Notebookcheck

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme (i7, 4K-HDR, GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q) Laptop Review

Business or Multimedia? Lenovo expands it ThinkPad X1-series with a 15.6-inch laptop and competes directly with the popular Dell XPS 15 as well as the Apple MacBook Pro 15. The new flagship is equipped with a high-resolution HDR screen as well as a discreet Nvidia GPU. But is this still a business laptop or rather a full-fledged multimedia device with some business features for consumers?

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Currently wanted: 
News Editor - Details here

The ThinkPad X1-series has been the pinnacle of Lenovo's slim and light business lineup for the last couple of years. So far, it was limited to 14-inch devices with the ThinkPad X1 Carbon and ThinkPad X1 Yoga, and there were no options for discreet GPUs. The Chinese manufacturer now adds launches the ThinkPad X1 Extreme, a slim and light 15.6-inch laptop. It is therefore a direct rival for devices like the Dell XPS 15Apple MacBook Pro 15, or the new HP EliteBook 1050 G1. Lenovo will also offer a workstation version of the X1 Extreme called ThinkPad P1, which will be equipped with professional Nvidia Quadro GPUs and Intel Xeon CPUs (optional).

It is hard to classify the ThinkPad X1 Extreme, and a look at the specs does not make it any easier. Things like a 4K touchscreen with HDR support and the Max-Q version of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti are perfect for a multimedia laptop, but also get maintenance options, familiar ThinkPad input devices, and comprehensive service options.

Our test model carries the designation 20MF000XGE and is exclusive for Lenovo's Campus program (eligible for student, teachers and scientific employees). It is currently the most expensive SKU at 2799 Euros, but you also get a lot of features in return: the previously mentioned 4K UHD HDR display and the Nvidia GPU, but also a modern Intel CPU with six cores (Coffee Lake). The memory equipment with 32 GB RAM and 1 TB SSD storage is not bad, either. The corresponding topseller model for regular customers (also 20MF000XGE) is 500 Euros more expensive (3299 Euros). You can also build your own device in Lenovo's online shop where the X1 Extreme starts at 2119 Euros all the way up to 4900 Euros with 2x 32 GB RAM and 2x 1TB SSDs.

Dell's XPS 15 9570 starts at a much lower price, but is closer when you select similar components. The HP EliteBook 1050 G1 is a bit more expensive and the, which is also the case for Apple's MacBook Pro 15. We will also compare the ThinkPad X1 Extreme with some Lenovo models over the course of the review, including the ThinkPad T580 with the UHD screen and GeForce MX150 graphics.

  • Update 1: Maintenance, system noise, temperature, battery runtime
  • Update 2: Case, response times, CPU tuning, system performance, battery runtime
  • Update 3: Communication, security, accessories, warranty, input devices, HDR, battery runtime gaming + HDR
  • Update 4: Performance on battery power, power consumption, gaming performance, speakers, pros & cons, verdict, rating
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE (ThinkPad X1 Extreme Series)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q - 4096 MB, Core: 1291 MHz, Memory: 1752 MHz, GDDR5, 398.27, Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, 2 x 16 GB Dual-Channel DDR4-2666, 2 Slots, up to 64 GB
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, capacitive, B156ZAN03.2, IPS, HDR, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel CM246
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB 
, 914 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm stereo jack, Card Reader: SD reader, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18.7 x 361.8 x 245.7 ( = 0.74 x 14.24 x 9.67 in)
Battery
80 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p + IR webcam
Additional features
Speakers: 2x2 Watt Stereo, Keyboard: Precision Keyboard, Keyboard Light: yes, RJ45 adapter, 135-Watt power adapter, service documents, Lenovo Vantage, Glance by Mirametrix, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
1.842 kg ( = 64.97 oz / 4.06 pounds), Power Supply: 449 g ( = 15.84 oz / 0.99 pounds)
Price
2799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - ThinkPad from every angle

The ThinkPad X1 Extreme will feel very familiar if you already know the current ThinkPad X1 Carbon. The design of the black chassis is also similar to the other current X1-series products with the colored X1 logo on the lid. The whole base unit is made of an aluminum alloy with a fine black surface. The stability is excellent and we can just slightly depress the center of the base unit with a lot of force. However, this should not be an issue even for heavy typists. there is one long support foot in the rear of the base unit as well as two smaller ones at the front, so the case sits very stable on flat surfaces. There is one criticism though: The surfaces attract fingerprints and dirt, which is also a major disadvantage compared to the aluminum case of the Apple MacBook Pro. ThinkPads usually show greasy spots after some usage, which should be the case here as well. The build quality of the base unit, however, is perfect and there are no creaking sounds.

