Points
min: 10412     avg: 11789     median: 11475 (31%)     max: 13258 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 39182     avg: 48304     median: 48251 (39%)     max: 57479 Points
min: 43026     avg: 55905     median: 56773 (46%)     max: 58897 Points
min: 49043     avg: 56648     median: 58913.5 (48%)     max: 59720 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 44524     avg: 50874     median: 51438 (42%)     max: 56661 Points
min: 51146     avg: 56438     median: 56720 (46%)     max: 58704 Points
min: 49398     avg: 53724     median: 53724 (44%)     max: 58050 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 55479     avg: 58242     median: 55515 (47%)     max: 63731 Points
min: 55371     avg: 57714     median: 57465.5 (48%)     max: 60233 Points
min: 38527     avg: 46153     median: 46152.5 (39%)     max: 53778 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5698     avg: 7447     median: 7716 (20%)     max: 8117 Points
min: 4876     avg: 9924     median: 10149 (26%)     max: 11320 Points
min: 7210     avg: 9823     median: 9689 (25%)     max: 11359 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 10095     avg: 11205     median: 11316 (20%)     max: 11900 Points
min: 8551     avg: 15199     median: 15533 (28%)     max: 17219 Points
min: 11232     avg: 15307     median: 16278 (29%)     max: 17107 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2861     avg: 3318     median: 3344 (14%)     max: 3574 Points
min: 2859     avg: 5724     median: 5858 (25%)     max: 7037 Points
min: 4099     avg: 5052     median: 4941 (21%)     max: 6116 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
874 Points (37%)
1050 Points (44%)
1121 Points (47%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3537 Points (6%)
4820 Points (9%)
4908 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 853     avg: 895     median: 884 (4%)     max: 959 Points
1006 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3007     avg: 3467     median: 3571.5 (11%)     max: 3718 Points
4860 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3898     avg: 4104     median: 4166 (42%)     max: 4186 Points
min: 4669     avg: 4982     median: 5040 (50%)     max: 5146 Points
min: 5044     avg: 5258     median: 5261 (53%)     max: 5464 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11396     avg: 12985     median: 13403.5 (15%)     max: 13738 Points
min: 17709     avg: 21069     median: 21648 (24%)     max: 23313 Points
min: 20696     avg: 22439     median: 22631.5 (25%)     max: 23797 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4548     avg: 4839     median: 4868.5 (66%)     max: 4997 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17048     avg: 19665     median: 19875 (48%)     max: 22006 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14478     avg: 14749     median: 14748.5 (26%)     max: 15019 Points
min: 20725     avg: 21871     median: 21920 (39%)     max: 22665 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3717     avg: 3768     median: 3768 (74%)     max: 3819 Points
min: 3734     avg: 3995     median: 4008 (78%)     max: 4163 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1132     avg: 1170     median: 1160 (1%)     max: 1228 ms
min: 695     avg: 1108     median: 1124 (1%)     max: 1272 ms
min: 981     avg: 1078     median: 1064.5 (1%)     max: 1220 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 77.5     avg: 82.3     median: 83 (1%)     max: 85.8 ms
76.1 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 29949     avg: 30479     median: 30626 (28%)     max: 30714 Points
min: 27460     avg: 34108     median: 34163 (31%)     max: 44549 Points
min: 33685     avg: 35133     median: 35232 (32%)     max: 36544 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
153 Points (32%)
213 Points (44%)
194 Points (40%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
830 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 43.3     avg: 106.8     median: 95 (16%)     max: 182 Watt
min: 0     avg: 67.1     median: 90.4 (16%)     max: 111 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.7     avg: 68.1     median: 66.4 (12%)     max: 97.1 Watt
min: 97     avg: 109.5     median: 109.5 (20%)     max: 122 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 8.29     avg: 12     median: 11 (8%)     max: 16.7 Points per Watt
min: 8.19     avg: 21     median: 12.6 (9%)     max: 42.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3750H → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8750H → 135% n=37

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8850H → 137% n=37

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 21. 00:33:13

#0 checking url part for id 11131 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9576 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9578 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11131 +0.019s ... 0.066s

#8 got single benchmarks 11131 +0.049s ... 0.115s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9576 +0.017s ... 0.132s

#10 got single benchmarks 9576 +0.387s ... 0.519s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9578 +0.017s ... 0.535s

#12 got single benchmarks 9578 +0.033s ... 0.569s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.569s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.526s ... 1.095s

#15 return log +0s ... 1.095s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)