The connection to the display is handled by a black center hinge. It does a decent job, but cannot prevent some bouncing when you adjust the opening angle (up to 180 degrees). Light vibrations on the other hand (like on a train ride) are no problem. The hinge could be firmer at very small angles, where the display will fall down.

We can only talk about the 4K HDR SKU when we talk about the lid. It is equipped with an additional layer of glass, which also increases the weight and the height compared to the 1080p model. We cannot say whether it improves the stability at this point, but the stability of our test unit is excellent. You can even lift the device when you grab it at the corner of the display and it requires a lot of force to provoke picture distortions on the panel. However, there are clearly audible creaking sounds, which affect the good impression a bit. The bezels are slim at the two sides and there is just slightly more room at the top for the cameras. We do not really like the big black bar at the bottom of the panel though, and it looks like a 16:10 panel would have fitted nicely.

Lenovo says the ThinkPad X1 Extreme passed several MIL-STD 810G tests, but does not specify the individual scenarios. The keyboard is also spillwater resistent. All in all, the case appears very sophisticated, only the creaking sounds (under pressure) from the lid do not really fit.

The rivals are close in the size comparison, but there are differences. Both the Dell XPS 15 as well as the Apple MacBook Pro have an even smaller footprint, and the Apple is also a bit lighter. However, the weight of the X1 Extreme is still very good at little more than 1.8 kg since the other rivals are between 200-300 grams heavier. The 1080p SKU of the X1 Extreme is supposed to the a bit lighter, but we have to wait for the test unit to confirm.

Size Comparison

Connectivity - Thunderbolt 3 and regular USB ports

Ethernet adapter is included
Ethernet adapter is included

The port selection is very balanced with two full-fledged Thunderbolt 3 ports (USB-C connectors, USB 3.1 Gen.2, DisplayPort) as well as two regular USB-A ports (USB 3.1 Gen.1) and an HDMI 2.0 video output. The ThinkPad X1 Extreme can also be charged via USB-C (up to 100W). You also get a card reader and a small Mini-Ethernet connector if you prefer wired network connections. The necessary adapter (see picture) is included. All in all, the X1 Extreme can drive up to four independent displays (up to [email protected] via TB3, up to [email protected] via HDMI).

The lack of the new docking port is one important difference to many current ThinkPad models. The reason is simple though, because Thunderbolt 3 just cannot provide the required power. This limits the number of docking solutions for the X1 Extreme, but we will have a closer look at this in the Accessories section.

All in all, the ThinkPad X1 Extreme has a good mixture of old and modern ports, and additional adapters should not be necessary for the majority of peripherals.

Independent journalism is made possible by advertising. We show the least amount of ads whenever possible but we intentionally show more ads when an adblocker is used. Please, switch off ad blockers and support us!

Right side: SmartCard reader, SD reader, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen.1 (1x Always-On), Kensington Lock
Right side: SmartCard reader, SD reader, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen.1 (1x Always-On), Kensington Lock
Left side: Power (SlimTip), 2x Thunderbolt 3 with USB-C connectors (USB 3.1 Gen.2, DisplayPort), HDMI 2.0, Mini-Ethernet, 3.5 mm stereo jack
Left side: Power (SlimTip), 2x Thunderbolt 3 with USB-C connectors (USB 3.1 Gen.2, DisplayPort), HDMI 2.0, Mini-Ethernet, 3.5 mm stereo jack

SD Card Reader

Lenovo fortunately includes an SD card reader for full-size SD cards contrary to the smaller sibling ThinkPad X1 Carbon (microSD). It is spring-loaded and takes the full card. The two X1 models are at the top of the ranking in terms of transfer speeds. We determine more than 240 MB/s in combination with our reference card from Toshiba (Exceria Pro UHS-II 64 GB). This is a great result and you won't need an external USB 3.0 card reader when you copy large amounts of data on a regular basis.

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
191.2 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
189 MB/s ∼99%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174 MB/s ∼91% -8%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
152.1 MB/s ∼80% -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77.8 MB/s ∼41% -59%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 190, n=150)
57.5 MB/s ∼30% -70%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
241.7 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
223.9 MB/s ∼93% -7%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
210 MB/s ∼87% -13%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192 MB/s ∼79% -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.4 MB/s ∼35% -65%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.2 - 253, n=147)
75.2 MB/s ∼31% -69%

Communication

Intel Wireless-AC 9560 with Bluetooth 5.0
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 with Bluetooth 5.0

Lenovo only ships the ThinkPad x1 Extreme with the new Intel WLAN module Wireless-AC 9560. It supports all common Wi-Fi standards and finally Bluetooth 5.0. We did not have any problems with the wireless network connection and the transfer rates are also very good. The sending performance was improved compared to the previous Wireless-AC 8265. Wired networks are handled by an Intel I219-V or I219-LM module (vPro SKUs), respectively.

We cannot understand why Lenovo drops a WWAN module for the X1 Extreme. Potential buyers of the smaller X1 Carbon already had to decide pre purchase for or against an LTE modem, because it was not upgradeable. It just makes no sense to waive the option for a flagship business laptop.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Broadcom 802.11ac
817 (min: 664, max: 835) MBit/s ∼100% +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
638 MBit/s ∼78% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
633 MBit/s ∼77% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
627 (min: 319, max: 666) MBit/s ∼77%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s ∼64% -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (44 - 949, n=109)
495 MBit/s ∼61% -21%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
362 MBit/s ∼44% -42%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
649 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
628 (min: 593, max: 651) MBit/s ∼97%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Broadcom 802.11ac
602 (min: 543, max: 628) MBit/s ∼93% -4%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s ∼89% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
511 MBit/s ∼79% -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (46.1 - 949, n=108)
466 MBit/s ∼72% -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
162 MBit/s ∼25% -74%

Security

The ThinkPad X1 Extreme is equipped with all the security features you know from the business series. This includes TPM 2.0, fingerprint scanner (touch), Kensington Lock and several passwords (boot, BIOS, Windows). Some models have a SmartCard reader, which improves the integration into business environments. You also get an IR camera, which allows the Windows access via Windows Hello. However, SKU equipped with the IR cam do not get the mechanical ThinkShutter camera cover, which is only available in combination with the regular 720p webcam. You can choose between them with the matte 1080p screen, but the 4K option requires the IR cam.

Accessories

We already mentioned the lack of the SideDock connector on the X1 Extreme, so most of Lenovo's docking stations are not compatible with the new X1 Extreme. You will wither have to get USB port replicators or Lenovo's Thunderbolt 3 Workstation Dock. The latter has a combined connector (SlimTip + TB3), so one cable is still sufficient for the connection. However, the model is not that cheap at 350 Euros. Lenovo's ThinkPad Pen is another interesting accessory. We will have a look at it in the section Input Devices.

Maintenance

The ThinkPad X1 Extreme does not have a maintenance hatch, but you can easily remove the bottom cover. Lenovo only uses seven regular Philips screws you only have to loosen (not remove!). Then you can lift the rear end of the bottom cover and remove it. Once inside you will find two RAM slots and two slots for M.2-2280 SSDs, which makes upgrades very easy. 

Internal layout
Internal layout
2x SODIMM slots
2x SODIMM slots

Warranty

Lenovo ships the ThinkPad x1 Extreme with a three-year on-site service by default in Germany. It can be extended up to five years and combined with other services like premier phone support, damage protection, battery replacement, keep your drive, and an international service.

Input Devices

Keyboard

The keyboard of the ThinkPad X1 Extreme is identical to the 14-inch X1 Carbon. This means there is no numeric keypad you get on the ThinkPad T580, for example. However, the other comparison devices do not offer one, either.

We already praised the keyboard on the ThinkPad X1 Carbon for its rich pressure point and the decent key travel. These two devices are currently equipped with the best keyboard from the current ThinkPad lineup. The typing experience is just one step above other devices like the Dell XPS 15 and the MacBook Pro 15 in particular, even though this is always a matter of taste. There are some settings for the keyboard both in Lenovo's Vantage software as well as the BIOS like switch the default allocation of the function keys or swap Fn & Ctrl.

Lenovo includes the usual white LED illumination with two intensity levels, which can dazzle a bit depending on the angle. We would also like to see a brightness sensor, so the lighting is automatically adjusted in darker environments.

Input devices
Input devices
The keyboard illumination can dazzle a bit depending on the angle.
The keyboard illumination can dazzle a bit depending on the angle.

TouchPad & TrackPoint

You get the touchpad (which is a clickpad) as well as the red TrackPoint in the center of the keyboard. There are three dedicated mouse buttons above the touchpad that work in combination with the TrackPoint. They offer a well-defined and even pressure point on our test model. Once you get used to the small red dot it is very easy to control the mouse and we prefer it over the touchpad. The latter is also reliable for inputs and provides decent gliding capabilities. It is a Precision touchpad and supports gestures with up to four fingers. You can click the pad down in the lower half, and the clicking sounds are similar for left and right clicks.

Touchpad and TrackPoint
Touchpad and TrackPoint

Touchscreen, Digitizer & Glance

The 4K panel is a touchscreen at the same time and also supports pen inputs. We tested it and it worked well (as you come to expect from a modern touchscreen), but you still have to ask whether it makes sense to have a touchscreen on a regular15.6-inch laptop. There are certainly some apps where it is useful, but it is definitely not a must-have feature.

ThinkPad X1 Extreme SKUs with the IR camera are also equipped with the Glance software, which can deactivate the screen when yo don't look. It also supports the movement of Windows, but the feature was not always reliable and there seemed to be occasional issues with glasses.

Display - 4K HDR Dolby Vision

Subpixel array with visible touch layer
Subpixel array with visible touch layer
Visible backlight bleeding around the edges
Visible backlight bleeding around the edges

Lenovo's display selection is very similar to Dell, because you either get a matte 1080p IPS screen rated at 300 nits or the 4K screen (+354.62 Euros) from our test unit. The latter is brighter at 400 nits and is supposed to have wider color gamut. Similar to the smaller ThinkPad X1 Carbon, the screen also supports the playback of HDR contents, which is not possible on the rivals. It is also a touchscreen with pen support, but this also means the surface is glossy.

The subjective picture impression is very good and basically identical to the smaller ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018 HDR. The 15.6-inch panel with the ID B156ZAN03.2 is provided by AU Optronics. We already mentioned the advertised brightness of 400 nits, but our test unit just misses this number. We determine an average luminance of 380 nits, which is on par with the HP EliteBook 1050 G1, while the other competitors from Dell and Apple are much brighter. The X1 Extreme gets points for the brightness distribution (90%) and the decent black value (0.28), which results in a very high contrast ratio (>1400:1). However, all the comparison devices are more or less on the same level.

You can notice some backlight bleeding around the edges on the two brightest settings, at least on dark contents. This is especially noticeable when you watch letterbox videos. We did not detect PWM on any brightness setting.

360
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 396 cd/m² Average: 380.3 cd/m² Minimum: 4.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 397 cd/m²
Contrast: 1414:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 88.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
B156ZAN03.2, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.6
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
AUO30EB, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
APPA040, , 2880x1800, 15.4
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
B140QAN02.0, , 2560x1440, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NV156QUM-N44, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
13%
9%
16%
-2%
12%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
61.6 (30.8, 30.8)
46.4 (22.8, 23.6)
25%
56 (26, 30)
9%
43.2 (20.4, 22.8)
30%
59.2 (28.4, 30.8)
4%
51.2 (24.4, 26.8)
17%
Response Time Black / White *
32 (15.6, 16.4)
32 (18, 14)
-0%
29 (14, 15)
9%
31.2 (16.4, 14.8)
2%
34.4 (16.4, 18)
-8%
29.6 (17.2, 12.4)
7%
PWM Frequency
980.4 (25)
117000 (75, 150)
952.4 (99)
Screen
-10%
-17%
29%
20%
-14%
Brightness middle
396
494
25%
440
11%
520
31%
578
46%
310
-22%
Brightness
380
457
20%
389
2%
492
29%
533
40%
283
-26%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
83
-8%
88
-2%
84
-7%
87
-3%
Black Level *
0.28
0.34
-21%
0.34
-21%
0.39
-39%
0.38
-36%
0.24
14%
Contrast
1414
1453
3%
1294
-8%
1333
-6%
1521
8%
1292
-9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4
5.2
-30%
5.04
-26%
1.2
70%
1.9
52%
3.1
22%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.6
17.5
-130%
6.99
8%
2.3
70%
3.8
50%
7.6
-0%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.9
2.04
-127%
0.8
11%
2.2
-144%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.1
2.7
56%
4.98
18%
1.3
79%
3
51%
2.3
62%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.1 105%
2.48 89%
2.18 101%
2.14 103%
2.21 100%
CCT
7786 83%
7038 92%
7777 84%
6738 96%
6377 102%
6876 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88.5
71.2
-20%
61
-31%
88.8
0%
59.1
-33%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
98.8
-1%
94
-6%
100
0%
90.1
-10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
2% / -6%
-4% / -13%
23% / 26%
9% / 16%
-1% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Lenovo only installs one color profile (extended color gamut) and there is no setting to switch between the color spaces. We tested the panel against the AdobeRGB reference and were surprised by the bad results. The grayscale shows a major blue cast and high deviations from the target value (<3). The color temperature is also too cool and the situations is just marginally better for the colors. We would have expected a better factory profile not unlike the one on the smaller X1 Carbon. Apple's MacBook Pro 15 is much better out of the box within the comparison group.

CalMAN Grayscale (target color space AdobeRGB)
CalMAN Grayscale (target color space AdobeRGB)
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps (target color space AdobeRGB)
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps (target color space AdobeRGB)
CalMAN ColorChecker (target color space AdobeRGB)
CalMAN ColorChecker (target color space AdobeRGB)

Our calibration with the X-Rite i1 Pro 2 spectrophotometer improves the performance significantly. Thanks to an almost perfect color temperature, you can enjoy a warmer picture without any blue cast. The average DeltaE-2000 deviation drops to just 0.9, which is a great results. The color deviation dropped as well (average DeltaE: 0.9), only 100 % blue cannot be displayed more accurate. Overall, still a very good performance.

CalMAN Grayscale calibrated (target color space AdobeRGB)
CalMAN Grayscale calibrated (target color space AdobeRGB)
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps calibrated (target color space AdobeRGB)
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps calibrated (target color space AdobeRGB)
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrated (target color space AdobeRGB)
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrated (target color space AdobeRGB)

The next item on our list is the color gamut, which is advertised with 100% AdobeRGB by Lenovo. We check the color space coverage with Argyll, which calculates the overlap in 3D. This results in a more accurate value. The result is very good at 88.5% and on par with the 14-inch sibling. CalMAN uses a simpler 2D diagram for the calculation and determines complete AdobeRGB gamut. Both X1 models are ahead of the competition in this respect.

vs. AdobeRGB: 88.5 %
vs. AdobeRGB: 88.5 %
vs. sRGB: 100 %
vs. sRGB: 100 %

Similar to the HDR panel of the smaller ThinkPad X1 Carbon we detect very high response times. This is noticeable in practice, especially when you move the cursor on dark backgrounds and scroll through websites there is visible ghosting. From our experiences with the smaller X1 Carbon we can say that you will get used to it and it was no issue for us. You cannot notice it when you watch videos, but you should avoid the HDR panel if you plan to play fast first-person shooters on the X1 Extreme.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
61.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 30.8 ms rise
↘ 30.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

We already mentioned Lenovo offers a matte 1080p display as well as the glossy 4K touchscreen on our test model. If you are often on the road or cannot always influence the position of light sources, you should prefer the matte screen. We will take some comparison pictures once the X1 Extreme with the matte display has arrived.

The screen is not as reflective as the 14-inch screen of the smaller X1 Carbon, but you can still use it as a mirror depending on the position and the light source. It is hard to see anything on the panel when there are reflections. However, the competitors have the same issues and all devices are very similar subjectively, even though Apple and Dell have the advantage of a brighter screen. The viewing angle stability is inconspicuous and very good.

In der Sonne
In der Sonne
In der Sonne ohne direkte Reflexion
In der Sonne ohne direkte Reflexion
Blickwinkelstabilität
Blickwinkelstabilität

HDR Dolby Vision - only on paper?

Similar to the smaller X1 Carbon, Windows recognizes the screen of the X1 Extreme as HDR display and can show corresponding video. Apps like Netflix and Amazon also show HDR contents. Windows automatically sets the brightness to the maximum level in fullscreen mode, but this is where the issues start. The panel of the X1 Extreme (around 400 nits) is much darker compared to the X1 Carbon and not nearly bright enough for decent HDR playback. It is also just an 8-bit panel, which can only display 256 shades of gray instead of 1024 on a 10-bit panel. The quality of decent HDR TVs cannot be expected. All in all, high-resolution videos look great, but this is also the case for the competitors.

HDR videos are shown, in this case on YouTube
HDR videos are shown, in this case on YouTube

Performance

LatencyMon during playback of 4K YouTube video
LatencyMon during playback of 4K YouTube video

The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme is a powerful notebook, but the choice of components is limited compared to other ThinkPad models. You can choose between two quad-core (i5-8300H & i5-8400H) and two hexa-core CPUs (i7-8750H & i7-8850H) from Intel's Coffee lake generation. The two more expensive models (i5-8400H & i7-8850H) support Intel's vPro technology and are particularly important for larger companies. There is no Core i9 option, but this is not necessarily a bad thing with a slim chassis. The workstation sibling ThinkPad P1 is also available with Xeon processors (optional). You cannot change the GPU, which is always the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti we already know from the Dell XPS 15. It is the more efficient Max-Q version with (supposedly) lower clocks. However, we already saw performance figures similar to a regular GTX 1050 Ti depending on the cooling solution. The X1 Extreme is only available with M.2-NVMe-SSDs, so the subjective performance impression is very good. We did not experience any latency issues with our test model.

Preloaded software
Preloaded software
 

Processor - Coffee Lake i7

Our test model is equipped with the Intel Core i7-8750H and its six native CPU cores run at a nominal clock of 2.2 GHz. The Turbo frequencies, however, can be much higher: 4.1 for one or two cores, and up to 3.9 GHz for six active cores, at least with sufficient cooling. The processor supports all common features like Hyper Threading and also comes with an integrated GPU, which takes care of the video output during light workloads.

Intel XTU settings (default)
Intel XTU settings (default)

The actual processor clock depends on the cooling capabilities as well as the TDP configuration, which can be adjusted by the OEMs. Lenovo selected rather conservative TDP limits below Intel's recommendation (55/78W). The CPU can consume up to 75W for short periods, but only 45W under sustained workloads. We performed our benchmarks with the default values, but we will also test with other TDP limits and reduce the core voltage as well (undervolting). For now, we start with the regular Cinebench scores.

The new ThinkPad X1 Extreme performs very well in the Cinebench R15 Multi test and is only beaten by the Dell XPS 15 9570 with the identical Core i7 processor but slightly higher TDP limits. Apple's MacBook Pro 15 2018 with the slightly faster Core i7-8850H on the other hand is a bit slower (even after Apple's major software updates). HP's EliteBook 1050 G1 is similar to the ThinkPad. Our test also shows the big gap compared to the ULV chips in the smaller ThinkPad X1 Carbon as well as the 15.6-inch ThinkPad T580, which fall behind by more than 40%.

There are, however, limitations on battery power. We set all the BIOS options to maximum performance, but the CPU cannot utilize its Turbo Boost and only runs at 2.0 GHz during the Cinebench R15 Multi test, which results in just 648 points.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
177 Points ∼100% +1%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H
177 Points ∼100% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼99%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=47)
173 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Core i7-8550U
168 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Intel Core i7-8550U
163 Points ∼92% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 191, n=334)
124 Points ∼70% -30%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8750H (Undervolting)
1251 Points ∼100% +3%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8750H
1215 Points ∼97% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
Intel Core i7-8750H (Undervolting)
1218 Points ∼97%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
Intel Core i7-8750H
1135 Points ∼91% -7%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H
1131 Points ∼90% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=50)
1103 Points ∼88% -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H (macOS Software Update)
1064 Points ∼85% -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H (macOS Software Update 2)
1057 Points ∼84% -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H (macOS)
953 Points ∼76% -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Core i7-8550U (undervolted)
708 Points ∼57% -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Core i7-8550U
648 Points ∼52% -47%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Intel Core i7-8550U
660 Points ∼53% -46%
Average of class Multimedia
  (73 - 1550, n=345)
456 Points ∼36% -63%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
176 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1218 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
105.7 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
CPU data during the Cinebench loop
CPU data during the Cinebench loop

It is always interesting to see how slim devices handle sustained workloads and not just short benchmarks with runtimes between 30-45 seconds. Our Cinebench Multi loop with 50 runs only shows a small drop of the score to ~1060 points, despite the conservative 45W limit. A more detailed analysis shows an average clock of 3.4 GHz for all six cores in combination with a core temperature of around 87 °C, so there is still some headroom. We ignore the undervolted results of the Dell XPS 15 for now (we will try this with the X1 Extreme as well) and see that the test model is ahead of the competition including the Apple MacBook Pro 15 with the supposedly faster i7-8850H.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Undervolting: Ø1218 (1194.56-1224.81)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1065 (1052.44-1126.79)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Undervolting: Ø1168 (1123.47-1219.85)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1012 (980.27-1215.12)
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1015 (972-1114)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H, Intel Core i7-8850H; macOS Software Update: Ø1006 (962.51-1065.02)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H, Intel Core i7-8850H; macOS Software Update 2: Ø1031 (1009-1058)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H, Intel Core i7-8850H; macOS: Ø832 (773-940)

CPU Tuning

Optimized XTU settings
Optimized XTU settings
CPU data during the Cinebench loop (undervolted)
CPU data during the Cinebench loop (undervolted)

There are two ways to improve the processor performance: Increase the TDP limits and reduce the core voltage (undervolting). Especially slim devices often have problems with increased TDP limits or are often already struggling with the original settings under sustained workloads. However, the 45W limit on the test unit of the X1 Extreme is rather conservative, so we set it to 57W for sustained workloads. We also reduced the core voltage at the same time with the tool Intel XTU. Please see our dedicated guide for detailed instructions on the undervolting process. Every processor is different and the results can vary. We managed to operate the Core i7-8750H at -0.165 mV, which has a massive effect on the power consumption and therefore the performance.

The processor now only needs about 50W for 6x 3.9 GHz during the Cinebench Multi test, and the system can maintain this level of performance. This results in excellent scores during our Cinebench loop, because all the results are north of 1200 points with two minor exceptions. The average results after 50 runs is 1.218 points. The CPU temperature is still 2 degrees lower. The ThinkPad X1 Extreme is therefore even better than the undervolted XPS 15, which was already very fast. The other rivals are clearly beaten. Our extreme torture test with Prime95 is even more stressful for the CPU and the full 6x 3.9 GHz require around 61W, but we still see strong 3.65 GHz once the 57W limit sets in. All in all a very good performance for a slim device.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Undervolting: Ø1218 (1194.56-1224.81)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1065 (1052.44-1126.79)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Undervolting: Ø1168 (1123.47-1219.85)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1012 (980.27-1215.12)

System Performance

The subjective performance impression of the ThinkPad X1 Extreme is very good with short boot times, responsive handling, and minor waiting times when you launch applications. The base SKU of the X1 Extreme is also equipped with an NVMe-SSD, so the system performance of this model should be similar. There are differences between the individual devices in the synthetic benchmarks and the test unit is often just average within the comparison, but you cannot notice these differences in practice.

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4664 Points ∼100% +6%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4643 Points ∼100% +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
4575 Points ∼98% +4%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4418 Points ∼95% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (4381 - 4418, n=2)
4400 Points ∼94% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4381 Points ∼94%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=251)
4234 Points ∼91% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4063 Points ∼87% -7%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5284 Points ∼100% +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5027 Points ∼95% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (4725 - 5284, n=2)
5005 Points ∼95% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4725 Points ∼89%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1765 - 6408, n=185)
3989 Points ∼75% -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
3836 Points ∼73% -19%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3752 Points ∼100% +4%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
3735 Points ∼100% +3%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3631 Points ∼97% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (3611 - 3631, n=2)
3621 Points ∼97% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3611 Points ∼96%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
3433 Points ∼91% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1740 - 4693, n=271)
3350 Points ∼89% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3145 Points ∼84% -13%
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5605 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (4908 - 5605, n=2)
5257 Points ∼94% +7%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4920 Points ∼88% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4908 Points ∼88%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
4473 Points ∼80% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1511 - 5823, n=65)
3623 Points ∼65% -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3116 Points ∼56% -37%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3062 Points ∼55% -38%
Productivity
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
7569 Points ∼100% +13%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
7037 Points ∼93% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (6671 - 7037, n=2)
6854 Points ∼91% +3%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
6770 Points ∼89% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6727 Points ∼89% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6671 Points ∼88%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3113 - 8020, n=66)
5998 Points ∼79% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5079 Points ∼67% -24%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9087 Points ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
8894 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (8429 - 9087, n=2)
8758 Points ∼96% -4%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
8429 Points ∼93% -7%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
8281 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7849 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3733 - 9360, n=66)
7222 Points ∼79% -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6891 Points ∼76% -24%
Score
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4966 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (4785 - 4966, n=2)
4876 Points ∼98% +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
4805 Points ∼97% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4785 Points ∼96%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4666 Points ∼94% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3905 Points ∼79% -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2046 - 5358, n=66)
3824 Points ∼77% -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3425 Points ∼69% -28%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3611 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4725 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4381 points
Help

Storage Devices - Samsung PM981 NVMe-SSD

2x M.2-2280 slots with NVMe support
2x M.2-2280 slots with NVMe support

The ThinkPad X1 Extreme can accommodate two M.2-2280 NVMe-SSDs (attached via PCIe-x4 each). Our test unit is equipped with Samsung's PM981 in the 1 TB configuration and you can use around 914 GB after the initial set-up. The performance of the storage drive is excellent and the write performance in particular is ahead of the competition. However, all models here have fast storage drives and you won't notice a subjective difference in practice. Lenovo uses different suppliers, so your X1 Extreme might be equipped with another drive. See our comprehensive HDD/SSD list for more benchmarks and comparisons.

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-24%
-30%
-3%
-31%
2%
Write 4K
123.72
79.13
-36%
94.81
-23%
131.86
7%
131.4
6%
113 (103 - 124, n=2)
-9%
Read 4K
44.07
37.89
-14%
26.45
-40%
44.6
1%
29.47
-33%
48.4 (44.1 - 52.6, n=2)
10%
Write Seq
2215.11
1118.87
-49%
1037
-53%
1824.25
-18%
877.7
-60%
2216 (2215 - 2216, n=2)
0%
Read Seq
2241.58
1851.94
-17%
1280
-43%
2162.98
-4%
883
-61%
1920 (1599 - 2242, n=2)
-14%
Write 4K Q32T1
313.86
361.12
15%
277.6
-12%
338.15
8%
256
-18%
458 (314 - 603, n=2)
46%
Read 4K Q32T1
359.81
257.85
-28%
333.9
-7%
351.85
-2%
337.7
-6%
341 (321 - 360, n=2)
-5%
Write Seq Q32T1
2403.8
1131.2
-53%
1037
-57%
1972.1
-18%
1723
-28%
2399 (2395 - 2404, n=2)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3332.7
3095.5
-7%
3135
-6%
3387.2
2%
1778
-47%
2792 (2251 - 3333, n=2)
-16%
Write 4K Q8T8
1043.5
Read 4K Q8T8
913.6
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Sequential Read: 2699 MB/s
Sequential Write: 2198.3 MB/s
512K Read: 904.52 MB/s
512K Write: 2225.78 MB/s
4K Read: 59.15 MB/s
4K Write: 128.39 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 353.55 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 310.14 MB/s

GPU Performance - GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

GPU-Z Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU-Z Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

There are more and more devices with the Max-Q version of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. We recently reviewed the efficient (and supposedly slower) version of the GTX 1050 Ti in the Dell XPS 15 9570. Nvidia has special requirements for Max-Q models (power consumption, fan noise during gaming), which are usually realized with lower clocks. However, the GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q in the XPS 15 was just as fast as a regular GTX 1050 Ti thanks to sufficient cooling capabilities. This is also the case for the ThinkPad X1 Extreme, because the official Boost frequency of 1291 MHz is clearly surpassed with up to 1695 MHz (Witcher 3).

Our test model is just behind the Dell XPS 15 with the same GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q in the synthetic 3DMark tests, but faster than the Radeon Pro 560X in the MacBook as well as the GTX 1050 Max-Q in the EliteBook 1050 G1; the X1 Extreme is between 14 - 38% faster depending on the benchmark. The smaller GeForce MX150 in the ThinkPad T580 is even slower. The X1 Extreme also passed the demanding Time Spy stress test without any problems (99.8%).

We already mentioned the integrated UHD Graphics 630 of the processor. Nvidia's Optimus technology automatically selects the graphics adapter based on the workload. The iGPU is much more efficient if you don't need the additional performance, and the powerful video decoder is also perfect for the playback of high-resolution videos/movies.

The GPU performance is slightly reduced on battery power with a graphics score of 6311 points compared to 7199 points on mains (3DMark Fire Strike).

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
9079 Points ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (8317 - 9079, n=5)
8760 Points ∼96% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
8619 Points ∼95%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H
7590 Points ∼84% -12%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
6874 Points ∼76% -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
4392 Points ∼48% -49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 18234, n=602)
2777 Points ∼31% -68%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1901 Points ∼21% -78%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
2278 Points ∼100% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (2196 - 2278, n=2)
2237 Points ∼98% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
2196 Points ∼96%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H
1614 Points ∼71% -27%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
1596 Points ∼70% -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (281 - 4734, n=41)
1564 Points ∼69% -29%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
7428 Points ∼100% +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (6957 - 7428, n=5)
7249 Points ∼98% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
7199 Points ∼97%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H
5699 Points ∼77% -21%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
5677 Points ∼76% -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3291 Points ∼44% -54%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 14463, n=378)
2679 Points ∼36% -63%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1283 Points ∼17% -82%
3DMark 11 Performance
8886 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6424 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
2361 points
Help

Gaming Performance

We encountered some issues during our gaming benchmarks, because some titles refused to start with the preloaded driver version 398.27. We then tried to download the latest drivers from Nvidia, but the installation failed because the installation routine did not find compatible hardware. We found an update for the Intel & Nvidia GPU from September 26th on Lenovo's website, which updates the Nvidia drives to version 399.11. Most games worked, only Assassin's Creed crashed repeatedly and the drivers from Nvidia still refused to install. This could be a problem when you ant to play the latest games, because drivers from the manufacturer are usually released with some delay.

The good news first: The gaming performance is steady, which is also shown by our Witcher 3. Contrary to the stress test (see Temperature section), the CPU load during gaming is much lower and not all the cores are fully utilized all the time. The average results during the Witcher 3 test are 1392 MHz/73 °C for the GPU and 3,7 GHz/69 °C for the CPU. The performance is slightly reduced on battery power; instead of 24.9 fps (Witcher 3 Ultra) we only determine 23 fps.

0102030